Connect with us

Finance

The Fed just cut interest rates again, this time by a quarter of a percentage point

Published

on

The Fed’s rate cut came in response to inflation heading closer to the 2% mark.  (iStock )

The Federal Reserve just cut interest rates for the second time this year, a move that was largely expected as inflation continues to drop. The Fed lowered rates by a quarter of a percentage point to 4.5% to 4.75%.

The decision came on the heels of the lowest rise in inflation since 2021. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) technically increased by 0.2% in September, but this rise was minimal compared to what consumers have seen in the last few years.

“Unexpectedly low October job growth came on the heels of better-than-expected labor market data in September that has since been revised lower,” Realtor.com Chief Economist Danielle Hale said in a meeting about the cuts.

“These data remind decision makers that it is important to consider broad trends rather than any single piece of information. As a whole, the totality of the data suggests that the labor market continues to slow, and the risks of cooling too fast or too slow are likely more balanced than was thought in early October,” Hale said.

Back in September, the Fed initially cut rates by half a percentage point to 4.75% to 5%. Both rate cuts were in response to inflation inching lower towards the 2% mark the Fed has aimed for. At this moment, it’s difficult to determine if any more rate cuts are coming down the line. 

“Financial markets fully anticipated this rate cut, and the FOMC’s statement provides no new information regarding the likelihood of future cuts,” MBA SVP and Chief Economist Mike Fratantoni said in a statement.

Worried about the state of the economy? You could consider paying down high-interest debt with a personal loan at a lower interest rate. Visit Credible to speak with a personal loan expert and get your questions answered.

THE US ADDED 818,000 FEWER JOBS THIS YEAR THAN ORIGINALLY ESTIMATED

Mortgage rates rise despite Fed’s rate cut

Not all loans and credit will follow these rate cuts. The election and its effects on the economy have a major impact on the outcome of rates as well.

“MBA expects that mortgage rates will remain within a fairly narrow range over the next year, with mortgage rates moving higher on signs of economic strength and more stimulative fiscal or monetary policy, or lower if it’s the opposite,” Fratantoni explained. “Housing markets continue to be primed for a stronger spring homebuying season, boosted by more housing supply and slower home-price growth.” 

On the heels of the rate cuts, mortgage rates actually rose last week from 6.72% to 6.79% for 30-year fixed home loans, Freddie Mac reported. Some economists cite the election results as a potential reason for the turbulent market.

“While it’s not always 100% clear what markets are thinking, they could be expecting a combination of stronger economic growth, more fiscal spending, as well as higher prices and inflation because of more tariffs and lower taxes,” Realtor.com Senior Economist Ralph McLaughlin said.

After the Trump-Vance victory, the 10-year Treasury yield jumped to the highest level since April, and typically, mortgage rates move in the same direction as the 10-year yield. This wasn’t the case this past week.

“While we still expect mortgage rates to stabilize by the end of the year, they will likely be at a higher level than markets were initially expecting prior to election week,” explained McLaughlin.

If you’re looking to purchase a home, consider visiting Credible to find the best mortgage rate for your financial situation.

HOUSING BEGINS TO TIP IN FAVOR OF BUYERS; SELLERS SLASH PRICES TO ENTICE THEM BACK TO MARKET: REPORT

The homebuying market has the potential to rebound in 2025

Despite hard times for mortgage rates, there is some optimism among experts in the mortgage industry, although it’s difficult to predict exactly when prices and rates may drop.

“The Fed’s rate cut was widely anticipated and unlikely to herald in much of a change for the housing market. Potential homebuyers will be disappointed to see that mortgage rates remain stubbornly high, as it also moves with the 10-year Treasury, so the markets will only slowly begin to normalize,” CoreLogic Chief Economist Dr. Selma Hepp said in a statement. “We anticipate a much more improved rate environment for homebuying next year.”

Homebuyers have, by in large, been dragging their feet on homebuying. Many homeowners currently have mortgage rates below 6%, so they’re not selling their homes. Homes that are on the market are sitting there for longer as buyers wait for volatile rates to settle.  

“Despite these challenges, Americans remain optimistic about homeownership, and homebuilders are positioned to fill in the gaps, especially if policy makers at the federal, state, and local levels can clear challenges to building,” said Hale.

“While existing home sales continue to tread near 30-year lows, new home sales remain on par with a pace similar to 2019, and even as existing home prices continue to climb, a focus on smaller-footprints and affordability has kept new home prices more steady,” further explained Hale.

If you think you’re ready to shop around for a home loan, use Credible to help you easily compare interest rates from multiple lenders in minutes.

MORTGAGE PAYMENTS SOAR FOR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS IN SWING STATES: REALTOR.COM

Have a finance-related question, but don’t know who to ask? Email The Credible Money Expert at [email protected] and your question might be answered by Credible in our Money Expert column.

Continue Reading

Finance

China’s EV race to the bottom leaves a few possible winners

Published

on

Continue Reading

Finance

Stocks making the biggest moves midday: WOOF, TSLA, CRCL, LULU

Published

on

Continue Reading

Finance

Swiss government proposes tough new capital rules in major blow to UBS

Published

on

A sign in German that reads “part of the UBS group” in Basel on May 5, 2025.

Fabrice Coffrini | AFP | Getty Images

The Swiss government on Friday proposed strict new capital rules that would require banking giant UBS to hold an additional $26 billion in core capital, following its 2023 takeover of stricken rival Credit Suisse.

The measures would also mean that UBS will need to fully capitalize its foreign units and carry out fewer share buybacks.

“The rise in the going-concern requirement needs to be met with up to USD 26 billion of CET1 capital, to allow the AT1 bond holdings to be reduced by around USD 8 billion,” the government said in a Friday statement, referring to UBS’ holding of Additional Tier 1 (AT1) bonds.

The Swiss National Bank said it supported the measures from the government as they will “significantly strengthen” UBS’ resilience.

“As well as reducing the likelihood of a large systemically important bank such as UBS getting into financial distress, this measure also increases a bank’s room for manoeuvre to stabilise itself in a crisis through its own efforts. This makes it less likely that UBS has to be bailed out by the government in the event of a crisis,” SNB said in a Friday statement.

‘Too big to fail’

UBS has been battling the specter of tighter capital rules since acquiring the country’s second-largest bank at a cut-price following years of strategic errors, mismanagement and scandals at Credit Suisse.

The shock demise of the banking giant also brought Swiss financial regulator FINMA under fire for its perceived scarce supervision of the bank and the ultimate timing of its intervention.

Swiss regulators argue that UBS must have stronger capital requirements to safeguard the national economy and financial system, given the bank’s balance topped $1.7 trillion in 2023, roughly double the projected Swiss economic output of last year. UBS insists it is not “too big to fail” and that the additional capital requirements — set to drain its cash liquidity — will impact the bank’s competitiveness.

At the heart of the standoff are pressing concerns over UBS’ ability to buffer any prospective losses at its foreign units, where it has, until now, had the duty to back 60% of capital with capital at the parent bank.

Higher capital requirements can whittle down a bank’s balance sheet and credit supply by bolstering a lender’s funding costs and choking off their willingness to lend — as well as waning their appetite for risk. For shareholders, of note will be the potential impact on discretionary funds available for distribution, including dividends, share buybacks and bonus payments.

“While winding down Credit Suisse’s legacy businesses should free up capital and reduce costs for UBS, much of these gains could be absorbed by stricter regulatory demands,” Johann Scholtz, senior equity analyst at Morningstar, said in a note preceding the FINMA announcement. 

“Such measures may place UBS’s capital requirements well above those faced by rivals in the United States, putting pressure on returns and reducing prospects for narrowing its long-term valuation gap. Even its long-standing premium rating relative to the European banking sector has recently evaporated.”

The prospect of stringent Swiss capital rules and UBS’ extensive U.S. presence through its core global wealth management division comes as White House trade tariffs already weigh on the bank’s fortunes. In a dramatic twist, the bank lost its crown as continental Europe’s most valuable lender by market capitalization to Spanish giant Santander in mid-April.

Continue Reading

Trending