Almost 10 months after a scandal that shook Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., the commodity-trading giant is still struggling to sort out its accounting.
ADM, which in March adjusted its financial disclosures going back to 2018, said late Monday that it found more errors in the way it reported transactions between its business units. The crop trader said it will restate results for last year and the first and second quarters of 2024. The move prompted ADM to cancel its quarterly earnings call with analysts only 14 hours before it was due to start.
The Chicago-based company said it will make the formal corrections “as soon as reasonably practicable,” and it doesn’t expect any material impact from the changes. But even as the financial impact of the errors on consolidated earnings have so far been minor, the broader consequences could be significant as investors lose confidence in the company.
ADM has erased almost $12 billion in market value since the accounting issues first became public in January. The stock plunged as much as 12% on Tuesday to the lowest level since December 2020, heading for its worst annual performance in almost a decade. The scandal has drawn investigations by the Department of Justice and Securities & Exchange Commission, and the company removed Vikram Luthar from the Chief Financial Officer role.
ADM said earlier this year it has identified “material weakness” in its internal controls over financial reporting of transactions between units, which totaled roughly $4.4 billion last year. The newly identified errors were found as the company started testing new controls — a process it said will continue through the end of the year. The decision to formally restate previous financial statements was taken by ADM’s board after discussions with the SEC.
Representatives for ADM and the SEC each declined to comment.
Assessing whether errors are significant requires considering a broad mix of information, not just numbers, according to SEC guidance. A small numerical error can become serious if it affects compliance with loan covenants, changes earnings, or boosts executive pay, among other factors.
“It is entirely possible for something to not be quantitatively material and yet still be qualitatively material,” said Bruce Pounder, founder of GAAP Lab, an accounting advisory firm.
The restatement of information about the so-called inter-segment transactions raises concerns that profits from the nutrition unit may be lowered further. ADM has spent billions expanding the business since 2014, when it made its biggest-ever acquisition — the $3 billion buyout of European natural ingredient maker Wild Flavors GmbH — in a bid to diversify from row crop grains and oilseeds into processed products. Nutrition companies tend to trade at a premium to commodity traders because of their higher growth potential and increased earnings stability.
ADM also spent about $1.8 billion to buy animal feed maker Neovia from France’s InVivo Group in 2019. But profits have failed to live up to initial expectations due to weakening demand, including for plant-based food.
This isn’t the first scandal involving ADM. Back in the 1990s, it was implicated in a price-fixing conspiracy that later became the basis of the 2009 film “The Informant!” starring Matt Damon. ADM pleaded guilty to the price-fixing charges in 1996. The company has also responded to a lawsuit over allegations of price manipulation involving its trading of ethanol.
The renewed accounting issues come at a time when ADM is struggling with a drop in crop prices around the globe and lower profits from processing soybeans into meal and oil — a key earnings driver amid increased crushing capacity in the U.S. A surge in imports of ingredients such as tallow and waste oil has also impacted demand for soybean oil for biofuel production. ADM closed its only soybean crushing facility in Iowa for maintenance during the current harvest of a record U.S. crop, further eroding its ability to gain from processing.
ADM was expected to release its third-quarter financial statement on Tuesday before the start of trading. In the surprise preliminary report late Monday, the company said earnings excluding some items slumped 33% from a year ago to $1.09 per share. That missed even the lowest of analysts’ estimates compiled by Bloomberg. The company also wrote down the value of its investment in Wilmar International Ltd. by $461 million.
The trader slashed its full-year earnings outlook to a range of $4.50 to $5 per share, citing slower market demand, internal operational challenges as well as legislative and regulatory policy uncertainties. The company previously projected a profit between $5.25 and $6.25.
The Internal Revenue Service may be facing steep cuts in its budget with the win on Tuesday night of President-elect Donald Trump.
Funding for the IRS has become a political issue, with Republicans successfully pushing to cut the extra $80 billion funding from the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 already during battles over the debt limit.
“I think IRS funding is at significant risk right now, both the annual appropriation funding as well as the remaining IRA funding,” said Washington National Tax Office principal Rochelle Hodes at the Top 25 Firm Crowe LLP.
So far, Republicans have mainly called for cuts in the IRS’s enforcement budget. The increase in enforcement is supposed to be used to pay for the cost of the IRA, but the funding increase is also supposed to be used for taxpayer service and technology improvements.
“The only question for me on funding is, will any portion of the funding remain available for taxpayer service-related improvements at the IRS?” said Hodes.
“I don’t think that will be in the sight line, but the IRA money is part of what’s being used for that,” said Hodes. “As we’ve seen in appropriations bills, there could be language directed at that, that no money can be spent on that initiative.”
A more important priority will be the extension of the expiring provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. “Getting TCJA resolved is going to be the first priority,” said Hodes. “The second question is, how will the cost of that endeavor be determined. If the view that is held by several Senate Republicans wins the day, then the cost of extending the expiring provisions will not be counted under those particular budget rules that are created dealing with extending current policy. If, however, that view is not adopted, then there is a high cost just to TCJA, and so any other provisions with cost will sort of stretch the boundaries of what many in Congress would be comfortable with. I think it will be necessary to see how the scoring goes for extending TCJA provisions.”
Trump has also called for exempting various forms of income, such as tip income, Social Security income and overtime from taxes.
“I also am not sure which of the ideas that were put forward on the campaign trail, other than extending TCJA, are provisions that have true champions who will want to pursue those,” said Hodes.
That may depend on who ends up in Congress, with several important races in the House yet to be decided.
“Although the House remains undecided, the Republicans’ control of the Senate makes it much more likely that Republicans will be able to implement many of Trump’s proposed tax policies, such as making parts of the expiring 2017 TCJA provisions permanent,” said John Gimigliano, principal in charge of the Federal Legislative & Regulatory Services group within KPMG’s Washington National Tax practice, in a statement. “The pressing question now is how the Administration and Congress will fund such an ambitious agenda and what additional measures they might introduce, such as eliminating taxes on tips and overtime. These items will only add to the hefty $4+ trillion price tag they face. Until then, taxpayers should continue to stay apprised of developments and scenario plan for the different outcomes to get ahead.”
Over half of accounting and tax firms plan to increase fees across all services in 2025, according to a new survey.
The survey, released Wednesday by practice management technology company Ignition, found that the majority (around 58%) cited rising business costs as the main motivator for their fee increases, while only 5% are raising prices to increase revenue. Most of the nearly 350 firms surveyed intend to increase fees across services by 5% or 10%.
Some 57% of the respondents plan to increase fees across all services. With regard to tax preparation specifically, 90% of the survey respondents plan to increase fees for individual tax returns, and 87% plan to increase fees for business tax returns. In addition, 70% plan to increase fees for tax planning and advisory services;. 85% plan to increase fees for bookkeeping and accounting services; and 76% plan to increase fees for CFO and controller services.
“While accounting firm owners are embracing price increases in 2025, the report shows that the majority (around 58%) cite rising business costs as the main motivator,” said Ignition global president Greg Strickland in a statement. “Only 5% are raising prices to increase revenue, which indicates an opportunity for firms to leverage pricing as a strategic tool to unlock revenue growth.”
The report found a shift from hourly billing to fixed-fee and value-based pricing, with 79% of the survey respondents indicating they use fixed-fee or value-based pricing for bookkeeping and accounting services. Over half (54%) use fixed-fee or value-based pricing for tax preparation services, 67% use fixed-fee or value-based pricing for tax planning and advisory services, and 75% use fixed-fee or value-based pricing for CFO and controller services.
The report benchmarked current fees for tax, accounting and advisory services, which varied based on firms’ annual revenue range. The biggest variation in pricing was for tax planning and advisory services in particular. For firms with revenue of as much as $250,000, approximately 23% said they charge less than $500 for these services, while a nearly equal number (around 21%) indicated they charge more than $2000.
Illinois voters approved a nonbinding proposal to add an extra 3% levy on annual incomes of more than $1 million, which could fuel a new effort to raise taxes on the state’s highest earners.
The ballot measure – which was an advisory question – won 60% of support, according to the Associated Press. About 90% of the votes have been counted.
“The vote is a gigantic step in the right direction,” said former Governor Pat Quinn, a supporter of the measure.
While the proposal has no legal effect, the vote opens the door to a new debate over ramping up taxes on the rich even as Illinois and Chicago, its biggest city, contend with population declines and a string of departures by major companies and wealthy residents. In 2020, voters rejected a separate measure backed by Governor JB Pritzker to replace the state’s flat tax on incomes with a graduated system that would raise rates on higher-earners.
The Pritzker plan drew staunch opposition from billionaire financier Ken Griffin, who donated about $50 million to help torpedo the initiative. Griffin then left Chicago for Miami in 2022, moving the headquarters of his Citadel empire there as well. Companies from Caterpillar Inc. to Boeing Co. have also departed amid rising concerns over public safety, regulation and taxes.
This year’s referendum asked voters if the Illinois Constitution should be amended to create the additional tax on income over $1 million. It called for using the proceeds to ease the state’s notoriously high property levies.