Connect with us

Accounting

AICPA, NASBA approve CPA licensure model legislation

Published

on

The American Institute of CPAs and the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy have given their approval to new model legislation providing an alternative path to a CPA license in an effort to attract more people to the accounting profession.

The optional path aims to maintain public protection while offering additional flexibility and options for CPA candidates. The changes will add an extra pathway to CPA licensure requiring a baccalaureate degree, including an accounting concentration, along with two years of experience, and passage of the Uniform CPA Examination. 

Other revisions to the model legislation, which can be used by states, include a shift from state-based mobility to an individual-based practice privilege that would maintain a CPA’s ability to practice across state lines with just one license. There’s also new safe harbor language allowing CPAs who were licensed under differing education, experience and exam requirements as of Dec. 31, 2024, to continue to have practice privileges under mobility.

The AICPA and NASBA proposed the changes to the UAA last September and an alternative path to CPA licensure in February.

“By aligning our model legislative framework with the laws recently adopted in certain states, we’re encouraging removal of outdated barriers and reaffirming our commitment to a truly mobile CPA profession,” said Susan Coffey, the AICPA’s CEO of public accounting, in a statement Wednesday. “Businesses today demand seamless practice across state lines, and this action provides legislators and regulators with a model under which CPAs can meet that need without disruption. This is how we protect the public while keeping the profession strong, relevant, and ready for what’s next.”

The additional path will be included in the amended Uniform Accountancy Act to be released early this summer by AICPA and NASBA. The UAA offers state legislatures and boards of accountancy a national model that can be adopted in whole or in part to meet the needs of each individual jurisdiction.

“NASBA and Boards of Accountancy remain committed to maintaining public protection while implementing these changes to the UAA,” said NASBA president and CEO Daniel Dustin in a statement. “We will continue to work closely with state boards as the new pathway and changes to CPA mobility are implemented.”

The new pathway envisions a wider role for experience to be determined at the jurisdiction level. Individual states will still need to formally enact legislation and/or adopt rules and regulations, depending on the jurisdiction, before candidates can pursue this path. To date, 14 states have done so.

The new pathway would be added to the existing pathways:

Post-baccalaureate degree with an accounting concentration plus one year of experience plus passage of the CPA Exam;

Baccalaureate degree with an accounting concentration plus 30 credits plus one year of experience + passage of the CPA Exam.

The updated edition of the UAA maintains that oversight and disciplinary authority over licensees continues with a state board of accountancy.

The AICPA and NASBA asked for feedback on the proposals in March, and the various comments on the proposals can be found on the NASBA and AICPA  websites. They intend to continue to have discussions on maintaining the relevance of the UAA while also exploring the knowledge and skills needed for a newly licensed CPA to serve the public, promote public protection, and be positioned for a career as a CPA. The organizations said they’re discussing conducting a wide-ranging study that will include research and engagement with stakeholders, including regulators and the CPA profession.

As they begin this new phase, the AICPA and NASBA are also exploring opportunities for how to help CPAs navigate practice mobility as states enact legislation.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Senate Republicans balk at House plan to gut energy tax cuts

Published

on

Key Senate Republicans are resisting the House’s plan to gut clean energy tax credits, vowing to soften the blow for emerging technologies and nuclear power.

The pushback comes after House Republicans released a plan to help pay for an extension of President Donald Trump’s tax cuts by cutting more than $500 billion in energy tax credits from former President Joe Biden’s signature climate law.

The comments from GOP lawmakers mean industries facing a sharp cutoff in federal help still have a chance to preserve their tax incentives for longer.

The plan “needs refinement,” said Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican, who serves on the Senate’s tax writing committee and was one of four Republicans to sign a letter to Senate leadership last month, vowing to defend Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act’s energy tax credits. “It needs more transitions. It’s not quite what we would author out here.” 

The House’s plan to phase out technology-neutral tax credits for green energy projects that begin operating in 2029 is too aggressive, and emerging technologies should be given more time, said Senator Kevin Cramer, a North Dakota Republican.

“I think that the newer credits that have yet to really be applied will need to be extended beyond 2029,” Cramer told reporters in the Capitol Tuesday. “I would expect we will make some changes to try and improve it.” 

Cramer also said the House GOP’s deadline to phase out a production tax credit for nuclear power by 2032 needs to be pushed back. 

In all, the House bill would save $560 billion by rolling back incentives for clean energy and electric vehicles. Production and investment credits for clean electricity production from energy sources like wind and solar and another credit for nuclear electricity would be phased out, while credits for electric vehicles and hydrogen production would also end.

The legislation, which the House is aiming to pass by the end of the month, would then go to the Senate, where Republicans can only afford three defections and still pass it.

The tax credits, which were initially estimated by congressional estimators to cost $270 billion, have been forecast to cost trillions of dollars over the coming decades. That makes them a tempting target for Republicans seeking to pay for extending tax cuts that are also estimated to cost trillions.

But the credits are also providing jobs and spurring the construction of factories in numerous GOP districts.

Emerging Republican pushback means the House plan is likely a “ceiling for changes to the credits,” research firm Capstone LLC wrote in a note to clients. It said additional changes weakening the energy tax cuts could be made by moderate House Republicans before the bill is sent to the Senate.

Senator Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican and moderate who also signed the April letter vowing to defend the credits, said she anticipated changes. 

“Anything that comes over from the House, almost by law, we’ve got to redo,” Murkowski told reporters.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Here are the winners and losers in the Republican tax bill

Published

on

Wealthy Americans and business investors are among the big winners in House Republicans’ draft tax legislation while targets of President Donald Trump’s ire such as immigrants and elite universities were hammered. 

The tax plan is likely to undergo significant changes as it winds through the House and then the Senate. But the committees’ drafts released this week have set up initial goalposts. 

Here’s who’s winning and losing so far in the tax fight.

Winners

Multimillionaires

The rich would dodge a tax increase and gain the ability to pass more wealth on to their heirs in the bill approved early Wednesday by the House’s tax committee.

House Republicans omitted a proposal the Trump administration floated to raise the income tax rate from 37% to 39.6% on people with very high incomes. Instead, wealthy families get another tax break: the estate tax exemption will rise to $15 million for individuals and $30 million for married couples next year, and rise with inflation afterward. Moreover, their Trump tax cuts would become permanent.

Small business owners

The bill increases the pass-through business tax deduction from 20% to 23% and expands the definition of who can qualify. The deduction is available to owners of sole proprietorships, LLCs and partnerships.

Private equity

The carried interest tax break benefiting private equity, venture capital and real estate partnerships would survive again, despite the president’s push to eliminate it. Private equity also won an expanded interest expensing tax break.

Domestic car dealers

Up to $10,000 a year in loan interest for U.S.-made cars would be tax deductible through 2028, a boon to auto dealers looking to close sales. But the break phases out slowly for individuals with more than $100,000 in income and couples with more than $200,000. This new break will cost an estimated $57 billion in lost tax revenue.

Manufacturers

The bill revives several favorable tax rules for businesses, including bonus depreciation for the cost of production upgrades and a research and development tax break, winning the endorsement of the National Association of Manufacturers. Those breaks, however, would also be temporary. 

Elderly and tipped workers

In a nod to some of Trump’s populist campaign promises, taxpayers aged 65 and older would get a larger standard deduction, while tips and overtime pay would be exempted from income taxes. The provisions included limits to shrink their cost and would expire after 2028.

Parents

The child tax credit would increase from $2,000 to $2,500 through 2028. Newly minted parents could open up new “MAGA” investment accounts for their babies seeded with $1,000 from the government.

Corporations

Other tax increases that had been considered that would have hit big business, such as an increase in the stock buyback tax or a limit on the state and local deduction for corporations, were mostly rejected.

Defense contractors

The package boosts defense spending by $150 billion, with much of the funding going to new weapons systems made by major contractors.

Losers

Low-Income Americans

Some of the cost for the tax bill would be defrayed through cuts to Medicaid health coverage and food stamps, both of which benefit low-income Americans. House Republicans are seeking to impose work requirements on able-bodied Medicaid recipients up to 64 years old and beneficiaries would have to pick up more costs. 

The GOP also has proposed cuts to the nation’s largest anti-hunger program, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. That includes expanding current work requirements to cover more beneficiaries. Beginning in 2028, states also would be required to pay a portion of food benefit costs, which are now fully paid by the federal government.

Residents of high-tax states

Lawmakers representing high-tax states such as New York, New Jersey and California pressed to increase a limit on the deduction for state and local taxes first imposed to help pay for Trump’s 2017 tax law. But House Republicans’ plan to raise the limit to $30,000 — up from the current $10,000 — fell far short of demands.

Negotiations are still underway and the disappointed lawmakers have plenty of leverage. House Speaker Mike Johnson said a SALT deal is likely Wednesday. House Ways and Means Chairman Jason Smith has criticized the demands for an even bigger SALT deduction, saying that a $30,000 cap covers more than 90% of the constituents in high-tax districts.

The limit would expire entirely at the end of the year without new legislation and because of the small Republican majority just a few lawmakers from high-tax states could block the House bill if they withhold their votes, as they have threatened to do.

Renewable energy

Clean energy industries would be hit by the Republican plan, which would roll back many provisions of former President Joe Biden’s landmark climate law. 

A tax credit for solar panels and other clean energy systems would be phased out, as would investment and production tax credits for wind, solar and other clean electricity production. Tax credits for the production of nuclear power and hydrogen production also would be phased out. 

Electric vehicle makers

Tesla Inc., General Motors Co. and other electric vehicle makers would be hit by elimination of a consumer tax credit of up to $7,500 for the purchase of electric vehicles. 

The GOP proposal also ends tax credits for used and commercial electric vehicles. 

Elite universities

Add tax bills to the escalating battle the Trump administration and Republicans are waging against elite universities such as Harvard and Columbia.

Private colleges and universities with at least 500 students and endowments exceeding $2 million per student would pay a rate of 21% on net investment income, up from the current tax of 1.4%. That includes Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Princeton and MIT.

But the plan won’t only impact the wealthiest private colleges. Colleges with endowments over $750,000 to $1.25 million per pupil will pay a 7% tax, while colleges with endowments over $1.25 million per student but below $2 million would pay 14%. Religious institutions are exempted.

Private foundations

Private foundations also would face an escalating tax based on their size: 2.78% for private foundations with assets between $50 million and $250 million, 5% for entities with assets between $250 million and $5 billion; and 10% for foundations with assets of at least $5 billion, such as the Gates Foundation, a longtime target for Republicans.

Immigrants

Several provisions would raise taxes on immigrants. That includes a new 5% tax on transfers of money to foreign countries, known as remittances. Many immigrants in the U.S. send money to relatives in their countries of origin. U.S. citizens could apply for credits to offset that cost.

The proposal also would restrict some immigrants’ access to tax credits for health coverage premiums. The change would prevent immigrants granted asylum or temporary protected status from accessing those credits.

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI recruiting has arrived for accounting. It’s not enough

Published

on

Artificial intelligence-based automation is lowering the curtain on the accounting profession’s long and fruitful spreadsheet era — just as the spreadsheet ended the era of hand-calculated ledgers.

This time is different, though. The fundamental labor of tax and audit has forever changed. AI can, in a flash, accomplish what litanies of VLOOKUPs, pivot tables, conditional formulas and various other spreadsheet techniques take hours to do. By altering the basic currency of accounting work, AI has changed the skill sets and personal characteristics tied to success in the accounting profession. That, in turn, has changed this field’s recruiting game — and, more broadly, the talent- and resource-management games. 

AI’s role in recruiting grows by the day, and along two main fronts. The first is boosting HR efficiency by reducing the cost, effort and time required to recruit through the sourcing, screening and evaluation processes. The second is increasing the quality and fit of incoming team members through better accuracy and conversion rates in hiring.

AI is revolutionizing recruiting in tax and audit

A dizzying number of AI-infused solutions exist along both fronts. These include standalone systems as well as recruiting-specific modules offered by major ERP vendors. In addition, ERPs are increasingly exploiting cloud integration to enable the smooth incorporation of what once would have been standalone systems. SAP alone has more than 100 such partners, including Apli, HireEZ, Impress.ai, JobAI-lysis, Magneto, Paradox, Pulsifi, SeekOut, SniperAI and TurboHire, to name just a few.

Some focus narrowly; some cover lots of territory. AI helps screen resumes. Old-school applicant-tracking systems have been doing that for years, but AI is enabling far more precision, to the benefit of companies and candidates alike. More impressively, AI conducts automated, conversational interactions (via web chat, SMS, WhatsApp, email and more) to assess both hard skills (yes, Excel still counts) and soft skills such as emotional intelligence, leadership traits, reliability, customer orientation and teamwork. All that feeds into better candidate profiles while saving HR staff a ton of time.

AI enables tailoring of hiring criteria based on past successful hires. It can run psychometric tests and rank candidates on dozens of variables. It can tap into talent pools through public profiles, professional-service organizations, job boards, university databases and other sources, locally and globally. It can scour for passive candidates and predict candidate interest and availability. AI can determine a prospect’s market value, then use predictive hiring analytics to estimate the likelihood of offer acceptance. It can conduct video interviews and assess communication style and tone, verbal and nonverbal cues, and the consistency of responses, then transcribe and summarize the results.

AI in service delivery changes what accounting firms are recruiting for

AI’s ability to help recruiters tease out soft skills and personal qualities is particularly important to today’s accounting profession. The managing partner of a Big Four firm once joked that an extroverted accountant was one who, while conversing, looked at your shoes instead of his own. That won’t cut it anymore. This field needs people with interpersonal skills and an ability to understand the business significance of the data AI has already spreadsheet-jockeyed. They must compellingly present and explain their conclusions to others in the organization. Much earlier in their careers, accountants must now be able to assess the state of the race rather than just spur on a single horse. 

That has implications far beyond AI in recruiting. Where we’re headed is the AI-facilitated integration of recruiting, resource management and talent management to help spreadsheet sophisticates learn the bigger-picture business and build and refine their strategic-thinking and interpersonal skills — and at the same time provide a new generation of accountants hired on evolved criteria with the deeper audit-and-tax skills they must harness for the firm’s and their own success.

AI-powered resource management has become a major focus

Given the need to bring in strong performers in a specialized field in which retirements are outpacing new entrants, accounting firms are moving on all three fronts. Notably, they’re turning to ERP-integrated AI resource-management and talent-management systems such as ProFinda and Whoz. These take into account skills, rates, availability, capacity and other factors to determine the optimal mix of internal and external workforces, including a growing number of gig-work and contract accountants. Central to these systems are staff retention and reskilling, both which go hand in hand with the new recruiting paradigm. 

The sunset of the spreadsheet era has profound implications for accounting firms. AI-powered recruiting solutions are now indispensable in finding, assessing and bringing in talent poised to thrive in reshaped tax and audit ecosystems. But AI recruiting is not enough. It’s going to take combinations of integrated AI systems to ensure staff can grow quickly into more strategic roles even as firms profitably maintain high levels of client service. It takes a village to raise a child, the saying goes. These days, it takes an AI village to develop an accountant.

Continue Reading

Trending