Connect with us

Accounting

Caution: Successful firms identify challenges ahead

Published

on

The 2025 Fastest-Growing Firms, like the rest of the profession, are dealing with a people problem — and many anticipate that to be a continued challenge.

When asked about the biggest roadblocks ahead for their practices, the firms with the highest percentage growth over the last year identified several, including finding and keeping the best talent.

“I think that staffing, retaining our people, is going to be a challenge as we move forward,” said Maureen Dillmore, vice president of partnerships at Arlington, Virginia-based Top 100 Firm Ascend, which provides a private equity-backed platform for firms. “I think that’s just going to be a challenge for everyone. All the firms out there are going to be competing for top talent, so as long as we really focus on their people, focus on the talent, we can stay ahead of that. But that will be a challenge going forward.”

(Watch: “Ascend doesn’t grow just for the sake of growth”)

Omaha, Nebraska-based Bland & Associates is seeking a specific experience level.

“If we had five more, 10 more, unicorns, that’d be awesome,” shared managing partner Jeremy Vokt. “When I think about the people that we have that have been there since the beginning, if we had those types of people, I think we continue to grow. We don’t have an issue hiring new people out of college or interns. We seem to attract those people fairly easily. But how do you find another five or 10 manager-level people, a five-year person, whatever that looks like, that would allow us to grow even more.”

FGF Vokt.jpg
Bland & Associates managing partner Jeremy Vokt

Jesse Sutton

Meanwhile, the wave of baby boomer retirements is being felt at Glastonbury, Connecticut-based MahoneySabol.

“You know, for us as a firm, succession planning — being a firm that’s 35 years old, our average partner age is, you know, pushing around 60 to 62. So, while people are working longer, the runway is not that long, and you’ve got to have enough people coming up behind you. And as I mentioned, a lot of them don’t have that entrepreneurial mindset. I mean, they’re good technicians. They may want to be partners, but do they really want to run a business and buy the other guys out and take on all the responsibilities of, you know, administration and HR and IT, all the other stuff. So, that’s part of the challenge.”

(Watch: “Dean Dorton’s early adoption pays off”)

The right skills and experience are also paramount for Lexington, Kentucky-based Top 100 Firm Dean Dorton, according to president and CEO David Bundy, who reports positive traction on that front thus far.

“I think we’ve been able to successfully recruit and add talent,” Bundy said. “It’s getting harder. It’s the competition for that skill, those skill sets, is fierce and I think we’re doing OK and we’re winning our battles in that.”

Fixing the pipeline

Regardless of the talent battles the Fastest-Growing Firms have clearly won to support their success over the last year, many voiced concern about addressing the issue much earlier in the pipeline.

(Watch: “Crete’s unique model and vision”)

“One is really just about talent acquisition,” replied Steve Stagner, CEO of No. 1 Fastest-Growing Firm Crete Professionals Alliance, when asked about potential issues on the horizon. “We really want to make the accounting profession more attractive to the younger generation. I have a saying, which is to grow the organization, you have to grow the people. And so it’s investing in leadership and development, investing in learning that is beyond just the traditional accounting skills: learning and teaching that next generation how to be better leaders and also serve their clients differently.”

FGF Dressler Stagner Brackney Davis.jpg
From left: Your Part-Time Controller chief growth officer Jerilyn Dressler, Crete Professionals Alliance CEO Steve Stagner, Springline Advisory CEO Tim Brackney, and PP&Co. senior partner Edward Davis

Jesse Sutton

Chad Anschuetz, CEO of Troy, Michigan-based Top 100 Firm Doeren Mayhew, has some ideas  for improving the early part of the pipeline.

“Well, it’s nice that the profession is finally taking action on the 150 rule,” he said of the number of college credit hours required to sit the CPA exam. “As the economy has remained strong for over a decade, the young adults who come out of college have chosen the 120-hour finance degree over the 150-hour CPA degree. And on top of the fact that the finance degree paid more and less hours to graduate, obviously, it came as no surprise that an overwhelming bunch of them have chosen that profession over our own profession. So, we started tackling that, but I think as a profession, we can do more… Why can’t universities offer a 15-hour credit for a paid internship? And then also I think as a profession, we need to pay more for our starting salaries to make it more attractive in the finance market.”

(Watch: “Citrin Cooperman creates excitement in collaboration”)

Aaron Dawson, CEO of Vancouver, Washington-based Opsahl Dawson, also advocates for adjusting hours, but more specifically the long days of busy season that can turn off younger professionals. 

“One of the big ones is, as you carry a larger workforce, we have to figure out how to spread the busy season curve,” he said of the most looming challenges. “The new workforce doesn’t want to donate 2 1/2 months of their lives to public accounting. They want to have a more well-balanced workload. The larger workforce that you carry, you have to figure out a way to keep people busy, in and out of your normal tax season. You’ve got to make sure that you have a mix of advisory and compliance and assurance work to be able to have a flexible work staff.”

FGF Dressler vert.jpg
Your Part-Time Controller chief growth officer Jerilyn Dressler

Jesse Sutton

Jerilyn Dressler, chief growth officer at Philadelphia-based Top 100 Firm Your Part-Time Controller, is optimistic about the recent upward trend in accounting students, though her firm is still prepared to properly equip its people — regardless of how many the pipeline currently provides.

“I think the accounting pipeline is going to continue to be a challenge,” she said. “I think there was a recent study that said that last year was the first year that the number of accounting majors had increased in a number of years, which was very heartening. We don’t know if that trend will continue. So the way that we look at that challenge is we have to be able to implement technology to get the most out of the humans that we have and that we’ll be able to attract and retain.”

‘Transaction distraction’

While competition remains hot for the best and brightest accountants, it’s also ramping up in the mergers and acquisitions and restructuring realms, according to the Fastest-Growing Firms.

“Our growth includes an M&A strategy, and M&A is just becoming more and more challenging,” explained Sean Taylor, CEO of Atlanta-based Top 100 Firm Smith + Howard, which received private equity funding last fall. “As private equity enters the marketplace, firms are really geared toward doing a great deal of M&A and there’s more and more firms targeting the same firms for acquisitions. So it’s very challenging to find a firm that really fits our culture, that fits into the puzzle that we’re building together. And to have a good shot at being successful there, because of the quantity of competition there is for acquisition. So that’s probably the main challenge we’re going to continue to face in the near term. I think in the long term, it’s the ability to integrate all of that growth. Short-term integration is one thing, but maintaining a culture long term is very challenging as well. I think we’re up for it, but it’s something you can never really stop doing. It’s not [that] you get to a point and it’s over. It’s constantly working to maintain that.”

Chicago-based Prosperity Partners is also feeling the pressure, according to CEO Jeremy Dubow.

“We are a private equity-backed accounting firm. And with firms like ours, growth comes in two forms,” he explained. “On the one hand, it’s organic. We’re trying to increase business, increase our top line, improve our clients, increase the number of clients we have. But on the other hand, we’re also focused on inorganic growth, which is in so many words, acquiring other businesses who are going to fit into our culture.” 

FGF Dubow Cogan Froemming.jpg
Prosperity Partners CEO Jeremy Dubow (left) and REDW managing principal Steve Cogan flanking CalCPA president and CEO Denise LeDuc Froemming

Jesse Sutton

“And the biggest challenge we have right now is in the last 12 months, the acquisition game has become very, very competitive,” he continued. “And we have been successful with it. We’ve acquired five businesses in the last 16 to 17 months or so. We have an additional two under LOI [letter of intent] right now, which means we’re going to close in the next couple months. But everyone that we’re talking to, all of a sudden we’ve got seven or eight of our best firms that are also interested in those businesses. And so you’re going to see a fierce competition to grow through acquisition inorganically, and I think that’s going to be one of the biggest challenges that we face, as well as our peers.”

While equally busy on the acquisition front, fellow private equity-backed and Top 100 Firm Springline Advisory also aims to turn down some of the noise on all that activity.

“I think the big challenge is we’re founding a firm by bringing firms together,” explained CEO Tim Brackney. “And so what you want to try to do is, if there’s — especially because they’re all successful firms — is to make sure that you’re not distracting them from the momentum that they had while also building things that will accelerate their growth in the future. So we really are going to try to minimize what I call ‘transaction distraction.'”

Asked how he accomplishes that with all the firms that operate under Springline’s PE-backed model, Brackney said, “It’s kind of tough, right? Because what you really want is input from all the firms. And so what you do is you make sure that you’re not doing things top down and that you’re communicating really clearly and that everybody understands what the ‘why’ is, and at the same time making sure that whatever support is needed, that we can give it to them.”

Bundy reported healthy organic growth at Dean Dorton, but added, “it’s that strategic growth that we’ve supplemented our organic growth with over the years that’s going to be challenged, just with the private equity and the way transactions are structured. We’ve not taken private equity money. So to be able to maintain that’s going to be difficult, but I also think those deals are out there and will fit. So right now that’s what we’ll look at. But that’s going to be probably the biggest challenge going forward.”

AI awareness (with a human touch)

With or without M&A, PE money, or a range of alternative practice structures sweeping the profession, a great equalizer is technology — though the scale of those resources is obviously tied to available funding.

“So it’s clearly an evolving industry, particularly with new types of investors in the space,” said Jeffrey Rosen, managing partner at Towson, Maryland-based RS&F. “A lot of what they’re bringing into the arena is enhancements in technology, even how people are going to pursue careers in our industry. So as a smaller firm in this space, I think we have enough resources to fight the good fight, but certainly I think it’s going to be a challenge to be able to invest in people and technology when so many other firms with a lot more resources are doing so as well. And I think we are going to keep up with them. We’re going to differentiate as best we can, but we’re not naive to the challenges that’s going to present as the industry continues to consolidate.”

August FGF 1.jpg
Several leaders of the 2025 Fastest-Growing Firms being honored at Accounting Today’s Firm Growth Forum

Jesse Sutton

Artificial intelligence was oft-mentioned as the most significant technology as firms look to the future.

“In my view, AI is consequential,” said Nishta Sharma, CEO of Atlanta-based KNAV. “I think it’s more consequential than any other changes our industry has experienced. So the real challenge actually lies in how quickly and, I’d say, meaningfully we can adopt technology and AI across our operations globally. And I also think a lot about what it really means to upscale our teams in an AI-driven world. How do we train our people to provide meaningful application? Of critical skills? How do you apply judgments? You build relationships, you know some of these skills are intuitive.”

(Watch: “AbitOs capitalizes on a niche market”)

Alberto Guzman, partner at Coral Gables, Florida-based AbitOs, has a similarly reflective take on the rise of AI.

“I think that’s our best friend and also a little bit of our challenge in the future,” he shared. “It’s amazing the things we can do with it and we’re just scratching the surface, I think, in that department. But by the same token, I think that’s going to be probably a challenge. Now, you may not have to be that savvy or that prepared and use that technology to do certain things that now a lot of people cannot do just because they’re not prepared. Also people — we are getting a lot of clients and prospective clients with a lot of knowledge or what they think is a lot of knowledge just from the AI or from the technology. So now you’re not only competing against other firms and the client, but the actual technology itself. So I think that’s going to be one of the challenges.”

As many of the Fastest-Growing Firms attributed their success to carving out niches, it’s no surprise that some of the challenges they forecast relate to these specific industries.

(Watch: “PP&Co. aims for operational excellence”)

Two firm leaders, for example, named tariffs as something to keep an eye on.

Andrew Gragnani, former president and now chief operating officer of Cleveland-based Top 10 Firm CBIZ / CBIZ CPAs, mentioned it as a notable administrative issue, as did Jeanne Bernick, chief client officer at Top 100 Firm Pinion.

“The challenges now are things that we can’t control; tariffs, globally,” she said. “Commodity prices for farmers going up and down. So we have a real focus around helping our clients with risk management. So I think that’s been the thing now that we’ve got kind of the foundation of our firm’s house in order. Now, it’s just the obstacles of what’s happening in the markets, in the industries for our clients. But that’s also an opportunity because if they trust us, if we’re giving them better client experience and better service, they’re going to come to us in the good times and the bad times. But the biggest challenge right now is what’s happening in the food and egg markets.”

(Watch: “An entrepreneurial mindset at REDW”)

New York City-based LMC Advisors also touched on client relationships as an issue, but one that is decidedly more under the control of CEO and managing partner Lee Cohen and his team.

“Concentrating and making sure that we don’t lose the white-glove service and personal touch that we’ve always given,” Cohen identified as a continued challenge down the line. “That the clients still feel the same level of service that they’re accustomed to with us.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

on

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Trending