Connect with us

Accounting

Chicago nixes property-tax hike as Olympic loan payment extended

Published

on

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson is reversing his plan to raise property taxes by offering to use some bond refinancing savings and defer a loan repayment to close the budget deficit.

After delaying Friday’s vote on his 2025 spending plan, Johnson is trying to garner enough support to pass a budget by the Dec. 31 deadline. He had struggled for weeks to convince a simple majority of aldermen in the 50-person city council to support his proposed property-tax hike to close the deficit. Aldermen were told on Sunday about the city’s plan and the city council is set to vote on the revised budget Monday afternoon.

“Based on conversations with aldermen the decision was made to remove the property-tax” increase, Chief Financial Officer Jill Jaworski said in a telephone interview on Monday.

Earlier this month, the city refinanced municipal bonds that generated about $146 million in savings, and officials now see about $54 million in lower debt service costs to help plug the $1 billion budget shortfall, Jaworski said. The city had considered using those funds to repay debt related to a loan under Mayor Richard M. Daley for the 2009 purchase of the former Michael Reese Hospital campus. That site was intended to be a part of the Olympic campus but Chicago lost the bid for the 2016 Olympic games to Rio de Janeiro. 

The mayor’s proposal in October didn’t include repayment of the final loan portion of the more than $90 million the city had paid for the Michael Reese site, Jaworski said. The loan, a general obligation of the city not supported by the property-tax levy, had a fixed interest rate of 3.55% following a 2017 refinancing and an outstanding balance of about $40 million that was set to mature June 30, 2024, according to a bond filing in 2022. The loan has lingered for years on the city’s balance sheet even after Chicago agreed in 2021 to sell the site to a developer in phases through 2035.  

The city paid that $40 million from a separate line of credit this year and is proposing to amortize the debt in 2026, Jaworski said. She added that at the high-end, deferring paying off the debt entirely may cost the city $2 million a year.

Alderman Daniel La Spata said the proposal appears to be “kicking the can down the road.”

Jaworski disagreed, adding that the city is looking at different ways to repay the loan over time given the site has not been developed yet. 

The city council is expected to approve the latest version of Johnson’s spending plan Monday now that the property-tax hike has been removed. He had originally pitched a $300 million property-tax hike that aldermen unanimously rejected, and then lowered it to $68.5 million before nixing it.

Johnson and his team have negotiated items piecemeal and proposed raising other taxes, fines and fees to fill the nearly $1 billion deficit in the city’s $5.6 billion operating fund, known as the corporate fund. That fund pays for public safety, streets and sanitation among other services.

Rating firms are watching how the budget process unfolds. Last month, S&P Global Ratings put the city on a negative credit watch with at least a one-in-two chance of a downgrade in the next 90 days amid the struggle to pass a budget.

The rating firms have expressed concerns that include the city making its statutorily mandated pension payments as well as the supplemental amounts that have been added in recent years, Jaworski said. They have also stressed that the city focus on budgets that are primarily structurally balanced.

“We are hopeful that the rating agencies will be comfortable with this budget and with all the revenues and cuts,” she said. “But we recognize they are looking at it carefully and there always is some risk that we could get downgraded.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Business Transaction Recording For Financial Success

Published

on

Business Transaction Recording For Financial Success

In the world of financial management, accurate transaction recording is much more than a routine task—it is the foundation of fiscal integrity, operational transparency, and informed decision-making. By maintaining meticulous records, businesses ensure their financial ecosystem remains robust and reliable. This article explores the essential practices for precise transaction recording and its critical role in driving business success.

The Importance of Detailed Transaction Recording
At the heart of accurate financial management is detailed transaction recording. Each transaction must include not only the monetary amount but also its nature, the parties involved, and the exact date and time. This level of detail creates a comprehensive audit trail that supports financial analysis, regulatory compliance, and future decision-making. Proper documentation also ensures that stakeholders have a clear and trustworthy view of an organization’s financial health.

Establishing a Robust Chart of Accounts
A well-organized chart of accounts is fundamental to accurate transaction recording. This structured framework categorizes financial activities into meaningful groups, enabling businesses to track income, expenses, assets, and liabilities consistently. Regularly reviewing and updating the chart of accounts ensures it stays relevant as the business evolves, allowing for meaningful comparisons and trend analysis over time.

Leveraging Modern Accounting Software
Advanced accounting software has revolutionized how businesses handle transaction recording. These tools automate repetitive tasks like data entry, synchronize transactions in real-time with bank feeds, and perform validation checks to minimize errors. Features such as cloud integration and customizable reports make these platforms invaluable for maintaining accurate, accessible, and up-to-date financial records.

The Power of Double-Entry Bookkeeping
Double-entry bookkeeping remains a cornerstone of precise transaction management. By ensuring every transaction affects at least two accounts, this system inherently checks for errors and maintains balance within the financial records. For example, recording both a debit and a credit ensures that discrepancies are caught early, providing a reliable framework for accurate reporting.

The Role of Timely Documentation
Prompt transaction recording is another critical factor in financial accuracy. Delays in documentation can lead to missing or incorrect entries, which may skew financial reports and complicate decision-making. A culture that prioritizes timely and accurate record-keeping ensures that a company always has real-time insights into its financial position, helping it adapt to changing conditions quickly.

Regular Reconciliation for Financial Integrity
Periodic reconciliations act as a vital checkpoint in transaction recording. Whether conducted daily, weekly, or monthly, these reviews compare recorded transactions with external records, such as bank statements, to identify discrepancies. Early detection of errors ensures that records remain accurate and that the company’s financial statements are trustworthy.

Conclusion
Mastering the art of accurate transaction recording is far more than a compliance requirement—it is a strategic necessity. By implementing detailed recording practices, leveraging advanced technology, and adhering to time-tested principles like double-entry bookkeeping, businesses can ensure financial transparency and operational efficiency. For finance professionals and business leaders, precise transaction recording is the bedrock of informed decision-making, stakeholder confidence, and long-term success.

With these strategies, businesses can build a reliable financial foundation that supports growth, resilience, and the ability to navigate an ever-changing economic landscape.

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRS to test faster dispute resolution

Published

on

Easing restrictions, sharpening personal attention and clarifying denials are among the aims of three pilot programs at the Internal Revenue Service that will test changes to existing alternative dispute resolution programs. 

The programs focus on “fast track settlement,” which allows IRS Appeals to mediate disputes between a taxpayer and the IRS while the case is still within the jurisdiction of the examination function, and post-appeals mediation, in which a mediator is introduced to help foster a settlement between Appeals and the taxpayer.

The IRS has been revitalizing existing ADR programs as part of transformation efforts of the agency’s new strategic plan, said Elizabeth Askey, chief of the IRS Independent Office of Appeals.

IRS headquarters in Washington, D.C.

“By increasing awareness, changing and revitalizing existing programs and piloting new approaches, we hope to make our ADR programs, such as fast-track settlement and post-appeals mediation, more attractive and accessible for all eligible parties,” said Michael Baillif, director of Appeals’ ADR Program Management Office. 

Among other improvements, the pilots: 

  • Align the Large Business and International, Small Business and Self-Employed and Tax Exempt and Government Entities divisions in offering FTS issue by issue. Previously, if a taxpayer had one issue ineligible for FTS, the entire case was ineligible. 
  • Provide that requests to participate in FTS and PAM will not be denied without the approval of a first-line executive. 
  • Clarify that taxpayers receive an explanation when requests for FTS or PAM are denied.

Another pilot, Last Chance FTS, is a limited scope SB/SE pilot in which Appeals will call taxpayers or their representatives after a protest is filed in response to a 30-day or equivalent letter to inform taxpayers about the potential application of FTS. This pilot will not impact eligibility for FTS but will simply test the awareness of taxpayers regarding the availability of FTS. 

A final pilot removes the limitation that participation in FTS would preclude eligibility for PAM. 

The traditional appeals process remains available for all taxpayers. 

Inquiries can be addressed to the ADR Program Management Office at [email protected].

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRS revises guidance on residential clean energy credits

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service has updated and added new guidance for taxpayers claiming the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit and the Residential Clean Energy Property Credit.

The updated Fact Sheet 2025-01 includes a set of frequently asked questions and answers, superseding the fact sheet from last April. The IRS noted that the updates include substantial changes.

New sections have been added on how long a taxpayer has to claim the tax credits, guidance for condominium and co-op owners, whether taxpayers who did not previously claim the credit can file an amended return to claim it, and a series of questions on qualified manufacturers and product identification numbers. Other material has been added on how to claim the credits, what kind of records a taxpayer has to keep for claiming the credit, and for how long, and whether taxpayers can include financing costs such as interest payments in determining the amount of the credit.

The IRS states that “financing costs such as interest, as well as other miscellaneous costs such as origination fees and the cost of an extended warranty, are not eligible expenditures for purposes of the credit.” 

Continue Reading

Trending