Connect with us

Accounting

FAF report finds Private Company Council effective

Published

on

The Financial Accounting Foundation released a report that found the Private Company Council has been performing its duties effectively in representing the views of privately held companies and advising the Financial Accounting Standards Board and should continue to operate.

The FAF, which oversees FASB and the PCC, as well as the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, began reevaluating the role of the PCC in February. The PCC emerged in 2012 after the FAF, which oversees both FASB and the Government Accounting Standards Board, heard feedback from private companies that they would like more of a voice in standard-setting at FASB.

Previously, FASB and the American Institute of CPAs had operated a joint committee known as the Private Company Financial Reporting Committee. The FAF, the AICPA and the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy set up a Blue-Ribbon Panel on Standard Setting for Private Companies in 2009 to study the issue of allowing greater input from private companies, and the panel issued a plan in 2011 calling for establishment of a separate council under the oversight of the FAF that would hold its own votes. However, within a few years, it became more of an advisory committee to FASB, much like the Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council, but not a standard-setter in its own right. The PCC still meets regularly, including  this week, and FASB continues to report on its meetings.

The PCC uses a Private Company Decision-Making Framework to advise FASB on the appropriate accounting treatment for private companies for items under active consideration on the FASB’s technical agenda. The PCC also advises the FASB on possible alternatives within GAAP to address the needs of users of private company financial statements. Any proposed changes to GAAP are subject to endorsement by FASB.

Led by the Standard-Setting Process Oversight Committee of the FAF Board of Trustees, the review elicited input from stakeholders vita surveys, virtual meetings, and letters in response to a request for public comment.

The FAF trustees determined that, overall, the PCC is fulfilling its mission and duties effectively and that it should maintain its current mission, remit and structure. The trustees also affirmed the PCC’s current meeting operations and culture. However, the report did point to opportunities for positive change, including ramping up the PCC’s communications activities, publishing a PCC annual report, and enhancing recruiting activities to identify and select new PCC members in the future.

“Good governance prompts us to conduct periodic reviews of our important advisory councils,” said FAF trustee and co-chair of the Standard-Setting Process Oversight Committee Timothy Ryan, head of technology and business enablement at Citigroup, in a statement Wednesday. “I am pleased that stakeholders largely expressed support for the PCC while making excellent suggestions for potential improvements to make it an even more effective body.”

Many stakeholders agreed the PCC is effectively fulfilling its advisory role to FASB, striking the right balance between reducing complexity and ensuring relevant and reliable information to stakeholders, according to the report. They also expressed views that the PCC has been successful in addressing the needs of the users of private company financial statements, indicating they have observed wide adoption of private company alternatives and practical expedients. 

“Overall, the sentiments focused on the positive impact the PCC has had on financial reporting for private companies and their stakeholders since its establishment in 2012, with a recognition that the PCC is the optimal vehicle to continue this important work,” said the report. 

Several stakeholders said the PCC has successfully educated FASB on issues where private companies operate differently than how public companies operate. For example, the PCC provided feedback to FASB on certain aspects of the leasing standard, and on areas that resulted in GAAP alternatives for private companies for goodwill, intangibles, hedge accounting and variable interest entity consolidation standards. 

“We are grateful to the many stakeholders who freely shared their diverse perspectives about the PCC,” added FAF trustee and co-chair of the Standard-Setting Process Oversight Committee Manju Ganeriwala, the former treasurer of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in a statement. “We are confident that the PCC can sustain its excellent track record of providing thoughtful, expert advice and counsel to the FASB for many years to come.”

The AICPA praised the findings of the report. “The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants appreciates the thoroughness of the Financial Accounting Foundation’s review of the Private Company Council, and we share the report’s findings that the council has been effective in its mission,” stated AICPA vice president of financial reporting Daniel Noll. “The AICPA has observed all of the PCC meetings since its inception and notes that it has fulfilled its role well, both in  suggesting changes to existing GAAP and in advising on prospective GAAP. As the FAF’s report notes, there are thousands of public companies in the United States but millions of private companies, so this is a critical advisory role for our capital markets. We look forward to more important work by the PCC and its continued advocacy for stakeholders who depend on financial reporting by private companies.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Business Transaction Recording For Financial Success

Published

on

Business Transaction Recording For Financial Success

In the world of financial management, accurate transaction recording is much more than a routine task—it is the foundation of fiscal integrity, operational transparency, and informed decision-making. By maintaining meticulous records, businesses ensure their financial ecosystem remains robust and reliable. This article explores the essential practices for precise transaction recording and its critical role in driving business success.

The Importance of Detailed Transaction Recording
At the heart of accurate financial management is detailed transaction recording. Each transaction must include not only the monetary amount but also its nature, the parties involved, and the exact date and time. This level of detail creates a comprehensive audit trail that supports financial analysis, regulatory compliance, and future decision-making. Proper documentation also ensures that stakeholders have a clear and trustworthy view of an organization’s financial health.

Establishing a Robust Chart of Accounts
A well-organized chart of accounts is fundamental to accurate transaction recording. This structured framework categorizes financial activities into meaningful groups, enabling businesses to track income, expenses, assets, and liabilities consistently. Regularly reviewing and updating the chart of accounts ensures it stays relevant as the business evolves, allowing for meaningful comparisons and trend analysis over time.

Leveraging Modern Accounting Software
Advanced accounting software has revolutionized how businesses handle transaction recording. These tools automate repetitive tasks like data entry, synchronize transactions in real-time with bank feeds, and perform validation checks to minimize errors. Features such as cloud integration and customizable reports make these platforms invaluable for maintaining accurate, accessible, and up-to-date financial records.

The Power of Double-Entry Bookkeeping
Double-entry bookkeeping remains a cornerstone of precise transaction management. By ensuring every transaction affects at least two accounts, this system inherently checks for errors and maintains balance within the financial records. For example, recording both a debit and a credit ensures that discrepancies are caught early, providing a reliable framework for accurate reporting.

The Role of Timely Documentation
Prompt transaction recording is another critical factor in financial accuracy. Delays in documentation can lead to missing or incorrect entries, which may skew financial reports and complicate decision-making. A culture that prioritizes timely and accurate record-keeping ensures that a company always has real-time insights into its financial position, helping it adapt to changing conditions quickly.

Regular Reconciliation for Financial Integrity
Periodic reconciliations act as a vital checkpoint in transaction recording. Whether conducted daily, weekly, or monthly, these reviews compare recorded transactions with external records, such as bank statements, to identify discrepancies. Early detection of errors ensures that records remain accurate and that the company’s financial statements are trustworthy.

Conclusion
Mastering the art of accurate transaction recording is far more than a compliance requirement—it is a strategic necessity. By implementing detailed recording practices, leveraging advanced technology, and adhering to time-tested principles like double-entry bookkeeping, businesses can ensure financial transparency and operational efficiency. For finance professionals and business leaders, precise transaction recording is the bedrock of informed decision-making, stakeholder confidence, and long-term success.

With these strategies, businesses can build a reliable financial foundation that supports growth, resilience, and the ability to navigate an ever-changing economic landscape.

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRS to test faster dispute resolution

Published

on

Easing restrictions, sharpening personal attention and clarifying denials are among the aims of three pilot programs at the Internal Revenue Service that will test changes to existing alternative dispute resolution programs. 

The programs focus on “fast track settlement,” which allows IRS Appeals to mediate disputes between a taxpayer and the IRS while the case is still within the jurisdiction of the examination function, and post-appeals mediation, in which a mediator is introduced to help foster a settlement between Appeals and the taxpayer.

The IRS has been revitalizing existing ADR programs as part of transformation efforts of the agency’s new strategic plan, said Elizabeth Askey, chief of the IRS Independent Office of Appeals.

IRS headquarters in Washington, D.C.

“By increasing awareness, changing and revitalizing existing programs and piloting new approaches, we hope to make our ADR programs, such as fast-track settlement and post-appeals mediation, more attractive and accessible for all eligible parties,” said Michael Baillif, director of Appeals’ ADR Program Management Office. 

Among other improvements, the pilots: 

  • Align the Large Business and International, Small Business and Self-Employed and Tax Exempt and Government Entities divisions in offering FTS issue by issue. Previously, if a taxpayer had one issue ineligible for FTS, the entire case was ineligible. 
  • Provide that requests to participate in FTS and PAM will not be denied without the approval of a first-line executive. 
  • Clarify that taxpayers receive an explanation when requests for FTS or PAM are denied.

Another pilot, Last Chance FTS, is a limited scope SB/SE pilot in which Appeals will call taxpayers or their representatives after a protest is filed in response to a 30-day or equivalent letter to inform taxpayers about the potential application of FTS. This pilot will not impact eligibility for FTS but will simply test the awareness of taxpayers regarding the availability of FTS. 

A final pilot removes the limitation that participation in FTS would preclude eligibility for PAM. 

The traditional appeals process remains available for all taxpayers. 

Inquiries can be addressed to the ADR Program Management Office at [email protected].

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRS revises guidance on residential clean energy credits

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service has updated and added new guidance for taxpayers claiming the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit and the Residential Clean Energy Property Credit.

The updated Fact Sheet 2025-01 includes a set of frequently asked questions and answers, superseding the fact sheet from last April. The IRS noted that the updates include substantial changes.

New sections have been added on how long a taxpayer has to claim the tax credits, guidance for condominium and co-op owners, whether taxpayers who did not previously claim the credit can file an amended return to claim it, and a series of questions on qualified manufacturers and product identification numbers. Other material has been added on how to claim the credits, what kind of records a taxpayer has to keep for claiming the credit, and for how long, and whether taxpayers can include financing costs such as interest payments in determining the amount of the credit.

The IRS states that “financing costs such as interest, as well as other miscellaneous costs such as origination fees and the cost of an extended warranty, are not eligible expenditures for purposes of the credit.” 

Continue Reading

Trending