Connect with us

Accounting

FAF report finds Private Company Council effective

Published

on

The Financial Accounting Foundation released a report that found the Private Company Council has been performing its duties effectively in representing the views of privately held companies and advising the Financial Accounting Standards Board and should continue to operate.

The FAF, which oversees FASB and the PCC, as well as the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, began reevaluating the role of the PCC in February. The PCC emerged in 2012 after the FAF, which oversees both FASB and the Government Accounting Standards Board, heard feedback from private companies that they would like more of a voice in standard-setting at FASB.

Previously, FASB and the American Institute of CPAs had operated a joint committee known as the Private Company Financial Reporting Committee. The FAF, the AICPA and the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy set up a Blue-Ribbon Panel on Standard Setting for Private Companies in 2009 to study the issue of allowing greater input from private companies, and the panel issued a plan in 2011 calling for establishment of a separate council under the oversight of the FAF that would hold its own votes. However, within a few years, it became more of an advisory committee to FASB, much like the Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council, but not a standard-setter in its own right. The PCC still meets regularly, including  this week, and FASB continues to report on its meetings.

The PCC uses a Private Company Decision-Making Framework to advise FASB on the appropriate accounting treatment for private companies for items under active consideration on the FASB’s technical agenda. The PCC also advises the FASB on possible alternatives within GAAP to address the needs of users of private company financial statements. Any proposed changes to GAAP are subject to endorsement by FASB.

Led by the Standard-Setting Process Oversight Committee of the FAF Board of Trustees, the review elicited input from stakeholders vita surveys, virtual meetings, and letters in response to a request for public comment.

The FAF trustees determined that, overall, the PCC is fulfilling its mission and duties effectively and that it should maintain its current mission, remit and structure. The trustees also affirmed the PCC’s current meeting operations and culture. However, the report did point to opportunities for positive change, including ramping up the PCC’s communications activities, publishing a PCC annual report, and enhancing recruiting activities to identify and select new PCC members in the future.

“Good governance prompts us to conduct periodic reviews of our important advisory councils,” said FAF trustee and co-chair of the Standard-Setting Process Oversight Committee Timothy Ryan, head of technology and business enablement at Citigroup, in a statement Wednesday. “I am pleased that stakeholders largely expressed support for the PCC while making excellent suggestions for potential improvements to make it an even more effective body.”

Many stakeholders agreed the PCC is effectively fulfilling its advisory role to FASB, striking the right balance between reducing complexity and ensuring relevant and reliable information to stakeholders, according to the report. They also expressed views that the PCC has been successful in addressing the needs of the users of private company financial statements, indicating they have observed wide adoption of private company alternatives and practical expedients. 

“Overall, the sentiments focused on the positive impact the PCC has had on financial reporting for private companies and their stakeholders since its establishment in 2012, with a recognition that the PCC is the optimal vehicle to continue this important work,” said the report. 

Several stakeholders said the PCC has successfully educated FASB on issues where private companies operate differently than how public companies operate. For example, the PCC provided feedback to FASB on certain aspects of the leasing standard, and on areas that resulted in GAAP alternatives for private companies for goodwill, intangibles, hedge accounting and variable interest entity consolidation standards. 

“We are grateful to the many stakeholders who freely shared their diverse perspectives about the PCC,” added FAF trustee and co-chair of the Standard-Setting Process Oversight Committee Manju Ganeriwala, the former treasurer of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in a statement. “We are confident that the PCC can sustain its excellent track record of providing thoughtful, expert advice and counsel to the FASB for many years to come.”

The AICPA praised the findings of the report. “The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants appreciates the thoroughness of the Financial Accounting Foundation’s review of the Private Company Council, and we share the report’s findings that the council has been effective in its mission,” stated AICPA vice president of financial reporting Daniel Noll. “The AICPA has observed all of the PCC meetings since its inception and notes that it has fulfilled its role well, both in  suggesting changes to existing GAAP and in advising on prospective GAAP. As the FAF’s report notes, there are thousands of public companies in the United States but millions of private companies, so this is a critical advisory role for our capital markets. We look forward to more important work by the PCC and its continued advocacy for stakeholders who depend on financial reporting by private companies.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

XcelLabs launches to help accountants use AI

Published

on

Jody Padar, an author and speaker known as “The Radical CPA,” and Katie Tolin, a growth strategist for CPAs, together launched a training and technology platform called XcelLabs.

XcelLabs provides solutions to help accountants use artificial technology fluently and strategically. The Pennsylvania Institute of CPAs and CPA Crossings joined with Padar and Tolin as strategic partners and investors.

“To reinvent the profession, we must start by training the professional who can then transform their firms,” Padar said in a statement. “By equipping people with data and insights that help them see things differently, they can provide better advice to their clients and firm.”

Padar-Jody- new 2019

Jody Padar

The platform includes XcelLabs Academy, a series of educational online courses on the basics of AI, being a better advisor, leadership and practice management; Navi, a proprietary tool that uses AI to help accountants turn unstructured data like emails, phone calls and meetings into insights; and training and consulting services. These offerings are currently in beta testing.

“Accountants know they need to be more advisory, but not everyone can figure out how to do it,” Tolin said in a statement. “Couple that with the fact that AI will be doing a lot of the lower-level work accountants do today, and we need to create that next level advisor now. By showing accountants how to unlock patterns in their actions and turn client conversations into emotionally intelligent advice, we can create the accounting professional of the future.”

Tolin-Katie-CPA Growth Guides

Katie Tolin

“AI is transforming how CPAs work, and XcelLabs is focused on helping the profession evolve with it,” PICPA CEO Jennifer Cryder said in a statement. “At PICPA, we’re proud to support a mission that aligns so closely with ours: empowering firms to use AI not just for efficiency, but to drive growth, value and long-term relevance.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting is changing, and the world can’t wait until 2026

Published

on

The accountant the world urgently needs has evolved far beyond the traditional role we recognized just a few years ago. 

The transformation of the accounting profession is not merely an anticipated change; it is a pressing reality that is currently shaping business decisions, academic programs and the expected contributions of professionals. Yet, in many areas, accounting education stubbornly clings to outdated, overly technical models that fail to connect with the actual demands of the market. We must confront a critical question: If we continue to train accountants solely to file tax reports, are we truly equipping them for the challenges of today’s world? 

This shift in mindset extends beyond individual countries or educational systems; it is a global movement. The recent announcement of the CIMA/CGMA 2026 syllabus has made it unmistakably clear: merely knowing how to post journal entries is insufficient. Today’s accountants are required to interpret the landscape, anticipate risks and act with strategic awareness. Critical thinking, sustainable finance, technology and human behavior are not just supplementary topics; they are essential components in the education of any professional seeking to remain relevant. 

The CIMA/CGMA proposal for 2026 is not just a curriculum update; it is a powerful manifesto. This new program positions analytical thinking, strategic business partnering and technology application at the core of accounting education. It unequivocally highlights sustainability, aligning with IFRS S1 and S2, and expands the accountant’s responsibilities beyond mere numbers to encompass conscious leadership, environmental impact and corporate governance. 

The current changes in the accounting profession underscore an urgent shift in expectations from both educators and employers. Today, companies of all sizes and industries demand accountants who can do far more than interpret balance sheets. They expect professionals who grasp the deeper context behind the numbers, identify inconsistencies, anticipate potential issues before they escalate into losses, and act decisively as a bridge between data and decision making. 

To meet these expectations, a radical mindset shift is essential. There are firms still operating on autopilot, mindlessly repeating tasks with minimal critical analysis. Likewise, many academic programs continue to treat accounting as purely a technical discipline, disregarding the vital elements of reflection, strategy and behavioral insight. This outdated approach creates a significant mismatch. While the world forges ahead, parts of the accounting profession remain stuck in the past. 

The consequences of this shift are already becoming evident. The demand for compliance, transparency and sustainability now applies not only to large corporations but also to small and mid-sized businesses. Many of these organizations rely on professionals ill-equipped to drive the necessary changes, putting both business performance and the reputation of the profession at risk. 

The positive news is that accountants who are ready to thrive in this new era do not necessarily need additional degrees. What they truly need is a commitment to awareness, a dedication to continuous learning, and the courage to step beyond their comfort zones. The future of accounting is here, and it is firmly rooted in analytical, strategic and human-oriented perspectives. The 2026 curriculum is a clear indication of the changes underway. Those who fail to think critically and holistically will be left behind. 

In contrast, accountants who see the big picture, understand the ripple effects of their decisions, and actively contribute to the financial and ethical health of organizations will undeniably remain indispensable, anywhere in the world.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Republicans push Musk aside as Trump tax bill barrels forward

Published

on

Congressional Republicans are siding with Donald Trump in the messy divorce between the president and Elon Musk, an optimistic sign for eventual passage of a tax cut bill at the root of the two billionaires’ public feud.

Lawmakers are largely taking their cues from Trump and sticking by the $3 trillion bill at the center of the White House’s economic agenda. Musk, the biggest political donor of the 2024 cycle, has threatened to help primary anyone who votes for the legislation, but lawmakers are betting that staying in the president’s good graces is the safer path to political survival.

“The tax bill is not in jeopardy. We are going to deliver on that,” House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Friday.

“I’ll tell you what — do not doubt, don’t second guess and do not challenge the President of the United States Donald Trump,” he added. “He is the leader of the party. He’s the most consequential political figure of our time.”

A fight between Trump and Musk exploded into public view this week. The sparring started with the tech titan calling the president’s tax bill a “disgusting abomination,” but quickly escalated to more personal attacks and Trump threatening to cancel all federal contracts and subsidies to Musk’s companies, such as Tesla Inc. and SpaceX which have benefitted from government ties.

Republicans on Capitol Hill, who had —  until recently — publicly embraced Musk, said they weren’t swayed by the billionaire’s criticism that the bill cost too much. Lawmakers have refuted official estimates of the package, saying that the tax cuts for households, small businesses and politically important groups — including hospitality and hourly workers — will generate enough economic growth to offset the price tag.

“I don’t tell my friend Elon, I don’t argue with him about how to build rockets, and I wish he wouldn’t argue with me about how to craft legislation and pass it,” Johnson told CNBC earlier Friday.

House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington told reporters that House lawmakers are focused on working with the Senate as it revises the bill to make sure the legislation has the political support in both chambers to make it to Trump’s desk for his signature. 

“We move past the drama and we get the substance of what is needed to make the modest improvements that can be made,” he said.

House fiscal hawks said that they hadn’t changed their prior positions on the legislation based on Musk’s statements. They also said they agree with GOP leaders that there will be other chances to make further spending cuts outside the tax bill. 

Representative Tom McClintock, a fiscal conservative, said “the bill will pass because it has to pass,” adding that both Musk and Trump needed to calm down. “They both need to take a nap,” he said.

Even some of the House bill’s most vociferous critics appeared resigned to its passage. Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie, who voted against the House version, predicted that despite Musk’s objections, the Senate will make only small changes.

“The speaker is right about one thing. This barely passed the House. If they muck with it too much in the Senate, it may not pass the House again,” he said.

Trump is pressuring lawmakers to move at breakneck speed to pass the tax-cut bill, demanding they vote on the bill before the July 4 holiday. The president has been quick to blast critics of the bill — including calling Senator Rand Paul “crazy” for objecting to the inclusion of a debt ceiling increase in the package.

As the legislation worked its way through the House last month, Trump took to social media to criticize holdouts and invited undecided members to the White House to compel them to support the package. It passed by one vote.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune — who is planning to unveil his chamber’s version of the bill as soon as next week — said his timeline is unmoved by Musk. 

“We are already pretty far down the trail,” he said.

Continue Reading

Trending