Connect with us

Personal Finance

First-year college enrollment falls, though more students qualify for aid

Published

on

Al Seib | Los Angeles Times | Getty Images

Although more students are eligible for federal financial aid, fewer high schoolers are pursuing a four-year degree. Increasingly, college is becoming a path for only those with the means to pay for it, many studies show. 

Although undergraduate enrollment is up overall, the number of new first-year students sank 5% this fall compared with last year, with four-year colleges notching the largest declines, according to an analysis of early data by the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.

“It is startling to see such a substantial drop in freshmen, the first decline since the start of the pandemic,” Doug Shapiro, the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center’s executive director, said in a statement.

More from Personal Finance:
Some families pay $500,000 for Ivy League admissions consulting
These are the top 10 highest-paying college majors
The sticker price at some colleges is now nearly $100,000 a year

“But the gains among students either continuing from last year or returning from prior stop outs [or temporary withdrawals] are keeping overall undergraduate numbers growing, especially at community colleges, and that’s at least some good news,” he said.

The declines in first-year student enrollment were most significant at four-year colleges that serve low-income students, the report also found. At four-year colleges where large shares of students receive Pell Grants, first-year student enrollment plummeted more than 10%.

More students qualify for federal financial aid

The new Free Application for Federal Student Aid is meant to improve access by expanding Pell Grant eligibility to provide more financial support to low- and middle-income families.

As a result of changes to the financial aid application, more students can now qualify for a Pell Grant, a type of aid awarded solely based on financial need.

New data from the Department of Education shows that 10% more students are on track to receive Pell Grants this year, including 3% more current high school seniors.

But overall, the number of Pell Grant recipients is down significantly. In fact, the number of Pell Grant recipients peaked over a decade ago, when 9.4 million students were awarded grants in the 2011-12 academic year, and sank 32% to 6.4 million in 2023-24, according to the College Board, which tracks trends in college pricing and student aid.

Federal aid is not keeping up with costs

Also, those grants have not kept up with the rising cost of a four-year degree. Currently, the maximum Pell Grant award rose to $7,395 — after notching a $500 increase in the 2023-34 academic year.

Meanwhile, tuition and fees plus room and board for a four-year private college averaged $58,600 in the 2024-25 school year, up from $56,390 a year earlier. At four-year, in-state public colleges, it was $24,920, up from $24,080, the College Board found.

Experts have continuously warned that ongoing problems with the new FAFSA have resulted in fewer students applying for financial aid, which could also contribute to declining enrollment.

“The changes from FAFSA simplification were supposed to increase the number of Pell grant recipients. This was before all of the chaos ensued,” said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.

FAFSA rollout bugs and blunders: Here's what you need to know

Last year, 45% of college applicants reported frustrations with the process and 12% said they ultimately chose a community college, technical school or other alternative because of their FAFSA experience, according to an exclusive look at Jenzabar/Spark451′s upcoming college-bound student survey. The higher education marketing firm polled more than 5,400 recent high school graduates in September.

Rising college costs and ballooning student debt balances are still a major concern, causing more students to question the return on investment, experts also say. 

“There is growing skepticism and paranoia about the value of a degree,” said Jamie Beaton, co-founder and CEO of Crimson Education, a college consulting firm. 

Meanwhile, the number of students pursuing shorter-term accreditations is growing rapidly, with enrollment in certificate programs up 7.3%, according to the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Personal Finance

Tax benefits of health savings accounts make them worth considering

Published

on

Fg Trade | E+ | Getty Images

Health savings accounts have become popular workplace perks with significant tax-advantaged investment opportunities — but many Americans have no idea how they work. 

About 26 million people had an HSA at the end of 2023, according to Devenir, a research and investment firm based in Minneapolis. Assets in these accounts reached about $137 billion by this June, and are expected to grow to $175 billion by the end of 2026.

“We definitely are seeing growth in the number of people who sign up,” said Todd Katz, executive vice president of group benefits at MetLife. Strong market performance has also spurred growth of the investments in HSA accounts, helping to boost balances.

More from Your Money:

Here’s a look at more stories on how to manage, grow and protect your money for the years ahead.

Still, 50% of U.S. adults don’t understand how HSA’s work, according to a survey by Empower, a financial services company. Only 34% of employees with access to an HSA have enrolled in the benefit, and just 24% who have enrolled have funded their accounts, according to MetLife’s U.S. Employee Benefits Trends Study conducted in September 2024.

That can be an expensive miss: HSA benefits are “unmatched, really, relative to Roth IRAs or 401(k)s,” said Christine Benz, director of personal finance and retirement planning at Morningstar. “You just don’t see tax benefits like that.”

Here’s what to know about HSAs, and how to take advantage:

Tax benefits of health savings accounts

HSAs are tax-advantaged accounts for health expenses. Funds roll over from year to year, and the account comes with you if you change jobs. HSA money can also be invested.

To be eligible to contribute to a health savings account, an individual must be enrolled in a high-deductible health plan, or HDHP. For 2025, the Internal Revenue Service defines that as any plan with an annual deductible of at least $1,650 for an individual or $3,300 for a family. The maximum out-of-pocket expenses for an HDHP are $8,300 for an individual or $16,600 for a family. 

A saving, spending and investment account, HSAs offer three ways to save on taxes.

“You’re able to put pre-tax dollars into your health savings account. As long as the money stays within the confines of the HSA is it is not taxed,” said Benz, the author of “How to Retire.” “And then, assuming that you pull the funds out and use them for qualified health care expenses, those funds aren’t taxed either. So you earn a tax break every step of the way.” 

In 2025, eligible individuals can contribute to a HSA up to $4,300 or $8,550 for family coverage.

‘You need to run the numbers’

A new report from Voya Financial finds 91% of working Americans pick the same health plan from the year before. But experts say it can pay to crunch the numbers

“If you’re somebody who has to go to the doctor all the time, you know you’re going to meet your deductible, you probably want to go with a copay plan, but you need to run the numbers,” said Carolyn McClanahan, a physician and CFP based in Jacksonville, Florida. She’s a member of CNBC’s Financial Advisor Council.

Benz agrees, adding that “successfully using the high deductible plan very much rests on taking advantage of that health savings account.”

SIGN UP NOW: For more advice on how to grow your wealth, achieve your investment goals, and safeguard your money, join us this Thursday, October 24 at 1pm ET for a free, CNBC Your Money event. Register here.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

2025 child tax credit, earned income tax credit terms

Published

on

Momo Productions | Digitalvision | Getty Images

Child tax credit for 2025

The refundable portion of the child tax credit — a tax break parents can take for qualifying children — will be $1,700 for 2025, which is unchanged from 2024. That figure represents how much families may claim even with zero tax balance on their tax returns.

The maximum child tax credit of $2,000 per child under 17 is available to parents with up to $400,000 in modified adjusted gross income if they are married and filing jointly, or under $200,000 if they are single. Those figures are also unchanged from 2024.

Notably, the terms of the current child tax credit are set to expire at the end of tax year 2025. At that time, the child tax credit is scheduled to drop to a maximum $1,000 per child.

However, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have touted proposals to make the credit more generous.

The new changes for 2025 are standard adjustments for inflation to make it so taxpayers don’t face higher tax liabilities, according to Alex Durante, economist at the Tax Foundation. The terms still reflect the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

“But the year following, 2026, families should be expecting to see higher tax liabilities unless Congress votes to extend these tax provisions that were implemented in 2017,” Durante said.

Earned income tax credit for 2025

A tax credit for low- to middle-income individuals and families — the earned income tax credit, or EITC — will have higher maximum amounts in 2025.

The earned income tax credit helps qualifying individuals and families reduce the amount of tax they owe, while also potentially providing a refund, according to the IRS.

In 2025, the maximum EITC amount will be $8,046 for qualifying taxpayers with three or more eligible children. That is up from $7,830 for tax year 2024.

The maximum amount available for qualifying taxpayers with two eligible children will be $7,152, up from $6,960 in 2024; one qualifying child, $4,328, compared to $4,213 in 2024; and no qualifying children, $649, up from $632 this year.

To qualify for the tax credit, individuals and families must be under certain thresholds for adjusted gross income — defined as total income excluding any eligible deductions.

In 2025, the maximum AGI to qualify for the EITC for married couples with three or more children will be $68,675, up from $66,819 in 2024; and for single, head of household and widowed filers with three or more children will be $61,555, adjusted from $59,899 this year. The EITC is also subject to phaseout thresholds.

Taxpayers are also limited to how much investment income they can have in order to qualify for the earned income tax credit. In 2025, that threshold will go up to $11,950, up from $11,600 in 2024. If investment income is above $11,950 in 2025, taxpayers will not qualify for the credit.

Adoption, gift tax exclusion changes

Other changes announced by the IRS may also affect families.

The maximum adoption credit for a child, including those with special needs, will apply to qualified expenses of up to $17,280 in 2025, up from $16,810 in 2024.

The annual exclusion for gifts will go up to $19,000, up from $18,000 in 2024. If taxpayers give $19,000 to each of their children in 2025, the annual exclusion will apply to each gift.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

When exchange-traded funds really flex their ‘tax magic’ for investors

Published

on

Christopher Grigat | Moment | Getty Images

Investors can generally reduce their tax losses in a portfolio by using exchange-traded funds over mutual funds, experts said.

“ETFs come with tax magic that’s unrivaled by mutual funds,” Bryan Armour, Morningstar’s director of passive strategies research for North America and editor of its ETFInvestor newsletter, wrote earlier this year.

But certain investments benefit more from that so-called “magic” than others.

Tax savings are moot in retirement accounts

ETFs’ tax savings are typically greatest for investors in taxable brokerage accounts.

They’re a moot point for retirement investors, like those who save in a 401(k) plan or individual retirement account, experts said. Retirement accounts are already tax-preferred, with contributions growing tax-free — meaning ETFs and mutual funds are on a level playing field relative to taxes, experts said.

The tax advantage “really helps the non-IRA account more than anything,” said Charlie Fitzgerald III, a certified financial planner based in Orlando, Florida, and a founding member of Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo.

“You’ll have tax efficiency that a standard mutual fund is not going to be able to achieve, hands down,” he said.

The ‘primary use case’ for ETFs

Mutual funds are generally less tax-efficient than ETFs because of capital gains taxes generated inside the fund.

Taxpayers who sell investments for a capital gain (i.e., a profit) are likely familiar with the concept of paying tax on those earnings.

The same concept applies within a mutual fund: Mutual fund managers generate capital gains when they sell holdings within the fund. Managers distribute those capital gains to investors each year; they divide them equally among all shareholders, who pay taxes at their respective income tax rate.

More from ETF Strategist

Here’s a look at other stories offering insight on ETFs for investors.

However, ETF managers are generally able to avoid capital gains taxes due to their unique structure.

The upshot is that asset classes that generate large capital gains relative to their total return are “a primary use case for ETFs,” Armour told CNBC. (This discussion only applies to buying and selling within the fund. An investor who sells their ETF for a profit may still owe capital gains tax.)

Why U.S. stocks ‘almost always’ benefit from ETFs

U.S. stock mutual funds have tended to generate the most capital gains relative to other asset classes, experts said.

Over five years, from 2019 to 2023, about 70% of U.S. stock mutual funds kicked off capital gains, said Armour, who cited Morningstar data. That was true of less than 10% of U.S. stock ETFs, he said.

“It’s almost always an advantage to have your stock portfolio in an ETF over a mutual fund” in a non-retirement account, Armour said.

Jim Cramer explains why mutual funds are not the best way to invest

Actively managed stock funds are also generally better candidates for an ETF structure, Fitzgerald said.

Active managers tend to distribute more capital gains than those who passively track a stock index, because active managers buy and sell positions frequently to try to beat the market, he said.

However, there are instances in which passively managed funds can trade often, too, such as with so-called “strategic beta” funds, Armour said.

Bonds have a smaller advantage

ETFs are generally unable to “wash away” tax liabilities related to currency hedging, futures or options, Armour said.

Additionally, tax laws of various nations may reduce the tax benefit for international-stock ETFs, like those investing in Brazil, India, South Korea or Taiwan, for example, he said.

Bond ETFs also have a smaller advantage over mutual funds, Armour said. That’s because an ample amount of bond funds’ returns generally comes from income (i.e., bond payments), not capital gains, he said.

Fitzgerald says he favors holding bonds in mutual funds rather than ETFs.

However, his reasoning isn’t related to taxes.

During periods of high volatility in the stock market — when an unexpected event triggers a lot of fear selling and a stock-market dip, for example — Fitzgerald often sells bonds to buy stocks at a discount for clients.

However, during such periods, he’s noticed the price of a bond ETF tends to disconnect more (relative to a mutual fund) from the net asset value of its underlying holdings.

The bond ETF often sells at more of a discount relative to a similar bond mutual fund, he said. Selling the bond position for less money somewhat dilutes the benefit of the overall strategy, he said.

Continue Reading

Trending