Connect with us

Personal Finance

Here’s why ETFs often have lower fees than mutual funds

Published

on

Businessperson reviewing pie charts and data analysis documents in an office setting.

Freshsplash | E+ | Getty Images

The trend is clear: Investors continue to seek out lower fees for investment funds.

The mass migration to cheaper funds has been a key driver of falling costs, according to Zachary Evens, a manager research analyst for Morningstar.  

Average annual fund fees have more than halved in the past two decades, to 0.36% in 2023 from 0.87% in 2004, Evens wrote.

And when it comes to fees, exchange-traded funds often beat their mutual-fund counterparts, experts said.  

The average ETF carries a 0.51% annual management fee, about half the 1.01% fee of the average mutual fund, according to Morningstar data.

More from ETF Strategist

Here’s a look at other stories offering insight on ETFs for investors.

Some experts say comparing average ETF fees to those of mutual funds isn’t quite fair, because most ETFs have historically been index funds, not actively managed funds. Index funds are generally cheaper than active ones, which employ stock-picking tactics to try and beat the market; that means average ETF fees are naturally lower, experts said.

However, there’s a similar fee dynamic when comparing on a more apples-to-apples basis.

To that point, index ETFs have a 0.44% average annual fee, half the 0.88% fee for index mutual funds, according to Morningstar. Similarly, active ETFs carry a 0.63% average fee, versus 1.02% for actively managed mutual funds, Morningstar data show.

Investors pay this fee — a percentage of their fund holdings — each year. Asset managers pull it directly from client accounts.

“There are so many things you can’t control in investing,” said Michael McClary, chief investment officer at Valmark Financial Group. “The one thing you can control is fees.”

“I think it’s one of the key things people should care about,” he said.

‘Cheap mutual funds also exist’

ETFs and mutual funds are similar. They’re both baskets of stocks and bonds overseen by professional money managers, and offer ways to diversify your investments and access a wide range of markets.

ETFs are newer. The first U.S. ETF — the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), an index fund tracking the S&P 500 stock index — debuted in 1993.

Mutual funds hold more than $20 trillion, about double the assets in ETFs. But ETFs have steadily increased their market share as investor preferences have changed.

While ETFs tend to be cheaper, on average, that’s not to say mutual funds are always more expensive.

“Cheap mutual funds also exist,” said Bryan Armour, director of passive strategies research for North America and editor of the ETFInvestor newsletter at Morningstar.

Jim Cramer explains why mutual funds are not the best way to invest

For example, some index mutual funds, like those that track “major” indexes such as the S&P 500, have competitive fees relative to similar ETFs, Armour said.

“It’s really just the core indexes where mutual funds compete more directly with ETFs on fees,” Armour said. “Other than that, I’d say ETFs are, generally speaking, cheaper.”

And, fees for newly issued mutual funds are declining while those of new ETFs are increasing, data shows.

The “fee gap” between newly launched mutual funds and ETFs shrank by 71% in the last decade, from 0.67% to 0.19%, according to Evens of Morningstar.

That’s largely due to “the emergence of active and alternative ETF strategies, which tend to be pricier than broad index strategies,” he said.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Personal Finance

Demand for Roth IRA conversions may increase under a Trump presidency

Published

on

dowell | Moment | Getty Images

Before the election, some advisors increased Roth individual retirement account conversions for clients amid the threat of higher taxes after 2025.

Now, tax hikes are less likely under President-elect Donald Trump. However, demand for Roth conversions will continue as investors seek long-term tax planning strategies, experts said.

“In general, we see an uptick in Roth conversions at the end of the year and into the new year ahead of the tax filing deadline in April, and we expect to see these trends again in 2025,” said Rita Assaf, vice president of retirement offerings at Fidelity Investments.  

More from FA Playbook:

Here’s a look at other stories impacting the financial advisor business.

Fidelity saw a 45% year-over-year increase in the volume of Roth conversions as of July, Assaf said.

But while Roth conversions are on the rise, many investors are still learning about the strategy.

“I think you are only going to see an increase in Roth IRA conversions,” said certified financial planner Byrke Sestok, a partner at Moneco Advisors in Harrison, New York. 

“The percentage of people who know about the benefits of Roth IRA conversions is still low,” he said. “The number of people who actually execute a conversion is even lower.”

The benefit of Roth conversions

Roth conversions shift pretax or nondeductible IRA funds to a Roth IRA, which can jump-start tax-free growth. The trade-off is paying regular income taxes on the converted balance.

With Trump’s 2017 tax cuts scheduled to expire after 2025, including lower federal income tax brackets, some advisors have accelerated Roth conversions for their clients to leverage the lower tax rates through 2025.

However, Trump has vowed to extend his 2017 tax breaks, which would keep lower tax brackets intact. That plan could be easier if Republicans control the White House, Senate and House of Representatives.

Even without tax increases from Congress, experts said, Roth conversions can reduce long-term taxes on your portfolio, particularly for older workers and retirees with sizable pretax balances.

However, whether Roth conversions make sense depends on your “unique financial situation,” Assaf said.

Filling up tax brackets

Advisors often complete Roth conversions in lower-income years, such as early retirement before claiming Social Security benefits or taking required minimum distributions. The strategy can minimize the upfront tax bill while reducing your pretax balance.

Currently, you may consider “filling up the 12% and 24% tax brackets” with income triggered by a Roth conversion because there’s a big jump to the next tier, Sestok said.

However, it’s important to run a complete tax projection, including all other sources of income, before executing the strategy, tax experts say.

Each bracket is based on “taxable income,” which you calculate by subtracting the greater of the standard or itemized deductions from your adjusted gross income. The taxable income thresholds will increase in 2025.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Yields on cash ‘well ahead of inflation,’ expert says. How to invest now

Published

on

Nopphon Pattanasri | Istock | Getty Images

Investors have been able to get the best returns on cash, as the Federal Reserve raised interest rates to bring down the pace of inflation.

Now that the central bank is lowering rates — with a new quarter point rate cut announced by the Fed on Thursday — experts say having money in cash can still be a competitive strategy.

“The best yields, whether we’re looking at high yield savings accounts, money markets or CDs [certificates of deposit] are well ahead of inflation, and that’s likely to continue for a while,” said Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate.

“Rates are coming down, but cash is still a pretty good place to be,” he said.

Yet just how much cash to set aside is a question every individual investor needs to determine.

Earlier this year, Callie Cox, chief market strategist at Ritholtz Wealth Management, warned investors may be holding too much cash. That may still be true today, she said Thursday.

“If you’re sitting in cash because the environment doesn’t feel right, then that’s probably not a good reason to be sitting in cash,” Cox said.

Strive for at least a six-month emergency fund

Most financial advisors recommend having cash set aside so that unexpected expenses don’t blow your budget or cause you to rack up credit card debt.

“The rule of thumb is six months of really necessary expenses,” said Natalie Colley, a certified financial planner and partner and senior lead advisor at Francis Financial in New York.

However, having a year’s worth of expenses set aside may also be reasonable, depending on your household budget, she said.

If your savings are not yet at that six-month or one-year mark, start with a goal of setting aside three months’ expenses and then keep building your cash, Colley said.

If you’re behind on emergency savings, you’re not alone.

Almost two-thirds — 62% — of Americans feel behind on emergency savings, a September Bankrate survey found. For many individuals, inflation and having too many expenses has made finding cash to set aside more difficult.

How to build emergency savings

Pay attention to asset allocation

Savers may be at risk of missing out on today’s higher rates if they have not moved their savings to a high-yield online savings or other account paying a more competitive yield.

Yet even if they’re accessing those higher interest rates on cash, investors may still be missing out.

Whether or not that’s true for investors comes down to a person’s time horizon, experts say.

For longer-term goals, stocks pay the best returns on your money, and can best help ensure you have the money you need for your intended milestones.

“Stocks move higher over time,” Cox said. “If you let your emotions get in the way, you could miss out on a rally that’s crucial to you meeting your financial goals.”

More from Personal Finance:
What the Federal Reserve’s latest rate cut means for your money
Is the ‘vibecession’ here to stay? Here’s what experts say
Parents aren’t confident they can teach kids about investing

If you have cash on the sidelines that you want to put into the market, it can make sense to add a fixed portion of that money over time, say every month — a strategy called dollar-cost averaging, Colley said.

Having that fixed schedule can help you avoid trying to time the market, which can be difficult to do effectively, she said. Importantly, investors should try to opt for broadly diversified funds rather than individual stocks.

Having a long-term view can pay off.

If you had invested all of your money before the financial crisis, it would have felt like the worst timing in the entire world, Colley said.

Now, your returns look great, provided you let that money grow for the 15-year run, she said.

Revise your cash strategy as conditions shift

To be sure, there are risks that investors need to keep tabs on when it comes to their cash and other investments.

“Rates are going to come down slower than they went up — much slower,” McBride said.

Consequently, cash investors may enjoy returns that have the potential to outpace inflation for longer, he said.

Still, there are risks for savers to watch.

The policies put in place under the next presidential administration may affect both inflation and interest rates, Cox said.

“If inflation picks back up, it could be hard to earn a beatable yield in cash,” Cox said.

In that case, stocks may provide a better way to beat inflation, though there are no guarantees on prospective returns, she said.

Regardless of whether investors opt for cash or stocks, they need to be asking themselves why they’re making those choices and what they need that money for, she said.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Will you have a lower tax rate in retirement? Maybe not, advisors say

Published

on

Laylabird | E+ | Getty Images

Most Americans will have a lower tax burden in retirement than during their working years.

However, that may not be the case for some retirees, especially for higher earners and big savers, which could have a significant impact on their financial plans, according to financial advisors.

“Substantial evidence” suggests retirees have lower tax rates than during their working years, according to a 2024 paper published by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

There are a few general reasons for this, according to a joint 2017 research paper by the Internal Revenue Service and Investment Company Institute: People who leave the workforce no longer pay payroll taxes. Their household income often drops, generally meaning less income is taxed. And Social Security recipients only pay tax on a portion of their benefits.

More from FA Playbook:

Here’s a look at other stories impacting the financial advisor business.

The “overwhelming majority” of people will have a lower tax rate in retirement, “hands down,” said Jeffrey Levine, a certified financial planner and certified public accountant based in St. Louis and chief planning officer at Buckingham Wealth Partners.

But that’s not always the case.

Required minimum distributions may be large

Those who’ve built up a sizable nest egg, perhaps with disciplined saving in a 401(k) plan or individual retirement accounts, may have large required minimum distributions, Levine said.

For example, the IRS requires that older investors take minimum withdrawals annually from “traditional” (i.e., pre-tax) retirement accounts when they reach a certain age. (It’s age 73 for those who turned 72 after Dec. 31, 2022.)

The total amount is based on an IRS formula. A bigger nest egg generally corresponds to a larger RMD.

This matters because RMDs from pre-tax accounts add to a household’s taxable income, thereby raising its total tax bill. By contrast, distributions from Roth accounts aren’t taxable, with some exceptions.

Investors held $11.4 trillion in traditional IRAs in 2023, about eight times more than the $1.4 trillion in Roth IRAs, according to the Investment Company Institute.

Additionally, investors who inherited a retirement account, perhaps from a parent, may have to empty the account within 10 years of the owner’s death, Levine said. Such withdrawals from a pre-tax account would further add to taxable income.  

Retirees may not want to shrink their lifestyle

What Financial Advising Looks Like Now

“Most clients we sit down with today don’t want to see a diminished amount of income when they retire,” Jenkin said. “They still want to take the same level of trips, level of going out to concerts and dining, taking care of grandchildren, and many are still carrying a mortgage into retirement.”

In the first three to five years of retirement, Jenkin actually finds clients generally spend more than they do during their working years due to what he calls “a period of jubilation.”

“A lot of people just don’t want to shrink their lifestyle,” he said.

Consider your income tax assumptions

Continue Reading

Trending