Accounting
How to sell the personal goodwill of advisory practices
While all buyers look for a degree of figurative goodwill from advisory practice sellers, some financial advisors could reap tax savings by offering up that literal type of asset in the deal.
The
Sales of personal goodwill may help solve a problem that pops up for the founders of practices with one or more younger advisors who have built a base of clients without amassing any equity. Such sales may also eliminate the need for a traditional “12 months and a day” waiting period to complete a deal in order to ensure sellers get the long-term rate, Kupfer said.
“There’s some friction because you’re saying to an advisor that you have to wait over a year,” he said in an interview. “My sense is that it’s really only within the last two or three years that this has taken off, and the reason is that there’s
READ MORE:
Sellers should consult a tax expert early and often to consider every possible rule or implication from this form of asset transaction, according to Kupfer and Thomas Phelan, a partner with the
Goodwill
In a personal transaction that distinguishes those assets from the goodwill of the corporation, the buyer “ends up in the same position” with “a deal that allows them
“If they’re operating
The transactions require careful planning for a process that won’t be a fit for every possible seller out there,
“A personal goodwill allocation approach should be raised early in the negotiation process,” they wrote. “This will safeguard against a challenge that allocation of personal goodwill was an afterthought, with the value negotiated by the parties assuming the goodwill was part of the business. The seller should obtain a third-party appraisal to establish the existence and the value of the personal goodwill. A separate agreement or, at a minimum, separate provisions of a purchase agreement should be used to evidence the sale of the personal goodwill separately from the corporate goodwill of the business. Could a personal goodwill allocation be right for your sale? Ultimately, answering this fact-sensitive question will benefit from the help of experienced professionals.”
READ MORE:
Kupfer has worked on the buy or sell side of eight to 10 personal goodwill transactions over the past couple of years — an amount that is “not the majority, certainly” but a decent number considering that “people are still learning about it,” he said. Buyers interested in drawing wirehouse teams into the RIA channel in particular are reaching out to Kupfer to discuss them, with “one or two that haven’t been able to get comfortable,” others that are vetting the idea and “some of them I know are planning on using it,” he said.
In addition, he advised on one sale of an independent advisory practice with the personal goodwill structure on behalf of the sole owner of a firm who managed roughly 70% of the client base. Two other advisors respectively served another 10% and 20% of the customers, but they didn’t own any of the firm’s equity.
That dynamic created a “potential problem” from the fact that the firm would turn less valuable if those advisors left before the succession deal, or if the owner decided to share some of the deal proceeds with them in the form of ordinary income, Kupfer noted. So the owner sold 70% of the firm’s equity, then negotiated a personal goodwill transaction with the same buyer for the other 30% on behalf of the two other advisors.
“The only reason you need this is, when somebody doesn’t have an asset to sell because they don’t own the client list,” Kupfer said. “We were able to get them capital gains treatment, so, in the independent space, that’s the applicable scenario for personal goodwill.”
In the “worst-case scenario,” the seller could wind up with an IRS finding that the deal proceeds were ordinary income and the buyer may wind up with “a failure to withhold claim” based on that compensation, he said. Still, he hasn’t seen the agency challenge any of the deals.
“If we had 10 or 20 years of history we could be more comfortable,” he said. “In the insurance space especially and in other spaces you do have that history of it being successful.”
READ MORE:
Such nuances with personal goodwill deals point to the necessity of engaging with experts well in advance about topics like the terms of prior employment contracts, the structure of a deal and the resulting taxes, according to Phelan. He has “often seen it come up” when the owners of a closely held corporation find out about their future bills to Uncle Sam under a deal after signing the letter of intent with a buyer, he said.
“You want to talk to someone on the tax front early — ideally in the LOI process when it’s initially being negotiated,” Phelan said. “There’s an LOI, they’re buying the business and then they realize, ‘Oh shoot, we’re going to get hit with a double tax on this.'”
The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board is proposing to tailor some of its standards to align with recent additions to the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants when it comes to using the work of an external expert.
The
- ISA 620, Using the Work of an Auditor’s Expert;
- ISRE 2400 (Revised), Engagements to Review Historical Financial Statements;
- ISAE 3000 (Revised), Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information;
- ISRS 4400 (Revised), Agreed-upon Procedures Engagements.
The IAASB is asking for comments via a digital response template that can be found on the
In December 2023, the IESBA approved an exposure draft for proposed revisions to the IESBA’s Code of Ethics related to using the work of an external expert. The proposals included three new sections to the Code of Ethics, including provisions for professional accountants in public practice; professional accountants in business and sustainability assurance practitioners. The IESBA approved the provisions on using the work of an external expert at its December 2024 meeting, establishing an ethical framework to guide accountants and sustainability assurance practitioners in evaluating whether an external expert has the necessary competence, capabilities and objectivity to use their work, as well as provisions on applying the Ethics Code’s conceptual framework when using the work of an outside expert.
President Donald Trump’s tariffs would effectively cause a tax increase for low-income families that is more than three times higher than what wealthier Americans would pay, according to an
The report from the progressive think tank outlined the outcomes for Americans of all backgrounds if the tariffs currently in effect remain in place next year. Those making $28,600 or less would have to spend 6.2% more of their income due to higher prices, while the richest Americans with income of at least $914,900 are expected to spend 1.7% more. Middle-income families making between $55,100 and $94,100 would pay 5% more of their earnings.
Trump has
Economists have warned that costs from tariff increases would ultimately be passed on to U.S. consumers. And while prices will rise for everyone, lower-income families are expected to lose a larger portion of their budgets because they tend to spend more of their earnings on goods, including food and other necessities, compared to wealthier individuals.
Food prices could rise by 2.6% in the short run due to tariffs, according to an
The Yale Budget Lab projected that the tariffs would result in a loss of $4,700 a year on average for American households.
Artificial intelligence is just getting started in the accounting world, but it is already helping firms like technology specialist
Schellman CEO Avani Desai said there have definitely been some shifts in headcount at the Top 100 Firm, though she stressed it was nothing dramatic, as it mostly reflects natural attrition combined with being more selective with hiring. She said the firm has already made an internal decision to not reduce headcount in force, as that just indicates they didn’t hire properly the first time.
“It hasn’t been about reducing roles but evolving how we do work, so there wasn’t one specific date where we ‘started’ the reduction. It’s been more case by case. We’ve held back on refilling certain roles when we saw opportunities to streamline, especially with the use of new technologies like AI,” she said.
One area where the firm has found such opportunities has been in the testing of certain cybersecurity controls, particularly within the SOC framework. The firm examined all the controls it tests on the service side and asked which ones require human judgment or deep expertise. The answer was a lot of them. But for the ones that don’t, AI algorithms have been able to significantly lighten the load.
“[If] we don’t refill a role, it’s because the need actually has changed, or the process has improved so significantly [that] the workload is lighter or shared across the smarter system. So that’s what’s happening,” said Desai.
Outside of client services like SOC control testing and reporting, the firm has found efficiencies in administrative functions as well as certain internal operational processes. On the latter point, Desai noted that Schellman’s engineers, including the chief information officer, have been using AI to help develop code, which means they’re not relying as much on outside expertise on the internal service delivery side of things. There are still people in the development process, but their roles are changing: They’re writing less code, and doing more reviewing of code before it gets pushed into production, saving time and creating efficiencies.
“The best way for me to say this is, to us, this has been intentional. We paused hiring in a few areas where we saw overlaps, where technology was really working,” said Desai.
However, even in an age awash with AI, Schellman acknowledges there are certain jobs that need a human, at least for now. For example, the firm does assessments for the FedRAMP program, which is needed for cloud service providers to contract with certain government agencies. These assessments, even in the most stable of times, can be long and complex engagements, to say nothing of the less predictable nature of the current government. As such, it does not make as much sense to reduce human staff in this area.
“The way it is right now for us to do FedRAMP engagements, it’s a very manual process. There’s a lot of back and forth between us and a third party, the government, and we don’t see a lot of overall application or technology help… We’re in the federal space and you can imagine, [with] what’s going on right now, there’s a big changing market condition for clients and their pricing pressure,” said Desai.
As Schellman reduces staff levels in some places, it is increasing them in others. Desai said the firm is actively hiring in certain areas. In particular, it’s adding staff in technical cybersecurity (e.g., penetration testers), the aforementioned FedRAMP engagements, AI assessment (in line with recently becoming an ISO 42001 certification body) and in some client-facing roles like marketing and sales.
“So, to me, this isn’t about doing more with less … It’s about doing more of the right things with the right people,” said Desai.
While these moves have resulted in savings, she said that was never really the point, so whatever the firm has saved from staffing efficiencies it has reinvested in its tech stack to build its service line further. When asked for an example, she said the firm would like to focus more on penetration testing by building a SaaS tool for it. While Schellman has a proof of concept developed, she noted it would take a lot of money and time to deploy a full solution — both of which the firm now has more of because of its efficiency moves.
“What is the ‘why’ behind these decisions? The ‘why’ for us isn’t what I think you traditionally see, which is ‘We need to get profitability high. We need to have less people do more things.’ That’s not what it is like,” said Desai. “I want to be able to focus on quality. And the only way I think I can focus on quality is if my people are not focusing on things that don’t matter … I feel like I’m in a much better place because the smart people that I’ve hired are working on the riskiest and most complicated things.”
Many Americans are worried about running out of money in retirement
IAASB tweaks standards on working with outside experts
Tariffs will hit low-income Americans harder than richest, report says
New 2023 K-1 instructions stir the CAMT pot for partnerships and corporations
The Essential Practice of Bank and Credit Card Statement Reconciliation
Are American progressives making themselves sad?
-
Economics1 week agoDonald Trump’s approval rating is dropping
-
Personal Finance1 week agoHere’s why retirees shouldn’t fully ditch stocks
-
Economics1 week agoChina targets U.S. services and other areas after decrying ‘meaningless’ tariff hikes on goods
-
Blog Post6 days agoDocumenting Bookkeeping Processes and Procedures
-
Personal Finance1 week agoIRS’ free tax filing program is at risk amid Trump scrutiny
-
Economics1 week agoCan Progressives learn to make progress again?
-
Economics6 days agoDonald Trump wants a certain kind of immigrant: the uber-rich
-
Economics7 days agoTrump’s approval rating on economy at lowest of presidential career