Check out the companies making headlines before the bell. Humana – Shares plunged more than 22% after the healthcare company announced dire preliminary Medicare Advantage data for 2025. The company said in an 8-K filing that 25% of its members are currently enrolled in plans rated 4 stars and above for next year, which is down from 94% in 2024. Nike – Shares sank 7% after the athletic apparel and sneaker company withdrew its full-year guidance . Nike, which posted an earnings beat and revenue miss for its fiscal first quarter, also postponed its investor day as its new CEO prepares to take office. China stocks – Shares of Chinese companies continued to gain amid the broader stimulus rally . E-commerce company JD.com and electric vehicle maker Li Auto both advanced more than 9%, while tech company Baidu and Temu parent PDD moved more than 6% higher. Fellow e-commerce company Alibaba also jumped more than 4%. Lamb Weston – Shares of the French fry maker company fell 5% after the company warned in its fiscal first-quarter that demand looks soft for restaurants and frozen products. Lamb Weston’s adjusted earnings for the period did come in slightly higher than expected at 73 cents per share. Analysts surveyed by LSEG were looking for 72 cents per share. Diamondback Energy – The oil stock rose 3% following an upgrade to overweight from equal weight at Barclays. Analyst Betty Jiang said that Diamondback had one of the “clearest positive event paths,” nodding to the firm’s $26 billion merger agreement with Endeavor Energy Resources. LPL Financial – Shares slid 3.4% after LPL Financial fired CEO Dan Arnold for allegedly violating its “commitment to a respectful workplace.” The firm said Rich Steinmeier, chief growth officer, will take over as interim CEO. Harley-Davidson – The motorcycle maker’s stock fell 4% after receiving a downgrade to neutral from buy at Baird. The firm cited risks to its third-quarter guidance, including both a weak retail outlook and excess inventory. Energy stocks – Shares of energy companies rose following Iran’s missile attack on Israel . APA Corp and Marathon Oil both rose more than 2%, and Occidental Petroleum rose more than 1%. — CNBC’s Lisa Kailai Han, Jesse Pound, Sarah Min and Michelle Fox Theobald contributed reporting.
Check out the companies making headlines in midday trading: American Airlines — Shares slipped less than 1%, recovering from earlier losses, after the airline temporarily grounded all of its flights due to a technical issue. Broadcom — The semi stock added 2%, extending its December rally. Shares have surged more than 46% this month, propelling its 2024 gain above 112%. Big banks — Shares of some big bank stocks rose more than 1% amid news that a group of banks and business groups are suing the Federal Reserve over the annual stress tests, saying it “produces vacillating and unexplained requirements and restrictions on bank capital.” Citigroup , JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs shares gained more than 1% each. Arcadium Lithium — Shares rose more than 4% after the company announced its shareholders have approved the $6.7 billion sale to Rio Tinto . The deal is expected to close in mid-2025. International Seaways — The energy transportation provider surged 8% after an announcement that the company would be added to the S & P SmallCap 600 index, effective Dec. 30. The company will replace Consolidated Communications , which is soon to be acquired. Crypto stocks — Shares of stocks tied to the price of bitcoin rose as the cryptocurrency gave back recent losses amid a climb in tech names broadly. Crypto services provider Coinbase gained almost 3% and bitcoin proxy MicroStrategy gained more than 5%. Miners Riot Platforms and IREN gained 6% and 4%, respectively. U.S. Steel — The steel producer’s stock hovered near the flatline amid news that President Joe Biden will decide on the fate of its proposed acquisition by Japan’s Nippon Steel after a government panel failed to reach a decision . Apple — Apple shares gained 0.9% to notch a new all-time high. The stock has rallied nearly 34% year to date. — CNBC’s Sean Conlon, Lisa Han, Tanaya Macheel and Alex Harring contributed reporting.
A general view of the Federal Reserve Building in Washington, United States.
Samuel Corum | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images
The biggest banks are planning to sue the Federal Reserve over the annual bank stress tests, according to a person familiar with the matter. A lawsuit is expected this week and could come as soon as Tuesday morning, the person said.
The Fed’s stress test is an annual ritual that forces banks to maintain adequate cushions for bad loans and dictates the size of share repurchases and dividends.
After the market close on Monday, the Federal Reserve announced in a statement that it is looking to make changes to the bank stress tests and will be seeking public comment on what it calls “significant changes to improve the transparency of its bank stress tests and to reduce the volatility of resulting capital buffer requirements.”
The Fed said it made the determination to change the tests because of “the evolving legal landscape,” pointing to changes in administrative laws in recent years. It didn’t outline any specific changes to the framework of the annual stress tests.
While the big banks will likely view the changes as a win, it may be too little too late.
Also, the changes may not go far enough to satisfy the banks’ concerns about onerous capital requirements. “These proposed changes are not designed to materially affect overall capital requirements, according to the Fed.
The CEO of BPI (Bank Policy Institute), Greg Baer, which represents big banks like JPMorgan, Citigroup and Goldman Sachs, welcomed the Fed announcement, saying in a statement “The Board’s announcement today is a first step towards transparency and accountability.”
However, Baer also hinted at further action: “We are reviewing it closely and considering additional options to ensure timely reforms that are both good law and good policy.”
Groups like the BPI and the American Bankers Association have raised concerns about the stress test process in the past, claiming that it is opaque, and has resulted in higher capital rules that hurt bank lending and economic growth.
In July, the groups accused the Fed of being in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, because it didn’t seek public comment on its stress scenarios and kept supervisory models secret.