Connect with us

Accounting

IRS expands Tax Pro Account, launches enforcement campaign

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service is adding more features to the Tax Pro Account, Business Tax Account and Individual Online Account, while announcing a new enforcement campaign, even as it faces the threat of major cutbacks under the incoming Trump administration.

IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel discussed the new enforcement effort and technology improvements during a quarterly update Thursday on the IRS’s strategic operating plan, as he fended off questions from reporters about the future of the agency as it faces the prospect of $20 billion in budget cuts and a new IRS commissioner, Billy Long, who was named by Trump to replace him three years before his term expires. 

The Tax Pro Account helps tax professionals manage their authorization relationship with taxpayers, view the taxpayers’ information and act on the taxpayers’ behalf. New features include

  • The ability to view individual and business taxpayer payment activity; 
  • A new virtual assistant that allows tax professionals access to an automated chatbot to resolve tax issues, with the ability to escalate to live chat for help with collection related issues; and, 
  • The ability to view and act on behalf of individual taxpayers to set up and revise payment plans; and, 
  • Make up to five same day payments on behalf of authorized clients using a checking or savings account.

“We’ve also made several enhancements to the tax professional online account to expand the work tax pros can do on behalf of taxpayers,” said Werfel. “Tax professionals are vitally important to the nation’s tax system. We have taken some initial steps with this tool. We’ve added the ability for tax professionals to easily navigate secure two-way messaging to digitally communicate with the IRS on behalf of their clients. There is also a new virtual assistant, which allows tax professionals access to an automated chat bot to help them resolve tax issues. Tax professionals can escalate to live chat for collection-related issues for assistance. These are important steps, but we’ve heard from tax professionals, and we know we need to do more with this important tool.”

When fully developed, the Tax Pro Account will become a stronger online tool, including the ability to initiate power of attorney and tax information authorizations for business taxpayers that they can review and approve in their Business Tax Account, link and manage business Centralized Authorization File access, view refund and audit status for individual and business taxpayers and much more. 

Business Tax Accounts

As part of its Digital First Initiative, the IRS is expanding the features in Business Tax Account, an online self-service tool for business taxpayers. C corporations can now activate a Business Tax Account, bringing the total number of business entities eligible for this online self-service tool into the millions. 

“The IRS has further expanded its Business Tax Account tool to include C corporations,” said Werfel. “That means millions of businesses now qualify to use this self service tool.”

Some of the other recent additions include: 

  • Authorized individuals of C corporations and S corporations who can legally act on behalf of their corporation are now able to view and pay tax balances and Federal Tax Deposits. 
  • The IRS also introduced a new feature that helps to speed up the lending process by providing sole proprietors and authorized individuals with access to the long-standing IRS Income Verification Express Service to approve or reject a tax transcript authorization request from a lending company. 
  • Business taxpayers can now access available tax returns, account and most entity transcripts in Spanish.

“IVES enables sole proprietors and authorized individuals to deal with the tax transcript authorization requests from lending companies, and we are also pleased that the Business Tax Account is now available in Spanish,” said Werfel.

 The changes follow upgrades in September enabling business taxpayers to view and submit balance-due payments.

The IRS has also expanded the types of Transcript Delivery System transcripts available to business taxpayers, historically an underserved population. Previously, taxpayers and their representatives had to call to request information not available through a TDS transcript. Customer service representatives would provide an internal print with the requested information, manually masking the personally identifiable information before providing the prints to the caller. Masking the transcripts was time consuming. Now taxpayers and their representatives can access these new transcripts through online self-help tools that include Business Tax Account and e-Services TDS.

Business Entity and Form 94X Series Tax Return transcripts are now available through TDS for tax professionals and reporting agents with access to TDS through e-Services. IRS employees can access these transcripts through the Employee User Portal, and authorized users of Business Tax Account can download these transcripts. Transcript expansion will continue in a phased approach through December 2026. Future releases will include the Form 990 series, Form 1041. Form 2290, Form 1042 and Form 706. And transcripts in Spanish. 

Individual Online Accounts

Taxpayers can also get more help for their personal accounts through the IRS Individual Online Account, Werfel noted. “For example, they can retrieve tax related information from a single source, including digital copies of notice and letters,” he added. “We have redesigned 247 of the most common notices, all of which are now available in the Individual Online Account. They can see their refund status and check updates on certain audits. They can access a complete overview of their account information, including detailed historical data. This is extremely helpful for people to have at tax time and throughout the year. They can access Identity Protection Services and a lien payoff calculator, and those who need help with a tax bill can apply for an installment agreement more easily by using smartphones or tablets.”

The online accounts are not the only way the IRS is helping to provide a better digital experience, he added. “Taxpayers now have access to more than 60 mobile adaptive forms, allowing them to fill out common tax forms on cell phones and tablet devices and then submit them to the IRS digitally,” said Werfel. “The three most recent forms feature save and draft capabilities, which allow taxpayers to start a form, save it and return to it later.” 

Enforcement campaign

Werfel also discussed the launch of a new enforcement campaign at the IRS aimed at improving taxpayer compliance among those with complex returns and those who intentionally evade tax responsibilities.

One of the issues the IRS is targeting involves the exploitation of deferred legal fees. The IRS has begun an examination campaign to address a tax deferral transaction where taxpayers, specifically plaintiff’s attorneys or law firms, fail to report legal fees earned from representing clients in litigation on a contingency fee basis.

The IRS noted that plaintiff’s attorneys or law firms representing clients in lawsuits on a contingency fee basis can receive up to 40% of the settlement amount that they then defer by entering an arrangement with a third party unrelated to the litigation, who then may distribute to the taxpayer in the future; generally, 20 years or more from the date of the settlement. The taxpayer fails to report the deferred contingency fees as income at the time the case is settled or when the funds are transferred to the third party. Instead, the taxpayer defers recognition of the income until the third party distributes the fees under the arrangement.

The goal of the new campaign is to ensure taxpayer compliance and consistent treatment of similarly situated taxpayers which requires the contingency fees be included in taxable income in the year the funds are transferred to the third party.

The IRS is also staying focused on offshore tax evasion through unreported financial accounts and structures, employing data analytics and other tools to spot various forms of offshore tax evasion. The agency is also encouraging whistleblowers to come forward and report on offshore tax evasion and other tax schemes by filing a whistleblower claim. The IRS pays awards to eligible individuals whose information can be attributed to taxes and other amounts collected. In fiscal year 2024, the IRS paid awards totaling approximately $123 million based on tax and other amounts collected of approximately $475 million attributable to whistleblower information.

“Our compliance work is protecting billions of dollars of revenue by enforcing laws already on the books, and we’re cracking down on terrorist financing and drug dealers through IRS Criminal Investigation’s work,” said Werfel. “The momentum from this historic work at the IRS is real, and we’re continuing to build on these successes month after month. We still have a long way to go to deliver the IRS the taxpayers deserve. But I firmly believe the agency is on the right path, and the agency is well positioned for continued modernization efforts, including those from the incoming administration.”

IRS Criminal Investigation

On the compliance front, IRS Criminal Investigation agents helped deliver convictions in several high-profile criminal cases, resulting in the recovery of billions of dollars and long prison sentences for dangerous criminals, he noted. 

The IRS has now recovered $4.7 billion from new initiatives underway during the period of its strategic operating plan, he added. “We have recovered $2.9 billion related to IRS Criminal Investigation work into tax and financial crimes, including drug trafficking, cyber crime and terrorist financing, and another $475 million in proceeds from criminal and civil cases,” said Werfel. 

The $4.7 billion figure also includes more than $1.3 billion from high income, high wealth individuals who have not paid overdue tax debts or filed tax returns. 

The IRS Criminal Investigation Division has worked on cases covering terrorist financing and drug trafficking, Werfel noted. These cases include an 18-year sentence for a fentanyl trafficker for attempting to support terrorist activity connected to ISIS. In two other cases, IRS CI efforts played a part in a nearly 20-year sentence for one drug dealer and netted nearly four years for another. 

Werfel also provided some updates on the IRS’s work on high income nonfilers who have not filed tax returns since 2017. The IRS has now collected $292 million from more than 28,000 nonfilers, an increase of $120 million since September. 

“These are cases where the IRS has received third-party information, such as Forms W-2 and 1099, where we see people receive income from between $400,000 and $1 million, and in some cases more than $1 million, but failed to do their basic civic duty under the law to file a tax return,” said Werfel. “This is an important effort. The nonfiler program ran sporadically since 2016 due to severe budget and staff limitations that did not allow these cases to be pursued. With additional funding, the IRS had the capacity to resume this core tax administration work earlier this year.”

Improving taxpayer service

Werfel believes it’s crucial to improve IRS technology, provide new tools, add more efficiency and continue the agency’s work on taxpayer service. 

“At the same time, we remain focused on improving taxpayer services and advancing our monetization efforts,” said Werfel. “Our work in these areas has made a world of difference for taxpayers during the past two tax seasons, and we believe taxpayers will continue to see benefits of our modernization work as we head into the 2025 filing season.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

20 states ranked by unemployment insurance taxes in 2025

Published

on

Complimentary Access Pill

Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.

The Tax Foundation recently ranked the states with the most and least competitive unemployment insurance taxes in 2025. 

Delaware has the least expensive unemployment insurance taxes, having rate structures with lower minimum and maximum rates and a wage base approximately at the federal level. Delaware also has simpler experience formulas and charging methods, and has not complicated its systems with benefit add-ons and surtaxes. New Jersey has the most expensive unemployment insurance taxes.

Read more about the states with the most and least expensive unemployment insurance taxes in 2025 below. The Tax Foundation determines a score by examining each state’s rate structure and tax base, with 1 being the worst and 10 the best.

In 2020-2024, the rank of Washington, D.C., does not affect the rank of states featured.

Worst states for unemployment insurance taxes

2025
rank
State

2025

score

2024

rank

2023

rank

2022

rank

2021

rank

2020

rank

50 New Jersey

3.66

48

44

42

45

44

49 Hawaii

3.89

50

40

41

32

30

48 Rhode Island

3.91

45

46

47

48

47

47 Massachusetts

3.97

49

47

49

49

49

46 Nevada

4.00

47

48

48

47

48

45 Alaska

4.00

44

50

50

50

50

44 Washington

4.00

46

49

46

44

41

43 Illinois

4.20

43

42

39

43

42

42 Minnesota

4.31

42

45

45

42

43

41 Oregon

4.48

34

43

43

40

45

Best states for unemployment insurance taxes

2025 rank State

2025

score

2024

rank

2023

rank

2022

rank

2021

rank

2020

rank

10 Florida

5.63

9

8

10

5

5

9 Louisiana

5.64

11

14

12

4

4

8 Vermont

5.66

7

15

6

13

13

7 North Carolina

5.69

8

9

7

9

9

6 Oklahoma

5.70

6

5

9

1

1

5 Missouri

5.81

4

3

2

7

10

4 Kansas

5.82

5

11

15

10

11

3 Nebraska

6.01

2

1

1

2

2

2 Arizona

6.04

3

2

3

3

3

1 Delaware

6.12

1

4

11

11

7

Continue Reading

Accounting

Ohio Society of CPAs names Laura Hay next president

Published

on

Scott Wiley is stepping down from his role as president and CEO of the Ohio Society of CPAs and is being succeeded by Laura Hay, effective today. 

Hay is the first woman and first CPA to lead the organization in its 100-plus-year history. Her strategic priorities include developing CPA talent to strengthen the pipeline and advocating for protections for the profession.

Hay served as OSCPA’s executive vice president for 11 years and previously as chief operating officer. She was a senior auditor at PricewaterhouseCoopers.

“Laura’s extensive experience and proven leadership within OSCPA make her the ideal choice to lead us into the future,” Rick Fedorovich, executive chairman of BMF CPAs and OSCPA board chair, said in a statement. “Her strategic vision and unwavering commitment to innovation will build on the stability, strength and success Scott has fostered. We are deeply grateful for Scott’s contributions and wish him every success in his next chapter.”

Laura Hay OSCPA

Laura Hay

“Laura is a leader who cares about developing people and building strong teams,’ Wiley said in a statement. “I trust her — and more importantly, Ohio CPAs trust her. With Laura at the helm, OSCPA’s best days are ahead.”

Wiley served as president and CEO for 12 years. 

“I am honored to lead this remarkable organization and deeply inspired by the trust and commitment of our statewide membership,” Hay said in a statement. “With the dedication of our dynamic staff and the vision of our board, I am confident that we can achieve extraordinary things together.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Key wealth management legal cases to watch in 2025

Published

on

This year may not bring as many consequential Supreme Court decisions as the last one for financial advisors, but there are several pending lawsuits with big potential industry implications.

Ongoing uncertainty around the reporting of “beneficial ownership information” under the Corporate Transparency Act, a Supreme Court case testing the power of the IRS to collect pre-bankruptcy tax payments and possible new challenges to the agency’s rules after the demise last year of the so-called Chevron doctrine could each affect advisors and their clients, according to Leila Carney, a member in the Tax Disputes & Tax Litigation Group at the Washington, D.C., office of Caplin & Drysdale. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission and FINRA are facing their own legal confrontations over enforcement capabilities.

“What we’ve seen is, 2024 cases have chipped away at agency power, lending momentum to private litigants,” Carney said in an interview last month shortly after the high court heard arguments in the case involving creditors’ ability to claw back tax payments prior to bankruptcy, U.S. v. Miller. “This case will, I think, be a weather balloon to see whether we can expect continued weakening of agencies.”

READ MORE: What the Supreme Court’s eventful term means for financial advisors

In the wake of one of the Supreme Court rulings last year that gave every SEC defendant the right to a jury trial rather than an administrative law judge, the agency is contending with cases scrutinizing its authority to attach “follow-on” industry bans and FINRA’s process for expelling brokerages from its membership

The victories by President-elect Donald Trump and his Republican allies in Congress also likely delivered the knockout blow to the Labor Department’s new retirement advice rule that was already in a stay blocking its implementation during an industry lawsuit. The Trump administration could drop Labor’s appeal of the stay or simply abide by any possible court decisions vacating the new rule.

The path ahead for another new law requiring companies to disclose their ownership to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network looks much more murky. Federal judges have halted the Corporate Transparency Act under multiple lawsuits criticizing the law as overly broad under the Constitution, but the Justice Department has asked the Supreme Court to lift the injunction. For the moment, the law has yet to go into effect.

“The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) plays a vital role in protecting the U.S. and international financial systems, as well as people across the country, from illicit finance threats like terrorist financing, drug trafficking and money laundering. The CTA levels the playing field for tens of millions of law-abiding small businesses across the United States and makes it harder for bad actors to exploit loopholes in order to gain an unfair advantage,” according to a website maintained by the agency with the latest updates on the status of the law. 

“The government continues to believe — consistent with the orders issued by the U.S. District Courts for the District of Oregon and the Eastern District of Virginia — that the CTA is constitutional and will continue defending the law as necessary,” the agency said.

But the constitutional questions about whether the law extends beyond the federal government’s legally mandated oversight of interstate commerce could one day reach the high court, according to Carney.

“Most Americans are hesitant to share information that they would otherwise expect to keep private, just as a matter of good security practices,” she said. “The constitutional argument is that, because it’s requiring a report of entity formation, it’s not within the scope of regulating business because an entity may be formed and may not be doing any business.”

READ MORE: Lawsuit contests SEC’s ability to slap advisors with industry bans

Another unit of the Treasury, the IRS, is fighting a legal case filed by 3M disputing an agency rule about companies’ allocations of corporate income. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit heard arguments in the case this past fall. 

It and another case before the Tax Court filed by Abbott Laboratories represent the next struggles over a substitute framework for the Chevron deference taken away from agency rulemaking as part of last year’s decision in the Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo case, tax lawyers Lauren Ann Ross and Adam Spiegel of Covington & Burling wrote in Bloomberg Law. Each of the cases are seeking to overturn earlier decisions that revolved around the Chevron deference.

“Two lines of inquiry are likely to emerge: First, does the regulation embody a policy choice or factual determination? If so, courts also are likely to defer to the agency’s regulation as long as it reflects reasoned decision-making,” Ross and Spiegel wrote. “Otherwise, if the regulation is interpreting the statute, courts may move to a second question: Does the Treasury have discretionary authority to interpret the statute through regulations? If so, the agency’s interpretation may still be entitled to deference. If not, the court would interpret the statute without deference to the regulation and could hold the regulation invalid.”

In light of Chevron’s demise, Congress could “easily fill the gap with legislation” that addresses the possible level of deference for agency rulemaking, Carney said. The incoming Trump administration may single out certain rules for non-enforcement as well, by “targeting regulations that are likely to be challenged” after the Loper Bright case, she said.

READ MORE: FINRA dealt blow by court in its power to expel brokerages

Trump’s administration and its allies in Congress are likely to pull back IRS enforcement funding that had previously ramped up the agency’s scrutiny of what it described as tax-dodging efforts by the wealthy. However, another area of enforcement called the “economic substance doctrine” that restricts tax benefits for transactions that do not present any legitimate business or economic purpose bears close watching by advisors and tax professionals too, according to Carney. A district court’s decision siding with the IRS in a case brought by a company called Liberty Global put tax attorneys on alert about the impact to basic strategies deployed by clients for savings. The case is currently awaiting a ruling in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.

“The IRS has been making it a priority to enforce the economic substance doctrine recently,” she said. “The litigation climate may make that harder.”

Continue Reading

Trending