Accounting
IRS signals that IRA heirs should start RMDs
The IRS has quashed any remaining hope that it would alter its new guidelines for inherited individual retirement accounts,
With its finding in rules
“Everyone thought there was a mistake. The longer we waited for the final regulations, the more the industry seemed to be thinking, ‘OK, they’re actually going to hold us to this,'” Heather Zack, the director of high net worth solutions with Waltham, Massachusetts-based wealth management firm
READ MORE:
That said, the rules point to “a strategy that most advisors were taking already” in seeking to “equalize distributions over 10 years” rather than setting up a “tax bomb” by taking them all at once, she noted. “I don’t think there were many advisors who were telling their clients, ‘Let’s wait and take out everything in year 10.'”
The rules’ implications to retirement planning with “a tax component” merit a conversation with clients who inherited an IRA in any of the past four years, said Matthew Cleary, a financial planner with Wakefield, Massachusetts-based 401(k) and wealth firm
“We want to bring that up absolutely, because it may be a situation where you do want to have more of a schedule to minimize the tax burden of taking it out in one year,” Cleary said in an interview. “There are a couple of exceptions to that rule, but for the most part the stretch IRA is dead.”
Caveats to the new 10-year requirement apply to eligible designated beneficiaries — a group that includes the spouse of the deceased IRA owner, heirs who are chronically ill or disabled, and heirs younger than the late retirement saver by only a decade or less, Zack and Cleary noted. Another carve-out from the mandatory distributions applies to heirs who are 20 years old or younger, who can still use the stretch strategy until they are 21,
READ MORE:
In addition, the rules maintained the “controversial” provision that most beneficiaries are subject to the 10-year guideline — even if the account owner died on or after the beginning period for the holder’s own required minimum distributions, Brenner wrote
“This rule requires annual RMDs to continue once they have started,” she wrote. “Many believed this rule went away with the Secure Act, but apparently the IRS thought differently. Due to all the confusion its interpretation caused, the IRS waived RMDs during the 10-year period for beneficiaries for the years 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024. In the newly released final regulations, the IRS is doubling down on its position that these annual RMDs are required. They must be taken starting in 2025. However, the IRS will not impose penalties for annual RMDs that were not taken for years before 2025.”
In its announcement, the IRS specifically discussed the concerns around that interpretation.
“Treasury and IRS reviewed comments suggesting that a beneficiary of an individual who has started required annual distributions should not be required to continue those annual distributions if the remaining account balance is fully distributed within 10 years of the individual’s death as required by the Secure Act,” the agency said in its
As part of his
“I honestly can’t remember a time when advisors, tax pros and ‘mom and pop’ investors more eagerly awaited news from the IRS,” Levine said. “But more than 4.5 years after Secure was passed, we now have some definitive answers to key Q’s.”
READ MORE:
IRA owners seeking to avoid a tax hit on their beneficiaries could convert traditional accounts to Roth ones, which usually won’t carry any more duties tied to the added income, Cleary noted.
“They would still be subject to the 10-year rule, but then they don’t necessarily have the tax issue,” he said. “It’s an idea for the right person who’s able to pay those taxes up front.”
While there are “not a ton” of strategies that advisors can take to reduce the impact of the distributions on their income once they start taking them, separate charitable donations and maximizing other deductions could mitigate part of the burden, Zack said.
Since inherited IRAs are “something that every advisor deals with,” the rules have created “this whole maze of different beneficiary withdrawal requirements” based on the year of the account owner’s death and the age, spousal and health status of the heir, she noted. And the final rule clarified that the 10-year distribution span started with IRA owners who died in 2020 — regardless of the fact that the IRS pushed back the required distribution four years in a row.
“It’s just made the landscape a lot more complicated for advisors and clients now than it used to be,” Zack said. “That is definitely of concern for some folks. That clock has been running this entire time.”
Jody Padar, an author and speaker known as “The Radical CPA,” and Katie Tolin, a growth strategist for CPAs, together launched a training and technology platform called XcelLabs.
XcelLabs provides solutions to help accountants use artificial technology fluently and strategically. The Pennsylvania Institute of CPAs and CPA Crossings joined with Padar and Tolin as strategic partners and investors.
“To reinvent the profession, we must start by training the professional who can then transform their firms,” Padar said in a statement. “By equipping people with data and insights that help them see things differently, they can provide better advice to their clients and firm.”
The platform includes XcelLabs Academy, a series of educational online courses on the basics of AI, being a better advisor, leadership and practice management; Navi, a proprietary tool that uses AI to help accountants turn unstructured data like emails, phone calls and meetings into insights; and training and consulting services. These offerings are currently in beta testing.
“Accountants know they need to be more advisory, but not everyone can figure out how to do it,” Tolin said in a statement. “Couple that with the fact that AI will be doing a lot of the lower-level work accountants do today, and we need to create that next level advisor now. By showing accountants how to unlock patterns in their actions and turn client conversations into emotionally intelligent advice, we can create the accounting professional of the future.”
“AI is transforming how CPAs work, and XcelLabs is focused on helping the profession evolve with it,” PICPA CEO Jennifer Cryder said in a statement. “At PICPA, we’re proud to support a mission that aligns so closely with ours: empowering firms to use AI not just for efficiency, but to drive growth, value and long-term relevance.”
The accountant the world urgently needs has evolved far beyond the traditional role we recognized just a few years ago.
The transformation of the accounting profession is not merely an anticipated change; it is a pressing reality that is currently shaping business decisions, academic programs and the expected contributions of professionals. Yet, in many areas, accounting education stubbornly clings to outdated, overly technical models that fail to connect with the actual demands of the market. We must confront a critical question: If we continue to train accountants solely to file tax reports, are we truly equipping them for the challenges of today’s world?
This shift in mindset extends beyond individual countries or educational systems; it is a global movement. The recent announcement of the
The CIMA/CGMA proposal for 2026 is not just a curriculum update; it is a powerful manifesto. This new program positions analytical thinking, strategic business partnering and technology application at the core of accounting education. It unequivocally highlights sustainability, aligning with IFRS S1 and S2, and expands the accountant’s responsibilities beyond mere numbers to encompass conscious leadership, environmental impact and corporate governance.
The current changes in the accounting profession underscore an urgent shift in expectations from both educators and employers. Today, companies of all sizes and industries demand accountants who can do far more than interpret balance sheets. They expect professionals who grasp the deeper context behind the numbers, identify inconsistencies, anticipate potential issues before they escalate into losses, and act decisively as a bridge between data and decision making.
To meet these expectations, a radical mindset shift is essential. There are firms still operating on autopilot, mindlessly repeating tasks with minimal critical analysis. Likewise, many academic programs continue to treat accounting as purely a technical discipline, disregarding the vital elements of reflection, strategy and behavioral insight. This outdated approach creates a significant mismatch. While the world forges ahead, parts of the accounting profession remain stuck in the past.
The consequences of this shift are already becoming evident. The demand for compliance, transparency and sustainability now applies not only to large corporations but also to small and mid-sized businesses. Many of these organizations rely on professionals ill-equipped to drive the necessary changes, putting both business performance and the reputation of the profession at risk.
The positive news is that accountants who are ready to thrive in this new era do not necessarily need additional degrees. What they truly need is a commitment to awareness, a dedication to continuous learning, and the courage to step beyond their comfort zones. The future of accounting is here, and it is firmly rooted in analytical, strategic and human-oriented perspectives. The 2026 curriculum is a clear indication of the changes underway. Those who fail to think critically and holistically will be left behind.
In contrast, accountants who see the big picture, understand the ripple effects of their decisions, and actively contribute to the financial and ethical health of organizations will undeniably remain indispensable, anywhere in the world.
Congressional Republicans are siding with Donald Trump in the messy divorce between the president and Elon Musk, an optimistic sign for eventual passage of a tax cut bill at the root of the two billionaires’ public feud.
Lawmakers are largely taking their cues from Trump and sticking by the $3 trillion bill at the center of the White House’s economic agenda. Musk, the biggest political donor of the 2024 cycle, has threatened to help primary anyone who votes for the legislation, but lawmakers are betting that staying in the president’s good graces is the safer path to political survival.
“The tax bill is not in jeopardy. We are going to deliver on that,” House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Friday.
“I’ll tell you what — do not doubt, don’t second guess and do not challenge the President of the United States Donald Trump,” he added. “He is the leader of the party. He’s the most consequential political figure of our time.”
A fight between Trump and Musk exploded into public view this week. The sparring started with the tech titan calling the president’s tax bill a “disgusting abomination,” but quickly escalated to more personal attacks and Trump threatening to cancel all federal contracts and subsidies to Musk’s companies, such as Tesla Inc. and SpaceX which have benefitted from government ties.
Republicans on Capitol Hill, who had — until recently — publicly embraced Musk, said they weren’t swayed by the billionaire’s criticism that the bill cost too much. Lawmakers have refuted official estimates of the package, saying that the tax cuts for households, small businesses and politically important groups — including hospitality and hourly workers — will generate enough economic growth to offset the price tag.
“I don’t tell my friend Elon, I don’t argue with him about how to build rockets, and I wish he wouldn’t argue with me about how to craft legislation and pass it,” Johnson told CNBC earlier Friday.
House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington told reporters that House lawmakers are focused on working with the Senate as it revises the bill to make sure the legislation has the political support in both chambers to make it to Trump’s desk for his signature.
“We move past the drama and we get the substance of what is needed to make the modest improvements that can be made,” he said.
House fiscal hawks said that they hadn’t changed their prior positions on the legislation based on Musk’s statements. They also said they agree with GOP leaders that there will be other chances to make further spending cuts outside the tax bill.
Representative Tom McClintock, a fiscal conservative, said “the bill will pass because it has to pass,” adding that both Musk and Trump needed to calm down. “They both need to take a nap,” he said.
Even some of the House bill’s most vociferous critics appeared resigned to its passage. Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie, who voted against the House version, predicted that despite Musk’s objections, the Senate will make only small changes.
“The speaker is right about one thing. This barely passed the House. If they muck with it too much in the Senate, it may not pass the House again,” he said.
Trump is pressuring lawmakers to move at breakneck speed to pass the tax-cut bill, demanding they vote on the bill before the July 4 holiday. The president has been quick to blast critics of the bill — including calling Senator Rand Paul
As the legislation worked its way through the House last month, Trump took to social media to criticize holdouts and invited undecided members to the White House to compel them to support the package. It passed by one vote.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune — who is planning to unveil his chamber’s version of the bill as soon as next week — said his timeline is unmoved by Musk.
“We are already pretty far down the trail,” he said.
UK’s FCA teams up with Nvidia to let banks experiment with AI
Donald Trump’s new travel ban is coming into effect
Sending the National Guard to LA is not about stopping rioting
New 2023 K-1 instructions stir the CAMT pot for partnerships and corporations
The Essential Practice of Bank and Credit Card Statement Reconciliation
Are American progressives making themselves sad?
-
Blog Post1 week agoCommon Bookkeeping Challenges and Solutions for Small Businesses
-
Economics1 week agoWhy the president must not be lexicographer-in-chief
-
Finance1 week agoThis is why Jamie Dimon is so gloomy on the economy
-
Personal Finance1 week agoU.S. birth rate drop outpaces policy response, raising future concerns
-
Accounting1 week agoSteinhoff fraud trial moved to South Africa’s high court
-
Economics1 week agoGerman inflation May 2025
-
Personal Finance7 days agoWhat the national debt, deficit mean for your money
-
Personal Finance1 week agoHow to save on summer travel in 2025