Connect with us

Accounting

Italy firm got Carlyle cash and allegedly paid for yacht, winery

Published

on

It seemed like a low-risk bet when in 2020 Carlyle Group Inc. agreed to provide around €200 million ($210 million) in private bonds to Pro-Gest SpA, a family-owned paper and packaging company based near Venice.

The papermaker’s finances came under pressure in 2019 as production at one of its main plants was temporarily suspended by local authorities. The pandemic helped boost demand for paper packaging and Carlyle agreed to step in to refinance a portion of Pro-Gest’s debt when the company offered some of its best assets as collateral. The deal put the American private capital giant first in line for repayment in case anything went wrong, ahead of bondholders who had previously given the company €250 million.

Fast forward to 2025 and the company, after defaulting on some of its debt, is now attempting to restructure its obligations in a court-supervised process known locally as composizione negoziata.

The move follows months of negotiations with creditors that saw the company’s board overhauled, its first chief restructuring officer suddenly depart and — amid the negotiations with creditors — a draft report from the auditing firm Deloitte LLP that raised questions about more than €80 million of financial transactions by Pro-Gest and its owners, members of the Zago family. The expenses questioned included payments for a yacht and cash used to fund a prosecco winery.

The draft report was presented to Pro-Gest’s board, but never acted on. The company’s current CRO Angelo Rodolfi said in a statement to Bloomberg that claims the firm misused cash are “incorrect and untrue.”

But the episode underscores the difficulties often faced by lenders in the booming world of private credit. A few of the industry’s largest players have made lending to companies that aren’t owned by private equity a key piece of their strategy, hoping to reduce their reliance on buyout financing — an increasingly competitive and lower-return business — to deploy capital. While the loans typically come with high yields, they’re often provided to businesses that aren’t accustomed to the same high levels of disclosure and scrutiny as publicly traded borrowers.

Pro-Gest’s debt came from the Carlyle Credit Opportunities fund, a strategy launched in 2019 to provide capital “primarily for upper middle market borrowers,” including firms owned by families and entrepreneurs, according to the fund’s website.

By early last year, Pro-Gest had breached some of the terms governing the Carlyle debt, according to people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified because they aren’t authorized to talk about it. While the U.S. fund agreed to waive the breaches of financial covenants, it wanted to appoint independent directors to the board. And as part of the compromise between family owners and the fund, the board commissioned Deloitte to conduct a forensic analysis of Pro-Gest’s finances and transactions with related parties.

Deloitte analyzed internal accounting, collected material on the company’s IT devices through December 2023, and produced a draft report in May 2024 that identified potential anomalies with a total financial impact of about €81.6 million. 

Some of these transactions may have impacted Pro-Gest’s balance sheet, and others may have breached covenants in Carlyle’s debt and disclosure obligations, Deloitte said in the report. It also said founder Bruno Zago and other members of his family may have used company funds to pay for non-business-related expenses.

After Deloitte completed its draft report, a round of interviews with some employees and managers backed its preliminary findings, and the report was filed to Pro-Gest’s board for review, the people said. Over the summer, however, the chief restructuring officer and other independent directors suddenly resigned after less than six months in the post.

A new CRO and new board members were appointed, and while they received Deloitte’s draft report, they never voted on it, the people said.

As part of CRO Rodolfi’s response to Bloomberg in December, he said that claims the firm misused cash and the representation of events “are harmful and defamatory.” He didn’t comment on the details of the allegations contained in Deloitte’s draft report. The company said in a separate email response in early January that its own financial reports are correct.

Representatives for Deloitte and Carlyle declined to comment on the draft report.

Alleged breaches

Deloitte said it found 16 transactions that were in breach of the financial covenants of the debt Pro-Gest got from Carlyle. And it singled out 29 cases when the company’s cash coffers, which had been boosted by Carlyle’s funds, were allegedly used for non-business purposes.

The list of breaches includes a €1.4 million purchase of a Ferretti Custom Line 94 yacht, and zero-interest loans to several Zago family members and close allies, some of which weren’t paid back, according to the draft report.

Deloitte’s report also claimed Pro-Gest’s funds were used to finance family businesses that are legally and financially separate from the packaging group, including one that makes prosecco in the hills of Veneto, and a local food catering company. And Deloitte’s report said it found €12.5 million of “financials granted by Pro-Gest in favor of AMG,” a real estate company also owned by the Zago family. AMG didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Zago family members allegedly used company funds to pay for aircraft rentals for purposes not related to Pro-Gest’s core business, and to cover about €530,000 in yacht maintenance costs between 2021 and 2024, according to the draft report. They also moved assets back-and-forth between the Pro-Gest group and entities controlled by the Zagos, the report alleged.

For instance, in 2018 it sold €20 million worth of paper reels to World Cart Srl, a company in which Pro-Gest held a minority stake and whose biggest shareholder was Pro-Gest’s founder. In 2021 and 2022, after the debt from Carlyle helped stabilize Pro-Gest’s finances, the group bought back those assets from World Cart, which in turn directed a large chunk of its profits to benefit AMG, according to the draft report. 

Bruno Zago eventually transferred his stake in World Cart to Pro-Gest in October 2024, according to a corporate filing. Luca Lazzarotto, who owns 25% of World Cart and is the firm’s chief executive officer, said in an emailed statement to Bloomberg that he isn’t aware of strictly private information that was presented to Pro-Gest’s board, and warned against spreading false reports.

Debt talks

It’s unclear what Carlyle did when Deloitte submitted its report to the board. A Carlyle spokesperson declined to comment when asked whether the fund had received the report when it was sent to Pro-Gest’s board. 

Either way, Carlyle and unsecured creditors have been in on-and-off talks with the company to restructure its debt for more than a year. Pro-Gest stopped paying interest on its debt to bondholders in June, and didn’t pay the unsecured notes when they matured on Dec. 15. The private bonds from Carlyle are due this year.

This month, Pro-Gest said it had entered court-supervised negotiations and issued a proposal to extend debt maturities, sell assets and reduce rental costs. It also plans to recover funds credited to AMG. The court-supervised procedure, which protects the company against its creditors, can last as long as a year.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Interim guidance from the IRS simplifies corporate AMT

Published

on

irs-nametags.jpg

Jordan Vonderhaar/Photographer: Jordan Vonderhaar/

The Internal Revenue Service has released Notice 2025-27, which provides interim guidance on an optional simplified method for determining an applicable corporation for the corporate alternative minimum tax.

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 amended Sec. 55 to impose the CAMT based on the “adjusted financial statement income” of an “applicable corporation” for taxable years beginning in 2023. 

Among other details, proposed regs provide that “applicable corporation” means any corporation (other than an S corp, a regulated investment company or a REIT) that meets either of two average annual AFSI tests depending on financial statement net operating losses for three taxable years and whether the corporation is a member of a foreign-parented multinational group.

Prior to the publication of any final regulations relating to the CAMT, the Treasury and the IRS will issue a notice of proposed rulemaking. Notice 2025-27 will be in IRB: 2025-26, dated June 23.

Continue Reading

Accounting

In the blogs: Whiplash | Accounting Today

Published

on

Conquering tariffs; bracing for notices; FBAR penalty timing; and other highlights from our favorite tax bloggers.

Whiplash

Number-crunching

  • Canopy (https://www.getcanopy.com/blog): “7-Figure Firm, 4-Hour Workweek: 5 Questions to Ask Yourself.”
  • The National Association of Tax Professionals (https://blog.natptax.com/): This week’s “You Make the Call” looks at Sarah, a U.S. citizen who moved to London for work in 2024. On May 15, 2025, it hit her that she forgot to file her 2024 U.S. return. Was she required to file her 2024 taxes by April 15?
  • Taxable Talk (http://www.taxabletalk.com/): Anteing up with Uncle Sam: The World Series of Poker is back, and one major change this year involves players from Russia and Hungary. After suspension of tax treaties with those nations, players will have 30% of winnings withheld. 
  • Parametric (https://www.parametricportfolio.com/blog): Direct indexing seems to come with a common misunderstanding: On the performance statement, conflating the value of harvested losses with returns. 

Problems brewing

  • Taxing Subjects (https://www.drakesoftware.com/blog): No chill is chillier than the client’s at the mailbox when an IRS notice appears out of the blue. How you can educate — and warn — them about the various notices everybody’s that favorite agency might send.
  • Dean Dorton (https://deandorton.com/insights/): Perhaps because they can be founded on trust, your nonprofit clients are especially vulnerable to fraud.
  • Global Taxes (https://www.globaltaxes.com/blog.php): When it’s your time, it’s your time: The clock starts on FBAR penalties when the tax forms are due and not when penalties are assessed — and even the death of the taxpayer doesn’t extend the deadline.
  • TaxConnex (https://www.taxconnex.com/blog-): Your e-commerce clients can muck up sales tax obligations in many ways. How some of the seeds of trouble might hide in their own billing system.
  • Sovos (https://sovos.com/blog/): What’s up with the five states that don’t have a sales tax?
  • Taxjar (https://www.taxjar.com/resources/blog): Humans are still needed to handle sales tax complexity, with real-world examples.
  • Wiss (https://wiss.com/insights/read/): A business — and business-advising — success story from a California chicken eatery.

Almost half done

Continue Reading

Accounting

What the House gave the Senate: Inside the Big Beautiful tax bill

Published

on

The reconciliation bill passed by the House on May 22 is currently being considered by the Senate, and will likely undergo changes before approval by the upper chamber. To what extent the changes will create stumbling blocks before a final bill is produced and voted on is uncertain, with the increased SALT deduction, Medicaid reforms, and repeal of certain Inflation Reduction Act credits on the line. 

While much can change between now and the final version of the bill, the following is a quick overview of some of the provisions:

  • Bonus depreciation. First-year bonus depreciation, currently being phased down 20% per year since 2023, is 40% for 2025, and will drop to 0% in 2027. Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (or OBBBA) it will be reset at 100% for eligible property acquired and placed in service after Jan. 19, 2025, and before Jan. 1, 2030.
  • Section 199A Qualified Business Income deduction. The QBI deduction, created by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, is available through 2025 to owners of pass-through entities, sole proprietors and the self-employed. The OBBBA would make the deduction permanent, and the deduction would increase to 23% for tax years beginning after 2025.
  • Domestic research and experimental expenditures. The OBBBA would reinstate the deduction available to businesses that conduct research and experimentation. Expenses incurred after 2024 and before 2030 would be eligible. 
  • Section 179 expensing. The bill increases the limit to $2.5 million and increases the phaseout threshold to $4 million for property placed in service after 2024. The limit and threshold would be adjusted annually for inflation.
  • Excess business loss limitation. The bill makes permanent the excess business loss limitation for pass-through entities.
  • Pease limitation. The bill would make permanent the repeal of the Pease limitation on itemized deduction, but would introduce a new limitation for taxpayers in the 37% bracket for years after 2025. It would also temporarily increase the standard deduction for tax years 2025 through 2028.
  • The Child Tax Credit. The bill makes the CTC permanent and raises it to $2,5000 per child for tax years 2025 through 2028, after which it would return to its present $2,000 with an annual inflation adjustment. 
  • Federal gift and estate tax exemption. The bill increases the federal gift and estate tax exemption to $15 million, and adjusts it annually for inflation. It is currently set at $13.99 million.

One sector the bill is very positive for is real estate, according to Tyler Davis, president of Saunders Real Estate: “It makes a lot of the TCJA provisions permanent. The estate tax exemption is made permanent and raised to $15 million, and the bonus is back to 100% for the next four years. This allows purchasers to depreciate their investments a lot faster, so it makes deals more attractive for investors and developers. A special provision for industrial manufacturing property under the bill, it is eligible for 100% expensing.”

Rural land for sale

Photographer: Nikita Sobolkov/nikkytok – stock.adobe.com

This would allow 100% of a project’s cost to be deducted in the first year, making it “hugely attractive,” he said. “The administration wants to bring investment back to the U.S. This will incentivize that process.”

Under the bill, the Section 163(j) business interest deduction would expand and allow more interest to be deducted on qualifying real estate, he said. “And they’re redoing some of the Opportunity Zone rules and boundaries, and are lowering reinvestment thresholds for investments. This should drive more investment into rural communities. And, lastly, there are no Section 1031 changes in the bill. That’s a really positive thing from a transactions and reinvestment perspective.”

Continue Reading

Trending