Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.

The most important issue is staff recruitment, training, retention and work conditions. While each of these is a separate issue, the whole staff issue is a neglected area when it should be the top area of concern. This has been so since I started practicing, and I am perplexed that meaningful actions are not taken to remedy the situation. I did, and many firms do, and they are much more successful than the others, but too many do not deal realistically with this.

Recruitment: Starting salaries have not kept up with overall business conditions, and I do not believe they have remained competitive when about 15 years ago they were at the top of the curve. This can be easily corrected by firms increasing their starting salaries. Many refer to the added 30 credits as a hindrance, but I don’t believe this is a more important objection than the lower starting salaries being offered. Staff recognize having master’s degrees as an enhancement that makes themselves more valuable and they feel good about it … after they get their degree.

Training: Training is a significant area and is done by many firms, particularly smaller practices, as a cookie cutter obligatory process, not focused on the staff person’s responsibilities and expected work assignments. Firms send staff to available CPE courses when they should be developing customized CPE, either in their firm or in partnership with similar firms or through their state society committees. (I’ve done all of these and it works.) Firms also need to become training organizations using error disclosure as immediate training opportunities and deliberate on-the-job training by everyone in a supervisory position. Firms’ cultures have to be to train and develop. In conjunction with this, all supervisors need to be trained on how to train.

Retention: Turnover is terrible. Two years ago, a Big Four firm had 25% staff turnover. Last year it was 17% (and they were voted one of the Top 100 best places to work both years! Huh?). Many firms neglect “marketing” the benefits of working for them and take the current staff for granted. Retention needs a deliberate effort by every supervisor, manager, partner and owner. It needs work and will pay the best dividends. This effort might not stop a person from leaving, but it could retain them for an extra year or more. An attitude that you want them to stay forever also helps.

Work conditions: Tax season hours are untenable at most firms, while some larger firms maintain tax season conditions after tax season ends or add mini periods of extended hours. In my own informal and unofficial exit polls, most people provide as the primary reason for leaving a lack of work-life balance. I know people from top 10 firms that leave public accounting for reasons that indicate a complete noncompliance by their employers with the stated “favorable work-life and caring atmosphere and culture” in those firms’ recruitment brochures. Firms show a total lack of attention to this.  

Solution: This is an industry problem, but it can only be solved one firm at a time. My solution is to acknowledge the problem at your practice and then make every change necessary to eliminate that problem. You might not be able to do it immediately, but you can start immediately and work on these issues as they come up while starting a serious and meaningful training program. Every change needed can be implemented within a year. Let that year start now!

Do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected] with your practice management questions or about engagements you might not be able to perform. 

The rainmaker days are over.

Rainmakers, the select charismatic few — usually partners — who brought in the vast majority of an accounting firm’s clients, are becoming obsolete as firms professionalize business development and shift their reliance off the individual and onto the collective team. Looking ahead, experts say the most successful firms will be those that entrench themselves in a niche and poach clients with their hyperspecialized services.

In the past, firms’ growth strategies were rudimentary and unsophisticated, according to Gale Crosley, CEO of Crosley and Co. Firms relied on the individual contributions of rainmakers to generate the bulk of their revenue while growth strategies remained largely unchanged year to year. Now, especially since the Paycheck Protection Program stimulated growth during the COVID-19 pandemic, “driving demand is on cruise control,” Crosley said.

“The fish are jumping in the boat. They’ve been jumping in the boat for five years, and it’s not a business problem they have to solve right now,” she explained.

It’s a straightforward scenario where there is too much work to do and not enough talent or time to do it, meaning strategic growth is on the backburner for many firms as they manage day-to-day business operations.

“Fulfilling the demand side is sucking all the energy out of the firm,” Crosley said. “They’re totally focused on getting the laundry out the door, offshoring and technology.”

“The firms who are on it — the A+ firms who have always been on it — they’re not hitting the pause button,” she continued. “Only firms who always knew that they had to carve out that time and say, ‘We’ve got to look at growth strategies for the future,’ those are the ones who are doing it right.”

Modernizing business development

Firms are now formalizing and structuring the process of finding and bringing in new clients. The first key to modernizing business development is moving the responsibility of client acquisition beyond individual rainmakers.

“It’s taking more of a matrix, relationship-focused approach, instead of a singular source of that rainmaker being out with the client,” said Rebekah Gardner, chief growth officer at Top 25 Firm Wipfli. “You start to identify these segments, these clients and prospects, and then you look at the team that you have on your bench, and you start to match up relationships and skills, and you build that matrix.”

The second key is specialization. Competition for clients is increasing as more firms look to own entire market segments and tailor their services to those select niches. Firms that choose to stay generalists put themselves at risk of losing business.

(Read more: “Pathways to Growth: Strategic client development.“)

“You have got to have industry experts sitting on your team so that you build that ability to have a conversation at their level,” Gardner said. “If you can’t show up like that, I don’t think you belong in the game sometimes.”

“Specialization and niches allow firms to perform a much higher value service to their clients,” said Tim Petrey, CEO of HD Growth Partners, a member firm of private-equity-backed accounting firm platform Ascend. “They can get much deeper with a client than the surface-level tax and compliance work. As a result, you form a higher degree of trust between the accountant that owns the relationship and the client much faster. It can be difficult for a ‘generalist’ style firm to compete with industry experts.”

But it’s easier said than done. Becoming a specialist requires the difficult task of dropping low-profit, time-consuming clients, and focusing resources on high-growth, high-return clients.

“Firms need to improve by looking closely at the clients they best serve and build a marketing strategy around that,” Petrey added. “Treat your firm like a real business and it’s amazing what comes naturally from that. Treating a firm like a partnership often leaves marketing efforts stale because partners can’t agree on the strategy, the ideal client profile, the budget, or even just as simply the contribution of their staff’s time to the efforts.”

The decline of rainmakers

The accounting profession’s ongoing labor shortage impacts everything within a firm, especially business development.

“Finding great accountants is hard enough. Finding great accountants who can sell is like hunting for a unicorn,” Petrey said.

“With one person coming into an industry for every five who are leaving, staff are getting asked to do things earlier on in their careers than their predecessors. Partners and shareholders are getting younger and younger because firms need to find a way to get those great people locked in for years,” Petrey continued. “As a result, most firms never focused on building any real brand loyalty. There is loyalty to an individual but not loyalty to a brand. The rainmakers of the prior generation are still out winning business the old school way, but there aren’t enough of those rainmakers in the next generation.”

“That’s the crux of the problem,” said Bob Lewis, president of The Visionary Group. “Why we have so much M&A going on right now is because of the lack of business development and a lack of networking skills. “

Besides, the traditional rainmaker model isn’t necessarily the best fit for modern firm culture. “When a firm has a great rainmaker that is a poor manager, leader or colleague, they’ll often look past their issues as a leader because they generate so much revenue, which causes firms to further struggle to maintain or improve culture,” Petrey said.

Instead of relying on rainmakers, some firms have turned to the internet and search-engine optimization to supplement client acquisition.

“What they missed is that the activity you generate through SEO is typically the type of clients you don’t want. It’s clients that are searching the internet looking for a new provider,” Lewis said. “The good clients go through the professional network. They go through the bankers, they go through their lawyers, they go through the insurance agencies, and they get referrals into another accounting firm.”

“I can replace the accounting part, the tax part, overnight. I can’t replace the trust part, and that’s what people have learned and figured out how to sell,” Lewis said.

The rise of the CGO

With the sunset of the rainmaker era comes the dawn of the chief growth officer.

CGOs are the newest additions to small and midsized firms’ staff. While mergers and acquisitions certainly fall within a CGO’s remit, they are also focused on trimming clients that don’t fit the firm’s portfolio, upskilling the next generation of partners, adding more advisory services, and expanding relationships with existing clients, Lewis said.

CGOs also need to be “making sure that people inside of the firm are being deployed in their highest and best use,” Wipfli’s Gardner said. “Traditionally we’ve used our own partners, rank and file, to think about these things, but sometimes it takes an outsider perspective to come in and say, ‘Hey, let’s think about this a little bit differently.”

Unlike the average accountant, CGOs specialize in general management. The addition of them into accounting firms is a new trend that has only been accelerated by the wave of private equity investment in the profession.

(Read more: “The rise of the chief growth officer.“)

“Most accounting firms have historically run like a partnership rather than a real business,” Petrey said. “PE will continue to professionalize firms of all sizes to be better and smarter at business development. As a result, non-PE backed firms will need to find ways to make that investment into their firms to remain competitive.”

“​​The preexisting resource constraints and the seasonal nature of the business makes it really hard for anyone to make meaningful progress on a strategic initiative,” said David Wurtzbacher, CEO of Ascend, which is backed by PE firm Alpine Investors. Each of Ascend’s platform firms is required to have a CGO.

“For a long time, the public accounting industry couldn’t and didn’t attract general management type talent — think MBAs — because of the partnership model. It was, ‘We can’t really pay you that much, and we definitely can’t give you equity in these companies, and we’re not really growing that much,’ and so you didn’t have access to the talent markets the way other industries have access to it.”

“But the fact remains, there are people outside the industry who might be better suited for driving growth and transformation and strategic initiatives,” Wurtzbacher said.

Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.

Tax season usually marks the busiest time of the year for IRS professionals, but for the 30,000 staff who have accepted buyouts or been laid off by the agency this year, the calendar has  been painfully clear. 

Higher-ups have not been immune to the upheaval, with four IRS commissioners and multiple unit chiefs departing. Michael Faulkender, former deputy secretary of the Treasury, was announced as the newest acting commissioner on April 18 — replacing a predecessor who had been in place for less than a week.

“The fight against weaponization and politicization at the IRS is a top-tier priority for the Trump administration, and Deputy Secretary Faulkender will continue to make the needed changes both durable and lasting,” a Treasury spokesperson noted. “We urge Congress to act quickly to confirm permanent leadership at the IRS to ensure its ability to best serve taxpayers going forward.”

Read more: Treasury union asks for relief as IRS plans more layoffs

The uncertainty surrounding the IRS started on inauguration day, when previous Commissioner Danny Warfel resigned, citing President Trump’s intention to name former congressman Billy Long, R-Missouri, as the next commissioner. Long has yet to be confirmed however, leading to a power vacuum that has been filled by a series of acting commissioners, most recently Faulkender. 

As the revolving door at the top of the IRS continues to spin, Elon Musk’s Department of Governmental Efficiency has introduced its own initiatives to the agency. This tax season seemingly saw the end of the government’s Direct File program, after DOGE shut down development work on the project for 2026. This came following a report weeks earlier from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, which claimed that the IRS had underreported the cost of the program by millions of dollars. 

“Reported totals did not include an estimated $8.8 million for costs incurred by the Office of Management and Budget for employees detailed to the IRS to help develop and pilot Direct File and costs incurred to create or leverage existing accounts through the IRS’s credential service provider,” said the report regarding the main source of the costs discovered.

Though a significant portion of the funding for enforcement, taxpayer services, and tech modernization are being eliminated by Congress, mass layoffs may be the most salient example of DOGE’s transformation of the IRS.

“My real concern is that anything where you need people at the IRS will take more time,” said David Shapiro, partner and chair of the tax, compensation and benefits practice at law firm Saul Ewing LLP. “That goes for even the most mundane matters. For example, to establish a domestic entity you can just go online and get a tax ID, or do it by phone. A foreign entity can’t do that. So it’s harder for foreigners who want to do business in the U.S. Likewise for low-income taxpayers to resolve an issue through an offer in compromise. This will all go away without agents to help.”

Read more: Tennessee, Arkansas weather victims get tax relief

See below for the latest headlines out of the IRS this month at the conclusion of filing season.

Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg

Leadership changes and layoffs at the IRS

Tax Day 2025 marked the 70th anniversary of the April 15 filing deadline. As tax season has wound down, the uncertainty at the IRS has not.

Many high-level IRS officials have left or been pushed out in the waning months of the filing period, chief information officer Rajiv Uppal being the most recent on a list that includes four commissioners and former acting chief counsel William Paul.

IRS heads are not the only personnel at risk — 30,000 employees have taken buyouts or been laid off and 7,000 probationary workers have been placed on paid leave. A study by Yale’s Budget Lab concluded that 18,200 employees being cut would lead to a $1.4 billion savings in salaries but a $8.3 billion loss in tax revenue. 

Read more: IRS marks Tax Day amid layoffs, cutbacks

Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg

New acting commissioner appointed

After serving as acting commissioner for just three days, Gary Shapley was replaced by Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender — the fifth IRS head of the year. Shapley had achieved notoriety as a whistleblower after testifying against Hunter Biden to the House Oversight Committee as an IRS Criminal Investigation special agent in 2023. 

Reportedly, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent complained to the Trump administration that Shapley had been appointed without his consultation. Shapley had been named a senior advisor to Bessent last month.

Read more: Acting IRS commissioner replaced by Treasury official

Direct File ending next year after Elon Musk’s IRS reorganization

After Elon Musk posted on X that he had “deleted” the team that built the IRS Direct File system last year, further reporting found that IRS staff had been told to stop preparing the system for 2026. Though tax prep software firms have long opposed the program, former IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel had outlined plans to make the project permanent just last year. 

Lobbying group the American Coalition for Taxpayer Rights advocates for nurturing the public-private Free File partnership. In 2025, nonprofit Code For America helped bring the Direct File program to 25 states, up from 12 the year before. 

“Direct File was a massive success, saving taxpayers millions in fees, saving them time and cutting out an unnecessary middleman that took money out of Americans’ pockets for no good reason. Trump and Secretary Bessent are robbing regular American families to pay back lobbyists that spend millions to make tax filing more expensive and more difficult,” said Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, in a statement.

Read more: IRS Direct File reportedly ending next year 

Jordan Vonderhaar/Photographer: Jordan Vonderhaar/

DOGE creating super API next step in IRS data deregulation

Elon Musk plans to organize the IRS data system around a single API by early May— possibly with the help of Peter Thiel’s Palantir. APIs are necessary for data to transfer from one computer program to another, and the IRS already has several existing ones that this effort would centralize. 

Layoffs and privacy concerns seem to both be impediments to DOGE’s plans. The IRS has announced 20,000 future layoffs, and its 50 senior tech leaders are currently on paid administrative leave. Many special permissions are currently required to access the sensitive data that would be included in this API, and unifying this data would make it all the more a target to bad actors. 

Read more: DOGE to centralize IRS data under one API

Samuel Corum/Bloomberg

Basis shifting crackdown ended by Trump administration

Citing a February executive order from the Trump administration that established the DOGE deregulatory initiative, the Treasury Department and IRS announced plans to stop designating basis-shifting among partnerships and related parties as “transactions of interest.” Previous regulations had imposed possible penalties under Sections 6707A(a), 6707(a), and 6708 as the IRS had seen the practice to be a possible tax avoidance strategy.

After the IRS found tens of billions of dollars in dubious deductions while auditing a group of basis-shifting transactions last year, then-Commissioner Danny Werfel announced a new unit within the Office of Chief Counsel to target such tax loopholes.

“Taxpayers and their material advisors have criticized the Basis Shifting TOI Regulations as imposing complex, burdensome, and retroactive disclosure obligations on many ordinary-course and tax-compliant business activities, creating costly compliance obligations and uncertainty for businesses,” said a notice from the Treasury and IRS.

Read more: IRS proposes to end crackdown on basis-shifting transactions