Connect with us

Accounting

New BOI reporting guidance issued for short-lived entities and foreign companies

Published

on

As we approach Jan 1, 2025, the effective BOI reporting deadline for entities formed before Jan 1, 2024, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network continues to refine its guidance to help ensure clarity and compliance by releasing crucial updates to its Frequently Asked Questions. The Sep 10, 2024, updates (FAQ PDF / FAQ website) shed light on some of the more nuanced aspects of BOI reporting and helped clarify some of the more pressing questions we continue to hear. 

For accounting firms and tax professionals, understanding these updates is critical in guiding the tens of millions of LLCs, closely-held businesses, and other small business clients through the complexities of BOI compliance.

Corporate Transparency Act and BOI: A quick review

As I detailed in an article last year, the Corporate Transparency Act is a pivotal part of the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020. It marks a significant shift in corporate transparency requirements in the United States, aiming to create a comprehensive database of beneficial ownership information accessible to law enforcement agencies and financial institutions. This initiative is designed to prevent the misuse of corporate structures for illicit purposes, including money laundering, terrorism financing, and tax evasion.

For more background on the Corporate Transparency Act and BOI reporting requirements, read my article Corporate Transparency Act presents opportunity and risk for firms.

The latest FinCEN updates and their implications

As with any new legislative or regulatory requirement, there is no lack of questions. The latest FinCEN FAQs are particularly relevant for companies that cease operations shortly after formation, foreign entities operating in the U.S., and reporting historical beneficial ownership information. 

Reporting requirements for short-lived entities (FAQ C.14)

One of the most significant clarifications from this FAQ update pertains to entities that cease to exist shortly after creation or registration. FAQ C.14 answers a question asked multiple times at every BOI webinar we host – does an entity still have to file if it ceases operation before its reporting deadline?

The updated guidance establishes a clear mandate: regardless of how quickly a company winds up its affairs, it must fulfill BOI reporting obligations.

Entity Creation Date BOI Reporting Deadline
Jan. 1 – Dec 31, 2024 Within 90 of receiving notice of creation or registration.
After Jan 1, 2025 Within 30 of receiving notice of creation or registration

While the requirement applies even if the company ceases to exist before the reporting deadline, no additional report is necessary if a company files its initial BOI report and then ceases to exist before the deadline.

Read the full text of FAQ C.14.

Implications for CPAs and tax professionals

With the clarification from FAQ C.14, those who are working with clients on BOI reporting should consider taking these three steps:

  • Advising clients to ensure they understand their BOI reporting obligations, even in cases of rapid business closure;
  • Maintaining heightened vigilance during company formation and dissolution processes; and,.
  • Implementing robust tracking systems to ensure compliance with these tight reporting windows.

Foreign company reporting obligations (FAQ C.16)

Addressing a critical gap in understanding for foreign entities operating in the U.S. market, FAQ C.16 is new. While the FAQ only asked whether foreign companies were required to report BOI if they had ceased operations before the BOI effective date of Jan 1, 2024, the guidance addresses when foreign companies are subject to BOI reporting requirements.

The three key points from C.16 regarding foreign entities are:

  • Foreign companies are exempt from BOI reporting if they ceased U.S. operations before Jan 1, 2024;
  • FinCEN considers a foreign company to have ceased U.S. operations when it completes the formal and irrevocable withdrawal of all U.S. registrations; and
  • BOI filing is required for foreign companies registered to do business in the U.S. on or after Jan 1, 2024. Even if they subsequently withdraw registration or had already wound up affairs before that date, they must file a BOI report.

Read the full text of FAQ C.16.

Implications for CPAs and tax professionals

C.14 provides much-needed clarity regarding foreign entities. Anyone working with foreign entities should consider:

  • Conducting a thorough review of any foreign clients’ U.S. registration status;
  • Assisting in determining the precise dates of registration withdrawal for any borderline cases; and,
  • Developing clear communication strategies to inform foreign clients of their reporting obligations, especially those who may have ceased U.S. operations but maintained registrations.

Historical beneficial ownership reporting (FAQ G.4)

The updated FAQ G.4 provides essential guidance on the temporal aspect of beneficial ownership reporting, addressing whether historical ownership information should be included in initial reports.

The general rule is that initial BOI reports should only include beneficial owners as of the filing date, but there is an exception.

The exception is specifically for a company that meets all of the following criteria:

  • It was created/registered during/after 2024;
  • It ceased operations before its reporting deadline; and,
  • The report is filed post-dissolution. 

If a company meets all three criteria above, the report filed should reflect BOI accurately as of the moment before the company ceases to exist.
Implications for CPAs and tax professionals

With any general rule usually comes exceptions, and FAQ G.4 isn’t any different. If you’re working with clients on BOI, consider:

  • Developing clear protocols for capturing “point-in-time” beneficial ownership information;
  • Implementing systems to track changes in beneficial ownership, particularly for clients nearing dissolution; and,
  • Educating clients on the importance of timely reporting and the potential need to capture historical data in specific scenarios.

Read the full text of FAQ G.4.

Strategies for compliance and client advisory

As accounting and tax professionals, your role in navigating these new requirements is crucial. As you consider the strategies below, make sure your clients understand that you are not providing legal advice; the client should engage legal counsel if such is required.

Read more about BOI and UPL in my article: CNA to provide CPA firms with BOI coverage

Education and communication

  • Develop comprehensive educational materials for staff and clients, including regular briefings on CTA requirements and FinCEN updates.
  • Create clear, concise communication templates to inform clients of their obligations.
  • Ensure you alert clients that you are not providing legal advice and that the client should engage legal counsel if such is required. This language should be included in your engagement letter with your clients.

Technology and process adaptation

  • Invest in or develop robust tracking systems for client entity statuses and reporting deadlines.
  • Implement automated alerts for approaching deadlines and status changes.
  • Establish transparent workflows for gathering and verifying beneficial ownership information.

Risk assessment and mitigation

  • Conduct thorough reviews of your client base to identify entities at high risk of noncompliance.
  • Develop tailored strategies for complex cases, such as foreign entities or companies nearing dissolution.
  • Consider partnering with legal experts for particularly challenging scenarios and cases where a legal opinion is necessary.

Proactive advisory services

  • Offer BOI compliance checks/reporting as part of your regular services.
  • Guide on structuring decisions that may impact BOI reporting obligations. Again, CPAs must make clear to the client that if a legal opinion is required, the client should consult a lawyer. Avoiding the unauthorized practice of law (UPL) is a must.
  • Assist clients in developing internal processes for ongoing compliance and updates.

Continuous learning and adaptation

  • Stay abreast of further FinCEN updates and guidance.
  • Participate in industry forums and discussions on CTA implementation.
  • Regularly reassess and refine your firm’s BOI reporting advisory services approach.

What’s next 

The latest FinCEN FAQ updates represent a significant step towards clarifying the nuances of BOI reporting under the Corporate Transparency Act. These clarifications offer both challenges and opportunities for accounting firms and tax professionals. By thoroughly understanding these requirements and their implications, you further position yourselves as invaluable advisors in an increasingly complex regulatory landscape.

As we move closer to full implementation of the CTA, staying informed and agile cannot be overstated. These updates on short-lived entities, foreign company obligations, and historical reporting are the latest guidance from FinCEN to respond to confusion and unanswered questions. Many unanswered questions remain, and continued guidance will be forthcoming.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Aprio acquires JMS Advisory Group

Published

on

Aprio, a Top 25 Firm based in Atlanta, has acquired JMS Advisory Group, a firm that specializes in unclaimed property compliance and escheat process development, also based in Atlanta 

Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed. Aprio ranked No. 24 on Accounting Today’s just released 2025 list of the Top 100 Firms, with $485.34 million in annual revenue. JMS Advisory Group is bringing 12 team members and two partners to Aprio, which currently has over 2,100 team members and 205 partners. 

JMS was founded in 2006 and helps clients mitigate risk and capitalize on opportunities through managed unclaimed property compliance. The team includes attorneys, CPAs, CFEs and others.

JMS has a wide range of clients, including enterprise companies, financial institutions, credit unions, insurance companies, hospitality and health care organizations.

“As Aprio continues its rapid growth, we are committed to expanding our services to meet the evolving needs of our clients,” said Aprio CEO Richard Kopelman in a statement Tuesday. “The addition of JMS gives us the opportunity to continue strengthening our position as a future-focused advisory firm. JMS’s focus on escheat management and asset recovery not only enhances our current capabilities but also allows us to deliver even more impactful solutions to help businesses navigate complex compliance challenges.”

JMS president and CEO James Santivanez is joining Aprio as a partner and provides guidance to clients on unclaimed property and state and local tax issues. 

“We created JMS to make an impact nationally in the unclaimed property consulting industry, and I’m proud of our nearly 20-year history of helping clients mitigate risk and capitalize on opportunities resulting from accurate and properly managed unclaimed property compliance,” Santivanez said in a statement. “Joining with Aprio takes us to the next level, allowing us to build upon our success while providing even greater value to our clients. This is an exciting next step in our journey.”

JMS founder and director Sherridan Santivanez is also joining Aprio as a partner. He specializes in representing clients before state enforcement authorities and managing complex audits and voluntary disclosures for some of the world’s largest companies. She provides strategic guidance on audit preparation and navigates interactions with state and third-party auditors.

Aprio received a private equity investment last July from Charlesbank Capital Partners in Boston. The firm recently announced plans to open a law firm in Arizona known as Aprio Legal LLC, in partnership with Radix Law. (KPMG has also recently opened a law firm in Arizona known as KPMG Law US.) Aprio has completed over 20 mergers and acquisitions since 2017, adding Ridout Barrett & Co. CPAs & Advisors last December, and before that, Antares Group, Culotta, Scroggins, Hendricks & Gillespie, Aronson, Salver & Cook, Gomerdinger & Associates, Tobin & Collins, Squire + Lemkin, LBA Haynes Strand, Leaf Saltzman, RINA and Tarlow and Co.

Continue Reading

Accounting

AICPA, NASBA look for feedback on CPA licensure changes

Published

on

The American Institute of CPAs and the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy are asking for comments on their proposal for an additional pathway to CPA licensure through changes in the Uniform Accountancy Act model legislation used in states.

The AICPA and NASBA proposed the alternative pathway to CPA licensure last month and the UAA changes last September.

The UAA changes would:

  • Enable states to adopt a third licensure pathway that requires earning a baccalaureate degree with an accounting concentration, completing two years of professional experience as defined by Board rule, and passing the Uniform CPA Examination;
  • Shift to an “individual-based” mobility model, which allows CPAs to practice in other states with just one license; and
  • Add safe harbor language to ensure CPAs who meet existing licensure requirements preserve practice privileges.

The proposals come as several states are already moving forward with their own changes, including Ohio and Virginia. Accounting organizations are hoping to increase the pipeline of accountants and make it easier to recruit and train CPAs, including people who come from other backgrounds.

The updates reflect feedback gathered during a late 2024 exposure draft period and forward-looking solutions being advanced by state CPA societies and boards of accountancy to increase flexibility for  licensure candidates while maintaining the integrity of the CPA license.

The AICPA and NASBA are asking for comments on the proposed changes by May 3, 2025. They can be submitted through this form. All comments will be published following the 60-day exposure period.

The UAA offers state legislatures and boards of accountancy a national model they can adopt in full or in part to meet the licensure needs of each jurisdiction.

The proposal would maintain the current two pathways to CPA licensure:

  • Earning a  post baccalaureate degree with an accounting concentration, completing one year of professional experience as defined by Board rule, and passing the CPA exam; and,
  • Earning a  baccalaureate degree with an accounting concentration,  plus an additional 30 semester credit hours , completing one year of professional experience as defined by Board rule, and passing the CPA exam.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Small businesses saw moderate job growth in February

Published

on

Small business employment held steady last month, according to payroll company Paychex, while wage growth continued below 3%

The Paychex Small Business Employment Watch‘s Small Business Jobs Index, which measures employment growth among U.S. businesses with fewer than 50 employees, was 100.04, indicating moderate job growth. Hourly earnings growth for small business workers remained below 3% (at 2.92%) for the fourth month in a row. Hourly earnings growth has been mostly flat for the past seven months, ranging from 2.90% to 3.01%.

“Our employment data continues to show moderate job growth and wage growth below three percent,” said Paychex president and CEO John Gibson in a statement Tuesday. “The consistent long-term trend we’re seeing is a small business labor market that is resilient and stable with little job movement among workers. At the same time, small business owners are optimistic about future business conditions despite uncertainty about how to adapt to a rapidly evolving legislative and regulatory landscape.”

The Midwest remained the top region in the country for the ninth consecutive month with a jobs index level of 100.54. Seven of the 20 states analyzed gained more than one percentage point in February, led by Texas (up 2.11 percentage points).

Phoenix (101.92) increased its rate of small business job growth for the fourth month in a row in February to rank first among the largest U.S. metros.

Construction (3.29%) regained its top spot among industries in terms of hourly earnings growth in February, followed closely by “other services” (3.27%) and manufacturing (3.21%).

The pace of job growth in manufacturing gained 2.39 percentage points to 99.52 in February, the industry’s biggest one-month increase since April 2021.

Continue Reading

Trending