Connect with us

Accounting

New Corporate Transparency Act beneficial ownership information FAQs clarify reporting requirements, database access

Published

on

The landscape of Corporate Transparency Act beneficial ownership information reporting continues to evolve, and accountants and others who advise their small business clients need to stay ahead of the curve. 

FinCEN’s April 18, 2024, update to the BOI FAQs offers crucial insights from the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, impacting everything from homeowner association filing requirements to clarifying that S corporations are considered “corporations” for reporting company purposes and the timeline for accessing the BOI database.

The new FAQs reiterate the potential consequences of neglecting BOI reporting obligations. Civil penalties — which are annually adjusted for inflation — can reach up to $591 per day, while criminal penalties include imprisonment and hefty fines.

What about the NSBA ruling?

Yes, for the time being BOI reporting is suspended for the 60,000 or so National Small Business Association members. In case you missed it, the NSBA won a summary judgment in March of 2024, preventing the Corporate Transparency Act’s BOI reporting requirements from being enforced upon its roughly 60,000 members while the ruling goes through the appeals process. 

However, FinCEN has said it will continue implementing the Corporate Transparency Act and BOI requirements as required by Congress while complying with the court order. Even after the NSBA ruling, roughly 33 million entities currently fall under FinCEN’s purview, in addition to the 5 million new entities expected to be added in 2024 and each year through 2034. Many legal experts believe that the government will prevail in the courts and the constitutionality of the CTA will be upheld.

HOAs on notice: Reporting likely required

While the answer to the question, “Are homeowners associations considered reporting companies and required to file BOI reports?” is still “It depends,” the April 18 update has helped clarify the path to yes or no. 

According to the update, most HOAs incorporated or created by filing a document with a secretary of state or similar office may fall under the definition of “reporting companies” and, therefore, must report BOI information. 

Exemptions are limited and specific. According to the new FAQ, only unincorporated HOAs or those designated as social welfare organizations under IRC 501(c)(4) may be exempt.

With the Jan. 1, 2025 deadline for pre-2024 associations looming, it’s time for action. Homeowners associations formed in 2024 must take particular note since, unlike their pre-2024 colleagues, they only have 90 days from their formation date to file. 

To avoid year-end congestion and stress, many advisors are encouraging their pre-2024 business clients to file their initial BOI reports early, ideally in the next few months.

S corps aren’t exempt based on structure type

Under this update, the FAQs clarify that any S corporation that qualifies as a reporting company — and is not otherwise exempt from reporting — must comply with BOI reporting requirements. The S corp pass-through structure for tax purposes does not affect reporting obligations or make it a “tax-exempt entity” under FinCEN BOI reporting regulations.

Entities losing their exempt status in 2024 get a glimpse of relief

The new FAQs include some breathing room for certain companies that lose their exempt status between now and Jan. 1, 2025. 

Companies created before Jan. 1, 2024, that lose their exempt status during 2024 have an extended deadline to file their initial BOI report: Jan. 1, 2025, or 30 calendar days after losing their exempt status, whichever is later.

The FAQs provide this example: If an existing reporting company ceases to be exempt on Feb. 1, 2024, it will have until Jan. 1, 2025, to file its initial BOI report. If it ceases to be exempt on Dec. 15, 2024, it will have until Jan. 14, 2025, to file its initial BOI report.

BOI database: Who gets access and when?

The wait for accessing the BOI database continues for some stakeholders. FinCEN plans a phased approach throughout 2024 and into 2025. Here’s a breakdown of the expected phases and who is expected to get access:

  • Phase 1: Spring 2024. A “handful” of federal agency users kick-start access since Phase 1 is a pilot program.
  • Phase 2: Summer 2024. Treasury offices and other federal agencies involved in law enforcement and national security who already have memoranda of understanding for access to Bank Secrecy Act information are allowed in.
  • Phase 3: Fall 2024. The net widens to additional federal agencies engaged in law enforcement, national security, and intelligence activities, as well as state, local and tribal law enforcement partners.
  • Phase 4: Winter 2024. Intermediary federal agencies involved in processing foreign government requests get access.
  • Spring 2025. Financial institutions get access, subject to customer due diligence requirements under applicable law.

Currently, no other governmental entity, organization, business or individual has access to the BOI database, despite our being almost four months into populating the database.

A word on the IRS and BOI access

While not mentioned in the new FAQs — or elsewhere — as part of the U.S. Treasury Department, it’s not unlikely that the IRS could be granted access to BOI information, especially during criminal investigations. 

Expect additional guidance from the Treasury regarding under what circumstances and to what extent FinCEN would grant the IRS access to BOI information.

New FAQs provide some clarity, but expect more guidance

While the new FAQs answer some important questions, many lingering concerns remain. One ongoing issue the new FAQs don’t address is the critical need to educate the tens of millions of entities obligated to report under the Corporate Transparency Act. 

As to the NSBA and other cases challenging the constitutionality of the CTA, many experts believe one of two outcomes will occur: The courts will ultimately find the CTA constitutional, or Congress will amend the law to eliminate the issues that could lead to a finding that it is unconstitutional.

As we carefully watch the journey these cases take through the court system, we can expect continuing FinCEN guidance through the balance of the year and beyond.

Continue Reading

Accounting

10 best and worst state individual income taxes in 2025

Published

on

The Tax Foundation recently ranked the states with most and least competitive individual income taxes in 2025. 

Alaska, Florida, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Wyoming have the most competitive individual income taxes, as they do not levy individual income tax at all. New York, with its complex tax system, is the least competitive.

Read more about the states with the most and least competitive individual income taxes in 2025.

10 least competitive states for individual income taxes in 2025

2025 rank State 2025 score 2024 rank 2023 rank 2022 rank 2021 rank 2020 rank
41 Delaware 4.54 10 10 9 9 11
42 Vermont 4.51 9 11 11 10 10
43 Minnesota 4.35 7 7 8 8 7
44 Maryland 3.81 6 6 6 6 6
45 Hawaii 3.76 5 5 5 5 5
46 Connecticut 3.44 4 4 4 4 4
47 District of Columbia 3.50 3 3 5 5 5
48 New Jersey 2.57 3 3 3 3 2
49 California 2.37 2 2 2 1 1
50 New York 2.11 1 1 1 2 3

In 2020-2024, the rank of DC does not affect the rank of the states.

10 most competitive states for individual income taxes in 2025

2025
rank
State 2025
score
2024
rank
2023
rank
2022
rank
2021
rank
2020
rank
10 Montana 5.92 22 20 21 21 22
9 Utah 5.99 9 9 9 9 9
8 Arizona 6.31 8 8 14 14 14
7 Nevada 6.96 7 7 8 7 7
1 (tie) Alaska 10.00 1 1 1 1 1
1 (tie) Florida 10.00 1 1 1 1 1
1 (tie) South Dakota 10.00 1 1 1 1 1
1 (tie) Tennessee 10.00 1 1 1 8 8
1 (tie) Texas 10.00 1 1 1 1 1
1 (tie) Wyoming 10.00 1 1 1 1 1

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Crooks R Us

Published

on

The shadow knows; body of evidence; make a Note of it; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Newark, New Jersey: Thomas Nicholas Salzano, a.k.a. Nicholas Salzano, of Secaucus, New Jersey, the shadow CEO of National Realty Investment Advisors, has been sentenced to 12 years in prison for orchestrating a $658 million Ponzi scheme and conspiring to evade millions in taxes.

Salzano previously pleaded guilty to securities fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud the U.S., admitting that he made numerous misrepresentations to investors while he secretly ran National Realty. From February 2018 through January 2022, Salzano and others defrauded investors and potential investors of NRIA Partners Portfolio Fund I, a real estate fund operated by National Realty, of $650 million.

Salzano and his conspirators executed their scheme through an aggressive multiyear, nationwide marketing campaign that involved thousands of emails to investors, advertisements, and meetings and presentations to investors. Salzano led and directed the marketing campaign that was intended to mislead investors into believing that NRIA generated significant profits. It in fact generated little to no profits and operated as a Ponzi scheme.

Salzano stole millions of dollars of investor money to support his lavish lifestyle, including expensive dinners, extravagant birthday parties, and payments to family and associates who did not work at NRIA. He also orchestrated a separate, related conspiracy to avoid paying taxes on his stolen funds.

He was also sentenced to three years of supervised release and agreed to a forfeiture money judgment of $8.52 million, full restitution of $507.4 million to the victims of his offenses and $6.46 million to the IRS.

Marina del Rey, California: Tax preparer Lidiya Gessese has been sentenced to 41 months in prison for preparing and filing false returns for her clients and for not reporting her income.

Gessese owned and operated Tax We R/Tax R Us and Insurance Services from 2013 through 2019 and charged clients $300 to $800. Gessese would then prepare returns that included claims to deductions and credits she knew her clients were not entitled to, including falsely claiming dependents, earned income credits, the American Opportunity Credit, Child Tax Credits, business deductions, education expenses or unreimbursed employee business expenses. The illegitimate claims led to some $1,135,554.64 issued by the IRS for 2010 through 2018.

She failed to report, or underreported, her own income for 2010 through 2018, some of which included improperly diverted funds from clients’ inflated or fraudulent refunds, causing a tax loss of $488,276.

Gessese, who pleaded guilty in April, was also ordered to pay $1,096,034.01 to the IRS and $53,526.95 to her other victims.

Fullerton, California: In Chun Jung of Anaheim, California, owner of an auto repair business, has pleaded guilty to filing false returns for 2015 to 2022, underreporting his income by at least $1,184,914.

He owned and operated JY JBMT INC., d.b.a. JY Auto Body, which was registered as a subchapter S corp. Jung was the 100% shareholder.

Jung accepted check payments from customers that he and his co-schemers then cashed at multiple area check cashing services; the cashed checks totaled some $1,157,462. Jung withheld the business receipts and income from his tax preparer and omitted them on his returns.

He will pay $300,145 in taxes due to the IRS and faces a $250,000 penalty and up to three years in prison. Sentencing is Jan. 31.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Tucson, Arizona: Tax preparer Nour Abubakr Nour, 34, has been sentenced to 30 months in prison.

Nour, who pleaded guilty a year ago, operated the tax prep business Skyman Tax and for tax years 2016 through 2018 prepared and filed at least 27 false individual federal income tax returns for clients.

These returns included falsely claimed business income that inflated refunds so that he could pay himself large prep fees. Nour’s clients had no knowledge that he was filing false tax returns under their names.

Nour was also ordered to pay $150,154 in restitution to the United States for the false tax refunds.

Farmington, Connecticut: Tax preparer Mark Legowski, 60, has been sentenced to eight months in prison, to be followed by a year of supervised release, for filing false returns.

From January 2015 through December 2017, Legowski was a self-employed accountant and tax preparer doing business as Legowski & Co. Inc. He prepared income tax returns for some 400 to 500 individual clients and some 50 to 60 businesses.

To reduce his personal income tax liability for 2015 through 2017, Legowski underreported his practice’s gross receipts by excluding some client payment checks. He then filed false personal income tax returns that failed to report more than $1.4 million in business income, which resulted in a loss to the IRS of $499,289.

Legowski, who pleaded guilty earlier this year, has paid the IRS that amount in back taxes but must still pay penalties and interest. He has also been ordered to pay a $10,000 fine.

Wheeling, West Virginia: Dr. Nitesh Ratnakar, 48, has been convicted of failing to pay nearly $2.5 million in payroll taxes.

Ratnakar, who was found guilty of 41 counts of tax fraud, owned and operated a gastroenterology practice and a medical equipment manufacturer in Elkins, West Virginia. He withheld payroll taxes from employees’ paychecks and failed to make $2,419,560 in required payments to the IRS. Ratnakar also filed false tax returns in 2020, 2021 and 2022.

He faces up to five years in prison for each of the first 38 tax fraud counts and up to three years for the remaining counts.

Orlando, Florida: Two men have been sentenced for their involvement in the “Note Program,” a tax fraud.

Jasen Harvey, of Tampa, Florida, was sentenced to four years in prison and Christopher Johnson, of Orlando, was sentenced to 37 months for conspiring to defraud the U.S.

From 2015 to 2018, they promoted a scheme in which Harvey and others prepared returns for clients that claimed that large, nonexistent income tax withholdings had been paid to the IRS and sought large refunds based on those purported withholdings. The conspirators charged fees and required the clients to pay a share of the fraudulently obtained refunds to them.

Overall, the defendants claimed more than $3 million in fraudulent refunds on clients’ returns, of which the IRS paid about $1.5 million.

Both were also ordered to serve three years of supervised release. Johnson was also ordered to pay $864,117.42 in restitution to the United States; Harvey was ordered to pay $785,858.42 in restitution. Co-defendant Arthur Grimes will be sentenced on Jan. 13.

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida: Tax preparer Jean Volvick Moise, 39, has been sentenced to three years in prison for filing false income tax returns.

Moise prepared false returns for clients to inflate refunds. He prepared returns which included, among other things, false dependents, false 1099 withholdings, false educational credits and false Schedule C expenses, often for businesses which did not exist. Moise’s fee was larger than the typical one charged by a tax preparer.

Moise filed hundreds of false returns that caused the IRS to issue more than $574,000 in fraudulent refunds.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting in 2025: The year ahead in numbers

Published

on

With 2025 almost upon us, it’s worth thinking about what the new year will bring, and what accounting firms expect their next 12 months to look like.

With that in mind, Accounting Today conducted its annual Year Ahead survey in the late fall to find out firms’ expectations for 2025, including their growth expectations, their hiring plans, their growth expectations, how they think tax season will play out and much more. The overall theme: Thing are going well, but there are elements of friction holding them back, particularly when it comes to moving to more of a focus on advisory services.

You can see the full report here; a selection of key data points are presented below.

Continue Reading

Trending