Connect with us

Accounting

Opportunity zones and other gain deferral strategies save on taxes

Published

on

Stocks, real estate and alternative assets are near their all-time highs amid an election year with an uncertain tax landscape looming. Investors are calling and seeking last-minute tax mitigation strategies. For clients who have big gains from appreciated assets, I often recommend the federal opportunity zone program because it’s the most flexible and most impactful tax deferral program I’ve seen in my 40-plus year career. 

As of now, the OZ program is set to begin winding down in 2026. Absent pending legislation, September 2027 will be the last chance for your clients to roll over their calendar 2026 capital gains and to participate in the OZ program. But there are still plenty of reasons to consider opportunity zone investing for tax deferral (and ultimately tax exemption) purposes.

In a nutshell, the OZ program allows investors to defer their capital gains from sales of appreciated real estate, stocks, businesses, personal residences, collectibles and even crypto through 2026. They do so by investing in one of 8,700 distressed areas of the United States via a Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF). They just need to make their investment within 180 days of the gain reporting date. If the gain is coming through a K-1, the start of the 180-day period can be delayed until March 15 of the year following the gain date. The QOF then deploys those gains into qualifying real estate or an operating business located within one of the 8,700 designated OZ census tracts. By keeping their invested gains in place, your clients won’t pay tax on those gains until at least April of 2027. Further, if they hold the investment for 10 years, all post-reinvestment appreciation from their original QOF investment will be excluded at the federal level — and at the state level in all but six states. 

Bipartisan support

The OZ program has always had bipartisan support because it’s designed to spur economic growth in underserved areas. QOFs have raised an estimated $150 billion in equity since the program began in 2018 — far surpassing the most optimistic projections. Further, bipartisan legislation is pending to push out the gain deferral period from 2026 to Dec. 31, 2028. Proposed legislation would also bring back the basis step-ups of 10% and 5% that were part of the original program, but with shorter holding periods to qualify for the step-up — five years for the 5% step up and six years for the 10% step up.

Advantages of doing business in an opportunity zone

People typically associate OZ funds with real estate development, but about 25% of our OZ work involves operating businesses located within opportunity zone census tracts throughout the U.S. For your clients that are startups or existing businesses, there are many advantages to relocating to opportunity zones, such as more affordable real estate, rental rates and operating costs to help businesses save money. 

To become a Qualified Opportunity Zone Business (QOZB), a business must meet the 50% Gross Income Test. There are three “safe harbors” within the regulations and the business must meet only one of them:​

  • At least 50% of the services performed (based on hours) by its employees or contractors are performed within the Qualified Opportunity Zone.
  • At least 50% of the compensation paid to QOZ-based employees and independent contractors is performed in the QOZ.
  • The core operations and facilities responsible for generating half of the business’s gross revenue are located within a QOZ.

Our firm works with many serial entrepreneurs, including tech gurus and engineers, who sell their family businesses, rental real estate or personal real estate, and then roll the gains into a QOF where they start one or multiple businesses within the QOZ. Many entrepreneurs are using a combination of real estate entities and operating businesses in their OZ Funds.
OZ for homeowners with big gains 

In today’s real estate market, many homeowners are joyfully selling their residences for substantially more than they paid for their properties years or even decades ago. But after closing, they’re surprised to receive hefty capital gains tax bills on the appreciation over their first $500,000 in basis (married) or first $250,000 in basis (single). For instance, a married couple that bought their house for $200,000 30 years ago and sells it for $1 million today would have an $800,000 gain and would have to pay capital gains tax on $300,000, after claiming the $500,000 primary residence exemption ($1 million – $200,000 – $500,000). That’s a tax bill of $45,000 to $60,000 federal alone. 

If the homeowners are in good health, then reinvesting the capital gain into a QOF can offer substantial tax savings. In the above example, they still have $700,000 in cash after making the QOF investment, assuming there was no mortgage.

OZ vs. 1031 exchange

The OZ program differs from a 1031 exchange in several ways. A 1031 exchange can only be used for real estate assets, whereas with the OZ program, the gain from the sale of any type of asset — real estate, stocks, bonds, collectibles, crypto, etc. — can be placed into a QOF and receive the tax benefits. Remember, the OZ program only requires your client’s gain to be placed into the QOF (not the full market value of the investment) to defer 100% of the gain. Then the QOF or a subsidiary QOZB invests in the property. Your client cannot invest in the property directly. Example: Let’s say you had $300,000 basis on a piece of land, and you sold it for $1 million (i.e., a $700,000 gain). To get the full deferral under a 1031, you’d generally have to buy a $1 million dollar piece of property. In the OZ world, you would only have to reinvest $700,000 to eliminate 100% of your gain.

Also, under the OZ program, all the depreciation you claim, including cost segregation and everything in the interim period never gets recaptured when you dispose of it after 10 years. That ends up boosting your ROI another 2% to 3% per year. Also, your clients have time to do a ground-up build in an OZ fund using deferred tax dollars. By contrast, with a 1031 they generally can’t do a ground-up build since they must purchase real estate with an equal or higher value to defer all their 1031 gain.

Installment sales

If your clients don’t want the complexity of an OZ fund, they can simply do an installment sale. They simply sell their land with a building on it and take back a seller note for part of it. Many people overlook the fact that even if they don’t collect $1 on the note in the year of sale, they are still stuck with 100% of the recapture that they have on the depreciation they’ve previously claimed. Therefore, they must be sure to collect enough to pay the tax on the depreciation recapture. The good news is they can defer the rest of the gain until the cash is collected. Their tax basis is allocated to each tranche of collections that they receive. Also, they run the risk that capital gain rates could be higher, and that’s also a risk in the OZ world. Vice President Harris just announced plans for a 28% capital gain rate (up from 20%) for taxpayers with incomes above $1 million. We don’t know the outcome of the upcoming presidential election, so we don’t know what the 2026 tax rates are going to be. Remember, the OZ program defers the capital gain reporting — not the tax.

Delaware statutory trust

The Delaware statutory trust is another vehicle enabling investors to move or shelter their capital gains. DSTs are essentially pre-packaged 1031s that allow multiple investors to pool their money and invest in actual real estate properties (not funds) without the headache of managing the properties, which are often institutional-grade assets such as apartment buildings, office buildings and shopping centers. This collaboration allows your clients to diversify their portfolios and potentially earn higher after-tax returns on their investments.

Regardless of which party wins the White House in November, tax rates are likely to be worrisome for many of your successful clients. It will become more concerning for them in a few years when the multi-trillion-dollar U.S. debt load can no longer be ignored. If your client has gains of $1 million or more from any type of appreciated asset, the OZ program — or one of the other tactics explained above — should be on your short-list of strategies for them to consider. Doing good for others while doing well for your clients and their families. That’s a win-win all around — exactly the intention of the bipartisan drafters of the OZ program.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Aprio acquires JMS Advisory Group

Published

on

Aprio, a Top 25 Firm based in Atlanta, has acquired JMS Advisory Group, a firm that specializes in unclaimed property compliance and escheat process development, also based in Atlanta 

Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed. Aprio ranked No. 24 on Accounting Today’s just released 2025 list of the Top 100 Firms, with $485.34 million in annual revenue. JMS Advisory Group is bringing 12 team members and two partners to Aprio, which currently has over 2,100 team members and 205 partners. 

JMS was founded in 2006 and helps clients mitigate risk and capitalize on opportunities through managed unclaimed property compliance. The team includes attorneys, CPAs, CFEs and others.

JMS has a wide range of clients, including enterprise companies, financial institutions, credit unions, insurance companies, hospitality and health care organizations.

“As Aprio continues its rapid growth, we are committed to expanding our services to meet the evolving needs of our clients,” said Aprio CEO Richard Kopelman in a statement Tuesday. “The addition of JMS gives us the opportunity to continue strengthening our position as a future-focused advisory firm. JMS’s focus on escheat management and asset recovery not only enhances our current capabilities but also allows us to deliver even more impactful solutions to help businesses navigate complex compliance challenges.”

JMS president and CEO James Santivanez is joining Aprio as a partner and provides guidance to clients on unclaimed property and state and local tax issues. 

“We created JMS to make an impact nationally in the unclaimed property consulting industry, and I’m proud of our nearly 20-year history of helping clients mitigate risk and capitalize on opportunities resulting from accurate and properly managed unclaimed property compliance,” Santivanez said in a statement. “Joining with Aprio takes us to the next level, allowing us to build upon our success while providing even greater value to our clients. This is an exciting next step in our journey.”

JMS founder and director Sherridan Santivanez is also joining Aprio as a partner. He specializes in representing clients before state enforcement authorities and managing complex audits and voluntary disclosures for some of the world’s largest companies. She provides strategic guidance on audit preparation and navigates interactions with state and third-party auditors.

Aprio received a private equity investment last July from Charlesbank Capital Partners in Boston. The firm recently announced plans to open a law firm in Arizona known as Aprio Legal LLC, in partnership with Radix Law. (KPMG has also recently opened a law firm in Arizona known as KPMG Law US.) Aprio has completed over 20 mergers and acquisitions since 2017, adding Ridout Barrett & Co. CPAs & Advisors last December, and before that, Antares Group, Culotta, Scroggins, Hendricks & Gillespie, Aronson, Salver & Cook, Gomerdinger & Associates, Tobin & Collins, Squire + Lemkin, LBA Haynes Strand, Leaf Saltzman, RINA and Tarlow and Co.

Continue Reading

Accounting

AICPA, NASBA look for feedback on CPA licensure changes

Published

on

The American Institute of CPAs and the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy are asking for comments on their proposal for an additional pathway to CPA licensure through changes in the Uniform Accountancy Act model legislation used in states.

The AICPA and NASBA proposed the alternative pathway to CPA licensure last month and the UAA changes last September.

The UAA changes would:

  • Enable states to adopt a third licensure pathway that requires earning a baccalaureate degree with an accounting concentration, completing two years of professional experience as defined by Board rule, and passing the Uniform CPA Examination;
  • Shift to an “individual-based” mobility model, which allows CPAs to practice in other states with just one license; and
  • Add safe harbor language to ensure CPAs who meet existing licensure requirements preserve practice privileges.

The proposals come as several states are already moving forward with their own changes, including Ohio and Virginia. Accounting organizations are hoping to increase the pipeline of accountants and make it easier to recruit and train CPAs, including people who come from other backgrounds.

The updates reflect feedback gathered during a late 2024 exposure draft period and forward-looking solutions being advanced by state CPA societies and boards of accountancy to increase flexibility for  licensure candidates while maintaining the integrity of the CPA license.

The AICPA and NASBA are asking for comments on the proposed changes by May 3, 2025. They can be submitted through this form. All comments will be published following the 60-day exposure period.

The UAA offers state legislatures and boards of accountancy a national model they can adopt in full or in part to meet the licensure needs of each jurisdiction.

The proposal would maintain the current two pathways to CPA licensure:

  • Earning a  post baccalaureate degree with an accounting concentration, completing one year of professional experience as defined by Board rule, and passing the CPA exam; and,
  • Earning a  baccalaureate degree with an accounting concentration,  plus an additional 30 semester credit hours , completing one year of professional experience as defined by Board rule, and passing the CPA exam.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Small businesses saw moderate job growth in February

Published

on

Small business employment held steady last month, according to payroll company Paychex, while wage growth continued below 3%

The Paychex Small Business Employment Watch‘s Small Business Jobs Index, which measures employment growth among U.S. businesses with fewer than 50 employees, was 100.04, indicating moderate job growth. Hourly earnings growth for small business workers remained below 3% (at 2.92%) for the fourth month in a row. Hourly earnings growth has been mostly flat for the past seven months, ranging from 2.90% to 3.01%.

“Our employment data continues to show moderate job growth and wage growth below three percent,” said Paychex president and CEO John Gibson in a statement Tuesday. “The consistent long-term trend we’re seeing is a small business labor market that is resilient and stable with little job movement among workers. At the same time, small business owners are optimistic about future business conditions despite uncertainty about how to adapt to a rapidly evolving legislative and regulatory landscape.”

The Midwest remained the top region in the country for the ninth consecutive month with a jobs index level of 100.54. Seven of the 20 states analyzed gained more than one percentage point in February, led by Texas (up 2.11 percentage points).

Phoenix (101.92) increased its rate of small business job growth for the fourth month in a row in February to rank first among the largest U.S. metros.

Construction (3.29%) regained its top spot among industries in terms of hourly earnings growth in February, followed closely by “other services” (3.27%) and manufacturing (3.21%).

The pace of job growth in manufacturing gained 2.39 percentage points to 99.52 in February, the industry’s biggest one-month increase since April 2021.

Continue Reading

Trending