Historically, the first sales tax holidays started in the Southeast U.S. — hurricane-related holidays to incentivize people to prepare themselves for heavy weather events, under the premise that impacts of hurricanes would be lessened if residents were better prepared.
Sales tax holidays then expanded into back-to-school sales, starting pre-Labor Day in late July through early August. These holidays were built around the fact that they were great politics at a time of approaching elections and were great for retailers. This bolstered a weekend when people would be spending money anyway, getting ready for the school season.
But with the main sales tax season just ending, it’s worth noting one major challenge that comes along with them, according to Scott Peterson, vice president of U.S. tax policy and government relations at Avalara: “States don’t administer sales tax, retailers do. States simply make an announcement — the real change happens in the cash register.”
Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg
Avalara conducted a survey to quantify the burden for 500 businesses in the midst of ever-expanding sales tax holidays. “We queried operations and finance professionals in the middle of August, with questions around the operational side of sales tax holidays,” Peterson said. “We asked, ‘What does it take to do that work? How did holidays impact them? What did it cost to administer a sales tax holiday?'”
One-third of retailers said sales tax holidays are a logistical nightmare, with 32% responding that they only broke even at sales tax holidays due to personnel and other expenses, while 27% lost money after investing in new resources. A total of 41% of retailers made more money than it cost to prepare for the holiday.
Meanwhile, 57% needed to hire additional staff for sales tax holiday crunches, and 27% said the biggest challenge is the financial burden it puts on the business.
“The challenge is that retailers sell multiple products,” Peterson said. “Home Depot, for example, sells some goods that would seem to qualify for back-to-school. For instance, is a work shirt something a parent would buy their child for back-to-school? Home Depot sells pads, pens and pencils. What qualifies? A larger retailer might need to go to their state department of revenue to get clarity on the correct course of action.”
A good example of this complexity is Florida — they have eight sales tax holidays this year, including back-to-school holidays twice a year for a week each time.
“What really causes complexity is the lack of adequate notice of upcoming holidays,” Peterson observed. “Florida has a one-month Freedom Tax Holiday in July, exempting around 30 different types of products — for example camping supplies such as tents, chairs, sleeping bags, stoves, lanterns, flashlights, and so forth. Each product type has a separate dollar limit.”
As tax director of South Dakota, Peterson noted that retailers were often opponents of proposed sales tax holidays. “This was in the 1990s, and rudimentary cash registers were the norm, typically leased from companies that had to make changes to the cash registers. It could cost a retailer $3,000 to bring the leasing company in to make changes to cash registers for a single weekend.”
Adequate notice is considered 60 days, which is often not the case on the ground with state changes to existing sales tax holidays or introducing new holidays. But this year, Avalara received three days’ notice of a new Florida sales tax holiday and had to make rapid system changes.
“State departments of revenue need to decide on, for example, what constitutes a weekend,” said Peterson. “They then need to agree on product categories and dollar limits on products. And sales clerks and point of sale systems need to be aware of and updated for tax free items at the point of purchase.”
The states vary widely in their approach to exempting items for the holiday, according to Peterson.
“In Iowa, only clothing and footwear are included,” he explained. “But in Florida, back-to-school tax holidays involve a long list of eligible items. For Walmart, operating across states, their computers need to reflect specifics of each sales tax holiday in each state. And sophisticated shopping cart systems need to have each item mapped for the correct sales tax rate, integrated with back-end sales tax software. These holidays represent a big expense for retailers.”
Jody Padar, an author and speaker known as “The Radical CPA,” and Katie Tolin, a growth strategist for CPAs, together launched a training and technology platform called XcelLabs.
XcelLabs provides solutions to help accountants use artificial technology fluently and strategically. The Pennsylvania Institute of CPAs and CPA Crossings joined with Padar and Tolin as strategic partners and investors.
“To reinvent the profession, we must start by training the professional who can then transform their firms,” Padar said in a statement. “By equipping people with data and insights that help them see things differently, they can provide better advice to their clients and firm.”
Jody Padar
The platform includes XcelLabs Academy, a series of educational online courses on the basics of AI, being a better advisor, leadership and practice management; Navi, a proprietary tool that uses AI to help accountants turn unstructured data like emails, phone calls and meetings into insights; and training and consulting services. These offerings are currently in beta testing.
“Accountants know they need to be more advisory, but not everyone can figure out how to do it,” Tolin said in a statement. “Couple that with the fact that AI will be doing a lot of the lower-level work accountants do today, and we need to create that next level advisor now. By showing accountants how to unlock patterns in their actions and turn client conversations into emotionally intelligent advice, we can create the accounting professional of the future.”
Katie Tolin
“AI is transforming how CPAs work, and XcelLabs is focused on helping the profession evolve with it,” PICPA CEO Jennifer Cryder said in a statement. “At PICPA, we’re proud to support a mission that aligns so closely with ours: empowering firms to use AI not just for efficiency, but to drive growth, value and long-term relevance.”
The accountant the world urgently needs has evolved far beyond the traditional role we recognized just a few years ago.
The transformation of the accounting profession is not merely an anticipated change; it is a pressing reality that is currently shaping business decisions, academic programs and the expected contributions of professionals. Yet, in many areas, accounting education stubbornly clings to outdated, overly technical models that fail to connect with the actual demands of the market. We must confront a critical question: If we continue to train accountants solely to file tax reports, are we truly equipping them for the challenges of today’s world?
This shift in mindset extends beyond individual countries or educational systems; it is a global movement. The recent announcement of the CIMA/CGMA 2026 syllabus has made it unmistakably clear: merely knowing how to post journal entries is insufficient. Today’s accountants are required to interpret the landscape, anticipate risks and act with strategic awareness. Critical thinking, sustainable finance, technology and human behavior are not just supplementary topics; they are essential components in the education of any professional seeking to remain relevant.
The CIMA/CGMA proposal for 2026 is not just a curriculum update; it is a powerful manifesto. This new program positions analytical thinking, strategic business partnering and technology application at the core of accounting education. It unequivocally highlights sustainability, aligning with IFRS S1 and S2, and expands the accountant’s responsibilities beyond mere numbers to encompass conscious leadership, environmental impact and corporate governance.
The current changes in the accounting profession underscore an urgent shift in expectations from both educators and employers. Today, companies of all sizes and industries demand accountants who can do far more than interpret balance sheets. They expect professionals who grasp the deeper context behind the numbers, identify inconsistencies, anticipate potential issues before they escalate into losses, and act decisively as a bridge between data and decision making.
To meet these expectations, a radical mindset shift is essential. There are firms still operating on autopilot, mindlessly repeating tasks with minimal critical analysis. Likewise, many academic programs continue to treat accounting as purely a technical discipline, disregarding the vital elements of reflection, strategy and behavioral insight. This outdated approach creates a significant mismatch. While the world forges ahead, parts of the accounting profession remain stuck in the past.
The consequences of this shift are already becoming evident. The demand for compliance, transparency and sustainability now applies not only to large corporations but also to small and mid-sized businesses. Many of these organizations rely on professionals ill-equipped to drive the necessary changes, putting both business performance and the reputation of the profession at risk.
The positive news is that accountants who are ready to thrive in this new era do not necessarily need additional degrees. What they truly need is a commitment to awareness, a dedication to continuous learning, and the courage to step beyond their comfort zones. The future of accounting is here, and it is firmly rooted in analytical, strategic and human-oriented perspectives. The 2026 curriculum is a clear indication of the changes underway. Those who fail to think critically and holistically will be left behind.
In contrast, accountants who see the big picture, understand the ripple effects of their decisions, and actively contribute to the financial and ethical health of organizations will undeniably remain indispensable, anywhere in the world.
Congressional Republicans are siding with Donald Trump in the messy divorce between the president and Elon Musk, an optimistic sign for eventual passage of a tax cut bill at the root of the two billionaires’ public feud.
Lawmakers are largely taking their cues from Trump and sticking by the $3 trillion bill at the center of the White House’s economic agenda. Musk, the biggest political donor of the 2024 cycle, has threatened to help primary anyone who votes for the legislation, but lawmakers are betting that staying in the president’s good graces is the safer path to political survival.
“The tax bill is not in jeopardy. We are going to deliver on that,” House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Friday.
“I’ll tell you what — do not doubt, don’t second guess and do not challenge the President of the United States Donald Trump,” he added. “He is the leader of the party. He’s the most consequential political figure of our time.”
A fight between Trump and Musk exploded into public view this week. The sparring started with the tech titan calling the president’s tax bill a “disgusting abomination,” but quickly escalated to more personal attacks and Trump threatening to cancel all federal contracts and subsidies to Musk’s companies, such as Tesla Inc. and SpaceX which have benefitted from government ties.
Republicans on Capitol Hill, who had — until recently — publicly embraced Musk, said they weren’t swayed by the billionaire’s criticism that the bill cost too much. Lawmakers have refuted official estimates of the package, saying that the tax cuts for households, small businesses and politically important groups — including hospitality and hourly workers — will generate enough economic growth to offset the price tag.
“I don’t tell my friend Elon, I don’t argue with him about how to build rockets, and I wish he wouldn’t argue with me about how to craft legislation and pass it,” Johnson told CNBC earlier Friday.
House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington told reporters that House lawmakers are focused on working with the Senate as it revises the bill to make sure the legislation has the political support in both chambers to make it to Trump’s desk for his signature.
“We move past the drama and we get the substance of what is needed to make the modest improvements that can be made,” he said.
House fiscal hawks said that they hadn’t changed their prior positions on the legislation based on Musk’s statements. They also said they agree with GOP leaders that there will be other chances to make further spending cuts outside the tax bill.
Representative Tom McClintock, a fiscal conservative, said “the bill will pass because it has to pass,” adding that both Musk and Trump needed to calm down. “They both need to take a nap,” he said.
Even some of the House bill’s most vociferous critics appeared resigned to its passage. Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie, who voted against the House version, predicted that despite Musk’s objections, the Senate will make only small changes.
“The speaker is right about one thing. This barely passed the House. If they muck with it too much in the Senate, it may not pass the House again,” he said.
Trump is pressuring lawmakers to move at breakneck speed to pass the tax-cut bill, demanding they vote on the bill before the July 4 holiday. The president has been quick to blast critics of the bill — including calling Senator Rand Paul “crazy” for objecting to the inclusion of a debt ceiling increase in the package.
As the legislation worked its way through the House last month, Trump took to social media to criticize holdouts and invited undecided members to the White House to compel them to support the package. It passed by one vote.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune — who is planning to unveil his chamber’s version of the bill as soon as next week — said his timeline is unmoved by Musk.
“We are already pretty far down the trail,” he said.