Connect with us

Personal Finance

Senate to vote on bill to increase Social Security for some beneficiaries

Published

on

Cavan Images | Cavan | Getty Images

Last month, Congress moved to take rare bipartisan action to change certain Social Security rules.

The House of Representatives on Nov. 12 passed the Social Security Fairness Act by an overwhelming 327 to 75 majority.

The proposal would eliminate rules that reduce Social Security benefits for those who also receive income from public pensions, roughly around 2.8 million people.

For supporters of the bill, that legislative victory has been followed by a suspenseful wait. The Senate must also pass the proposal for it to become law. And the number of legislative days left in this session of Congress are quickly running out.

At a Wednesday rally on Capitol Hill, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-New York, promised to put the bill up for a vote.

“I am here to tell you the Senate is going to take action,” Schumer said, prompting cheers from the crowd including fire fighters, police, postal workers, teachers and other government employees, who stood outside the Capitol building in the rain.

“I got all my Democrats lined up to support it,” said Schumer, adding they need 15 Republicans.

“What’s happening to you is unfair, un-American,” Schumer said. “I will fight it all the way.”

Bette Marafino, an 86-year-old retired teacher and a member of a national grassroots task force that has pushed to have the rules eliminated, was at the Capitol when the House voted in November.

The vote prompted cheers that turned into tears of joy from the small group of advocates who witnessed it. “We were so happy,” Marafino said.

Now, she is worried what may happen if the Senate does not pass the bill by Dec. 20.

“It’s going to be start all over again, and we’ll need to have some champions,” Marafino said, now that Reps. Garret Graves, R-La., and Abigail Spanberger, D-Va., who co-led the bill, are leaving Congress.

More from Personal Finance:
Federal proposal aims to make long-term care more affordable
What are Social Security’s trust funds? Debate emerges on program’s financing
‘Dynamic pricing’ was a top contender for word of the year

Prospect of nixing rules prompts fierce debate

Despite the enthusiasm from advocates behind the bill, many experts on both the left and right have said the Social Security Fairness Act is not the best policy.

The rules the bill would eliminate — the Windfall Elimination Provision, or WEP, and the Government Pension Offset, or GPO — were designed to make it so all Social Security beneficiaries received a comparable reimbursement for their contributions to the program.

Social Security is progressive, which means workers with lower lifetime earnings receive higher income replacement rates.

Without the rules, workers who are eligible for Social Security retirement benefits and who also have income from pensions where they didn’t pay taxes into the program may receive a higher income replacement than some workers who contributed to the program for their entire careers, experts argue.  

The bill also does not include a way to offset the cost of the benefit increases it includes.

Over 10 years, it would cost around $196 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office. That’s as the program currently has just nine years before the trust fund it relies on to help pay retirement benefits may be depleted.

“As far as I know, there are no policy experts who support repealing the Windfall Elimination Provision and Government Pension Offset,” said Emerson Sprick, associate director of economic policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center.

House Majority Leader Rep. Scalise on DOGE, GOP House majority and top legislative priorities

The WEP affects about 2.1 million Social Security beneficiaries — or about 3% of all Social Security beneficiaries — who see their retirement or disability benefit checks reduced because they also receive pension benefits from jobs not covered by Social Security.

The GPO affects almost 746,000 individuals — about 1% of all Social Security beneficiaries — by reducing spousal or widow(er) benefits because of pensions from non-covered government employment.

Rather than eliminate the rules altogether, some experts have suggested it would make more sense to replace them with more precise formulas for adjusting benefits.

Yet groups like the International Association of Fire Fighters maintain eliminating the rules altogether is the best policy.

The starting salary for a firefighter in Louisiana is around $40,000, said Edward Kelly, general president of IAFF. To make ends meet, those professionals often take on second or third jobs, where they do pay Social Security payroll taxes. Yet once they become eligible for the program’s benefits, they have that income reduced.

Generally, workers who pay in the same amount as non-public employees can see their monthly benefits reduced by $500 or $600, Kelly said.

“That’s devastating and it’s patently unfair,” Kelly said. “You’re basically being discriminated against for your public service.”

Public workers say Social Security cuts hurt

For many public workers, the reduction of their Social Security benefits comes as a surprise.

Roger Boudreau, a 75-year-old former teacher who is on the executive board of the Alliance for Retired Americans, regularly received Social Security’s annual benefit statements with estimates of how much monthly income he may expect.

However, those disclosures did not include any information on the WEP or GPO penalties, he said.

Boudreau didn’t realize how much his monthly checks would be reduced until he went to sign up for his Social Security benefits 10 years ago.

It was a shock to find out his Social Security benefits would be cut by 40%, Boudreau said. He estimates has resulted in a loss of about $5,000 per year over the past decade.

Other public workers are forced to delay their retirements because of the way the rules affect them, according to Lois Carson, 64, president of the Ohio Association of Public School Employees, an affiliate of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees.

Carson, who has been a Columbus City School employee for about 37 years, has delayed her own retirement since the rules limit the Social Security survivor benefits she would receive while collecting a pension.

“Most women work longer, because they can draw their husband’s Social Security while they’re working,” Carson said. “But once they retire, it drops down to a third.”

If the bill is not passed, most of the 30,000 members she represents will go way beyond their 30 years of employment, she said.

Advocacy groups have been working tirelessly to get lawmakers to move the bill.

Since the proposal passed in the House in November, Kelly said the firefighters alone have sent around 29,000 emails urging Senate leaders to pass the bill.

The stakes are high, experts say.

The initiative must compete with the Senate’s other legislative priorities. If the bill doesn’t get passed in this Congress, it dies, Kelly said.

With 62 Senate co-sponsors, the bill has a strong chance of passing once it is brought up for a vote.

“If it gets to a final vote under standard Senate procedure, I don’t see a whole lot of opportunity for it to fail,” Sprick said. “The question is whether it gets to that final vote.”

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Here’s what upcoming budget negotiations may mean for Social Security

Published

on

Richard Stephen | Istock | Getty Images

As lawmakers in Washington, D.C., work to rein in government spending, some advocates and consumers are concerned that Social Security could see cuts.

Congress faces a March 14 deadline to extend funding for the federal government in order to avoid a government shutdown. Meanwhile, the Trump administration had hoped to slash $2 trillion in government spending.

Because Social Security accounts for 21% of the budget, or $1.5 trillion in spending in 2024, there are concerns that the program could be a target.

Here’s what experts are keeping a watchful eye on with regard to Social Security in the upcoming negotiations.

Benefit cuts are off the table in budget reconciliation

Last year, the Republican Study Committee, a large group of House Republicans, released a budget proposal to cut federal spending by $17.1 trillion over 10 years.

That included a proposal to raise the Social Security retirement age to 69. Currently, retirees are eligible for the full benefits they’ve earned at age 66 to 67, depending on their date of birth.

With that change, anyone born after 1971 would see their benefit cuts an average of 13%, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Importantly, no changes can be made to Social Security benefits in upcoming budget reconciliation legislation, due to the Byrd Rule. That law prevents the addition of extraneous provisions, according to Maria Freese, senior legislative representative at the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.

Mills: Congress, not the president, decides which agencies exist

But a proposal to raise the retirement age came up during last-minute Senate negotiations over the Social Security Fairness Act in December, and could come up again, experts say.

“Any opportunity that they [Congress] have, I could see it coming up,” Freese said. “They just can’t put it in reconciliation.”

For his part, President Donald Trump said he is opposed to cutting Social Security, except for any waste, fraud or abuse of the program.

Underfunding agency would hurt customer service

Without additional funding, it may take the agency more time to implement the Social Security Fairness Act, a new law that provides benefit increases to more than 3 million beneficiaries, experts have said.

“Congress has consistently and repeatedly underfunded that agency,” Freese said.

That has left the agency more susceptible to criticism, particularly with recent scrutiny of beneficiaries over age 100, she said.

“Part of what is among the first things to go are upgrades to computer systems and things that are considered non essential,” Freese added.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Here’s how to qualify for the retirement savings contributions credit

Published

on

Westend61 | Westend61 | Getty Images

There’s a lesser-known tax break for low- to moderate-income Americans who save for retirement. However, most eligible taxpayers don’t claim it, experts say.

The retirement savings contributions credit, or saver’s credit, helps offset funds added to an individual retirement account, 401(k) plan or another workplace plan. The tax break is worth up to $1,000 per filer.

It’s not too late if you didn’t make a qualifying contribution last year. There’s still time to make IRA deposits before April 15 to claim the credit on 2024 returns.

However, “the saver’s credit is a well-kept secret,” Catherine Collinson, CEO and president of Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies said in a February report. 

More from Personal Finance:
Here’s why Trump tariffs may raise your car insurance premiums
Don’t wait to file your taxes this season, experts say. Here’s why
As tariffs ramp up, here’s an investment option to protect against inflation

Only about half of U.S. workers know about the saver’s credit, according to a survey from Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies, which polled more than 10,000 U.S. adults in September and October. 

That percentage drops to 44% among taxpayers with a household income of less than $50,000. 

Awareness of the credit is very low across the board.

Emerson Sprick

Associate director for the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Economic Policy Program

“Awareness of the credit is very low across the board,” but it’s even lower among taxpayers who could qualify to use it, said Emerson Sprick, associate director for the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Economic Policy Program.

To that point, roughly 5.8% of returns claimed the saver’s credit in 2022, according to a the most recent IRS data. The average credit value that year was $194, according to a Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies analysis.

How the saver’s credit works

The saver’s credit can offset as much as 50% of retirement contributions up to $2,000 for single filers or $4,000 for married couples filing jointly, for maximum credits of $1,000 or $2,000, respectively.

The credit provides a dollar-for-dollar reduction of levies owed, which could reduce your tax bill or boost your refund. But the tax break is not “refundable,” which means there’s no benefit with $0 tax liability, Sprick explained.

“The way it’s calculated is fairly complex,” he said. 

There are income phase-outs to claim 50%, 20% or 10% of your contribution, depending on your filing status and adjusted gross income. You can use an IRS tool to see if you’re eligible. 

For 2024, your adjusted gross income can’t exceed $23,000 for single filers or $46,000 for married couples for the 50% credit. The percentages drop to 20% and 10%, respectively, as earnings increase, with a complete phase-out above $38,250 for individuals or $76,500 for joint filers.

Tax Tip: Earned Income Credit

Credit will soon be replaced

Because of the credit’s design and workers’ lack of awareness, “the uptake of this is really low,” Sprick said.

That’s part of the motivation for the “saver’s match” enacted via Secure 2.0, which will replace the saver’s credit in 2027 and deposit money directly into taxpayers accounts, he said.

“Everyone hopes that it’s going to be easier,” Sprick said. But “there are a lot of logistics that remain to be worked out.”

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

What to know about selecting health plans

Published

on

Picture Alliance | Picture Alliance | Getty Images

Although a broader window for Medicare enrollment has closed, some retirees have another opportunity to make changes to their coverage.

Medicare Advantage open enrollment is available from Jan. 1 through March 31.

Medicare Advantage plans are offered by private insurers as an alternative to original Medicare. Generally, Medicare Advantage may cover Medicare Parts A and B, as well as Medicare Part D prescription drug coverage and other potential extra benefits.

During this open enrollment period, individuals who are already enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan may switch to another Medicare Advantage plan. Alternatively, they may drop their current Medicare Advantage plan and opt for Medicare original coverage.

More from Personal Finance:
How IRS layoffs could impact your tax filing, refund
As tariffs ramp up, here’s an investment option
DOGE’s FDIC firings put banking system at risk

To be sure, there will be more options later in the year during a broader open enrollment period that lasts from October to December, when Medicare original enrollees may also opt to change plans.

For beneficiaries who are eligible to make changes during this time, it’s important not to ignore this window, according to Juliette Cubanski, deputy director of the program on Medicare policy at KFF, a provider of health policy research.

“Plans can change considerably from one year to the next,” Cubanski said. “If people don’t compare their coverage to other options, they may not know that they’re going to be faced with higher costs.”

Check for significant changes

In order to be confident that you’re getting the best deal, it helps to evaluate how your current Advantage plan may have changed since last year.

You may be faced with higher costs if your personal prescriptions have gone up, for example, or your preferred medical provider is no longer in network.

Digging into those plan changes now can help avoid “bad surprises” later, according to Cubanski.

“Make sure the coverage that you have is going to continue to be the coverage that works best for you,” Cubanski said.

Planning for long-term care: Here's what you need to know

Consider extra benefits

To be sure, Medicare Advantage plans have received negative attention because in some cases coverage was denied for necessary care.

Medicare Advantage plans are more likely than traditional Medicare to use prior authorization, approval needed before a patient can receive certain services or medications. However, because prior authorizations that have been denied are frequently overturned when they are appealed, that has prompted questions as to whether the plans are avoiding coverage obligations.

Medicare Advantage plans are more likely than original Medicare to offer extra benefits — such as dental, vision and hearing — that elderly beneficiaries need.

Most Medicare beneficiaries — 83% — consider supplemental benefits to be important to their coverage, according to a recent survey from The Commonwealth Fund, a provider of independent research on health care issues.

Notably, a larger share of Medicare Advantage enrollees — 89% — said supplemental benefits are important to them, versus 74% of traditional Medicare enrollees, The Commonwealth Fund found.

“People on Medicare, both older adults and those with disabilities, generally really need dental, hearing and vision services, as well as other benefits that are typically offered by Medicare Advantage plans,” said Gretchen Jacobson, vice president of Medicare at The Commonwealth Fund.

Beneficiaries who are in traditional Medicare may not have coverage for those same services unless they are able to purchase a supplemental plan or they qualify for Medicaid, Jacobson said.

Seek outside help

When it comes to comparing Advantage plans, beneficiaries do not have to go it alone, Cubanski noted.

State-based organizations — the State Health Insurance Program, or SHIP — provide assistance to Medicare beneficiaries to help sort through their plan options.

Unlike insurance brokers or other professionals, these organizations do not have a financial interest to sign people up for certain plans, Cubanski said.

Continue Reading

Trending