Springline Advisory, backed by private equity firm Trinity Hunt Partners, has invested in two more accounting firms, HM&M Advisory, based in Dallas, and Clark, Raymond & Company in Redmond, Washington.
Trinity Hunt Partners, a Dallas-based PE firm, created Springline Advisory earlier this year in partnership with MarksNelson, a Kansas-based firm it invested in last year. In addition to MarksNelson, Springline later added BGBC Partners, an Indianapolis-based firm and made plans to expand by adding more firms around the country that serve middle-market clients.
HM&M’s annual revenue is $21,970,805 and has approximately 110 employees. Clark, Raymond & Company earns between $8 million and $9 million in revenue and has nine people listed on its website. With these two partnership additions, Springline Advisory’s headcount will grow to roughly 250, and total partnership revenue with both firms will be north of $30 million.
“We’re making investments in likeminded firms and evolving into a firm together,” said Springline Advisory CEO Tim Brackney. “We’re looking for strong leadership and a growth trajectory with firms and teams that are looking for scale. They don’t need an investment, but recognize that to move faster and to provide more opportunity for their people, and to have more capability within their four walls, that it makes sense to join a group of firms that are evolving into one firm focused on the middle market.”
HM&M has been operating for more than 40 years and provides tax, assurance and accounting services. “This is a pivotal moment for HM&M,” said managing partner Susan Adams in a statement Wednesday. “This strategic combination will allow us to leverage the strengths of a larger firm while maintaining the personalized service and deep client relationships that have always defined us. This partnership will empower us to provide even more comprehensive and innovative solutions to our clients and more depth of opportunity for our people.”
Koltin Consulting Group CEO Allan Koltin advised HM&M and Springline Advisory on the deal.
“Springline Advisory is becoming a major force in the accounting and advisory services space. HM&M was a firm that many other larger firms wanted to combine with,” Koltin said in a statement. “They are fortunate to have great leadership and a stable of young “next-gen” stars both at the partner and manager/associate level. HM&M has some significant expansion goals for the future and found Springline to be the perfect strategic, cultural, and capital partner to help them achieve those goals.”
Brackney said Springline wants to have a presence in most major geographies, and that includes the Seattle metropolitan area where Clark, Raymond & Co. is based. CRC offers advisory, assurance and tax services. For all the firms that Springline invests in that have assurance or attest businesses, such as HM&M and CRC, Springline sets up an alternative practice structure, as is common with private equity funding of accounting firms.
“We’ve provided personalized services to businesses, nonprofits and community members throughout the Northwest region for more than 25 years, and we’re looking forward to expanding our capabilities and co-creating an irresistible culture with Springline,” said Ed Clark, founding and co-managing partner of CRC, in a statement. “Joining Springline as a founding firm member allows us the opportunity and privilege to continue to create impact not only in our community but within the industry, too.”
When firms join Springline, their partners generally return some rollover equity in the combined firm. They initially retain their branding, but that evolves over time. “Some of that evolution will be bespoke, depending on the firm and the strength of their individual brand,” said Brackney. “Generally, the evolution will be a sort of side by side branding, where within the first three months it will say CRC has joined Springline, and then it will go to an endorsed brand, which would be CRC, a Springline company, and then eventually it will just be Springline.”
Redmond is the home of Microsoft and Seattle is the headquarters of Amazon. Springline will probably be inheriting many individual clients who are employees of the two companies, although CRC isn’t large enough to audit either of the tech giants.
Brackney hopes to expand Springline further across the U.S. “We’re in active talks in in other parts of the country, the Northeast, Southeast, on the West Coast,” he said. “We kind of started in the center of the country, in the Midwest, and we’ve just made an investment here in the Southwest. We’ve thought of those generally as the regions where that’s what we’re focusing on from a geographic perspective. But our firm is not simply just trying to sort of aggregate different geographies together and different firms together. We’re also looking at depth and service line capability.”
The private equity funding will help finance those deals. “PE is one of the financial levers that we use to make those investments, but we’re really founding a firm and building a firm with PE as a financial partner,” said Brackney.
In the world of financial management, accurate transaction recording is much more than a routine task—it is the foundation of fiscal integrity, operational transparency, and informed decision-making. By maintaining meticulous records, businesses ensure their financial ecosystem remains robust and reliable. This article explores the essential practices for precise transaction recording and its critical role in driving business success.
The Importance of Detailed Transaction Recording At the heart of accurate financial management is detailed transaction recording. Each transaction must include not only the monetary amount but also its nature, the parties involved, and the exact date and time. This level of detail creates a comprehensive audit trail that supports financial analysis, regulatory compliance, and future decision-making. Proper documentation also ensures that stakeholders have a clear and trustworthy view of an organization’s financial health.
Establishing a Robust Chart of Accounts A well-organized chart of accounts is fundamental to accurate transaction recording. This structured framework categorizes financial activities into meaningful groups, enabling businesses to track income, expenses, assets, and liabilities consistently. Regularly reviewing and updating the chart of accounts ensures it stays relevant as the business evolves, allowing for meaningful comparisons and trend analysis over time.
Leveraging Modern Accounting Software Advanced accounting software has revolutionized how businesses handle transaction recording. These tools automate repetitive tasks like data entry, synchronize transactions in real-time with bank feeds, and perform validation checks to minimize errors. Features such as cloud integration and customizable reports make these platforms invaluable for maintaining accurate, accessible, and up-to-date financial records.
The Power of Double-Entry Bookkeeping Double-entry bookkeeping remains a cornerstone of precise transaction management. By ensuring every transaction affects at least two accounts, this system inherently checks for errors and maintains balance within the financial records. For example, recording both a debit and a credit ensures that discrepancies are caught early, providing a reliable framework for accurate reporting.
The Role of Timely Documentation Prompt transaction recording is another critical factor in financial accuracy. Delays in documentation can lead to missing or incorrect entries, which may skew financial reports and complicate decision-making. A culture that prioritizes timely and accurate record-keeping ensures that a company always has real-time insights into its financial position, helping it adapt to changing conditions quickly.
Regular Reconciliation for Financial Integrity Periodic reconciliations act as a vital checkpoint in transaction recording. Whether conducted daily, weekly, or monthly, these reviews compare recorded transactions with external records, such as bank statements, to identify discrepancies. Early detection of errors ensures that records remain accurate and that the company’s financial statements are trustworthy.
Conclusion Mastering the art of accurate transaction recording is far more than a compliance requirement—it is a strategic necessity. By implementing detailed recording practices, leveraging advanced technology, and adhering to time-tested principles like double-entry bookkeeping, businesses can ensure financial transparency and operational efficiency. For finance professionals and business leaders, precise transaction recording is the bedrock of informed decision-making, stakeholder confidence, and long-term success.
With these strategies, businesses can build a reliable financial foundation that supports growth, resilience, and the ability to navigate an ever-changing economic landscape.
Easing restrictions, sharpening personal attention and clarifying denials are among the aims of three pilot programs at the Internal Revenue Service that will test changes to existing alternative dispute resolution programs.
The programs focus on “fast track settlement,” which allows IRS Appeals to mediate disputes between a taxpayer and the IRS while the case is still within the jurisdiction of the examination function, and post-appeals mediation, in which a mediator is introduced to help foster a settlement between Appeals and the taxpayer.
The IRS has been revitalizing existing ADR programs as part of transformation efforts of the agency’s new strategic plan, said Elizabeth Askey, chief of the IRS Independent Office of Appeals.
“By increasing awareness, changing and revitalizing existing programs and piloting new approaches, we hope to make our ADR programs, such as fast-track settlement and post-appeals mediation, more attractive and accessible for all eligible parties,” said Michael Baillif, director of Appeals’ ADR Program Management Office.
Among other improvements, the pilots:
Align the Large Business and International, Small Business and Self-Employed and Tax Exempt and Government Entities divisions in offering FTS issue by issue. Previously, if a taxpayer had one issue ineligible for FTS, the entire case was ineligible.
Provide that requests to participate in FTS and PAM will not be denied without the approval of a first-line executive.
Clarify that taxpayers receive an explanation when requests for FTS or PAM are denied.
Another pilot, Last Chance FTS, is a limited scope SB/SE pilot in which Appeals will call taxpayers or their representatives after a protest is filed in response to a 30-day or equivalent letter to inform taxpayers about the potential application of FTS. This pilot will not impact eligibility for FTS but will simply test the awareness of taxpayers regarding the availability of FTS.
A final pilot removes the limitation that participation in FTS would preclude eligibility for PAM.
The traditional appeals process remains available for all taxpayers.
Inquiries can be addressed to the ADR Program Management Office at [email protected].
The Internal Revenue Service has updated and added new guidance for taxpayers claiming the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit and the Residential Clean Energy Property Credit.
The updated Fact Sheet 2025-01 includes a set of frequently asked questions and answers, superseding the fact sheet from last April. The IRS noted that the updates include substantial changes.
New sections have been added on how long a taxpayer has to claim the tax credits, guidance for condominium and co-op owners, whether taxpayers who did not previously claim the credit can file an amended return to claim it, and a series of questions on qualified manufacturers and product identification numbers. Other material has been added on how to claim the credits, what kind of records a taxpayer has to keep for claiming the credit, and for how long, and whether taxpayers can include financing costs such as interest payments in determining the amount of the credit.
The IRS states that “financing costs such as interest, as well as other miscellaneous costs such as origination fees and the cost of an extended warranty, are not eligible expenditures for purposes of the credit.”