Connect with us

Accounting

Tax reporting transparency reaches a tipping point

Published

on

Transparency is a critical component of sustainability that is foundational across the environmental, social and governance pillars: transparency in the supply chain, transparency in employee management and transparency in business decision-making. 

To achieve sustainable business models and greater long-term value creation, transparency with stakeholders is fundamental. Tax is one of the items that businesses need to consider within this broader transparency trend. 

We have reached a tipping point in global corporate tax reporting and disclosure. Regulators, investors and the public are demanding ever greater tax transparency, and companies must navigate evolving, complex reporting requirements around the globe. From expanded Financial Accounting Standards Board disclosures in the U.S. to public Country-by-Country Reporting legislation in the EU and reporting requirements under countries’ new Base Erosion and Profit Shifting 2.0 Pillar Two global minimum tax rules, companies face an array of new tax information responsibilities. 

Many of these tax reporting and disclosure regimes are coming online imminently. By proactively assessing these changes, highlighting the global tax footprint and managing the level of tax transparency in ESG agendas, companies can position themselves to tell their own story. Those that proactively adapt to this rapidly changing tax reporting and disclosure landscape will be better equipped to address risks, embrace opportunities and effectively communicate their tax narrative to the wide range of different stakeholders. 

Tax reporting here, there and everywhere

In the United States, in the EU and around the world, tax transparency is becoming commonplace, as governments and regulatory bodies seek additional visibility into corporate tax profiles. In a recent move that reflects the new corporate tax reporting environment, FASB late last year approved expanded income tax disclosures for U.S. companies that file under U.S. GAAP. 

FASB’s Accounting Standards Update 2023-09, which applies to annual periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2024, requires companies to disclose more specific and disaggregated information regarding the effective tax rate reconciliation; income or loss from continuing operations before income tax expense or benefit; and income tax expense or benefit from continuing operations. It also requires disclosure of income tax payments made to international, federal, state and local jurisdictions.  

At the same time, more widespread public CbCR disclosure obligations are being enacted around the globe. Within the EU, 21 member states currently have either proposed or enacted public CbCR legislation following the approval of an EU CbCR directive in December 2021. Differences in local rules, reporting requirements and timing can present challenges to multinational entities headquartered outside the EU and operating in multiple EU jurisdictions. 

Additionally, the BEPS 2.0 Pillar Two initiative of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development is creating new, complex tax reporting requirements for MNEs. Many countries are beginning to implement Pillar Two legislation, but the specifics and timing differ from country to country. Pillar Two calls for a global minimum tax of 15% for multinational corporations with group revenue of more than €750 million, and the necessary calculations require a substantial volume of data, some of which has not been maintained by tax departments for other purposes. 

The details of these various initiatives differ, but taken together, they share common themes and signal a broad shift in expectations about tax disclosures and reporting. In order for companies to keep up, they must transform their systems, processes and overall frameworks for tax reporting.

Opportunities and risk in a more transparent world

Greater tax transparency is quickly becoming the norm, and tax authorities around the globe are increasing their reporting requirements. Understanding the gaps and overlaps between the various tax reporting and disclosure regimes presents an opportunity to re-examine and leverage existing data and systems. Doing so can reveal ways to streamline cross-functional processes and can provide stakeholders with a more complete view of the financial impact on communities and society.

While regulators around the globe are heavily focused on income tax disclosures, those represent only one element of companies’ total tax contributions. Income taxes are significant, but the amount of non-income taxes companies pay similarly is often very significant. Companies also play a role in tax collection when they collect value-added taxes, sales and use taxes and payroll taxes, potentially alleviating some of the burden of governmental entities.      

Adapting to this world will require addressing new data and technology needs associated with addressing the above-mentioned tax disclosure and reporting requirements (e.g., FASB, public CbCR and Pillar Two reporting requirements). Collecting and analyzing the necessary data for reporting will require an in-depth process review and level of granularity not previously required. By proactively addressing these potential barriers and investing in suitable technology tools, companies can help facilitate more accurate, efficient, consistent and timely reporting and disclosures. 

While this may entail new costs, being able to collate data globally for all tax types allows for enhanced analytic capabilities and enables companies to make their societal contributions clearer, a key element of the ESG agenda. Companies will be better able to explain their tax situations to interested parties and demonstrate how their tax contributions support their communities. 

In this way, companies can take ownership of their tax narrative, which enhances trust with investors, customers and the public. This, in turn, can create a competitive advantage. Those that fall behind in responding to global trends calling for a more complete view of companies’ corporate tax profiles risk forfeiting control of their tax narrative and, in the process, losing stakeholder and public trust.  

Making transparency work — meeting the challenge 

Many companies have already started the tax transparency journey as part of their ESG agenda and are highlighting how tax obligations reflect societal commitments. One potential method is global tax footprint reporting, which can bridge the transparency gap and provide a more complete and holistic view of a company’s tax contributions. 

Reassessing data and technology needs and reporting practices in light of increasing transparency trends and reporting requirements allows companies to connect the tax function in a more meaningful way to ESG practices. By promoting a greater understanding of the complete tax picture, the tax function can add clear value to the ESG agenda. 

Proactively addressing transparency and reporting requirements can help companies establish themselves as forward-looking, engaged contributors to communities and society, able to balance business and strategic objectives with obligations to tax authorities, regulatory bodies, investors and the broader public. Below are some questions that can help start the process. 

Questions to consider

  1. How does tax currently fit into the company’s ESG reporting framework, and how might this plan need to change given expanding reporting obligations to tax authorities and public expectations for transparency?
  2. What is the company’s approach to showcase its global tax footprint and access the data and technology platforms needed across various tax jurisdictions to comply with new tax reporting requirements?
  3. What is the communication strategy for helping internal and external stakeholders understand the nuances of the tax data disclosed to the public? 

Tax transparency is here to stay, and companies need to develop action plans to respond. 

Kevin Dehner is EY Americas sustainability tax deputy leader. Other contributors to this article include Kristen Gray, EY Americas sustainability tax leader; David Campbell, EY Americas tax technology and transformation senior manager; and Colleen Sebra, EY Americas tax technology and transformation partner.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Acting IRS commissioner reportedly replaced

Published

on

Gary Shapley, who was named only days ago as the acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is reportedly being replaced by Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender amid a power struggle between Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Elon Musk.

The New York Times reported that Bessent was outraged that Shapley was named to head the IRS without his knowledge or approval and complained to President Trump about it. Shapley was installed as acting commissioner on Tuesday, only to be ousted on Friday. He first gained prominence as an IRS Criminal Investigation special agent and whistleblower who testified in 2023 before the House Oversight Committee that then-President Joe Biden’s son Hunter received preferential treatment during a tax-evasion investigation, and he and another special agent had been removed from the investigation after complaining to their supervisors in 2022. He was promoted last month to senior advisor to Bessent and made deputy chief of IRS Criminal Investigation. Shapley is expected to remain now as a senior official at IRS Criminal Investigation, according to the Wall Street Journal. The IRS and the Treasury Department press offices did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Faulkender was confirmed last month as deputy secretary at the Treasury Department and formerly worked during the first Trump administration at the Treasury on the Paycheck Protection Program before leaving to teach finance at the University of Maryland.

Faulkender will be the fifth head of the IRS this year. Former IRS commissioner Danny Werfel departed in January, on Inauguration Day, after Trump announced in December he planned to name former Congressman Billy Long, R-Missouri, as the next IRS commissioner, even though Werfel’s term wasn’t scheduled to end until November 2027. The Senate has not yet scheduled a confirmation hearing for Long, amid questions from Senate Democrats about his work promoting the Employee Retention Credit and so-called “tribal tax credits.” The job of acting commissioner has since been filled by Douglas O’Donnell, who was deputy commissioner under Werfel. However, O’Donnell abruptly retired as the IRS came under pressure to lay off thousands of employees and share access to confidential taxpayer data. He was replaced by IRS chief operating officer Melanie Krause, who resigned last week after coming under similar pressure to provide taxpayer data to immigration authorities and employees of the Musk-led U.S. DOGE Service. 

Krause had planned to depart later this month under the deferred resignation program at the IRS, under which approximately 22,000 IRS employees have accepted the voluntary buyout offers. But Musk reportedly pushed to have Shapley installed on Tuesday, according to the Times, and he remained working in the commissioner’s office as recently as Friday morning. Meanwhile, plans are underway for further reductions in the IRS workforce of up to 40%, according to the Federal News Network, taking the IRS from approximately 102,000 employees at the beginning of the year to around 60,000 to 70,000 employees.

Continue Reading

Accounting

On the move: EY names San Antonio office MP

Published

on

Carr, Riggs & Ingram appoints CFO and chief legal officer; TSCPA hosts accounting bootcamp; and more news from across the profession.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tech news: Certinia announces spring release

Published

on


Certinia announces spring release; Intuit acquires tech and experts from fintech Deserve; Paystand launches feature to navigate tariffs; and other accounting tech news and updates.

Continue Reading

Trending