Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Strategy: The IRS and the new Trump administration

Published

on

It is not surprising that a new Republican administration in the White House would create issues for the Internal Revenue Service. Past Republican administrations tended to starve the IRS for funds, resulting in a decline in audit activity and customer service. 

The new administration will have a new Treasury secretary and a new IRS commissioner. New executive orders have already had an impact on the IRS. The last Trump administration placed limits on new federal regulations, and the IRS has been active since the November election in promulgating new regulations. The new Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, has indicated that his top priority is extension of the expiring provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, many of which expire at the end of 2025.

Executive orders

One executive order of the new administration has placed a freeze on almost all federal hiring. For most federal departments, the freeze only lasts long enough for the departments to prepare plans justifying additional hiring. For the IRS, however, not only the Treasury secretary but also Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency are required to approve any resumption in IRS hiring. The agency has been forced to revoke hiring offers to new graduates and others. Legislation has already reduced the $80 billion in funding the IRS received under the Inflation Reduction Act by $40 billion. 

An executive order also directed withdrawal of any U.S. support for the Organization of Economic Development’s Pillar One and Pillar Two initiatives on international taxation to address base erosion and profit-shifting and a minimum corporate tax. The primary concern of the administration is that countries might be able to tax a multinational corporation doing business in the country if it was not paying at least a minimum corporate tax.

The executive order on Schedule F reclassification of federal workers, if upheld in the courts, could expose more IRS employees to termination by removing their protected status as Civil Service employees.

Scott Bessent, founder and CEO of Key Square Group LP and Treasury Secretary nominee, during a Senate Finance Committee confirmation hearing
Scott Bessent during a Senate Finance Committee confirmation hearing

Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Republicans in Congress are still working on how to approach extension of the expiring provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The House is focused on one budget reconciliation bill that would address both border and tax issues, while the Senate would prefer two reconciliation bills, with the tax bill coming later in the year. 

There is also some debate about whether extending existing provisions of the Tax Code requires revenue offsets in the legislation. Some Republicans are concerned about adding too much to the federal deficit, and the Republicans need to hold almost all Republican votes together to pass a budget reconciliation bill with a simple majority in both chambers of Congress. The narrow majorities might also force Congress to raise the $10,000 limit on the state and local tax deduction to gain the support of Republicans from New York and other high tax states. 

There are also a few business provisions in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that started phasing down a few years ago: the expensing of bonus depreciation, the limitation on the business interest deduction, and the research and experimentation expense deduction. Efforts to renew those through last year had proposed retroactivity back to the start of the phase-downs. If those are still retroactive in the tax legislation this year, the changes could retroactively impact 2024 tax returns as well as earlier returns.

IRS regulations

As is common at the end of the year, the IRS released a lot of regulations at the end of the 2024, but also in January before President Trump was sworn in. The first Trump administration had placed restrictions on issuing new federal regulations. Some of the regulatory effort may have been a guard against further regulatory restrictions. IRS regulations are somewhat usual in that regard since taxpayers are often hoping for the issuance of new regulations to provide guidance on ambiguous provisions of tax law, while many other federal regulations may be viewed as a burden to business.

Many of the recently promulgated regulations relate to the clean energy provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act. At the end of 2024 and beginning of 2025, final regulations were issued on:

  • The definition of “energy project” for purposes of the Energy Investment Credit; 
  • The Clean Hydrogen Production Credit and Energy Property Election; 
  • The Clean Electricity Production and Clean Electricity Investment Credits; and,
  • The allocation of the low-income community bonus credit for the Code Sec. 48E Clean Energy Investment Credit.

Plus, proposed regulations were issued on the emission rules for the Code Sec. 45Z Clean Fuel Production Credit, and on the Code Sec. 45W Commercial Clean Vehicle Credit. 
The authorization in the Inflation Reduction Act of a study on direct filing of tax returns with the IRS has resulted for 2024 in a Direct File trial program involving 25 states. Republicans seem generally opposed to the Direct File program, although Secretary Bessent has said that it is safe at least for the current filing season.

President Trump has discussed eliminating many of these clean energy credits, especially those related to electric vehicles, although Republicans in some states that benefit from certain of the credits may push for their survival.

Recent regulations in the crypto area include final regulations on digital asset reporting by front-end brokers and final and proposed regulations on digital content and closed transactions. President Trump has also expressed support for the crypto industry, although it is not clear how he views these reporting requirements.

Other recent regulations include:

  • Proposed regulations on the Previously Taxed Earnings Credit and basis adjustments; 
  • Final regulations on retirement of tax-exempt bonds; 
  • Final regulations on supervisory approval of penalties; 
  • Final regulations on partnership basis-shifting transactions as reportable transactions; 
  • Final regulations on certain disregarded payments and dual consolidated losses; 
  • Final regulations on the resolution of federal tax controversies;
  • Proposed regulations implementing catch-up contribution changes; 
  • Proposed regulations on the executive compensation deduction limit; 
  • Proposed regulations on corporate separation, incorporation and reorganization matters; and,
  • Final regulations on micro-captive transactions and transactions of interest.

Other issues

Congressional legislation has authorized the expansion of Form 1099-K reporting by third-party payment providers of transactions more than $600. The IRS has been delaying implementation of this requirement, and, for 2024, is only requiring reporting of transactions involving more than $5,000 ($2,500 in 2025 and $600 in 2026). Some Republicans have proposed restoring the old $20,000-and-200-transactions limit, or at least keeping it from falling to $600.

President Trump has suggested setting up a separate External Revenue Service to deal with tariff issues.

Summary

The generous funding that the IRS has enjoyed for the last few years seems likely to be coming to an end, perhaps along with improvements in customer service, audits and collections, and system upgrades. 

The current tax filing season should be relatively normal; however, the future beyond that is hard to predict. It is likely that significant tax legislation will pass this year; however, with the thin Republican majorities and deficit concerns, the scope of that legislation and possible revenue raisers are also hard to predict. Tariffs may not count as revenue raisers; however, their presence may make some Republicans more comfortable with adding to the deficit in extending Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provisions.

Continue Reading

Accounting

XcelLabs launches to help accountants use AI

Published

on

Jody Padar, an author and speaker known as “The Radical CPA,” and Katie Tolin, a growth strategist for CPAs, together launched a training and technology platform called XcelLabs.

XcelLabs provides solutions to help accountants use artificial technology fluently and strategically. The Pennsylvania Institute of CPAs and CPA Crossings joined with Padar and Tolin as strategic partners and investors.

“To reinvent the profession, we must start by training the professional who can then transform their firms,” Padar said in a statement. “By equipping people with data and insights that help them see things differently, they can provide better advice to their clients and firm.”

Padar-Jody- new 2019

Jody Padar

The platform includes XcelLabs Academy, a series of educational online courses on the basics of AI, being a better advisor, leadership and practice management; Navi, a proprietary tool that uses AI to help accountants turn unstructured data like emails, phone calls and meetings into insights; and training and consulting services. These offerings are currently in beta testing.

“Accountants know they need to be more advisory, but not everyone can figure out how to do it,” Tolin said in a statement. “Couple that with the fact that AI will be doing a lot of the lower-level work accountants do today, and we need to create that next level advisor now. By showing accountants how to unlock patterns in their actions and turn client conversations into emotionally intelligent advice, we can create the accounting professional of the future.”

Tolin-Katie-CPA Growth Guides

Katie Tolin

“AI is transforming how CPAs work, and XcelLabs is focused on helping the profession evolve with it,” PICPA CEO Jennifer Cryder said in a statement. “At PICPA, we’re proud to support a mission that aligns so closely with ours: empowering firms to use AI not just for efficiency, but to drive growth, value and long-term relevance.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting is changing, and the world can’t wait until 2026

Published

on

The accountant the world urgently needs has evolved far beyond the traditional role we recognized just a few years ago. 

The transformation of the accounting profession is not merely an anticipated change; it is a pressing reality that is currently shaping business decisions, academic programs and the expected contributions of professionals. Yet, in many areas, accounting education stubbornly clings to outdated, overly technical models that fail to connect with the actual demands of the market. We must confront a critical question: If we continue to train accountants solely to file tax reports, are we truly equipping them for the challenges of today’s world? 

This shift in mindset extends beyond individual countries or educational systems; it is a global movement. The recent announcement of the CIMA/CGMA 2026 syllabus has made it unmistakably clear: merely knowing how to post journal entries is insufficient. Today’s accountants are required to interpret the landscape, anticipate risks and act with strategic awareness. Critical thinking, sustainable finance, technology and human behavior are not just supplementary topics; they are essential components in the education of any professional seeking to remain relevant. 

The CIMA/CGMA proposal for 2026 is not just a curriculum update; it is a powerful manifesto. This new program positions analytical thinking, strategic business partnering and technology application at the core of accounting education. It unequivocally highlights sustainability, aligning with IFRS S1 and S2, and expands the accountant’s responsibilities beyond mere numbers to encompass conscious leadership, environmental impact and corporate governance. 

The current changes in the accounting profession underscore an urgent shift in expectations from both educators and employers. Today, companies of all sizes and industries demand accountants who can do far more than interpret balance sheets. They expect professionals who grasp the deeper context behind the numbers, identify inconsistencies, anticipate potential issues before they escalate into losses, and act decisively as a bridge between data and decision making. 

To meet these expectations, a radical mindset shift is essential. There are firms still operating on autopilot, mindlessly repeating tasks with minimal critical analysis. Likewise, many academic programs continue to treat accounting as purely a technical discipline, disregarding the vital elements of reflection, strategy and behavioral insight. This outdated approach creates a significant mismatch. While the world forges ahead, parts of the accounting profession remain stuck in the past. 

The consequences of this shift are already becoming evident. The demand for compliance, transparency and sustainability now applies not only to large corporations but also to small and mid-sized businesses. Many of these organizations rely on professionals ill-equipped to drive the necessary changes, putting both business performance and the reputation of the profession at risk. 

The positive news is that accountants who are ready to thrive in this new era do not necessarily need additional degrees. What they truly need is a commitment to awareness, a dedication to continuous learning, and the courage to step beyond their comfort zones. The future of accounting is here, and it is firmly rooted in analytical, strategic and human-oriented perspectives. The 2026 curriculum is a clear indication of the changes underway. Those who fail to think critically and holistically will be left behind. 

In contrast, accountants who see the big picture, understand the ripple effects of their decisions, and actively contribute to the financial and ethical health of organizations will undeniably remain indispensable, anywhere in the world.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Republicans push Musk aside as Trump tax bill barrels forward

Published

on

Congressional Republicans are siding with Donald Trump in the messy divorce between the president and Elon Musk, an optimistic sign for eventual passage of a tax cut bill at the root of the two billionaires’ public feud.

Lawmakers are largely taking their cues from Trump and sticking by the $3 trillion bill at the center of the White House’s economic agenda. Musk, the biggest political donor of the 2024 cycle, has threatened to help primary anyone who votes for the legislation, but lawmakers are betting that staying in the president’s good graces is the safer path to political survival.

“The tax bill is not in jeopardy. We are going to deliver on that,” House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Friday.

“I’ll tell you what — do not doubt, don’t second guess and do not challenge the President of the United States Donald Trump,” he added. “He is the leader of the party. He’s the most consequential political figure of our time.”

A fight between Trump and Musk exploded into public view this week. The sparring started with the tech titan calling the president’s tax bill a “disgusting abomination,” but quickly escalated to more personal attacks and Trump threatening to cancel all federal contracts and subsidies to Musk’s companies, such as Tesla Inc. and SpaceX which have benefitted from government ties.

Republicans on Capitol Hill, who had —  until recently — publicly embraced Musk, said they weren’t swayed by the billionaire’s criticism that the bill cost too much. Lawmakers have refuted official estimates of the package, saying that the tax cuts for households, small businesses and politically important groups — including hospitality and hourly workers — will generate enough economic growth to offset the price tag.

“I don’t tell my friend Elon, I don’t argue with him about how to build rockets, and I wish he wouldn’t argue with me about how to craft legislation and pass it,” Johnson told CNBC earlier Friday.

House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington told reporters that House lawmakers are focused on working with the Senate as it revises the bill to make sure the legislation has the political support in both chambers to make it to Trump’s desk for his signature. 

“We move past the drama and we get the substance of what is needed to make the modest improvements that can be made,” he said.

House fiscal hawks said that they hadn’t changed their prior positions on the legislation based on Musk’s statements. They also said they agree with GOP leaders that there will be other chances to make further spending cuts outside the tax bill. 

Representative Tom McClintock, a fiscal conservative, said “the bill will pass because it has to pass,” adding that both Musk and Trump needed to calm down. “They both need to take a nap,” he said.

Even some of the House bill’s most vociferous critics appeared resigned to its passage. Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie, who voted against the House version, predicted that despite Musk’s objections, the Senate will make only small changes.

“The speaker is right about one thing. This barely passed the House. If they muck with it too much in the Senate, it may not pass the House again,” he said.

Trump is pressuring lawmakers to move at breakneck speed to pass the tax-cut bill, demanding they vote on the bill before the July 4 holiday. The president has been quick to blast critics of the bill — including calling Senator Rand Paul “crazy” for objecting to the inclusion of a debt ceiling increase in the package.

As the legislation worked its way through the House last month, Trump took to social media to criticize holdouts and invited undecided members to the White House to compel them to support the package. It passed by one vote.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune — who is planning to unveil his chamber’s version of the bill as soon as next week — said his timeline is unmoved by Musk. 

“We are already pretty far down the trail,” he said.

Continue Reading

Trending