Connect with us

Accounting

Tesla excluded from EV buyer credits in California proposal

Published

on

Tesla Inc.’s electric vehicles would be shut out from consumer rebates under a proposal by California Governor Gavin Newsom, pitting the prospective Democratic presidential hopeful against Republican power player Elon Musk.

Newsom on Monday unveiled plans to offer rebates to EV buyers if US President-elect Donald Trump repeals a federal subsidy. A program California phased out in 2023 could be rebooted in lieu of the $7,500 tax credit, the governor said.

His office told Bloomberg News that the current proposal includes market-share limitations that would exclude Tesla’s popular EV models. The details — including Tesla’s possible omission from the credits — will be negotiated with the state legislature and could change, Newsom’s office said.

“It’s about creating the market conditions for more of these car makers to take root,” according to the governor’s office. It wasn’t immediately clear if other automakers would be excluded.

Musk, Tesla’s billionaire chief executive officer, posted on his X social-media platform that the proposal was “insane,” citing the automaker’s manufacturing presence in the state.

The move would leave market-leading Tesla out of a key incentive program aimed at spurring wider adoption of EVs at a time of slowing growth for all-electric vehicles. Tesla’s models do qualify for the federal credit, which was introduced as part of President Joe Biden’s signature climate bill, the Inflation Reduction Act.

Excluding Tesla could burnish Newsom’s standing on the left as he renews a clash with Musk, who has become a member of Trump’s inner circle and accepted a role helping the incoming administration cut government spending. Musk has said he’s fine with federal subsidies going away.

“This is a slap in Tesla’s face,” Gene Munster, managing partner of Deepwater Asset Management, said of the California proposal.

California tension

Tensions between Musk and Newsom have been strained for years, with the Tesla leader moving the automaker’s headquarters to Texas in 2021, in part citing frustration with California’s politics. 

Musk had angrily denounced state orders to close Tesla’s Fremont factory during the COVID-19 pandemic, labeling them “fascist” in an earnings call. When Musk announced the headquarters move, Newsom said Tesla owed some of its success to California.

Tesla still accounts for more than half of all new EVs sold in California, but its grip on the market is slipping. Tesla’s sales in California fell 12.6% during the first three quarters compared with a year earlier, even as overall electric-vehicle sales in the state rose 1%, according to the California New Car Dealers Association. Tesla made 54.5% of all EVs registered in the state during the first three quarters, a significant drop from 63% during the same period last year.

California clashed with Trump frequently on auto emission regulations during the incoming president’s first term, and the state’s leaders have made clear they are now girding for another fight. Newsom already has sought to shield the state’s policies on issues including reproductive rights, climate and immigration from potential threats under a Trump administration.

Trump has long criticized the Biden administration’s efforts to subsidize EVs in a bid to boost adoption of cleaner cars. His transition team is now looking to slash fuel-efficiency requirements for new cars and light trucks as part of plans to unwind Biden policies the president-elect has blasted as an “EV mandate,” Bloomberg News reported last week.

California, as well as states including Oregon and Colorado, currently are exempt from rules that preempt them from enacting their own emissions standards for new vehicles. More than a dozen states representing more than a third of the U.S. auto market now have formally opted to follow California’s rules.

Trump in his first term targeted California’s right to set tougher gas mileage rules than the federal government. He is expected to make another attempt to roll back the California carve out under the 1970 Clean Air Act after taking office in January.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

In the blogs: You will survive

Published

on

Saving Social Security; sued over an address; more 5471 opinions; and other highlights from our favorite tax bloggers.

You will survive

  • U of I Tax School (https://taxschool.illinois.edu/blog/): From fielding endless tax questions to relatives’ barrage of requests for help with returns, the accountants’ survival guide to Thanksgiving.
  • Tax Vox (https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox): Could a pre-tariff buying frenzy kick off a new round of inflation?
  • TaxProf Blog (http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/): Congress last reformed the nation’s current tax penalty regime some three decades ago, before the rise of big data and the advent of predictive analytics. Is it time for Congress to weave the latter into the Internal Revenue Code?
  • Tax Foundation (https://taxfoundation.org/blog) As Social Security faces looming insolvency, one issue that garners a lot of attention in the debate over solutions is raising the payroll tax cap. Policymakers should also recognize that broader changes in how workers are compensated have contributed to the decline in wages subject to payroll taxes. Expanding the payroll tax base to include all forms of worker compensation should be on the table.
  • Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (https://itep.org/category/blog/): A recent analysis shows that some widespread tariffs are beneficial — and that those now proposed wouldn’t be among them.
  • Don’t Mess with Taxes (http://dontmesswithtaxes.typepad.com/): What do holiday shopping and taxes share? The growing potential for ID theft.

Just guess

Tricky stuff

  • The Tax Times (https://www.thetaxtimes.com): The Tax Court just opined on another case that thwarts IRS authority to assess 5471 reporting penalties.
  • Global Taxes (https://www.globaltaxes.com/blog.php): Seems that in Mukhi v. Commissioner, the Tax Court rejected arguments that a due process hearing was conducted by a partial appeals officer and that non-filing penalties violated the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause. The big win was in the third question.
  • Withum (https://www.withum.com/resources/): Latest state updates include Washington’s Supreme Court denying an investment income deduction and new services subject to B&O retailing classification in the state.
  • TaxConnex (https://www.taxconnex.com/blog-): Execs go into M&A often blindly jazzed about the deal and thinking they know the landmines, such as employees’ reactions or overpaying the target company. What about the risk of past sales tax exposure?
  • Palm Beach Accounting and Financial Services (https://www.pbafs.com/blog): Savings bonds, 529 contributions and the good old-fashioned, rattling piggy bank: Gifts that can teach kids about finances.
  • Boyum & Barenscheer (https://www.myboyum.com/blog/): What to remind them about the differences between accounting and tax profitability.
  • Avalara (https://www.avalara.com/blog/en/north-america.html: A state-by-state look at clothing taxes.
  • Vertex (https://www.vertexinc.com/resources/resource-library/filter/field_asset_type/blog?page=0): What to remind them of the complexities of corporate taxes.
  • Armanino (https://www.armanino.com/articles/): The latest on issuing 1099s for next season.
  • Sovos (https://sovos.com/blog/): Third-party settlement organizations are also keeping a close watch on IRS guidance regarding their obligations under 1099-K requirements. Recent changes to reporting thresholds, coupled with delayed enforcement and conflicting guidance, have left many TPSOs on marshy ground about their responsibilities.
  • MBK (https://www.mbkcpa.com/insights): How business-vehicle deductions can be especially “tricky.”
  • Virginia – U.S. Tax Talk (https://us-tax.org/about-this-us-tax-blog/): Overseas Americans are entitled to certain tax breaks, one significant break being the exclusion of amounts provided by an employer for foreign housing.
  • Gordon Law (https://gordonlawltd.com/blog/): When big hearts co-exist with small tax brains: What to remind them about taxes and charities this giving season.
  • Summing It Up (http://blog.freedmaxick.com/summing-it-up): One of the main provisions of Secure 2.0 kicks in on Jan. 1: automatic enrollment for new employee benefit plans.
  • AICPA & CIMA Insights (https://www.aicpa-cima.com/blog): Whether accounting for digital assets or auditing entities in this space, to understand the asset class you need to understand the fundamentals of the underlying technology: blockchain.

Continue Reading

Accounting

PCAOB offers guidance on quality control standard

Published

on

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board introduced two pieces of guidance to help auditing firms apply its new quality control standard.

The Securities and Exchange Commission approved the PCAOB’s QC standard in September. QC 1000, A Firm’s System of Quality Control, will require all registered public accounting firms to identify specific risks to their practice and design a quality control system that can safeguard against those risks. The standard will require an annual evaluation of firms’ QC systems and reporting to the PCAOB. It takes effect on Dec. 15, 2025.

To help firms adjust to the upcoming requirements, the PCAOB posted two guidance documents Tuesday. QC 1000 Staff Guidance explains how all firms registered with the PCAOB, including those that don’t audit issuers or SEC-registered brokers and dealers, are affected by QC 1000, but not all requirements of QC 1000 will apply to every firm. The publication offers an overview of the various requirements of QC 1000 and along with staff guidance for firms about how to comply with the standard.

QC 1000 emphasizes accountability, firm culture and the “tone at the top,” and firm governance through requirements for specified roles within and responsibilities for the QC system, including at the highest levels of the firm; quality objectives that link compensation to quality; and, for the largest firms, the requirement of an independent perspective on firm governance, the publication points out.

The other publication is AS 2901 Staff Guidance. In connection with the adoption of the new QC 1000 standard, the PCAOB has expanded the auditor’s responsibility to respond to deficiencies on completed engagements under an amended and retitled AS 2901, Responding to Engagement Deficiencies After Issuance of the Auditor’s Report. In addition to an overview of these changes, this publication includes insights from the PCAOB staff on the scope and applicability of the new requirements, as well as information on responding to engagement deficiencies and documentation. AS 2901 requires firms to take action to respond to all engagement deficiencies identified on completed engagements unless it’s probable that the auditor’s report is not being relied on, the PCAOB noted.  

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRS phases in Form 1099-K threshold at $2,500 in 2025

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service extended its transition relief Tuesday for the new Form 1099-K information reporting threshold, setting it at $5,000 for 2024 and $2,500 in 2025 before reaching the statutory level of $600 in 2026 and thereafter.

The threshold applies to payment apps and online marketplaces such as Venmo, PayPal, eBay, Etsy, Airbnb and more, also known as third-party settlement organizations. The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 lowered the old threshold from $20,000 to $600 as a way of collecting more taxes from people and businesses who receive payment through these third parties.

Many taxpayers and tax professionals had worried the lower threshold would prompt a flood of 1099-K forms arriving in the mail for people who had never been subject to the requirement, prompting the IRS to repeatedly delay the requirement. Last November, the IRS began phasing in the lower threshold at $5,000 for calendar year 2024. Now it is setting the threshold at $2,500 for next year by issuing Notice 2024-85 on Tuesday.

Lawmakers in Congress have complained that the IRS has been overstepping its authority by setting its own thresholds, but legislation to repeal the $600 threshold has not yet passed in Congress. IRS commissioner Danny Werfel has defended the IRS’s authority to phase in the new threshold, as it has done for other parts of the Tax Code that have provoked resistance.

irs-indoor-sign.jpg
The Internal Revenue Service facility in New Carrollton, Maryland

Al Drago/Bloomberg

“There are a variety of examples throughout history where the IRS — to protect taxpayers from undue burden or from potentially being overtaxed — where we have either delayed implementation or ramped implementation,” said Werfel during a congressional hearing in February. “This is not the first time and I’m not the first commissioner that has confronted this tension.”

Under the guidance issued Tuesday, third-party settlement organizations will be required to report transactions when the amount of total payments for those transactions is more than $5,000 in 2024; more than $2,500 in 2025; and more than $600 in calendar year 2026 and after. Notice 2024-85 also says that for calendar year 2024, that the IRS will not assert penalties under section 6651 or 6656 for a TPSO’s failure to withhold and pay backup withholding tax during the calendar year.

TPSOs that have performed backup withholding for a payee during calendar year 2024 must file a Form 945 and a Form 1099-K with the IRS and furnish a copy to the payee. For calendar year 2025 and afterward, the IRS said it will assert penalties under section 6651 or 6656 for a TPSO’s failure to withhold and pay backup withholding tax. 

Continue Reading

Trending