Connect with us

Economics

War is not the only reason some Muslims are ditching the Democrats

Published

on

AS PRESS conferences go, the one held at the Arab American Chamber of Commerce building in Dearborn, a suburb of Detroit, on October 27th, was uncomfortable. On one side of a boardroom table, opposite a crowd of cameras and microphones, sat around a dozen men and women who are influential in Arab-American circles. Taking turns to speak, each of them explained how they were directly affected by war in the Middle East; how they felt disappointed and betrayed by President Joe Biden; and how despite it all, they would still be voting for Kamala Harris.

“I’ve heard people in my community say they want to punish Democrats for this war,” said James Zogby, the second speaker and the founder of the Arab American Institute. “They’re not going to punish Democrats. They’re going to punish immigrants. They’re going to punish innocent people.” He finished with a plea: “Don’t punish the country, the world, your children, your grandchildren, because you’re angry.”

As they spoke, a small crowd holding up Palestinian flags was gathering outside, suggesting that they would be doing exactly that: “There are traitors inside,” went the chant. “Endorsing our genocide.” Later they called the attendees “Zionist collaborators”. According to Jenin Yaseen, one of the protesters, the only difference between Ms Harris and Donald Trump is the speed at which each would accept the murder of all Palestinians. Both are appalling, she said, but she thought Mr Trump was at least honest in his contempt for the Palestinian cause.

Michigan is among the closest of swing states, with polls suggesting Ms Harris has the slenderest of leads: our model puts her just 0.4 percentage points ahead. And according to the census bureau, 310,000 people claim Middle Eastern or North African origins in the state, or about 3% of the total. Winning over Arab voters could deliver Mr Trump the election. On October 26th, at a rally in Novi, a suburb of Detroit, the former president appeared on stage with 21 Muslim and Arab leaders (all men), after being endorsed by the mayors of Dearborn Heights, a heavily Arab suburb next to Dearborn proper, and of Hamtramck, an enclave of Detroit with a fully Muslim city council. Mr Trump, one imam declared, will deliver “peace”.

This seems rather implausible. According to Lindsay Graham, a Republican senator, Mr Trump recently told Binyamin Netanyahu, the prime minister of Israel, that he has “awe” for Israeli military operations and backs more of them. The former president has also called for Mr Netanyahu to “finish the job”. But that may not stop some Arab-Americans in Michigan from voting for him.

Rania Batrice, a Palestinian-American Democratic operative who worked for Bernie Sanders in 2016, and who is reluctantly backing Ms Harris, says that those supporting Mr Trump know his promises of peace are “a big fat lie”. But she worries they don’t care, because they are simply too angry with Mr Biden and Ms Harris. Many were initially warmer towards her, but are disappointed the vice-president has not broken rhetorically with Mr Biden since becoming the nominee.

There is some reason to think that a few Muslims would be drifting to Mr Trump even without the war, and that the bloodshed in Gaza and Lebanon simply provides an excuse. On a call organised by the Trump campaign on October 21st, Amer Ghalib, the mayor of Hamtramck, barely mentioned the war in Gaza at all. An imam present suggested that if Ms Harris wins, “the boys will turn to girls, and the girls will turn to a boy.” Melissa Gilchrist, a resident of Hamtramck, says that she thinks Mr Ghalib’s endorsement of Mr Trump is more about local politics. A year ago, she was at the front of a protest against Mr Ghalib after he removed the city’s gay-rights rainbow flag from outside City Hall. The mayor and his clique “are much more conservative on social things than the Democratic Party”, she says. Endorsing Mr Trump is a jab at his critics locally.

A poll conducted for the Arab American Institute earlier this month found Arab-Americans divided equally between the two candidates. Muslim and Arab voters may also just stay away from the polls, or else turn out for a third-party candidate. A campaign encouraging them to do just that, called “Abandon Harris”, has endorsed Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate. Hassan Abdel Salam, its founder, says that his hope is that Ms Harris loses the election by a narrow margin in Michigan, and then that Democrats react by insisting their next candidate should adopt a more forceful approach to Israel. “We want to be written in history, for our great great grandchildren, we want to be remembered forever,” he says. It is a thought. 

Economics

Donald Trump has many ways to hurt Elon Musk

Published

on

THERE WAS a time, not long ago, when an important skill for journalists was translating the code in which powerful people spoke about each other. Carefully prepared speeches and other public remarks would be dissected for hints about the arguments happening in private. Among Donald Trump’s many achievements is upending this system. In his administration people seem to say exactly what they think at any given moment. Wild threats are made—to end habeas corpus; to take Greenland by force—without any follow-through. Journalists must now try to guess what is real and what is for show.

Continue Reading

Economics

Donald Trump has many ways to hurt Elon Musk

Published

on

THERE WAS a time, not long ago, when an important skill for journalists was translating the code in which powerful people spoke about each other. Carefully prepared speeches and other public remarks would be dissected for hints about the arguments happening in private. Among Donald Trump’s many achievements is upending this system. In his administration people seem to say exactly what they think at any given moment. Wild threats are made—to end habeas corpus; to take Greenland by force—without any follow-through. Journalists must now try to guess what is real and what is for show.

Continue Reading

Economics

Jobs report May 2025:

Published

on

U.S. payrolls increased 139,000 in May, more than expected; unemployment at 4.2%

Hiring decreased just slightly in May even as consumers and companies braced against tariffs and a potentially slowing economy, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.

Nonfarm payrolls rose 139,000 for the month, above the muted Dow Jones estimate for 125,000 and a bit below the downwardly revised 147,000 that the U.S. economy added in April.

The unemployment rate held steady at 4.2%. A more encompassing measure that includes discouraged workers and the underemployed also was unchanged, holding at 7.8%.

Worker pay grew more than expected, with average hourly earnings up 0.4% during the month and 3.9% from a year ago, compared with respective forecasts for 0.3% and 3.7%.

“Stronger than expected jobs growth and stable unemployment underlines the resilience of the US labor market in the face of recent shocks,” said Lindsay Rosner, head of multi-sector fixed income investing at Goldman Sachs Asset Management.

Nearly half the job growth came from health care, which added 62,000, even higher than its average gain of 44,000 over the past year. Leisure and hospitality contributed 48,000 while social assistance added 16,000.

On the downside, government lost 22,000 jobs as efforts to cull the federal workforce by President Donald Trump and the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency began to show an impact.

Stock market futures jumped higher after the release as did Treasury yields.

Though the May numbers were better than expected, there were some underlying trouble spots.

The April count was revised lower by 30,000, while March’s total came down by 65,000 to 120,000.

There also were disparities between the establishment survey, which is used to generate the headline payrolls gain, and the household survey, which is used for the unemployment rate. The latter count, generally more volatile than the establishment survey, showed a decrease of 696,000 workers. Full-time workers declined by 623,000, while part-timers rose by 33,000.

“The May jobs report still has everyone waiting for the other shoe to drop,” said Daniel Zhao, lead economist at job rating site Glassdoor. “This report shows the job market standing tall, but as economic headwinds stack up cumulatively, it’s only a matter of time before the job market starts straining against those headwinds.”

The report comes against a teetering economic background, complicated by Trump’s tariffs and an ever-changing variable of how far he will go to try to level the global playing field for American goods.

Most indicators show that the economy is still a good distance from recession. But sentiment surveys indicate high degrees of anxiety from both consumers and business leaders as they brace for the ultimate impact of how much tariffs will slow business activity and increase inflation.

For their part, Federal Reserve officials are viewing the current landscape with caution.

The central bank holds its next policy meeting in less than two weeks, with markets largely expecting the Fed to stay on hold regarding interest rates. In recent speeches, policymakers have indicated greater concern with the potential for tariff-induced inflation.

“With the Fed laser-focused on managing the risks to the inflation side of its mandate, today’s stronger than expected jobs report will do little to alter its patient approach,” said Rosner, the Goldman Sachs strategist.

Friday also marks the final day before Fed officials head into their quiet period before the meeting, when they do not issue policy remarks.

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

Continue Reading

Trending