Connect with us

Finance

What the stock market typically does after the U.S. election, according to history

Published

on

Traders work on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange on Oct. 24, 2024.

Brendan McDermid | Reuters

Stocks typically rise after a presidential election — but investors need to be prepared for some short-term choppiness first, history shows.

The three major benchmarks on average have seen gains between Election Day and year-end in the presidential election year going back to 1980, according to CNBC data. However, investors shouldn’t be expecting a straight shot up in the market after polls close.

The S&P 500 after the election

Election Date Day After Week After Month Later Year End
11/3/2020 2.20% 5.23% 8.83% 11.48%
11/8/2016 1.11% 1.91% 4.98% 4.64%
11/6/2012 -2.37% -3.77% -1.01% -0.15%
11/4/2008 -5.27% -10.62% -15.96% -10.19%
11/2/2004 1.12% 2.97% 5.29% 7.20%
11/7/2000 -1.58% -3.42% -6.17% -7.79%
11/5/1996 1.46% 2.16% 4.23% 3.72%
11/3/1992 -0.67% -0.31% 2.38% 3.76%
11/8/1988 -0.66% -2.48% 0.52% 0.93%
11/6/1984 -0.73% -2.61% -4.49% -1.86%
11/4/1980 2.12% 1.72% 5.77% 5.21%
Average -0.30% -0.84% 0.40% 1.54%
Median -0.66% -0.31% 2.38% 3.72%

Source: CNBC

In fact, the three indexes have all averaged declines in the session and week following those voting days. Stocks have tended to erase most or all of those losses within a month, CNBC data shows.

This means investors shouldn’t be anticipating an immediate pop on Wednesday or the next few days after.

The Dow after the election

Election Date Day After Week After Month Later Year End
11/3/2020 1.34% 7.06% 9.06% 11.38%
11/8/2016 1.40% 3.22% 6.99% 7.80%
11/6/2012 -2.36% -3.70% -1.30% -1.07%
11/4/2008 -5.05% -9.68% -12.98% -8.82%
11/2/2004 1.01% 3.49% 5.47% 7.45%
11/7/2000 -0.41% -2.48% -3.06% -1.51%
11/5/1996 1.59% 3.04% 5.85% 6.04%
11/3/1992 -0.91% -0.83% 0.74% 1.50%
11/8/1988 -0.43% -2.37% 0.67% 1.93%
11/6/1984 -0.88% -3.02% -5.92% -2.62%
11/4/1980 1.70% 0.73% 3.55% 2.86%
Average -0.27% -0.41% 0.83% 2.27%
Median -0.41% -0.83% 0.74% 1.93%

Source: CNBC

That’s especially true given the chance that the presidential race, which is considered neck-and-neck, may not be called by Wednesday morning. America may also need to wait for close Congressional races to have final counts for determining which party has control of the either house.

The Nasdaq Composite after the election

Election Day Day After Week After Month Later Year End
11/3/2020 3.85% 3.52% 10.90% 15.48%
11/8/2016 1.11% 1.58% 4.31% 3.65%
11/6/2012 -2.48% -4.25% -0.75% 0.25%
11/4/2008 -5.53% -11.19% -18.79% -11.41%
11/2/2004 0.98% 2.95% 8.00% 9.61%
11/7/2000 -5.39% -8.12% -19.41% -27.67%
11/5/1996 1.34% 2.23% 5.78% 5.04%
11/3/1992 0.16% 3.83% 8.56% 11.97%
11/8/1988 -0.29% -1.77% -0.96% 0.67%
11/6/1984 -0.32% -1.08% -4.58% -1.27%
11/4/1980 1.49% 0.97% 6.75% 4.76%
Average -0.46% -1.03% -0.02% 1.01%
Median 0.16% 0.97% 4.31% 3.65%

Source: CNBC

The “election is now center stage as the next catalyst for financial markets,” said Amy Ho, executive director of strategic research at JPMorgan. “We caution that uncertainty could linger on the outcome as the timeline for certifying election results could take days for the presidential race and weeks for the House races.”

This election comes amid a strong year for stocks that’s pushed the broader market to all-time highs. With a gain of about 20%, 2024 has seen the best first 10 months of a presidential election year since 1936, according to Bespoke Investment Group.

Continue Reading

Finance

China’s EV race to the bottom leaves a few possible winners

Published

on

Continue Reading

Finance

Stocks making the biggest moves midday: WOOF, TSLA, CRCL, LULU

Published

on

Continue Reading

Finance

Swiss government proposes tough new capital rules in major blow to UBS

Published

on

A sign in German that reads “part of the UBS group” in Basel on May 5, 2025.

Fabrice Coffrini | AFP | Getty Images

The Swiss government on Friday proposed strict new capital rules that would require banking giant UBS to hold an additional $26 billion in core capital, following its 2023 takeover of stricken rival Credit Suisse.

The measures would also mean that UBS will need to fully capitalize its foreign units and carry out fewer share buybacks.

“The rise in the going-concern requirement needs to be met with up to USD 26 billion of CET1 capital, to allow the AT1 bond holdings to be reduced by around USD 8 billion,” the government said in a Friday statement, referring to UBS’ holding of Additional Tier 1 (AT1) bonds.

The Swiss National Bank said it supported the measures from the government as they will “significantly strengthen” UBS’ resilience.

“As well as reducing the likelihood of a large systemically important bank such as UBS getting into financial distress, this measure also increases a bank’s room for manoeuvre to stabilise itself in a crisis through its own efforts. This makes it less likely that UBS has to be bailed out by the government in the event of a crisis,” SNB said in a Friday statement.

‘Too big to fail’

UBS has been battling the specter of tighter capital rules since acquiring the country’s second-largest bank at a cut-price following years of strategic errors, mismanagement and scandals at Credit Suisse.

The shock demise of the banking giant also brought Swiss financial regulator FINMA under fire for its perceived scarce supervision of the bank and the ultimate timing of its intervention.

Swiss regulators argue that UBS must have stronger capital requirements to safeguard the national economy and financial system, given the bank’s balance topped $1.7 trillion in 2023, roughly double the projected Swiss economic output of last year. UBS insists it is not “too big to fail” and that the additional capital requirements — set to drain its cash liquidity — will impact the bank’s competitiveness.

At the heart of the standoff are pressing concerns over UBS’ ability to buffer any prospective losses at its foreign units, where it has, until now, had the duty to back 60% of capital with capital at the parent bank.

Higher capital requirements can whittle down a bank’s balance sheet and credit supply by bolstering a lender’s funding costs and choking off their willingness to lend — as well as waning their appetite for risk. For shareholders, of note will be the potential impact on discretionary funds available for distribution, including dividends, share buybacks and bonus payments.

“While winding down Credit Suisse’s legacy businesses should free up capital and reduce costs for UBS, much of these gains could be absorbed by stricter regulatory demands,” Johann Scholtz, senior equity analyst at Morningstar, said in a note preceding the FINMA announcement. 

“Such measures may place UBS’s capital requirements well above those faced by rivals in the United States, putting pressure on returns and reducing prospects for narrowing its long-term valuation gap. Even its long-standing premium rating relative to the European banking sector has recently evaporated.”

The prospect of stringent Swiss capital rules and UBS’ extensive U.S. presence through its core global wealth management division comes as White House trade tariffs already weigh on the bank’s fortunes. In a dramatic twist, the bank lost its crown as continental Europe’s most valuable lender by market capitalization to Spanish giant Santander in mid-April.

Continue Reading

Trending