Connect with us

Economics

Why can’t politicians just admit when they’re wrong?

Published

on

The debate this week was short on exposition of policy but so rich in moments revelatory of the styles and characters of the two candidates that I struggled in the wee hours on Wednesday, while writing this week’s Lexington column, with what to leave out. One moment I’ve been thinking about since was when Vice-President Kamala Harris, in a litany about how Donald Trump has “attempted to use race to divide the American people”, referred to how he treated the so-called Central Park Five. 

Do you recall the case? In 1989, after a white woman out jogging in Central Park was raped and brutally beaten, five teenaged black and Latino boys, arrested and questioned for hours by police, confessed. The matter drew national attention. 

Almost two weeks after the attack, Mr Trump took out full-page advertisements in the four major New York newspapers calling for the reinstatement of the death penalty. Addressing the mayor, Ed Koch, who had urged New Yorkers not to carry “hate and rancour” in their hearts, Mr Trump wrote, “I want to hate these murderers and I always will. I am not looking to psychoanalyse or understand them, I am looking to punish them.” The Central Park Five served years in prison before being exonerated in 2002 by the confession, supported by DNA evidence, of a convicted rapist and murderer. 

After Ms Harris raised the incident, Mr Trump gave one of his jumbled rebuttals. The gist viewers might have taken away was that, as he put it, Ms Harris had to “stretch back years, 40, 50 years ago, because there’s nothing now.” Here’s why the story remains relevant: Mr Trump has never recanted, let alone apologised, and he has continued to imply the five men may have been responsible for the attack. He did so once again Tuesday night.“They pled guilty. And I said, well, if they pled guilty they badly hurt a person, killed a person ultimately,” he said. “Then they pled we’re not guilty.” (The victim is alive).

Why can’t Mr Trump acknowledge that the Central Park Five were innocent? Many of the convicted January 6th rioters also pleaded guilty, and though they have not been exonerated Mr Trump calls them patriots and hostages. He has said he himself is the victim of prosecutorial overreach and claimed “a lot of people said that that’s why the black people like me because they have been hurt so badly and discriminated against.” He seems unwilling to return such empathy. 

The Harris campaign brought a member of the Central Park Five—Yusef Salaam, now a member of the New York City council—to the debate. In the “spin room” afterwards, he called Mr Trump from a scrum of reporters, identifying himself as a member of the “exonerated five”. “That’s very good,” Mr Trump said, grinning, though possibly not realising whom he was dealing with. “You’re on my side!” Mr Salaam responded, “No, no, I’m not on your side.”

I think this is a particularly egregious case of a politician refusing to admit error because it does exacerbate racial division, and it falsely spreads suspicion of criminality. Mr Trump, of course, is extreme in his refusal to admit any shortcoming, such as losing an election, or even any facts that don’t fit his view of reality, as when he insisted during the debate that the FBI’s crime numbers are fraudulent because they do not show the crime wave he insists is engulfing America. But I should note that Ms Harris also seems resistant to simply saying she got something wrong, or even evolved in her thinking. Why can’t she explain why she changed her mind about fracking? I think voters would actually have more confidence in a politician who would forthrightly say that, confronted with new facts or arguments or experience, their view changed. A society in which people can’t own up to their mistakes—and forgive one another for them—seems doomed to make many more of them than it otherwise would. 

Thank you for the wonderful responses to my request for great political ads. I now suspect Australia’s political culture is considerably more creative than America’s, given the suggestions from down under, some of which I had to use Google to decode (eg, “Point Percy at the Parliament”, suggested by Saul Eslake). Roger Karess wrote from Paris to recall a bumper sticker from the Nixon era: “The majority isn’t silent, the government is deaf!” Cheryl Rivers of Stockbridge, Vermont, nominated a more recent example, Rafael Warnock’s puppy ad (not actually his beagle, I discovered while reporting a Lexington about his campaign). I was delighted to be reminded by Thellen Levy of a fictional ad, a sign described in the Raymond Chandler novel “The Lady in the Lake”: “Keep Jim Patton Constable. He is too old to go to work.” ■

Continue Reading

Economics

Republicans have a plan to add trillions of dollars to the national debt

Published

on

MUCH AS he may wish to, Donald Trump cannot govern through imperial decree alone. Congress is drafting legislation to remake the tax system and alter federal spending—something only it can do. On May 12th Republicans unveiled their new plan. Unfortunately it is a mess.

Continue Reading

Economics

CPI inflation April 2025: Rate hits 2.3%

Published

on

Customers line up at the check out booth on April 18, 2025 at a Costco branch in Niantic, Connecticut.

Robert Nickelsberg | Getty Images

Inflation was slightly lower than expected in April as President Donald Trump’s tariffs just began hitting the slowing U.S. economy, according to a Labor Department report Tuesday.

The consumer price index, which measures the costs for a broad range of goods and services, rose a seasonally adjusted 0.2% for the month, putting the 12-month inflation rate at 2.3%, its lowest since February 2021, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said. The monthly reading was in line with the Dow Jones consensus estimate while the 12-month was a bit below the forecast for 2.4%.

Excluding volatile food and energy prices, core CPI also increased 0.2% for the month, while the year-over-year level was 2.8%. The forecast was for 0.3% and 2.8% respectively.

The monthly readings were a bit higher than in March though price increases remain well off their highs of three years ago.

Shelter prices again were the main culprit in pushing up the inflation gauge. The category, which makes about one-third of the index weighting, increased 0.3% in April, accounting for more than half the overall move, according to the BLS.

After posting a 2.4% slide in March, energy prices rebounded, with a 0.7% gain. Food saw a 0.1% decline.

Used vehicle prices saw their second straight drop, down 0.5%, while new vehicles were flat. Apparel costs also were off 0.2% though medical care services increased 0.5%.

Egg prices tumbled, falling 12.7%, though they were still up 49.3% from a year ago.

While the April CPI figures were relatively tame, the Trump tariffs remain a wild card in the inflation picture, depending on where negotiations go between now and the summer.

In his much-awaited “Liberation Day” announcement, Trump slapped 10% duties on all U.S. imports and said he intended to put additional reciprocal tariffs on trading partners. Recently, though, Trump has backed off his position, with the most dramatic development a 90-day stay on aggressive tariffs against China while the two sides enter further negotiations.

Markets expect the president’s softening position to lead to less of a chance of interest rate cuts this year. Traders had been expecting the Federal Reserve to start easing in June, with at least three total reductions likely this year.

Since the China developments, the market has pushed out the first cut to September, with just two likely this year as the central bank feels less pressure to support the economy and as inflation has held above the Fed’s 2% target now for more than four years.

The Fed relies more on the Commerce Department’s inflation gauge for policymaking, though CPI figures into that index. The BLS on Thursday will release its April reading on producer prices, which are seen as more of a leading indicator on inflation.

This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.

Continue Reading

Economics

German business leaders tell new government: It’s time to deliver

Published

on

TEGERNSEE, GERMANY — Top German business leaders, economists and politicians descended onto a small, picturesque Bavarian town situated next to the iconic Tegernsee lake last week to share their hopes and discuss what’s at stake for the new government.

Buoyed by recent positive market sentiment for Europe’s largest economy, attendees at the summit were united in their call for the new administration to step up and honour campaign promises. Any missteps would likely not be tolerated, with some business leaders warning the government cannot allow itself a “lazy summer.”

Despite rain and low hanging clouds providing a somewhat dreary backdrop to the event, which has been dubbed the “Davos of Germany,” the promise of new beginnings enveloped the summit and the atmosphere was buzzing with excitement for potential changes the newly-appointed Chancellor Friedrich Merz could initiate.

The view across the Tegernsee from the Ludwig Erhard Summit

Sophie Kiderlin, CNBC

Big expectations for the government were commonplace, with concerns about Germany’s struggling economy and recent political turmoil seemingly having faded into the background.

The German DAX index is currently up over 18% since the beginning of this year, frequently hitting record highs in recent months. The German economy has however been in stagnation territory for over two years now, with tensions over economic, fiscal and budget policy in the previous ruling coalition and its eventual breakup continuing to weigh on expectations.

“There are very high hopes now on the new government,” Patrick Trutwein, chief risk officer and chief operating officer at the IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG, said during a panel moderated by CNBC’s Annette Weisbach.

He said he was feeling positive about Germany’s future considering the announcement of the major fiscal package enshrined in Germany’s constitution, as well as further potential reforms ahead and “an economy that’s pretty robust and can build on its own … productivity and competencies.”

Matthias Voelkel, CEO of Boerse Stuttgart Group, was among those feeling hopeful.

“If we look ahead and if they [the new government] do the right thing, I’m optimistic,” he told CNBC.

Audi CEO Gernot Döllner meanwhile said in a fireside chat that he was hopeful that the new government would “send an impulse into the German economy.”

The mood was also upbeat in Germany’s auto sector, which has long been struggling with competition from China, pressures from the transition to electric vehicles and has recently been hit by U.S. tariffs.

“The Germans are back,” Hildegard Müller, president of the German Association of the Automotive Industry, told CNBC’s Weisbach Friday. “We are competitive,” she added.

A talk at the Ludwig Erhard Summit.

Sophie Kiderlin, CNBC

But amid the positive buzz, it was clear that observers are keeping a close eye on the governments every move.

“This new government in Germany cannot allow itself a political lazy summer, I’m sorry, they’ve got to work and they’ve got to work hard,” said Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, chairman of Spitzberg Partners and former German politician.

Or as Veronika Grimm, member of the German Council of Economic Experts, told CNBC: “A lot lies ahead for the government.”

09 May 2025, Bavaria, Gmund Am Tegernsee: Katherina Reiche (CDU), Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Energy, takes part in the Ludwig Erhard Summit. Representatives from business, politics, science and the media are taking part in the three-day summit. Photo: Sven Hoppe/dpa (Photo by Sven Hoppe/picture alliance via Getty Images)

Germany’s new economy boss has a plan — and it starts with risk, speed and big bets

Overal the message was clear: Germany needs to get its act together.

Alexander Horn, general manager of Eli Lilly‘s Germany arm — Lilly Germany — said the business strongly welcomes the new government’s goals, but won’t tolerate any caveats.

“Specifically we expect that the declarations of intent that are in the coalition agreement will be implemented quickly, speed plays an enormously big role,” he said during a panel, according to a CNBC translation.

Boerse Stuttgart Group’s Voelkel indicated his optimism relied on action from the government, saying he was looking for moves towards “less bureaucracy, less anti-growth regulation, more innovation and particularly strengthening investment.”

'Crypto is going mainstream,' Boerse Stuttgart Group CEO says

The newly minted German government has set itself many of these points as policy goals, making promises to boost the country’s economy, reduce bureaucracy and boost innovation and investment during the election campaign and in its coalition agreement.

“This country needs an economic turnaround. After two years of recessions the previous government had to announce again [a] zero growth year for 2025 and we really have to work on this,” German economy minister Katherina Reiche told CNBC on the sidelines of the summit.

Continue Reading

Trending