Connect with us

Accounting

WNBA standoff pits players who want more pay vs. ex Deloitte CEO

Published

on

As WNBA Commissioner, Cathy Engelbert has transformed women’s basketball into a business juggernaut — but a standoff over how much players should share in the league’s growth could threaten her leadership, and her legacy. 

Engelbert, a 60-year-old former chief executive officer of the accounting giant Deloitte who took the once-struggling league’s top job in 2019, has been widely credited with steering the pro basketball league through the tumult of the COVID-19 pandemic and into a prosperous new era.

Thanks in part to a surge in interest stoked by young superstars including Caitlin Clark, Angel Reese and Paige Bueckers, the WNBA brought in $144 million in league revenue last year, a 177% jump since Engelbert’s tenure began. (League revenue excludes sales of merchandise, tickets and other money that flows directly to the teams.)

Engelbert and the WNBA were able to leverage that new popularity to forge a $2.2 billion, 11-year media deal with Walt Disney Co., NBCUniversal and Amazon.com Inc. — the biggest such pact in the history of women’s sports — that’s scheduled to begin in 2026. The league is also set to add five more teams by 2030, bringing the total to 18. Achieving such milestones would help pave the way to higher player pay, Engelbert had suggested in the past.

Yet, having attained its greatest financial and cultural success so far, the WNBA is facing the prospect of the first labor lockout in its 29-year history. The league’s collective bargaining agreement was set to expire on Oct. 31, but the two sides agreed to a 30-day extension with a new deadline of Nov. 30. As part of the agreement, either side can terminate the extension after a two-day notice period.

The biggest point of contention is how much of the WNBA’s windfall should be shared with players. The players union is hoping to lock down between 30% and 40% of all revenue coming to the league, which includes proceeds of the $200 million a year media deal, and to the teams, including merchandise, ticket sales and concessions, among other income streams, according to people familiar with the talks.

For some team owners, sharing more revenue could bite. Those who have been in control of their franchises the longest have experienced lean years that saw other teams fold — and are eager to recoup their losses. Meanwhile, newcomers such as Mark Davis, who bought the Las Vegas Aces in 2021, have indicated that they’re more open to greater revenue sharing.

“I haven’t been consulted, but I think you know what side of the table I’d probably be sitting on,” Davis said at a news conference in October

Engelbert also risks alienating the league’s fanbase. Many WNBA fans, like Betsy Carswell, 62, who has been a Washington Mystics season-ticket holder since the club’s first game in 1998, have been along for the ride as the league’s popularity slowly increased. “I’ve lived through the years where me saying I was a WNBA fan or a Mystics fan was a punchline,” she said.

When the team launched, Carswell was among the first to lock down season tickets, buying two lower-bowl, half-court seats for no more than $500 each. Today, Carswell pays about $2,700 a season for both seats. She said many WNBA fans had soured on Engelbert.

“It says a lot that at the end of the championship she got up to get that trophy and was booed not by the players but by the fans,” Carswell said.

The exact mix of team and league revenue that would be shared with players in a new labor pact is still being negotiated, according to the people familiar with the talks, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe private discussions. Under the National Basketball Association’s collective bargaining agreement, male players receive about 50% of all basketball-related income, including media rights, ticket sales and merchandise.

For its part, the WNBA has proposed tripling player salaries while keeping in place an arrangement that opens up revenue sharing if certain growth targets are reached, according to the people. To date, those benchmarks have never been hit.

Engelbert declined to be interviewed for this story, but she “strongly agrees with the players that they deserve to be paid more and is fully committed to negotiating in good faith and finalizing a new collective bargaining agreement that rewards the players’ significant contributions to the league’s continued success,” a WNBA spokesperson said in a statement.

A spokesman for the players union declined to comment on the talks.

In recent weeks, there have been clear signs that relations between Engelbert and the players are at a low ebb. At a news conference in September, Minnesota Lynx forward Napheesa Collier, a member of the players union’s executive committee, blasted the commissioner and the league. 

“We have the best players in the world, the best fans in the world, but right now we have the worst leadership in the world,” Collier said. Days later, Collier called off a meeting with Engelbert. Collier didn’t respond to requests for comment for this article.

In 2015, Engelbert became the first female chief executive at Deloitte — and the first woman to lead one of the Big Four consulting firms. When her four-year term was due to end, the WNBA came calling. For a league hungry for business savvy, the seasoned executive looked like a perfect candidate.

Engelbert faced a tough task. With the league losing money, TV viewership was waning; the 2018 WNBA Finals averaged 481,000 viewers, a 14% decrease from 2017. In 2019, only 381,000 tuned in to the Finals, a 20% plunge. 

In spite of those numbers, the WNBA and its players agreed to a new labor deal in 2020 that nearly doubled maximum player salaries from $117,500 to $215,000. The deal guaranteed season-long housing with additional bedrooms for players with children, as well as paid maternity leave.

Then, less than a year into Engelbert’s tenure, the pandemic turned sports inside out. Engelbert made sure a full season could be played by securing the “Wubble” facility at IMG Academy in Florida. She also wooed more corporate sponsors, winning praise from players, union leaders and others.

By the end of the WNBA’s 2020 fiscal year, the league had still brought in $56 million in revenue, an increase of more than 8% from a year earlier.

“Cathy was viewed as an innovator, her background in savvy business coming from Deloitte seemed to deserve credit for getting us to and through such a pivotal moment and keeping the season alive,” Monica McNutt, a basketball analyst at ESPN, said in an interview.

By 2021, the WNBA’s fortunes were improving, with its most-watched regular season since 2008. Merchandise sales rose 50%. Engelbert organized a $75 million capital raise from investors including Michael and Susan Dell, Laurene Powell Jobs and Condoleezza Rice that valued the league and its teams at $1 billion. And she continued to add to the league’s roster of corporate backers.

“Make no mistake, she has been an incredible business builder for this league,” said one owner. “In every category, player salaries, media, sponsorship and more, we’ve grown, she’s led that.”  

The players union saw the $2.2 billion media deal as a missed opportunity to build more cohesion between the league and the players. Terri Jackson, the union’s executive director, said in an interview earlier this year that Engelbert hadn’t included her or the players in the deal talks with broadcasters.  Jackson has repeatedly raised concerns about the undervaluation of the WNBA in the media rights deal.

“When you have the professional athlete there relaying the experience and the expectations, you get another insight,” Jackson said, adding that Engelbert said she was open to the idea for the next round of talks with the league’s media partners.

A person familiar with the matter said Engelbert hasn’t followed through with an invitation for players to participate in media deal talks. 

Terri Jackson speaks during the Bloomberg Power Players New York event on Sept. 4. Photographer: Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg

In September of last year, Engelbert’s relationship with the players deteriorated in the wake of comments she made about the rivalry between Caitlin Clark of the Indiana Fever and Angel Reese of the Chicago Sky. Both women had become the targets of racist and sexist commentary, especially online. 

Asked about the issue on CNBC, Engelbert drew a comparison to a famous NBA rivalry, drawing an immediate backlash from critics who said she’d failed to stand up for the players.

“It’s a little of that [Larry] Bird and Magic [Johnson] moment, when those two rookies came in from a big college rivalry, one white, one black, and so we have that moment with these two,” Engelbert said. “The one thing I know about sports is you need rivalry, that’s what makes people watch. They don’t want everybody being nice to one another.”

In the ensuing hours, the NBA brought in its crisis communications team to decide how to proceed, according to people familiar with the handling of the situation. Engelbert was encouraged to book an interview with ESPN, the league’s biggest media partner, to rebuke the racism and sexism her players were confronting. 

Engelbert was resistant to that idea, insisting she’d handle the situation her way, according to the people. The next evening, Engelbert clarified her remarks, saying in a social-media post that “there is absolutely no place for hate or racism of any kind in the WNBA or anywhere else.” She also sent a letter of apology to the league’s players and talked on the phone with them.

Ahead of the 2025 WNBA Draft, Engelbert said the league formed a task force to monitor hateful comments toward players. 

After the union opted out of the previous labor deal in October 2024, the two sides began negotiating that December, and met many times in the following months. The players hired a raft of high-profile advisers, including Nobel-Prize winning Harvard economist Claudia Goldin. Engelbert acknowledged the union sent a proposal at the WNBA Draft in April. 

At the same time, Engelbert was closing deals. On June 30, the league said that it would add three expansion teams by 2030 in Detroit, Philadelphia and Cleveland. The expansion fee for each franchise was a record $250 million, a 400% increase from two years earlier. 

In June, on the eve of the league’s All-Star Weekend, the league offered its first counterproposal, and the two sides met for talks on July 17. At a news conference the next day, Engelbert described the conversations as “constructive” and said she was optimistic that a “transformational” deal would get done. 

But the night before, players, who had been seething over what they saw as a paltry counterproposal from the league had been plotting a public demonstration of their anger. Thirty minutes after Engelbert was done speaking, players unzipped their warmup jackets and revealed shirts that read “pay us what you owe us.”

When Collier was presented with the MVP trophy at the end of the game, fans chanted, “pay them.”

A fan holds a sign saying “Pay the players” during the 2025 WNBA All-Star Game. Photographer: Steph Chambers/Getty Images

Engelbert had started planning to step down from the commissioner’s role as early as January 2024 and began telling team presidents and league executives that “she had more days behind her than she did in front,” according to a person familiar with Engelbert’s planning and communications with other officials. Engelbert has denied reports that she plans to leave the commissioner’s job. 

Some WNBA players have wondered how much power Engelbert has and have pushed for NBA Commissioner Adam Silver to get involved in the labor talks. On a union Zoom call in October, Collier said, “we should just go to Adam,” according to people who were on the call who declined to be named. 

Silver has indicated some skepticism toward comparing how men and women in the two basketball leagues are paid. On the Today show on Oct. 21, when asked if players should be receiving a bigger piece of revenue, he said “yes,” adding, “I think share isn’t the right way to look at it, because there’s so much more revenue in the NBA. I think you should look at absolute numbers in terms of what they are making.”

Silver has been at the NBA since before the WNBA launched and has navigated multiple collective bargaining negotiations. Engelbert said at a news conference following this year’s WNBA Finals that Silver has been “very supportive of how we’re thinking about the substantial increase in player salaries and benefits.”

Still, Silver has signaled his own wariness about the topic, noting that the tenor of the talks between Engelbert and Collier had gone off-piste.

“It’s become too personal,” he said at an NBC Sports event on Oct. 6. “We’re going to have to work through those issues.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

on

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Trending