Connect with us

Personal Finance

How President-elect Trump may impact investors in these 8 market sectors

Published

on

Brandon Bell | Getty Images News | Getty Images

As Inauguration Day nears, investors are trying to unravel what booms or busts lay ahead under President-elect Donald Trump.

Trump’s campaign promises — from tariffs to mass deportations, tax cuts and deregulation — and his picks to lead federal agencies suggest both risks and rewards for various investment sectors, according to market experts.  

Republican control of both chambers of Congress may grant Trump greater leeway to enact his pledges, experts said. However, their scope and timing is far from clear.

More from FA Playbook:

Here’s a look at other stories impacting the financial advisor business.

“There’s so much uncertainty right now,” said Jeremy Goldberg, a certified financial planner, portfolio manager and research analyst at Professional Advisory Services, which ranked No. 37 on CNBC’s annual Financial Advisor 100 list.

“I wouldn’t be making large bets one way or another,” Goldberg said.

Sectors often fare differently than expected

Past market results show why it’s difficult to predict the sectors that may win or lose under a new president, according to Larry Adam, chief investment officer at Raymond James.

When Trump was elected in 2016, financials, industrials and energy outperformed the S&P 500 in the first week. However, for the remaining three years and 51 weeks, those same sectors significantly underperformed, Adam explained.

“The market is known to have these knee-jerk reactions trying to anticipate where things go very quickly, but they don’t necessarily last,” Adam said.

What’s more, sectors that are expected to do well or poorly based on a president’s policies have sometimes gone the opposite way, according to Adam.

For example, the energy sector was down by 8.4% during Trump’s first administration, despite deregulation, record oil production and a rise in oil prices. Yet the energy sector climbed 22.9% under Biden as of Nov. 19, despite the administration’s push for renewables and sustainability.

For that reason, Raymond James ranks politics eighth for its potential impact on sectors. The seven factors that have more influence, according to the firm, are economic growth, fundamentals, monetary policy, interest rates and inflation, valuations, sentiment and corporate activity.

Here’s how Trump’s policy stances could influence eight sectors: autos, banks, building materials and construction, crypto, energy, health care, retail and technology.

Automobiles

Monty Rakusen | Digitalvision | Getty Images

The auto sector — like many others — will likely be a mixed bag, experts said.

Trump’s antipathy for electric vehicles is likely to create headwinds for EV producers.

His administration may try to roll back regulations like a Biden-era tailpipe-emissions rule expected to push broader adoption of EVs and hybrids. He also intends to kill consumer EV tax credits worth up to $7,500 — although states like California may try to enact their own EV rebates, blunting the impact.

Losing the federal credit would make EVs more costly, driving down sales and perhaps making “per unit economics even less favorable” for automakers, John Murphy, a research analyst at Bank of America Securities, wrote in a Nov. 21 research note.

Some companies seem well-positioned, though: Ford Motor (F), for example, “has a healthy pipeline of hybrid vehicles as well as traditional [internal combustion engine] vehicles to supplement the EV offerings,” Murphy wrote.

'Gradual electrification' is becoming more common in the auto industry, says fund manager

Tariffs and trade conflict pose threats to the auto industry, since the U.S. relies heavily on other nations to manufacture cars and parts, said Callie Cox, chief market strategist at Ritholtz Wealth Management.

They “could affect the cost and availability of cars we see in the U.S. market,” Cox said.

Economists expect tariffs and other Trump policies to be inflationary.

In that case, the U.S. Federal Reserve may have to keep interest rates higher for longer than anticipated. Higher borrowing costs may weigh on consumers’ desire or ability to buy cars, Cox said.

However, lower EV production could be a boon for companies that manufacture traditional gasoline cars, experts said.

Trump has also called for a “drill, baby, drill” approach to oil production. Greater supply could reduce gas prices, supporting demand for gas vehicles, experts said. But trade wars and sanctions on Iran and Venezuela could have the opposite impact, too.

—Greg Iacurci

Banks

In this 2017 file photo, President Donald Trump stands next to Jamie Dimon, chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co., left, in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington.

Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Trump’s first administration eased certain regulations for banking rules, fintech firms and financial startups.

Likewise, Trump’s second term is expected to usher in lighter financial regulations.

That may help bolster profitability in the sector, and therefore stock prices, said Brian Spinelli, co-chief investment officer at Halbert Hargrove in Long Beach, Calif., which is No. 54 on the 2024 CNBC FA 100 list.

“The larger banks probably benefit more from that,” Spinelli said.

Less regulation — combined with the prospect that interest rates could stay higher — will provide a net positive for the bank industry, since they may be able to lend out more risk-based capital, said David Rea, president of Salem Investment Counselors in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, which is No. 8 on the 2024 CNBC FA 100 list.

One issue that emerged this year that could resurface is concern about regional banks’ exposures to commercial real estate, Spinelli said.

“It wasn’t that long ago, and I don’t think those problems disappeared,” Spinelli said. “So you question, is that still looming out there?”

—Lorie Konish

Building materials and construction

Bill Varie | The Image Bank | Getty Images

The housing market has been “frozen” in recent years by high mortgage rates, said Cox of Ritholtz.

Lower rates would likely be a “catalyst” for housing and associated companies, she said.

However, that may not materialize — quickly, at least — under Trump, she said. If policies like tariffs, tax cuts and mass deportations stoke inflation, the U.S. Federal Reserve may have to keep interest rates higher for longer than anticipated, which would likely prop up mortgage rates and weigh on housing and related sectors, she said.

The whims of the housing market impact retailers, too: Home goods stores may not fare well if people aren’t buying, renovating and decorating new homes, Cox said.

Home buyers are accepting higher mortgage rates, says Compass CEO Robert Reffkin

That said, deregulation could be “absolutely huge” for the sector if it accelerates building timelines and reduces costs for developers, Goldberg said.

Trump has called for opening new land to builders and creating tax incentives for homebuyers, without providing much detail.

Housing policies will be “one of the most-watched initiatives coming out of the next administration,” Cox said. “We haven’t gotten a lot of clarity on that front,” she said.

“If we see realistic and well-thought-out policies, you could see real estate stocks and related stocks” like real estate investment trusts, home improvement retailers and home builders respond well, Cox said.

—Greg Iacurci

Crypto

Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump gestures at the Bitcoin 2024 event in Nashville, Tennessee, U.S., July 27, 2024.

Kevin Wurm | Reuters

Trump’s election has brought a new bullishness to cryptocurrencies, with bitcoin nearing a new $100,000 benchmark before its recent runup ended.

As president, Trump is expected to embrace crypto more than any of his predecessors.

Notably, he has already launched a crypto platform, World Liberty Financial, that will encourage the use of digital coins.

Those developments come as new ways of investing in crypto have emerged this year, with the January launch of spot bitcoin ETFs, and more recently, the addition of bitcoin ETF options.

Yet financial advisors are hesitant, with only about 2.6% recommending crypto to their clients, an April survey from Cerulli Associates found. Roughly 12.1% said they would be willing to use it or discuss it based on the client’s preference. Still, 58.9% of advisors said they do not expect to ever use cryptocurrency with clients.

“The number one reason why advisors aren’t investing in cryptocurrency on behalf of their clients is they don’t believe it’s suitable for client portfolios,” said Matt Apkarian, associate director in Cerulli’s product development practice.

Animal spirits, not fundamentals, are what's driving crypto markets: Portfolio manager

Even for advisors who do expect they may use crypto at some point, it’s “wait and see,” particularly regarding how the regulatory environment plays out, Apkarian said.

However, investors are showing interest in cryptocurrency, with 90% of advisors receiving questions on the subject, according to research from Christina Lynn, a certified financial planner and practice management consultant at Mariner Wealth Advisors.

For those investors, exchange-traded funds are a good starting place, since there’s less chance of falling victim to one of crypto’s pitfalls like scams or losing the keys, the unique alphanumeric codes attached to the investments, according to Lynn. Because crypto can be more volatile, it’s best not to invest any money you expect you’ll need to pay for near-term goals, she said.

Investors would also be wise to think of cryptocurrency like an alternative investment and limit the allocation to 1% to 5% of their overall portfolio, Lynn said.

“You don’t need to have a lot of this to have it go a long way,” Lynn said.

—Lorie Konish

Energy

U.S. President Donald Trump gestures after delivering a speech at a Double Eagle Energy Holdings LLC oil rig in Midland, Texas, on Wednesday, July 29, 2020.

Cooper Neill | Bloomberg | Getty Images

As of Nov. 19, energy has been the top-performing sector under President Joe Biden, with a 22.9% gain, even with the administration’s push for renewables and sustainability, according to Raymond James.

Yet it remains to be seen whether that performance can continue under Trump, who has advocated for more oil, gas and coal production. The outlook for the sector could change if Trump acts on a campaign threat to repeal the Inflation Reduction Act, a law enacted under Biden that includes clean energy incentives.

If Trump continues to make it easier to create more oil supply, that might not be a great thing for oil companies, according to Adam of Raymond James.

“Because there’s more supply, it may tamp down on the price of oil, and that’s one of the biggest drivers of that sector,” Adam said.

Eagle Global Advisors, a Houston-based investment management firm that specializes in energy infrastructure, is “cautiously optimistic” about Trump’s impact on the sector, according to portfolio manager Mike Cerasoli. Eagle Global Advisors is No. 35 on the 2024 CNBC FA 100 list.

“We would say we’re probably more on the optimistic side than the cautious side,” Cerasoli said. “But if we know anything about Trump it’s that he’s a wild card.”

Republican districts are biggest beneficiaries of the IRA, despite attempts to repeal

A lot of the Inflation Reduction Act may stay intact, since the top states that benefitted financially from the law also handed Trump a victory in the election, according to Cerasoli.

When Biden won in 2020, there was a lot of panic about the outlook for energy, oil and gas. In a third quarter letter that year, Cerasoli recalls writing, “I don’t think it’s going to be as bad as you think.”

Four years later, he has the same message for investors on the outlook for renewables. In the days following Trump’s January inauguration, Cerasoli expects there may be a deluge of executive orders.

“Once you get past that, you’ll get a sense of exactly how he’s going to treat energy,” Cerasoli said. “I think people will realize that it’s not the end of the world for renewables.”

—Lorie Konish

Health care

Medicine vials on a production line.

Comezora | Moment | Getty Images

Trump nominated Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as head of the Department of Health and Human Services.

RFK would be a “huge wild card” for the health care sector if the U.S. Senate were to confirm him, said Goldberg of Professional Advisory Services.

RFK is a prominent vaccine skeptic, which may bode ill for big vaccine makers like Merck (MRK), Pfizer (PFE) and Moderna (MRNA), said David Weinstein, a portfolio manager and senior vice president at Dana Investment Advisors, No. 4 on CNBC’s annual FA 100 ranking.

Cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, are also likely on the table to reduce government spending and raise money for a tax-cut package, experts said.

Publicly traded health companies like Centene (CNC), HCA Healthcare (HCA) and UnitedHealth (UNH) might be impacted by lower volumes of Medicaid patients or consumers who face higher healthcare premiums after losing ACA subsidies, for example, Weinstein said.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. during the UFC 309 event at Madison Square Garden on Nov. 16, 2024 in New York.

Chris Unger | Ufc | Getty Images

Medical tech providers — especially those that supply electronics with semiconductors sourced from China — could be burdened by tariffs, he added.

Conversely, deregulation might help certain pharmaceutical companies like Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) and Charles River Laboratories (CRL), which may benefit from faster approvals from the Food and Drug Administration, Goldberg said.

Vivek Ramaswamy, a former biotech executive who Trump appointed as co-head of a new Department of Government Efficiency, has called for streamlined drug approvals. But RFK has advocated for more oversight.

“There’s a real dichotomy here,” Weinstein said.

“Where do we end up? Maybe where we are right now,” he added.

—Greg Iacurci

Retail

Thomas Barwick | Digitalvision | Getty Images

Analyst: Trump's tariffs could lead to a double-digit increase of apparel prices in the U.S.

Home Depot sources more than half its goods from the U.S. and North America, but “there certainly will be an impact,” CEO and president Ted Decker said Nov. 12 during the firm’s Q3 earnings call.

“Whatever happens in tariffs will be an industry-wide impact,” Decker said. “It won’t discriminate against different retailers and distributors who are importing goods.”

It’s a good idea for investors to own “high quality” retailers without a lot of debt and with diversified inventory sources, Goldberg said. He cited TJX Companies (TJX), which owns stores like TJ Maxx, Marshalls and HomeGoods, as an example.

“Direct imports are a small portion of [its] business and TJX sources from a variety of countries outside of China,” Lorraine Hutchinson, a Bank of America Securities research analyst, wrote in a Nov. 21 note.

Deregulation may be positive for smaller retailers and franchises, which tend to be more sensitive to labor laws and environmental and compliance costs, Goldberg said.

—Greg Iacurci

Technology

Former President Donald J. Trump speaks about filing a class-action lawsuits targeting Facebook, Google and Twitter and their CEOs, escalating his long-running battle with the companies following their suspensions of his accounts, during a press conference at the Trump National Golf Club on Wednesday, July 07, 2021 in Bedminster, NJ.

Jabin Botsford | The Washington Post | Getty Images

The technology sector continued its strong run in 2024, thanks in large part to the Magnificent Seven — Amazon, Apple, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla.

Even broadly diversified investors may find it difficult to escape those names, as they are among the top weighted companies in the S&P 500 index.

Information technology — which includes all those stocks except for Amazon and Google parent Alphabet — comprises the largest sector in the S&P 500 index, with more than 31%.

Trump is poised to have an influence on looming antitrust issues, amid considerations as to whether Google’s influence on online search should be limited.

Any tariffs put in place may also prompt some sales to decline or the cost of raw materials to go up, said Rea of Salem Investment Counselors.

Nevertheless, Rea said his firm continues to have a “pretty heavy” tech allocation, with strong expectations for generative artificial intelligence. However, the firm does not own Tesla, due to its expensive valuation, and has recently been selling software company Palantir, a winning stock that may have gotten ahead of itself, he said.

Technology valuations are trading well into the high double digits on a price to earnings basis, which often signals forward returns will decline, according to Halbert Hargrove’s Spinelli.

Consequently, prospective investors who come in now would basically be buying high, he said.

“If you think you’re going to get the same double digit returns in the next five years, sure it could happen on a one-year basis,” Spinelli said. “But your chances historically have been that your returns come down.”

—Lorie Konish

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Social Security COLA projected to be lower in 2026. Tariffs may change that

Published

on

M Swiet Productions | Getty Images

The Social Security cost-of-living adjustment for 2026 is projected to be the lowest increase that millions of beneficiaries have seen in recent years.

This could change, however, due to potential inflationary pressures from tariffs. 

Recent estimates for the 2026 COLA, based latest government inflation data, place the adjustment to be around 2.2% to 2.3%, which are below the 2.5% increase that went into effect in 2025.

The COLA for 2026 may be 2.2%, estimates Mary Johnson, an independent Social Security and Medicare analyst. Meanwhile, the Senior Citizens League, a nonpartisan senior group, estimates next year’s adjustment could be 2.3%.

If either estimate were to go into effect, the COLA for 2026 would be the lowest increase since 2021, when beneficiaries saw a 1.3% increase.

As the Covid pandemic prompted inflation to rise, the Social Security cost-of-living adjustments rose to four-decade highs. In 2022, the COLA was 5.9%, followed by 8.7% in 2023 and 3.2% in 2024.

The 2.5% COLA for 2025, while the lowest in recent years, is closer to the 2.6% average for the annual benefit bumps over the past 20 years, according to the Senior Citizens League.

To be sure, the estimates for the 2026 COLA are indeed preliminary and subject to change, experts say.

The Social Security Administration determines the annual COLA based on third-quarter data for Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, or CPI-W.

New government inflation data released on Thursday shows the CPI-W has increased 2.2% over the past 12 months. As such, the 2.5% COLA is currently outpacing inflation.

Yet that may not last depending on whether the Trump administration’s plans for tariffs go into effect. Trump announced on Wednesday that tariff rates for many countries will be dropped to 10% for 90 days to allow more time for negotiations.

Tariffs may affect 2026 Social Security COLA

If the tariffs are implemented as planned, economists expect they will raise consumer prices, which may prompt a higher Social Security cost-of-living adjustment for 2026 than currently projected.

“We could see the effect of inflation in the coming months, and it could very well be by the third quarter,” Johnson said.

If that happens, the 2026 COLA could go up to 2.5% or higher, she said.

Retirees are already struggling with higher costs for day-to-day items like eggs, according to the Senior Citizens League. Meanwhile, new tariff policies may keep food prices high and increase the costs of prescription drugs, medical equipment and auto insurance, according to the senior group.

Most seniors do not feel Social Security’s annual cost-of-living adjustments keep up with the economic realities of the inflation they personally experience, the Senior Citizens League’s polls have found, according to Alex Moore, a statistician at the senior group.

“Seniors generally feel that that the inflation they experience is higher than the inflation reported by the CPI-W,” Moore said.

When costs are poised to go up and the economic outlook is uncertain, seniors may be more likely to feel financial stress because their resources are more fixed and stabilized, he said.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Tariffs, trade war inflation impact to be ‘pretty ugly’ by summer

Published

on

People shop at a grocery store in Manhattan on April 1, 2025, in New York City.

Spencer Platt | Getty Images

The impact of President Donald Trump’s tariff agenda and resulting trade war will translate to higher consumer prices by summer, economists said.

“I suspect by May — certainly by June, July — the inflation statistics will look pretty ugly,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s.

Tariffs are a tax on imports, paid by U.S. businesses. Importers pass on at least some of those higher costs to consumers, economists said.

While economists debate whether tariffs will be a one-time price shock or something more persistent, there’s little argument consumers’ wallets will take a hit.

Consumers will lose $4,400 of purchasing power in the “short run,” according to a Yale Budget Lab analysis of tariff policy announced through Wednesday. (It doesn’t specify a timeframe.)

‘Darkly ironic’ tariff impact

Federal inflation data doesn’t yet show much tariff impact, economists said.

In fact, in a “darkly ironic” way, the specter of a global trade war may have had a “positive” impact on inflation in March, Zandi said. Oil prices have throttled back amid fears of a global recession (and a resulting dip in oil demand), a dynamic that has filtered through to lower energy prices, he said.

“I think it’ll take some time for the inflationary shock to work its way into the system,” said Preston Caldwell, chief U.S. economist at Morningstar. “At first, [inflation data] might look better than it will be eventually.”

Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan: Higher tariffs would boost unemployment and inflation

But consumers will start to see noticeably higher prices by May, if the president keeps tariff policy in place, said Thomas Ryan, an economist at Capital Economics.

“Price increases take time to filter through the supply chain (starting with producers, then retailers/wholesalers, and finally consumers),” Ryan wrote in an e-mail.

Capital Economics expects the consumer price index to peak around 4% in 2025, up from 2.4% in March. That peak would be roughly double what the Federal Reserve aims for over the long term.

Food is first, then physical goods

Petersen: Our customers are reeling—28% paused bookings amid tariff chaos

There’s also the possibility that some companies may try to front-run the impact of tariffs by raising prices now, in anticipation of higher costs, Ryan said.

It would be a gamble for companies to do that, though, Caldwell said.

“Any company that kind of sticks its neck out first and increases prices will probably be subject to political boycotts and unfavorable attention,” he said. “I think companies will move pretty slowly at first.”

Trump may change course

There’s ample uncertainty regarding the ultimate scope of President Trump’s tariff policy, however, economists said.

Trump on Wednesday backed down from imposing steep tariffs on dozens of trading partners. Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said Thursday that 15 countries had made trade deal offers.

For now, all U.S. trading partners still face a 10% universal tariff on imports. The exceptions — Canada, China and Mexico — face separate levies. Trump put a total 145% levy on goods from China, for example, which constitutes a “de facto embargo,” said Caldwell.

Trump has also imposed product-specific tariffs on aluminum, steel, and automobiles and car parts.

There’s the possibility that prices for services like travel and entertainment could fall if other nations retaliate with their own trade restrictions or if there’s less foreign demand, Zandi said.

There was some evidence of that in March: “Steep” declines in hotel prices and airline fares in the March CPI data partly reflect the recent drop in tourist visits to the U.S., particularly from Canada, according to a Thursday note from Capital Economics.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Student loan changes likely coming under Trump

Published

on

US President Donald Trump speaks to reporters while in flight on Air Force One, en route to Joint Base Andrews on April 6, 2025. 

Mandel Ngan | Afp | Getty Images

The Trump administration recently announced that it would begin a process of overhauling the country’s $1.6 trillion federal student loan system.

The potential changes could impact how millions of borrowers repay their debt, and who qualifies for loan forgiveness.

“Not only will this rulemaking serve as an opportunity to identify and cut unnecessary red tape, but it will allow key stakeholders to offer suggestions to streamline and improve federal student aid programs,” said Acting Under Secretary James Bergeron in a statement on April 3.

Around 42 million Americans hold federal student loans.

Here are three changes likely to come out of the reforms, experts say.

1. SAVE plan won’t survive

Former President Joe Biden rolled out the SAVE plan in the summer of 2023, describing it as “the most affordable student loan plan ever.” Around 8 million borrowers signed up for the new income-driven repayment, or IDR, plan, the Biden administration said in 2024.

The plan has been in limbo since last year, and in February a U.S. appeals court blocked SAVE in February. The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the seven Republican-led states that filed a lawsuit against SAVE, arguing that Biden was trying to find a roundabout way to forgive student debt after the Supreme Court struck down his sweeping loan cancellation plan in June 2023.

SAVE came with two key provisions that the legal challenges targeted: It had lower monthly payments than any other federal student loan repayment plan, and it led to quicker debt erasure for those with small balances.

More from Personal Finance:
Why the stock market hates tariffs and trade wars
Why Fed chair wears purple ties — ‘we are nonpolitical’
Don’t miss these tax strategies during the tariff sell-off

The Trump administration is unlikely to continue to defend the plan in court, or to revise it in its regulations, experts say.

“It’s difficult to see any scenario where SAVE will survive,” said Scott Buchanan, executive director of the Student Loan Servicing Alliance, a trade group for federal student loan servicers.

For now, many borrowers who signed up for SAVE remain in an interest-free forbearance. That reprieve will likely end soon, forcing people to switch into another plan.

2. End to loan forgiveness under other plans

The Trump administration recently revised some of the U.S. Department of Education’s other income-driven repayment plans for federal student loan borrowers, saying that the changes were necessary to comply with the recent court order over SAVE.

Historically, at least, IDR plans limit borrowers’ monthly payments to a share of their discretionary income and cancel any remaining debt after a certain period, typically 20 years or 25 years. 

The IDR plans now open are: Income-Based Repayment, Pay As You Earn and Income-Contingent Repayment, according a recent Education Department press release.

As a result of Trump administration’s revisions, two of those plans — PAYE and ICR — no longer conclude in automatic loan forgiveness after 20 or 25 years, Buchanan said, noting that the courts have questioned the legality of that relief along with SAVE.

The Trump administration, through its changes to the student loan system, is likely to make at least some of those temporary changes permanent, said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.

Still, if a borrower enrolled in ICR or PAYE switches to IBR, their previous payments made under the other plans will count toward loan forgiveness under IBR, as long as they meet the plan’s other requirements, Kantrowitz said. Some borrowers may opt to take that strategy if they have a lower monthly bill under ICR or PAYE than they would on IBR.

3. Narrowed eligibility for PSLF

President Donald Trump signed an executive order in March that aims to limit eligibility for the popular Public Service Loan Forgiveness program.

PSLF, which President George W. Bush signed into law in 2007, allows many not-for-profit and government employees to have their federal student loans canceled after 10 years of payments.

According to Trump’s executive order, borrowers employed by organizations that do work involving “illegal immigration, human smuggling, child trafficking, pervasive damage to public property and disruption of the public order” will “not be eligible for public service loan forgiveness.”

For now, the language in the president’s order was fairly vague. Nor were many details given in the latest announcement about reforming the student loan system, which said the Trump administration is looking for ways to “improve” PSLF.

As a result, it remains unclear exactly which organizations will no longer be considered a qualifying employer under PSLF, experts said.

However, in his first few months in office, Trump’s executive orders have targeted immigrants, transgender and nonbinary people and those who work to increase diversity across the private and public sector. Many nonprofits work in these spaces, providing legal support or doing advocacy and education work.

Changes to PSLF can’t be retroactive, consumer advocates say. That means that if you are currently working for or previously worked for an organization that the Trump administration later excludes from the program, you’ll still get credit for that time, at least up until the changes go into effect.

Continue Reading

Trending