Connect with us

Accounting

PCAOB levies $27M in fines for exam cheating and answer sharing against KPMG Netherlands and Deloitte firms in Indonesia and Philippines

Published

on

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board imposed its largest ever penalty of $25 million against KPMG’s firm in the Netherlands, in addition to $2 million in fines against Deloitte’s firms in Indonesia and the Philippines, accusing the firms Wednesday of cheating on exams and sharing answers.

In the KPMG Netherlands case, the PCAOB posted two settled disciplinary orders sanctioning KPMG Accountants N.V. in addition to its former head of assurance, Marc Hogeboom, accusing them of violating the PCAOB rules and quality control standards pertaining to the firm’s internal training program and monitoring of its quality control system. The PCAOB said it found widespread improper answer sharing happening at the firm over a five-year period and that the firm made multiple misrepresentations to the PCAOB about its knowledge of the misconduct. The PCAOB learned of the exam cheating through a whistleblower report it received in 2022. 

“The growth and breadth of exam cheating in this case was enabled by the firm’s failure to take appropriate steps to monitor, investigate and identify potential misconduct,” said PCAOB chair Erica Williams during a press conference Wednesday. “Furthermore, during the course of our investigation, the firm submitted and failed to correct multiple inaccurate representations to the PCAOB. For example, the firm claimed to have no knowledge of answer sharing prior to the 2022 whistleblower report. Yet this could not have been true because members of the firm’s management board and supervisory board who signed off on that submission to the PCAOB have in fact cheated themselves. But it doesn’t end there. KPMG Netherlands’ CEO learned the submissions were inaccurate and failed to inform anyone until months later, when a second whistleblower came forward. Only then did the firm correct the inaccurate representations to investigators. This misconduct reveals an inappropriate tone at the top and a complete failure of firm leadership to promote an ethical culture worthy of investors’ trust.”

PCAOB chair Erica Williams

PCAOB chair Erica Williams

The sanctions imposed by the PCAOB included a $25 million civil money penalty on KPMG Netherlands — the biggest fine ever levied by the PCAOB — along with a permanent bar and $150,000 civil money penalty on Hogeboom.

KPMG Netherlands acknowledged the problems at the firm and its CEO apologized. The investigation revealed that from at least October 2017, over 500 people at the firm were involved in some form of improper conduct, including sending or receiving answers to training tests and providing or receiving assistance in taking such tests. The firm said the settlement reflects that KPMG Netherlands violated a number of PCAOB rules. 

“The conclusions are damning, and the penalty is a reflection of that,” said KPMG Netherlands CEO Stephanie Hottenhuis in a statement. “I deeply regret that this misconduct happened in our firm. Our clients and stakeholders deserve our apologies. They count on our quality and integrity as this is our role in society, with trust as our license to operate.”

The firm said that after the investigation, people, at all levels of seniority, who participated in answer sharing have been sanctioned, and some of them had to leave the firm. After the second whistleblower notification, with regard to a member of the management board, all members of the board of management and supervisory board were subject to additional personal investigations into their involvement in answer sharing. The investigation led to the departure of the former head of assurance as a partner in the firm. The chairman of the supervisory board resigned after admitting he had received assistance in completing a training test.

The PCAOB and the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets conducted parallel investigations, and the Dutch AFM separately imposed enhanced supervision measures under Dutch law to prevent recurrence of such behavior.

KPMG Netherlands said it has now taken several targeted remedial measures and is working on further improvements in policies and procedures relating to the assessment of mandatory training and internal culture. The remediation process is under the enhanced supervision of the AFM. The supervisory board of KPMG Netherlands will also monitor this closely.

“It is a hard lesson, and we are learning from this,” said Hottenhuis. “We have reviewed our approach to mandatory testing and made meaningful changes to our learning and development programs. We also have implemented controls to monitor whether training tests are being completed appropriately and will continue to do so going forward. We will continuously improve, and we must ensure we do our training sessions appropriately, sustainably.”

KPMG Netherlands also plans to encourage its employees to speak up about improper behavior. “This is a significant failure in our duty to serve the public interest,” said Hottenhuis. “Trust is essential in our business, and we must learn from this and make a change in our culture and behavior. Additional programs on ethical decision making are being rolled out for all teams. This is a critical topic that will remain on the agenda of all leaders and for everyone at our firm.”

The PCAOB said that from 2017 until 2022, hundreds of professionals at KPMG Netherlands engaged in improper answer sharing — either by providing access to test questions or answers, or by receiving such access without reporting it — in connection with tests for mandatory firm training courses. The courses related to different topics, including U.S. auditing standards, professional ethics and independence. The improper answer sharing reached as far as partners and senior firm leaders, including Hogeboom (who at the time was the firm’s head of assurance and a member of the firm’s management board). The growth of this widespread answer sharing was exacerbated by the firm’s failure to take appropriate steps to monitor, investigate and identify the potential misconduct. For example, starting in June 2020, the firm was aware that answer sharing had occurred at a KPMG service delivery center serving KPMG Netherlands and KPMG LLP in the United Kingdom, and the sharing had extended to the U.K. firm’s personnel. Nevertheless, KPMG Netherlands took virtually no steps to investigate potential answer sharing among its employees until a whistleblower reported the misconduct in July 2022.

Without admitting or denying the findings, the firm and Hogeboom agreed to the PCAOB’s respective orders against them. KPMG Netherlands was censured and agreed to pay a $25 million civil money penalty. The firm also agreed to review and improve its quality control policies and procedures to provide reasonable assurance that its personnel act with integrity in connection with internal training, and to report its compliance to the PCAOB. Hogeboom was censured, permanently barred from being an associated person of a registered public accounting firm, and agreed to pay a $150,000 civil money penalty.

Attorneys for Hogenboom and KPMG Netherlands did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Deloitte Indonesia and Philippines

In the cases involving Deloitte’s member firms in Indonesia and the Philippines, the investigations also uncovered problems with exam cheating and answer sharing on training tests and coverups at high levels of the firms.

The PCAOB announced three settled disciplinary orders sanctioning Imelda & Raken (Deloitte Indonesia), Navarro Amper & Co. (Deloitte Philippines), and the Philippines firm’s former national professional practice director, Wilfredo Baltazar, for violating PCAOB rules and quality control standards relating to the firms’ internal training programs and monitoring of their systems of quality control that led to pervasive cheating.

From 2017 to 2019, the PCAOB said Deloitte Philippines’s audit partners and other personnel engaged in widespread answer sharing — either by providing answers or using answers — or received answers without reporting such sharing in connection with tests for mandatory firm training courses. On at least six occasions, Baltazar, who was the partner who was supposed to be responsible for e-learning compliance, shared answers to training assessments with other audit partners at the firm. (He has since left the firm.) Attorneys for Baltazar and the firms did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

From 2021 to 2023, over 200 professionals at Deloitte Indonesia engaged in answer sharing. The firm’s failure to detect and deter improper answer sharing by its personnel happened despite numerous warnings from Deloitte Global and regional leadership that answer sharing was impermissible.

Without admitting or denying the findings, Deloitte Indonesia, Deloitte Philippines and Baltazar agreed to the PCAOB’s respective orders against them. Deloitte Indonesia and Deloitte Philippines were censured, and each agreed to pay a $1 million penalty. The firms also agreed to review and improve their quality control policies and procedures to provide reasonable assurance that their personnel act with integrity in connection with internal training, and to report their compliance to the PCAOB.

Baltazar was censured, barred from being an associated person of a registered public accounting firm with a right to apply to terminate his bar after three years, and agreed to pay a $10,000 civil money penalty that reflects his financial resources. The PCAOB said it would have imposed a civil money penalty of $50,000 if it hadn’t considered his financial resources.

“Today’s orders demonstrate that an inadequate tone at the top, particularly with regard to issues of integrity and personnel management, can permeate all levels of a firm,” said Robert Rice, director of the PCAOB’s Division of Enforcement and Investigations, in a statement.

Since 2021, the PCAOB has sanctioned nine registered firms for quality control deficiencies related to the inappropriate sharing of answers on internal training exams.

“I want to be very clear: The PCAOB will not tolerate exam cheating, nor any other unethical behavior period,” said Williams. “Impaired ethics erode trust and threaten the investor confidence our system relies on. The PCAOB will take action to hold firms accountable when they fail to enforce culture, honesty and integrity.” 

Accounting Today asked Williams during the press conference whether the new standards proposed Tuesday for firm reporting and engagement metrics would have ferreted out such conduct.

“The goal of those proposals is to provide consistent information about audit firms in their audit engagements to help bolster confidence in our markets and strengthen oversight and empower investors and audit committees as they make informed decisions in order to help drive product quality forward,” Williams responded. “As I noted yesterday, I look forward to reviewing all the input we receive and encourage anyone who’s interested to submit a comment.”

Record levels of enforcement activity

The PCAOB has been cracking down on firms and auditors alike, according to a report released Wednesday by Cornerstone Research. 

The report found the PCAOB publicly disclosed 46 total enforcement actions, 37 of which related to the performance of an audit (auditing actions), an increase of more than 28% from 2022. Twenty-nine of the 37 auditing actions were concluded in the second half of 2023, matching the total number of auditing actions for 2022. Monetary penalties totaled $19.7 million, nearly doubling the previous record of approximately $10.5 million in 2022.

“There was a notable shift in the types of respondents in 2023 auditing actions,” said Jean-Philippe Poissant, who co-authored the  report and is co-head of Cornerstone Research’s accounting practice, in a statement. “In the past, two-thirds of respondents were individuals. Yet in 2023, two-thirds of respondents were firms. This shift was the result of a substantial jump in the number of auditing actions that only involved firms.”

The great majority — 79% — of the auditing actions in 2023 included alleged violations of auditing standards. Some 60% of those actions included additional allegations related to ethics and independence standards, quality control standards or both. For the first time, the PCAOB included allegations related to critical audit matters, or CAMs, in enforcement actions, with three actions including such allegations.

Of the $19.7 million in total monetary penalties in 2023, $18.8 million were imposed on firms, nearly twice the $9.5 million imposed on firms in 2022. Some 15% of the firm respondents were required to obtain an independent consultant.

Many of the penalties involve firms outside the U.S., as in the cases today involving Big Four affiliates in the Netherlands, Indonesia and the Philippines.

“More than two-thirds of the PCAOB’s record-setting monetary penalties were imposed on non-U.S. respondents in 2023, even though non-U.S. respondents accounted for less than half of the auditing actions during the year,” said Russell Molter, a principal at Cornerstone Research and report co-author, in a statement. 

The number of respondents in auditing actions totaled 53, a 23% increase over 2022, according to the report. The PCAOB settled four actions involving three China-based firms after securing access to inspect and investigate Chinese firms in 2022.

For the second year in a row, there were no enforcement actions related to a company’s disclosure of a material weakness in internal control. In contrast, SEC enforcement actions that referred to an announced restatement and/or material weakness in internal control reached their highest levels in recent years.

Violations of quality control standards were alleged in more than half of the actions involving firm respondents. Nearly 80% of the total monetary penalties in 2023 were assessed on just six defendants. The proportion of individual respondents who were barred increased from 64% in 2022 to 85% in 2023.

Enforcement activity appears to be on course for another record-setting year in 2024.

“This board set a goal to strengthen PCAOB enforcement, and we are doing just that,” said Williams during Wednesday’s press conference. “As of today, the PCAOB has imposed $34 million in penalties this year alone, and it’s only April. We set a record in 2022. We broke that record in 2023, and we are breaking it again today.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Sikich launches virtual chief AI officer service

Published

on

The ascendency of AI has come with it the ascendency of Chief AI Officers, with a number of prominent companies having hired or appointed one in the past few years. But for the companies not yet ready to fully commit to bringing one on full time, Chicago-based Sikich announced the launch of its new virtual Chief AI Officer service

The service aims to provide clients with executive-level AI guidance without the overhead of a full-time hire. Such a virtual CAIO would provide custom-tailored AI strategies aligned with business objectives, identifying high-impact AI use cases and creating forward-looking implementation plans. They would also provide recommendations for AI tools, platforms and vendors, including guidance on build-versus-buy scenarios and seamless technology integration, as well as assistance with ensuring AI initiatives meet ethical standards, regulatory requirements and organizational values, with guidance on data privacy and AI model fairness. The service will also serve to facilitate collaboration between IT, data and business teams so as to maximize AI initiative value; and providing assessment and real-time optimization of AI strategies to keep pace with technological advancements and changing business needs. The virtual CAIO service also offers an add-on specifically designed to support customers embarking on the successful deployment of Microsoft 365 Copilot. 

In an email, Ray Beste, principal AI strategist at Sikich and the lead on this service line, said it is comparable to the virtual CFO services provided at many firms. It is, in fact, a strategic extension of the firm’s existing virtual executive services like virtual Chief Information Officer and virtual Chief Information Security Officer. 

Sikich lobby in Naperville, Ill.
Sikich lobby in Naperville, Illinois

Photo: Matt Stout

“What makes the vCAIO unique is its focus on a highly specific and evolving area of business: AI strategy. While a traditional CIO or CISO focuses on broader IT or security concerns, the vCAIO is designed to help organizations navigate the unique challenges and opportunities AI presents,” he said. 

Beste said he will serve as the primary resource, fully dedicated to this role. Depending on client needs, he said, they will scale and resource accordingly, leveraging the firm’s in-house AI experts. This follows the same successful model they use for their vCISO and vCIO services, where they bring in the right specialists to deliver tailored solutions. 

The firm used its own experience implementing AI solutions—combined with insights from client engagements and conversations—to develop this service by identifying the intersection of AI-specific needs and traditional executive roles. Through this process, they further refined their idea of what makes for a quality CAIO. 

“It’s someone who understands both the big picture of where AI is going and the practical realities of applying it to business problems. This person must collaborate seamlessly with CIOs, CDOs, CTOs and CISOs because AI impacts budgets, data and security across all these roles. A great vCAIO combines business acumen, technical knowledge and the ability to work at all levels of an organization,” he said. 

Beste said that this new service is still built on a foundation of AI advisory work they’ve been doing for years, and added that this initiative was born because their clients expressed a need for ongoing partnership in this area. So far, he said, industries like life sciences, insurance and professional services are showing the most interest. These organizations often already have CIOs or CDOs but need someone to cut through the noise and help them prioritize the right AI investments. 

He also said that smaller companies might benefit from the vCAIO service as well. 

“Smaller companies with ambitious growth goals may also find this service valuable. They might not yet be ready to hire a full-time AI executive but recognize that expert guidance can help them scale faster. Ultimately, it’s about mindset and urgency rather than size, industry or geography,” he said. 

Sikich is currently in active discussions with several organizations interested in leveraging this service to accelerate their AI strategies.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tax season kickoff: ‘The calm before the change’

Published

on

Blocks switching from 2024 to 2025

Jo Panuwat D – stock.adobe.com

“The calm before the change” — that is how one industry source aptly described this year’s tax season as Donald Trump returns to the White House, Republicans take control of Congress, and tax professionals navigate an evolving, tech-driven landscape.

While it is unlikely that this tax season will be impacted by any significant changes, the same will likely not hold true as we head into 2026 and beyond. As a result, much of the focus for this season will be on proactive planning, as significant portions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act are set to expire at the end of 2025, if they are not extended.

“We don’t expect radical changes for this upcoming tax season or the tax season after that. The current tax laws are in place until the end of 2025. However, the return of the Trump administration to the White House signals that the current tax foundation will likely be renewed into 2026 and beyond, with some possible new provisions. This means that proactive tax planning continues to be essential for those desirous of saving as much as they can in taxes,” said Randy Hughes, CEO of Atlanta-based Counting Pennies and co-founder of Seven Figure Profits.

As noted in a recent Wolters Kluwer tax briefing: “The expectation is that tax legislation will ramp up in early 2025. With the GOP in control of the Senate and the House, Trump’s agenda will have a much easier path to legislative approval. Action on the soon-to-expire TCJA is likely to be high on the to-do list for the new Congress.”

That being said, many tax professionals will also find themselves navigating stricter reporting requirements, evolving tax laws, technological advancements, and staffing constraints.

Keeping pace with regulations, legislation

As the regulatory landscape continues to evolve, it will be important for tax professionals to stay up to speed on potential changes and effectively manage client expectations this tax season.

Said Hughes, “The most significant changes include potential new regulations around cryptocurrency transactions, increased IRS scrutiny on high earners, and adjustments to clean energy credits. Most changes will not be changes to tax law, but the implementation of laws that are already in place. So being familiar with this implementation is important.”

“For our clients, this means being vigilant about reporting accuracy, especially in emerging investment spaces,” Hughes continued. “Top of mind for us is ensuring clients are compliant while maximizing available credits and deductions, particularly for business owners leveraging green energy initiatives.”

The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service, for instance, released in June 2024 final regulations on the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act reporting requirements for brokers of digital assets. As explained by the Treasury, this will “require brokers to report gross proceeds on the sale of digital assets beginning in 2026 for all sales in 2025. Brokers will be required to also report information on the tax basis for certain digital assets beginning in 2027 for sales in 2026.”

For transactions occurring in 2025, anyone who is considered a custodial digital asset broker must file the new Form 1099-DA to the IRS.

“The broker reporting of crypto transactions on the 1099-DA is going to start in 2025, so that has sort of postponed the concern a little. We won’t be seeing those forms until probably early 2026, but the other thing that is more of a concern for 2024 is the [Form] 1099-K,” said Mark Luscombe, principal federal tax analyst for Wolters Kluwer Tax and Accounting.

In late November, the IRS announced transition relief for third-party settlement organizations regarding transactions during calendar years 2024 and 2025. Under the IRS guidance, TPSOs will be required to file Form 1099-K to report transactions when the amount of total payments for those transactions is more than $5,000 in calendar year 2024. This threshold will shift to more than $2,500 in calendar year 2025; and more than $600 in calendar year 2026 and after.

Furthermore, TPSOs that have performed backup withholding for a payee during calendar year 2024 must file a Form 1099-K, as well as Form 945, with the IRS. The tax service also stated that, for calendar year 2024, it will not assert penalties for a TPSO’s failure to withhold and pay backup withholding tax during the calendar year. However, it will assert penalties for calendar year 2025 and after.

Luscombe also pointed to the likelihood of bipartisan disaster relief, which could potentially impact the tax season. “There’s a lot of bipartisan support for doing something on disaster relief. Congress has tended to do disaster relief on a piecemeal basis. … Now, with [Hurricanes] Helene and Milton, I think there’s probably going to be an effort at year-end to get through some disaster relief that could impact taxpayers for 2024,” he said.

When looking at new tax regulations or rule changes that could impact firms and their tax clients, Rema Serafi, vice chair of tax at KPMG, referred to what the Big Four firm calls the “Tax Policy Trifecta.”

“In 2025 and beyond, accounting firms — as well as other firms of all sizes — will continue to grapple with the Tax Policy Trifecta: the expiration of $4 trillion in tax cuts from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the ongoing implementation of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s global minimum tax and the future of the regime should the U.S. not comply, and a wave of regulatory changes, including changes introduced by the Inflation Reduction Act, the corporate alternative minimum tax and potential tariffs,” said Serafi. “These issues are top of mind for our firm and clients, as they’ll impact both businesses and individual taxpayers. The expiration of the TCJA provisions, for example, will have wide-reaching implications for many individuals and businesses alike. It’s expected to be a priority for the Trump administration right out of the gate, come next year.”

Working with the IRS

In 2024, service problems with the IRS were cited as a leading issue for most CPA firms, according to an American Insitute of CPAs survey. Will the experience be much the same for firms in 2025?

With funding from the Inflation Reduction Act, the agency has been working to modernize its technology and systems and hire more employees. According to the IRS, the efforts are resulting in improved phone service, faster response times, and higher usage of its virtual assistant tool on key IRS.gov pages, among other improvements.

While progress has been made in improving service, there remains room for improvement.

“The IRS’s efforts to modernize are promising but still uneven,” said Hughes. “While e-filing and automation enhancements have improved processing times, challenges remain with responsiveness and issue resolution. The IRS recently received a multibillion-dollar cash infusion from the government to work on [modernizing] their systems and the increasing of their staff. This means increased security and oversight, including more audits. We anticipate an increase in these activities from the IRS over the next several years.”

Commenting on the IRS’s efforts, Cathy Rowe, senior vice president and segment leader of the U.S. professional market of Wolters Kluwer Tax and Accounting North America, said, “I think the rollouts have been slow, overall, but they are continuing to make progress. I think some of the improvements that we have seen already have been around their communications, so we are expecting that to continue to improve this tax season. Last season they did have a lot of new hires that could not necessarily answer the phones, so the training that they would have had should help for this coming tax season.”

However, looking ahead, Luscombe cautioned that the Trump administration reduced IRS funding, so “the longer term looks not quite as bright under the new administration.”

Automation, AI take center stage

It likely comes as little surprise that greater automation and increased usage of artificial intelligence-powered technology are top of mind for many as firms look for more ways to keep pace with legislative and regulatory changes, improve efficiencies, and ease staffing issues.

Take, for instance, Thomson Reuters’ new generative AI assistant, named CoCounsel, with which tax professionals can ask a question in everyday language and, within moments, the solution will deliver a relevant answer with links to Checkpoint Edge editorial content and source materials.

“As legislation expands, and we know that the talent shortage out there means that there’s more work to be done with less resources, in addition to making the research easier, we see the opportunity for increased automation of different phases of the tax preparation process to be really important. Whether that is the automation of the source document gathering and then eventually the extraction and mapping of that data into tax returns,” said Piritta van Rijn, head of product for accounting, tax and practice at Thomson Reuters. “And then, ultimately, when we go into these periods of change, being able to advise clients on what and how did these legislative changes impact them and what kind of actions to take.”

In light of the issues facing today’s firms, Thomson Reut­ers has been working to enhance its products and deliver more generative AI-assisted experiences to help firms do more with less, van Rijn noted.

During its Synergy 2024 user conference in November, Thomson Reuters showcased some of the developments such as Review Ready, an AI-assisted tax preparation experience to increase firm efficiency. It combines the power of CoCounsel with workflow automation and software integrations and will be coming in beta this tax season, starting with UltraTax CS. Based on testing to date, van Rijn said users could save at least two hours per 1040 tax return this coming season.

April 15 wooden block calendar

Mr.Frost – stock.adobe.com

Van Rijn also pointed to the recent acquisition of Materia, a U.S.-based startup that specializes in the development of an agentic AI assistant for the tax, audit and accounting profession. The agentic AI assistant automates and augments research and workflows to help accountants improve efficiency and effectiveness.

“We are really excited to see how we can evolve that [Materia] offering and use it to accelerate some of these other areas. We’ve already got some of our proprietary Checkpoint content integrated into the Materia platform, and we are excited to see how that can also then help enable more workflow automation, continue to augment the research capabilities, document analysis capabilities, and really drive that product,” van Rijn said.

Meanwhile, Wolters Kluwer is also taking steps to help firms increase automation and improve their ability to harness the power of data. At its recent CCH Connections user conference, the company showcased “some new modules as it relates to firm intelligence,” Rowe said.

“What you are going to see as we move into next year is some schedule optimization modules, and some new reporting modules … . We are also delivering research differently through our CCH Axcess platform, so we’ve had more integration of research within our tax and the browser views,” Rowe explained.

Hughes stated that his firm leverages advanced analytics to help clients optimize their tax positions, and they are also exploring the use of predictive AI for strategic financial modeling.

“In this area, Intuit Tax Advisor, which automatically integrates with Intuit ProConnect, is a game-changer. And since we require Intuit Quickbooks Online of all those we do monthly business bookkeeping and accounting for, the three-tiered process from Quickbooks Online to ProConnect to Tax Advisor makes tax planning so much easier than it had been in the past,” Hughes said.

Hughes also stated that the firm uses automation and AI tools to “streamline processes like data entry, to flag potential compliance risks, and to provide data-driven insights for strategic planning. This is done through AI-powered tax software. In addition, AI-powered tax software can now recommend tax strategies based on the client’s current situation. This allows us to spend more time on client engagement and proactive advisory work, helping clients avoid pitfalls and capitalize on opportunities.”

Serafi at KPMG expects that generative AI will “continue having a significant and positive impact on the profession, where benefits outweigh risks.”

“From automating routine tasks — such as data entry and recordkeeping, to free up human resources to focus on more strategic tax planning activities — to analyzing large sets of financial data to identify patterns and trends, and providing real-time insights and recommendations based on changing tax regulations and market conditions to help companies stay ahead of the curve and make more informed business decisions, we’re infusing the technology in our everyday processes and work and expect it to continue enabling our professionals to better serve our clients. Additionally, the technology is helping tremendously as we help clients navigate the current landscape in tax,” Serafi said.

And while leveraging technology can certainly help firms ease bandwidth constraints during tax season, they would be wise not to overlook additional ways to handle staff shortages or skill gaps, whether that means hiring talent from outside of the tax profession or outsourcing.

For example, Serafi said that a recent “Tax Reimagined” survey conducted by KPMG found that a greater number of corporate tax departments are rethinking their approach and hiring more technology experts who can learn tax, rather than hiring tax experts who can learn technology.

“While a blend of both tech and tax skills will continue to be important, we’re seeing a shift in the desire to increasingly prioritize tech proficiency in certain parts of the tax department,” Serafi said.

And at Counting Pennies, Hughes said the firm focuses on three things:

  • Staffing at levels that allow for the firm to get work done even if one or two associates are out;
  • Cross training as much as possible; and,
  • Having a contractor or two available as a backup in the event of an emergency situation.

Clearly, there’s a lot of change, as well as lots of opportunities, afoot, as tax laws continue to evolve and tax professionals increasingly explore and navigate the powers of AI-enabled innovation.

“While we are still in early days, there is so much value, there is so much that is already available to our customers and to the industry. While it might be a little bit of the calm before the change, we are really optimistic and excited about the future ahead,” van Rijn said.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Chicago passes 2025 budget without property tax hike

Published

on

The Chicago City Council approved an approximately $17 billion budget for 2025 that raises levies and fees by more than $180 million after Mayor Brandon Johnson removed his proposed property tax hike. 

The spending plan comes after weeks of contentious talks between the Johnson administration and aldermen over how to close a nearly $1 billion deficit with higher taxes or cuts. The depth of disagreements had raised concerns about whether a budget would pass by the Dec. 31 statutory deadline. The budget passed 27 to 23 on Monday.

“I know this was a long and arduous process,” Johnson said in remarks in the council chamber after the votes. “The budget we passed today is yet another down payment on securing a better, stronger and a much safer future for the people of this fine city.”

To win approval, the first-term progressive mayor had to revise his plan amid vigorous pushback from council members. His original proposal in October included a $300-million property-tax increase that aldermen unanimously rejected. He scaled that down before nixing it completely to get enough support for passage. 

The spending plan won approval after Johnson and his team used a series of piecemeal items, including other taxes and fees to fill the nearly $1 billion deficit in the city’s more than $5 billion operating fund, known as the corporate fund. That fund pays for public safety, streets and sanitation among other services. The revenue measure also includes $128 million from higher cloud computing levies. 

Before the vote, Alderman Carlos Ramirez-Rosa, an ally of Johnson, said he supported the budget. He highlighted the critical investments in youth employment and mental health services as well as the supplemental pension payment.

Johnson’s budget uses about $54 million in savings from a municipal-bond refinancing earlier this month to help plug the deficit. While officials had considered using those funds to repay debt related to a loan for the 2009 purchase of the former Michael Reese Hospital, the city is now deferring that repayment.

The revised budget also cut vacant positions including positions in the mayor’s office. The budget passed even though some city council members complained about the lack of cuts and transparency. Chicago’s business community has voiced opposition to tax levies as they fear any hikes will curb economic growth and further raise the cost of living in the third-largest U.S. city.

“We cannot continue to spend beyond our means, but we do,” Alderman Marty Quinn said before the vote. “While there’s no longer a property tax increase on the table, there are a number of nickel and dime revenue generators.”

Continue Reading

Trending