Connect with us

Accounting

CAS needs to include client education

Published

on

Firms are hoping to develop enduring client relationships and increase profit by providing client advisory services. To increase the chance of success, there’s a critical piece that needs to be included with those services — client education. 

The amount of value clients receive from CAS offerings is diminished when the client doesn’t understand “the language of business.” Think about the times when someone in a different industry explained a totally foreign concept to you. It likely made sense if they explained it in lay terms. But did you understand it? Probably not. I call it the bobblehead doll syndrome. It’s the same thing with your clients — they hear what you’re saying, but can’t operationalize the guidance because they don’t understand it. 

What do I mean by “client education?” At a minimum, firms should provide basic financial and managerial accounting education — enough for clients to thoroughly understand their own business. 

Business doesn’t operate in a vacuum, so other beneficial offerings could include:

  • Organizational theory/development/structure/culture; 
  • Decision-making, planning, and strategy;
  • External analysis (Porter’s 5 Forces);
  • Governance, ethics, fraud prevention; and,
  • ESG (Scope 3 reporting)

Education can be an e-newsletter, micro-learning, industry-specific training or a series of self-study short courses. Your client education program can be customized in a variety of ways. 
Here are five reasons for adding client education to CAS:

  1. Clients don’t understand accounting and other essential business concepts well enough, which dilutes the value of the services you’re providing. If they don’t see the value of your services, they’re less likely to retain them long-term. 
  2. When clients leverage business knowledge that you provided to grow and become more profitable, the firm wins because the client needs and wants more of your services. 
  3. Implementing client education differentiates you from the competition. 
  4. Firm staff can simultaneously refresh or grow their knowledge of key business concepts. Use the program to enhance and supplement leadership development training.  
  5. If CPA firms don’t educate clients, someone else will. Upskilling is in high demand. Technology will replace a lot over the coming years, but not the need to understand the fundamentals. 

It takes commitment and planning to get client education up and running, but the annual cost can be less than one staff accountant. 
Don’t sell the basic education — include it in your pricing. More in-depth education is beneficial enough to warrant a fee. Many fundamental accounting and management lessons are static (the basic accounting equation has been around since 1494), and easy to reuse. Done correctly, firms can provide a wealth of targeted, custom education to clients and staff for less than the monthly cost per person of the more popular learning subscriptions. Those tools are great (and profitable!), but they can be overwhelming and frustrating. Clients don’t know what they need to learn or where to start. There’re so many options that it can be difficult to find exactly what you need. Firm provided client education is a more personalized, boutique solution. 

I’ve worked in and around accounting long enough to remember CPA firms offering outsourced and back-office type services in the past. It sounds great, but clients who use these services can be messy, inefficient, and time consuming. Engagements that should be profitable become more of a hassle than they’re worth. Unwinding the services is an expensive waste of finite resources, and not a good look for the firm. A small investment in client education reduces time spent on clients, bridges critical knowledge gaps, and helps ensure long-term viability. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Acting IRS commissioner reportedly replaced

Published

on

Gary Shapley, who was named only days ago as the acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is reportedly being replaced by Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender amid a power struggle between Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Elon Musk.

The New York Times reported that Bessent was outraged that Shapley was named to head the IRS without his knowledge or approval and complained to President Trump about it. Shapley was installed as acting commissioner on Tuesday, only to be ousted on Friday. He first gained prominence as an IRS Criminal Investigation special agent and whistleblower who testified in 2023 before the House Oversight Committee that then-President Joe Biden’s son Hunter received preferential treatment during a tax-evasion investigation, and he and another special agent had been removed from the investigation after complaining to their supervisors in 2022. He was promoted last month to senior advisor to Bessent and made deputy chief of IRS Criminal Investigation. Shapley is expected to remain now as a senior official at IRS Criminal Investigation, according to the Wall Street Journal. The IRS and the Treasury Department press offices did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Faulkender was confirmed last month as deputy secretary at the Treasury Department and formerly worked during the first Trump administration at the Treasury on the Paycheck Protection Program before leaving to teach finance at the University of Maryland.

Faulkender will be the fifth head of the IRS this year. Former IRS commissioner Danny Werfel departed in January, on Inauguration Day, after Trump announced in December he planned to name former Congressman Billy Long, R-Missouri, as the next IRS commissioner, even though Werfel’s term wasn’t scheduled to end until November 2027. The Senate has not yet scheduled a confirmation hearing for Long, amid questions from Senate Democrats about his work promoting the Employee Retention Credit and so-called “tribal tax credits.” The job of acting commissioner has since been filled by Douglas O’Donnell, who was deputy commissioner under Werfel. However, O’Donnell abruptly retired as the IRS came under pressure to lay off thousands of employees and share access to confidential taxpayer data. He was replaced by IRS chief operating officer Melanie Krause, who resigned last week after coming under similar pressure to provide taxpayer data to immigration authorities and employees of the Musk-led U.S. DOGE Service. 

Krause had planned to depart later this month under the deferred resignation program at the IRS, under which approximately 22,000 IRS employees have accepted the voluntary buyout offers. But Musk reportedly pushed to have Shapley installed on Tuesday, according to the Times, and he remained working in the commissioner’s office as recently as Friday morning. Meanwhile, plans are underway for further reductions in the IRS workforce of up to 40%, according to the Federal News Network, taking the IRS from approximately 102,000 employees at the beginning of the year to around 60,000 to 70,000 employees.

Continue Reading

Accounting

On the move: EY names San Antonio office MP

Published

on

Carr, Riggs & Ingram appoints CFO and chief legal officer; TSCPA hosts accounting bootcamp; and more news from across the profession.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tech news: Certinia announces spring release

Published

on


Certinia announces spring release; Intuit acquires tech and experts from fintech Deserve; Paystand launches feature to navigate tariffs; and other accounting tech news and updates.

Continue Reading

Trending