Instead of high-net-worth individuals, C-suite executives in China are increasingly using business jets, said Paul Desgrosseilliers, general manager at ExecuJet Haite General Aviation Services. The company opened a new service center at Beijing Daxing International Airport on Aug. 27, 2024.
ExecuJet Haite
BEIJING — China’s wealthy are increasingly looking for ways to move capital outside the mainland to pursue business opportunities, rather than just chasing investment returns, according to asset managers and consultants.
This year, there’s been a “very significant” trend of requests from Chinese family offices that want to acquire smaller businesses in Japan, said Ryota Kadogaki, co-founder and global CEO of Monolith, a Japan-based consulting firm for family offices.
“I’m studying Chinese as well, and I’m thinking to hire Chinese speakers in my company right now,” he said, noting that slower growth in China and a weaker Japanese yen are supporting the increased interest.Even with recent strengthening to around 20 yen versus the Chinese yuan, that’s still weaker than the 15 level seen in 2020.
Investors based in mainland China increased their non-financial direct investments overseas by 16.2% to the equivalent of $83.55 billion during the January to July period, according to the Ministry of Commerce. It said the investments covered more than 6,100 businesses in 152 countries and regions.
“Most of our clients are China-rooted entrepreneurs who are looking to further globalize,” Grant Pan, CFO of China-based wealth management firm Noah Holdings, told CNBC. “Obviously they are at least keeping their eyes open for opportunities for their businesses all over the world. Obviously there’s slowdown pressure in terms of domestic markets for many industries.”
“Many of our clients appear to be busier than before,” he said. “As they are exploring new markets, they travel more frequently, which more or less gives them a better perspective of global allocation.”
Noah Holdings said the number of its overseas registered clients rose by 23% from a year ago to nearly 16,800 as of the end of June. The company’s active overseas clients rose by nearly 63% year on year to 3,244.
Overseas assets under management rose nearly 15% to $5.4 billion from a year earlier, while mainland China assets under management fell over 6% to $15.8 billion, according to Noah’s quarterly earnings report.
Mainland China keeps a tight control on capital with an official limit of $50,000 in overseas foreign exchange a year. That’s meant affluent Chinese have long looked for alternative ways to grow wealth outside the country.
Kadogaki noted that buying foreign companies is a way for Chinese investors to move assets abroad. He also shared examples of how a fund investing in a tech company in China might now look to acquire a retail store in Japan to expand potential revenue.
In June 2023, Kadogaki said his company started working with Canopy, a Singapore-based wealth management software companyworking with many China-related funds, to help them localize in Japan. “We can be a gateway for their clients to invest in Japan,” he said.
Right now, Canopy says its system supports English, simplified and traditional Chinese and German. The company claims it works with more than 300 custodians with more than $160 billion in assets under reporting.
A ‘rational’ shift after the post-Covid rush
“Typically we deal with the professionals that help manage the money for the wealth owners,” said Mu Chen, executive director at Canopy. “What we are hearing from them is that the fastest growth in terms of interest from Chinese clients [occurred] in the post-Covid [period to] early last year.”
“In 2022, 2023, maybe it was more a reactionary behavior to think about going overseas,” he said. “I think now it becomes more rational and it’s more about these families, and these families planning not just their assets globally, but planning their assets, their business, their family globally using Hong Kong or Singapore as a base to look more outward.”
This interest in moving their wealth abroad to tap business opportunities comes as many Chinese companies have accelerated their global expansion in the last few years. That’s largely due to slower domestic growth, following years of rapid expansion.
That contrasts with how an earlier generation of Chinese entrepreneurs primarily tapped global markets by simply exporting China-made goods, or acquiring overseas real estate.
Noah Holdings’ Pan pointed out that many of the company’s affluent clients have set up offices and alternative residences in Hong Kong, Singapore or Japan as a way to explore global business opportunities while keeping proximity to China operations.
“Many entrepreneurs don’t have a very clear distinction between enterprise and family,” Pan said. “They get their wealth from operating such business and sometimes they inject capital back [to the family.]”
Affluent Chinese residents’ attempts to increasingly venture into global markets can also be witnessed in the demand for private, international travel.
“Whether it’s Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Africa, there’s been a lot of growth in these areas for Chinese conglomerates, so I think that the executives from China have a need to utilize [private] long-range aircraft … We see a lot of flights going there,” said Paul Desgrosseilliers, general manager at ExecuJet Haite General Aviation Services, which operates maintenance centers for private planes.
As part of a multi-year plan, ExecuJet Haite opened on Aug. 27 a maintenance, repair and operations center for private jets at Beijing Daxing International Airport. The center, which claims to be the largest for business aviation in Asia Pacific, can access a designated channel at the airport for international immigration processing and customs.
Tackling slower growth
Desgrosseilliers said international business jet flights across ExecuJet Haite’s other facilities at Beijing Capital Airport and in Tianjin have recovered, but not yet to pre-pandemic levels.
The trend of affluent Chinese looking to expand their businesses globally is still in relatively early stages, and not every family will choose to go abroad, Canopy’s Chen said. He cited how a family of a seasoning products business in China, whose founder is getting older, didn’t feel the need to globalize their business or wealth planning.
“As the newer generations’ founders, entrepreneurs think more globally, they also think [about] their business more globally.”
Jonathan Gray, president and chief operating officer of Blackstone Inc., from left, Ron O’Hanley, chief executive officer of State Street Corp., Ted Pick, chief executive officer of Morgan Stanley, Marc Rowan, chief executive officer of Apollo Global Management LLC, and David Solomon, chief executive officer of Goldman Sachs Group Inc., during the Global Financial Leaders’ Investment Summit in Hong Kong, China, on Tuesday, Nov. 19, 2024.
Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images
An “industrial renaissance” in the U.S. is fueling demand for capital, Marc Rowan, CEO of Apollo Global Management said at the Global Financial Leaders’ Investment Summit in Hong Kong.
“There is so much demand for capital, [including through debt and equity] … What’s going on is nothing short of extraordinary,” Rowan said on Tuesday during a panel discussion.
This demand has been supported by massive government spending, particularly on infrastructure, the semiconductor industry and projects under the Inflation Reduction Act, said the asset manager, who is reportedly in the running for Treasury Secretary position under President-elect Donald Trump.
“What we’re watching is this incredible demand for capital happening against a backdrop of a U.S. government that is running significant deficits. And so the capital raising business, I think that’s going to be a good business,” he said.
Rowan added that the U.S. has been the largest recipient of foreign direct investment over the past three years and is expected to stay at the top spot this year as well.
Rowan and other panelists also identified energy and data centers — needed for artificial intelligence and digitization — as growth sectors requiring more capital.
Blackstone President and COO Jonathan Gray told the panel that data centers were the biggest theme across his entire firm, with the company employing billions on their development.
“We’re doing it in equity, we’re doing it financing … this is a space we like a lot, and we will continue to be all in as it relates to digital infrastructure.”
Fundraising and M&A recovery
Other panelists at the summit organized by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority said that capital raising was well-positioned to recover from a recent slowdown.
According to David Solomon, Chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs, capital raising activity had reached peak levels in 2020 and 2021 amid massive Covid-era stimulus but later became muted amid the war in Ukraine, inflation pressures and tighter regulation from the Federal Trade Commission.
There has been a recent pick up in activity as conditions have normalized, along with expectations of friendlier regulation on dealmaking from the FTC under the incoming Donald Trump administration, Solomon said.
While there remains an inflationary backdrop and other risks in the current environment, Ted Pick, CEO of Morgan Stanley said that the consumer and corporate community are “by in large, in good shape” as the economy continues to grow.
“This environment has been one where, if you are in the business of allocating capital, it’s been great,” he said, adding that the group was now gearing up to get into “raising capital mode.”
“That is [the] hallmark of a growing and thriving economy, which is where the classic underwriting and mergers and acquisitions businesses take hold,” he said.
Solomon predicted that these trends would see “more robust” capital raising and M&A activity in 2025.
The Senate Judiciary Committee convened on Tuesday for a hearing on the alleged Visa–Mastercard “duopoly,” which committee members from both sides of the aisle say has left retailers and other small businesses with no ability to negotiate interchange fees on credit card transactions.
“This is an odd grouping. The most conservative and the most liberal members happen to agree that we have to do something about this situation,” committee chair and Democratic Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin said.
Interchange fees, also known as swipe fees, are paid from a merchant’s bank account to the cardholder’s bank, whenever a customer uses a credit card in a retail purchase. Visa and Mastercard have a combined market cap of more than $1 trillion, and control 80% of the market.
“In 2023 alone, Visa and Mastercard charged merchants more than $100 billion in credit card fees, mostly in the form of interchange fees,” Durbin told the committee.
Durbin, along with Republican Kansas Sen. Roger Marshall, have co-sponsored the bipartisan Credit Card Competition Act, which takes aim at Visa and Mastercard’s market dominance by requiring banks with more than $100 billion in assets to offer at least one other payment network on their cards, besides Visa and Mastercard.
“This way, small businesses would finally have a real choice: they can route credit card transactions on the Visa or Mastercard network and continue to pay interchange fees that often rank as their second or biggest expense, or they could select a lower cost alternative,” Durbin told the committee.
Visa and Mastercard, however, stand by their swipe fees.
“We consider them incentives, some people might consider them penalties. But if you can adopt new technology that reduces the risk and takes fraud out of the system and improves streamlined processing, then you would qualify for lower interchange rates,” said Bill Sheedy, senior advisor to Visa CEO Ryan McInerney. “It’s very expensive to issue a product and to provide payment guarantee and online customer service, zero liability. All of those things, and many more, senator, get factored into interchange [fees].”
The executives also warned against the Credit Card Competition Act, with Sheedy claiming that it “would remove consumer control over their own payment decisions, reduce competition, impose technology sharing mandates and pick winners and losers by favoring certain competitors over others.”
“Why do we know this? Because we’ve seen it before,” Mastercard President of Americas Linda Kirkpatrick said, in reference to the Durbin amendment to the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, which required the Fed to limit fees on retailers for transactions using debit cards. “Since debit regulation took hold, debit rewards were eliminated, fees went up, access to capital diminished, and competition was stifled.”
But the current high credit card swipe fees for retailers translate to higher prices for consumers, the National Retail Federation told the committee in a letter ahead of the hearing. The Credit Card Competition Act, the retail industry’s largest trade association wrote, will deliver “fairness and transparency to the payment system and relief to American business and consumers.”
“When we think of consumer spending, credit card swipe fees are not the first thing that comes to mind, yet those fees are a surprisingly large part of consumer spending,” Notre Dame University law professor Roger Alford said. “Last year, the average American spent $1,100 in swipe fees, more than they spent on pets, coffee or alcohol.”
Visa and Mastercard agreed to a $30 billion settlement in March meant to reduce their swipe fees by four basis points for three years, but a federal judge rejected the settlement in June, saying they could afford to pay more.
Visa is also battling a Justice Department lawsuit filed in September. The payment network is accused of maintaining an illegal monopoly over debit card payment networks, which has affected “the price of nearly everything,” according to Attorney General Merrick Garland.
Check out the companies making headlines in extended trading. Keysight Technologies — Shares added more than 8%. The electronics test and measurement equipment company’s fiscal fourth-quarter results beat analyst estimates on the top and bottom lines. Keysight also issued a rosy outlook for the current quarter, anticipating adjusted earnings ranging from $1.65 to $1.71 per share, while analysts polled by FactSet called for $1.57 a share. Dolby Laboratories —The audio technology company advanced 10% after its fiscal fourth-quarter earnings of 61 cents per share topped Street estimates of 45 cents per share, per FactSet. Dolby also increased its dividend by 10% to 33 cents a share. Powell Industries — The manufacturer of electrical equipment slipped almost 14%. Net new orders for fiscal 2024 came in at $1.1 billion, compared to $1.4 billion in the year-ago period. The company noted that the decline was largely due to the inclusion of three large megaprojects in Powell’s oil and gas and petrochemical sectors in fiscal 2023. Azek Company — Shares of the residential siding and trim company ticked up 2% after its fiscal fourth-quarter results beat analyst estimates. Azek reported earnings of 29 cents per share on revenue of $348.2 million. Analysts surveyed by FactSet were looking for earnings of 27 cents per share and $339.1 million in revenue. La-Z-Boy — The furniture company gained nearly 3% following fiscal second-quarter results. La-Z-Boy reported earnings of 71 cents per share on revenue of $521 million. That’s an improvement from the year-ago period, in which the company posted earnings of 63 cents per share and revenue of $511.4 million. La-Z-Boy also upped its quarterly dividend by 10% to 22 cents per share.