Personal Finance
How President-elect Trump may impact investors in these 8 market sectors
Published
6 months agoon

Brandon Bell | Getty Images News | Getty Images
As Inauguration Day nears, investors are trying to unravel what booms or busts lay ahead under President-elect Donald Trump.
Trump’s campaign promises — from tariffs to mass deportations, tax cuts and deregulation — and his picks to lead federal agencies suggest both risks and rewards for various investment sectors, according to market experts.
Republican control of both chambers of Congress may grant Trump greater leeway to enact his pledges, experts said. However, their scope and timing is far from clear.
More from FA Playbook:
Here’s a look at other stories impacting the financial advisor business.
“There’s so much uncertainty right now,” said Jeremy Goldberg, a certified financial planner, portfolio manager and research analyst at Professional Advisory Services, which ranked No. 37 on CNBC’s annual Financial Advisor 100 list.
“I wouldn’t be making large bets one way or another,” Goldberg said.
Sectors often fare differently than expected
Past market results show why it’s difficult to predict the sectors that may win or lose under a new president, according to Larry Adam, chief investment officer at Raymond James.
When Trump was elected in 2016, financials, industrials and energy outperformed the S&P 500 in the first week. However, for the remaining three years and 51 weeks, those same sectors significantly underperformed, Adam explained.
“The market is known to have these knee-jerk reactions trying to anticipate where things go very quickly, but they don’t necessarily last,” Adam said.
What’s more, sectors that are expected to do well or poorly based on a president’s policies have sometimes gone the opposite way, according to Adam.
For example, the energy sector was down by 8.4% during Trump’s first administration, despite deregulation, record oil production and a rise in oil prices. Yet the energy sector climbed 22.9% under Biden as of Nov. 19, despite the administration’s push for renewables and sustainability.
For that reason, Raymond James ranks politics eighth for its potential impact on sectors. The seven factors that have more influence, according to the firm, are economic growth, fundamentals, monetary policy, interest rates and inflation, valuations, sentiment and corporate activity.
Here’s how Trump’s policy stances could influence eight sectors: autos, banks, building materials and construction, crypto, energy, health care, retail and technology.
Automobiles
Monty Rakusen | Digitalvision | Getty Images
The auto sector — like many others — will likely be a mixed bag, experts said.
Trump’s antipathy for electric vehicles is likely to create headwinds for EV producers.
His administration may try to roll back regulations like a Biden-era tailpipe-emissions rule expected to push broader adoption of EVs and hybrids. He also intends to kill consumer EV tax credits worth up to $7,500 — although states like California may try to enact their own EV rebates, blunting the impact.
Losing the federal credit would make EVs more costly, driving down sales and perhaps making “per unit economics even less favorable” for automakers, John Murphy, a research analyst at Bank of America Securities, wrote in a Nov. 21 research note.
Some companies seem well-positioned, though: Ford Motor (F), for example, “has a healthy pipeline of hybrid vehicles as well as traditional [internal combustion engine] vehicles to supplement the EV offerings,” Murphy wrote.

Tariffs and trade conflict pose threats to the auto industry, since the U.S. relies heavily on other nations to manufacture cars and parts, said Callie Cox, chief market strategist at Ritholtz Wealth Management.
They “could affect the cost and availability of cars we see in the U.S. market,” Cox said.
Economists expect tariffs and other Trump policies to be inflationary.
In that case, the U.S. Federal Reserve may have to keep interest rates higher for longer than anticipated. Higher borrowing costs may weigh on consumers’ desire or ability to buy cars, Cox said.
However, lower EV production could be a boon for companies that manufacture traditional gasoline cars, experts said.
Trump has also called for a “drill, baby, drill” approach to oil production. Greater supply could reduce gas prices, supporting demand for gas vehicles, experts said. But trade wars and sanctions on Iran and Venezuela could have the opposite impact, too.
—Greg Iacurci
Banks
In this 2017 file photo, President Donald Trump stands next to Jamie Dimon, chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co., left, in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington.
Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Trump’s first administration eased certain regulations for banking rules, fintech firms and financial startups.
Likewise, Trump’s second term is expected to usher in lighter financial regulations.
That may help bolster profitability in the sector, and therefore stock prices, said Brian Spinelli, co-chief investment officer at Halbert Hargrove in Long Beach, Calif., which is No. 54 on the 2024 CNBC FA 100 list.
“The larger banks probably benefit more from that,” Spinelli said.
Less regulation — combined with the prospect that interest rates could stay higher — will provide a net positive for the bank industry, since they may be able to lend out more risk-based capital, said David Rea, president of Salem Investment Counselors in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, which is No. 8 on the 2024 CNBC FA 100 list.
One issue that emerged this year that could resurface is concern about regional banks’ exposures to commercial real estate, Spinelli said.
“It wasn’t that long ago, and I don’t think those problems disappeared,” Spinelli said. “So you question, is that still looming out there?”
—Lorie Konish
Building materials and construction
Bill Varie | The Image Bank | Getty Images
The housing market has been “frozen” in recent years by high mortgage rates, said Cox of Ritholtz.
Lower rates would likely be a “catalyst” for housing and associated companies, she said.
However, that may not materialize — quickly, at least — under Trump, she said. If policies like tariffs, tax cuts and mass deportations stoke inflation, the U.S. Federal Reserve may have to keep interest rates higher for longer than anticipated, which would likely prop up mortgage rates and weigh on housing and related sectors, she said.
The whims of the housing market impact retailers, too: Home goods stores may not fare well if people aren’t buying, renovating and decorating new homes, Cox said.

That said, deregulation could be “absolutely huge” for the sector if it accelerates building timelines and reduces costs for developers, Goldberg said.
Trump has called for opening new land to builders and creating tax incentives for homebuyers, without providing much detail.
Housing policies will be “one of the most-watched initiatives coming out of the next administration,” Cox said. “We haven’t gotten a lot of clarity on that front,” she said.
“If we see realistic and well-thought-out policies, you could see real estate stocks and related stocks” like real estate investment trusts, home improvement retailers and home builders respond well, Cox said.
—Greg Iacurci
Crypto
Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump gestures at the Bitcoin 2024 event in Nashville, Tennessee, U.S., July 27, 2024.
Kevin Wurm | Reuters
Trump’s election has brought a new bullishness to cryptocurrencies, with bitcoin nearing a new $100,000 benchmark before its recent runup ended.
As president, Trump is expected to embrace crypto more than any of his predecessors.
Notably, he has already launched a crypto platform, World Liberty Financial, that will encourage the use of digital coins.
Those developments come as new ways of investing in crypto have emerged this year, with the January launch of spot bitcoin ETFs, and more recently, the addition of bitcoin ETF options.
Yet financial advisors are hesitant, with only about 2.6% recommending crypto to their clients, an April survey from Cerulli Associates found. Roughly 12.1% said they would be willing to use it or discuss it based on the client’s preference. Still, 58.9% of advisors said they do not expect to ever use cryptocurrency with clients.
“The number one reason why advisors aren’t investing in cryptocurrency on behalf of their clients is they don’t believe it’s suitable for client portfolios,” said Matt Apkarian, associate director in Cerulli’s product development practice.

Even for advisors who do expect they may use crypto at some point, it’s “wait and see,” particularly regarding how the regulatory environment plays out, Apkarian said.
However, investors are showing interest in cryptocurrency, with 90% of advisors receiving questions on the subject, according to research from Christina Lynn, a certified financial planner and practice management consultant at Mariner Wealth Advisors.
For those investors, exchange-traded funds are a good starting place, since there’s less chance of falling victim to one of crypto’s pitfalls like scams or losing the keys, the unique alphanumeric codes attached to the investments, according to Lynn. Because crypto can be more volatile, it’s best not to invest any money you expect you’ll need to pay for near-term goals, she said.
Investors would also be wise to think of cryptocurrency like an alternative investment and limit the allocation to 1% to 5% of their overall portfolio, Lynn said.
“You don’t need to have a lot of this to have it go a long way,” Lynn said.
—Lorie Konish
Energy
U.S. President Donald Trump gestures after delivering a speech at a Double Eagle Energy Holdings LLC oil rig in Midland, Texas, on Wednesday, July 29, 2020.
Cooper Neill | Bloomberg | Getty Images
As of Nov. 19, energy has been the top-performing sector under President Joe Biden, with a 22.9% gain, even with the administration’s push for renewables and sustainability, according to Raymond James.
Yet it remains to be seen whether that performance can continue under Trump, who has advocated for more oil, gas and coal production. The outlook for the sector could change if Trump acts on a campaign threat to repeal the Inflation Reduction Act, a law enacted under Biden that includes clean energy incentives.
If Trump continues to make it easier to create more oil supply, that might not be a great thing for oil companies, according to Adam of Raymond James.
“Because there’s more supply, it may tamp down on the price of oil, and that’s one of the biggest drivers of that sector,” Adam said.
Eagle Global Advisors, a Houston-based investment management firm that specializes in energy infrastructure, is “cautiously optimistic” about Trump’s impact on the sector, according to portfolio manager Mike Cerasoli. Eagle Global Advisors is No. 35 on the 2024 CNBC FA 100 list.
“We would say we’re probably more on the optimistic side than the cautious side,” Cerasoli said. “But if we know anything about Trump it’s that he’s a wild card.”

A lot of the Inflation Reduction Act may stay intact, since the top states that benefitted financially from the law also handed Trump a victory in the election, according to Cerasoli.
When Biden won in 2020, there was a lot of panic about the outlook for energy, oil and gas. In a third quarter letter that year, Cerasoli recalls writing, “I don’t think it’s going to be as bad as you think.”
Four years later, he has the same message for investors on the outlook for renewables. In the days following Trump’s January inauguration, Cerasoli expects there may be a deluge of executive orders.
“Once you get past that, you’ll get a sense of exactly how he’s going to treat energy,” Cerasoli said. “I think people will realize that it’s not the end of the world for renewables.”
—Lorie Konish
Health care
Medicine vials on a production line.
Comezora | Moment | Getty Images
Trump nominated Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as head of the Department of Health and Human Services.
RFK would be a “huge wild card” for the health care sector if the U.S. Senate were to confirm him, said Goldberg of Professional Advisory Services.
RFK is a prominent vaccine skeptic, which may bode ill for big vaccine makers like Merck (MRK), Pfizer (PFE) and Moderna (MRNA), said David Weinstein, a portfolio manager and senior vice president at Dana Investment Advisors, No. 4 on CNBC’s annual FA 100 ranking.
Cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, are also likely on the table to reduce government spending and raise money for a tax-cut package, experts said.
Publicly traded health companies like Centene (CNC), HCA Healthcare (HCA) and UnitedHealth (UNH) might be impacted by lower volumes of Medicaid patients or consumers who face higher healthcare premiums after losing ACA subsidies, for example, Weinstein said.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. during the UFC 309 event at Madison Square Garden on Nov. 16, 2024 in New York.
Chris Unger | Ufc | Getty Images
Medical tech providers — especially those that supply electronics with semiconductors sourced from China — could be burdened by tariffs, he added.
Conversely, deregulation might help certain pharmaceutical companies like Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) and Charles River Laboratories (CRL), which may benefit from faster approvals from the Food and Drug Administration, Goldberg said.
Vivek Ramaswamy, a former biotech executive who Trump appointed as co-head of a new Department of Government Efficiency, has called for streamlined drug approvals. But RFK has advocated for more oversight.
“There’s a real dichotomy here,” Weinstein said.
“Where do we end up? Maybe where we are right now,” he added.
—Greg Iacurci
Retail
Thomas Barwick | Digitalvision | Getty Images
Tax cuts may boost consumers’ discretionary income, which would be a boon for companies selling consumer electronics, clothes, luxury goods and other items, Goldberg said.
Then again, there’s a “high probability” of tariffs, Weinstein said.
Retailers would likely pass on at least some of that additional cost to consumers, experts said.
All physical goods from apparel to footwear, tools and appliances are at risk from tariffs, Weinstein said. Tariff impact would depend on how the policies are structured.
The Home Depot (HD), Lowe’s (LOW) and Walmart (WMT), for example, source a relatively big chunk of their goods from abroad, Weinstein said.

Home Depot sources more than half its goods from the U.S. and North America, but “there certainly will be an impact,” CEO and president Ted Decker said Nov. 12 during the firm’s Q3 earnings call.
“Whatever happens in tariffs will be an industry-wide impact,” Decker said. “It won’t discriminate against different retailers and distributors who are importing goods.”
It’s a good idea for investors to own “high quality” retailers without a lot of debt and with diversified inventory sources, Goldberg said. He cited TJX Companies (TJX), which owns stores like TJ Maxx, Marshalls and HomeGoods, as an example.
“Direct imports are a small portion of [its] business and TJX sources from a variety of countries outside of China,” Lorraine Hutchinson, a Bank of America Securities research analyst, wrote in a Nov. 21 note.
Deregulation may be positive for smaller retailers and franchises, which tend to be more sensitive to labor laws and environmental and compliance costs, Goldberg said.
—Greg Iacurci
Technology
Former President Donald J. Trump speaks about filing a class-action lawsuits targeting Facebook, Google and Twitter and their CEOs, escalating his long-running battle with the companies following their suspensions of his accounts, during a press conference at the Trump National Golf Club on Wednesday, July 07, 2021 in Bedminster, NJ.
Jabin Botsford | The Washington Post | Getty Images
The technology sector continued its strong run in 2024, thanks in large part to the Magnificent Seven — Amazon, Apple, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla.
Even broadly diversified investors may find it difficult to escape those names, as they are among the top weighted companies in the S&P 500 index.
Information technology — which includes all those stocks except for Amazon and Google parent Alphabet — comprises the largest sector in the S&P 500 index, with more than 31%.
Trump is poised to have an influence on looming antitrust issues, amid considerations as to whether Google’s influence on online search should be limited.
Any tariffs put in place may also prompt some sales to decline or the cost of raw materials to go up, said Rea of Salem Investment Counselors.
Nevertheless, Rea said his firm continues to have a “pretty heavy” tech allocation, with strong expectations for generative artificial intelligence. However, the firm does not own Tesla, due to its expensive valuation, and has recently been selling software company Palantir, a winning stock that may have gotten ahead of itself, he said.
Technology valuations are trading well into the high double digits on a price to earnings basis, which often signals forward returns will decline, according to Halbert Hargrove’s Spinelli.
Consequently, prospective investors who come in now would basically be buying high, he said.
“If you think you’re going to get the same double digit returns in the next five years, sure it could happen on a one-year basis,” Spinelli said. “But your chances historically have been that your returns come down.”
—Lorie Konish
You may like
Personal Finance
What Pell Grant changes in Trump budget, House tax bill mean for students
Published
23 hours agoon
June 8, 2025
Carol Yepes | Moment | Getty Images
For many students and their families, federal student aid is key for college access.
And yet, the Trump administration’s budget proposal for fiscal year 2026 calls for significant cuts to higher education funding, including reducing the maximum federal Pell Grant award to $5,710 a year from $7,395, as well as scaling back the federal work-study program. The proposed cuts would help pay for the landmark tax and spending bill Republicans in the U.S. Congress hope to enact.
Roughly 40% of undergraduate students rely on Pell Grants, a type of federal aid available to low-income families who demonstrate financial need on the Free Application for Federal Student Aid. Work study funds, which are earned through part-time jobs, often help cover additional education expenses.
More from Personal Finance:
Social Security gets break from student loan collections
Is college still worth it? It is for most, but not all
What to know before you tap your 529 plan
President Donald Trump‘s “skinny” budget request said changes to the Pell Grant program were necessary due to a looming shortfall, but top-ranking Democrats and college advocates say cuts could have been made elsewhere and students will pay the price.
“The money we invest in post-high school education isn’t charity — it helps Americans get good jobs, start businesses, and contribute to our economy,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., told CNBC. “No kid’s education should be defunded to pay for giant tax giveaways for billionaires.”
Pell Grants are ‘the foundation for financial support’
Nearly 75% of all undergraduates receive some type of financial aid, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.
“Historically the Pell Grant was viewed as the foundation for financial support for low-income students,” said Lesley Turner, an associate professor at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy and a research fellow of the National Bureau of Economic Research. “It’s the first dollar, regardless of other types of aid you have access to.”
Under Trump’s proposal, the maximum Pell Grant for the 2026-2027 academic year would be at its lowest level in more than a decade.
“The Pell reduction would impact the lowest-income families,” said Betsy Mayotte, president of The Institute of Student Loan Advisors, a nonprofit.
More than 92% of Pell Grant recipients in 2019-2020 came from families with household incomes below $60,000, according to higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.
How Pell Grant cuts could affect college students
If the president’s cuts were enacted and then persisted for four years, the average student debt at graduation will be about $6,500 higher among those with a bachelor’s degree who received Pell Grants, according to Kantrowitz’s own calculations.
“If adopted, [the proposed cuts] would require millions of enrolled students to drop out or take on more debt to complete their degrees — likely denying countless prospective low- and moderate-income students the opportunity to go to college altogether,” Sameer Gadkaree, president and CEO of The Institute for College Access & Success, said in a statement.
Already, those grants have not kept up with the rising cost of a four-year degree. Tuition and fees plus room and board for a four-year private college averaged $58,600 in the 2024-25 school year, up from $56,390 a year earlier. At four-year, in-state public colleges, the average was $24,920, up from $24,080, according to the College Board.
The Pell program functions like other entitlement programs, such as Social Security or Medicare, where every eligible student is entitled to receive a Pell award.
However, unlike those other programs, the Pell program does not rely solely on mandatory funding that is set in the federal budget. Rather, it is also dependent on some discretionary funding, which is appropriated by Congress.
The Congressional Budget Office projected a shortfall this year in part because more students now qualify for a Pell Grant due to changes to the financial aid application, and, as a result, more students are enrolling in college.
Cutting the Pell Grant is ‘extreme’
Although there have been other times when the Pell program operated with a deficit, slashing the award amount is an “extreme” measure, according to Kantrowitz.
“Every past shortfall has been followed by Congress providing additional funding,” he said. “Even the current House budget reconciliation bill proposes additional funding to eliminate the shortfall.”
However, the bill also reduces eligibility for the grants by raising the number of credits students need to take per semester to qualify for the aid. There’s a concern those more stringent requirements will harm students who need to work while they’re in school and those who are parents balancing classes and child care.
“These are students that could use it the most,” said the University of Chicago’s Turner.
“Single parents, for example, that have to work to cover the bills won’t be able to take on additional credits,” Mayotte said.
“If their Pell is also reduced, they may have to withdraw from school rather than complete their degree,” Mayotte said.
Personal Finance
What a ‘revenge tax’ in Trump’s spending bill means for investors
Published
1 day agoon
June 8, 2025
WASHINGTON DC, UNITED STATES – MAY 30: United States President Donald Trump departs at the White House to U.S. Steel’s Irvin Works in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania in Washington D.C May 30, 2025.
Celal Gunes | Anadolu | Getty Images
As the Senate weighs President Donald Trump‘s multi-trillion-dollar spending package, a lesser-known provision tucked into the House-approved bill has pushback from Wall Street.
The House measure, known as Section 899, would allow the U.S. to add a new tax of up to 20% on foreigners with U.S. investments, including multinational companies operating in the U.S.
Some analysts call the provision a “revenge tax” due to its wording. It would apply to foreign entities if their home country imposes “unfair foreign taxes” against U.S. companies, according to the bill.
“Wall Street investors are shocked by [Section] 899 and apparently did not see it coming,” James Lucier, Capital Alpha Partners managing director, wrote in a June 5 analysis.
More from Personal Finance:
The average 401(k) savings rate hit a record high. See if you’re on track
On-time debt payments aren’t a magic fix for your credit score. Here’s why
With ‘above normal’ hurricane forecasts, check your home insurance policy
If enacted as written, the provision could have “significant implications for the asset management industry,” including cross-border income earned by hedge funds, private equity funds and other entities, Ernst & Young wrote on June 2.
Passive investment income could be subject to a higher U.S. withholding tax, as high as 50% in some cases, the company noted. Some analysts worry that could impact future investment.
The Investment Company Institute, which represents the asset management industry serving individual investors, warned in a May 30 statement that the provision is “written in a manner that could limit foreign investment to the U.S.”
But with details pending as the Senate assesses the bill, many experts are still weighing the potential impact — including who could be affected.
Here’s what investors need to know about Section 899.
How the ‘revenge tax’ could work
As drafted, Section 899 would allow the U.S. to hike existing levies for countries with “unfair foreign taxes” by 5% per year, capped at 20%.
Several kinds of tax fall under “unfair foreign taxes,” according to the provision. Those include the undertaxed profits rule, which is associated with part of the global minimum tax negotiated by the Biden administration. The term would also apply to digital services taxes and diverted profits taxes, along with new levies that could arise, according to the bill.
The second part of the measure would expand the so-called base erosion and anti-abuse tax, or BEAT, which aims to prevent corporations from shifting profits abroad to avoid taxes.
“Basically, all businesses that are operating in the U.S. from a foreign headquarters will face that,” said Daniel Bunn, president and CEO of the Tax Foundation. “It’s pretty expansive.”
The retaliatory measures would apply to most wealthy countries from which the U.S. receives direct foreign investment, which could threaten or harm the U.S. economy, according to Bunn’s analysis.
Notably, the proposed taxes don’t apply to U.S. Treasuries or portfolio interest, according to the bill.
‘Strong priority’ for House Republicans
Section 899 still needs Senate approval, and it’s unclear how the provision could change amid alarm from Wall Street.
But the measure has “strong support” from others in the business community, and it’s a “strong priority” for Republican House Ways and Means Committee members, Capital Alpha Partners’ Lucier wrote.
House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo., first floated the idea in a May 2023 bill, and has been outspoken, along with other Republicans, against the global minimum tax.

If enacted as drafted, Section 899 could raise an estimated $116 billion over 10 years, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation.
That could help fund other priorities in Trump’s mega-bill, and if removed, lawmakers may need to find the revenue elsewhere, Bunn said.
However, House Ways and Means Republicans may ultimately want foreign countries to adjust their tax policies before the new tax is imposed.
“If these countries withdraw these taxes and decide to behave, we will have achieved our goal,” Smith said in a June 4 statement.
Personal Finance
Forgotten 401(k) fees cost workers thousands in retirement savings
Published
2 days agoon
June 7, 2025

With more Americans job hopping in the wake of the Great Resignation, the risk of “forgetting” a 401(k) plan with a previous employer has jumped, recent studies show.
As of 2023, there were 29.2 million left-behind 401(k) accounts holding roughly $1.65 trillion in assets, up 20% from two years earlier, according to the latest data by Capitalize, a fintech firm.
Nearly half of employees leave money in their old plans during work transitions, according to a 2024 report from Vanguard.
However, that can come at a cost.
More from Personal Finance:
Average 401(k) balances drop 3% amid market swings
The average 401(k) savings rate hit a record high
On-time debt payments aren’t a magic fix for your credit score
For starters, 41% of workers are unaware that they are paying 401(k) fees at all, a 2021 survey by the U.S. Government Accountability Office found.
In most cases, 401(k) fees, which can include administrative service costs and fees for investment management, are relatively low, depending on the plan provider.
But there could be additional fees on 401(k) accounts left behind from previous jobs that come with an extra bite.
Fees on forgotten 401(k)s
Jelena Danilovic | Getty Images
Former employees who don’t take their 401(k) with them could be charged an additional fee to maintain those accounts, according to Romi Savova, CEO of PensionBee, an online retirement provider. “If you leave it with the employer, the employer could force the record keeping costs on to you,” she said.
According to PensionBee’s analysis, a $4.55 monthly nonemployee maintenance fee on top of other costs can add up to nearly $18,000 in lost retirement funds over time. Not only does the monthly fee eat into the principal, but workers also lose the compound growth that would have accumulated on the balance, the study found.
Fees on those forgotten 401(k)s can be particularly devastating for long-term savers, said Gil Baumgarten, founder and CEO of Segment Wealth Management in Houston.
That doesn’t necessarily mean it pays to move your balance, he said.
“There are two sides to every story,” he said. “Lost 401(k)s can be problematic, but rolling into a IRA could come with other costs.”
What to do with your old 401(k)
When workers switch jobs, they may be able to move the funds to a new employer-sponsored plan or roll their old 401(k) funds into an individual retirement account, which many people do.
But IRAs typically have higher investment fees than 401(k)s and those rollovers can also cost workers thousands of dollars over decades, according to another study, by The Pew Charitable Trusts, a nonprofit research organization.
Collectively, workers who roll money into IRAs could pay $45.5 billion in extra fees over a hypothetical retirement period of 25 years, Pew estimated.
Another option is to cash out an old 401(k), which is generally considered the least desirable option because of the hefty tax penalty. Even so, Vanguard found 33% of workers do that.
How to find a forgotten 401(k)
While leaving your retirement savings in your former employer’s plan is often the simplest option, the risk of losing track of an old plan has been growing.
Now, 25% of all 401(k) plan assets are left behind or forgotten, according to the most recent data from Capitalize, up from 20% two years prior.
However, thanks to “Secure 2.0,” a slew of measures affecting retirement savers, the Department of Labor created the retirement savings lost and found database to help workers find old retirement plans.
“Ultimately, it can’t really be lost,” Baumgarten said. “Every one of these companies has a responsibility to provide statements.” Often simply updating your contact information can help reconnect you with these records, he advised.
You can also use your Social Security number to track down funds through the National Registry of Unclaimed Retirement Benefits, a private-sector database.
In 2022, a group of large 401(k) plan administrators launched the Portability Services Network.
That consortium works with defined contributor plan rollover specialist Retirement Clearinghouse on auto portability, or the automatic transfer of small-balance 401(k)s. Depending on the plan, employees with up to $7,000 could have their savings automatically transferred into a workplace retirement account with their new employer when they change jobs.
The goal is to consolidate and maintain those retirement savings accounts, rather than cashing them out or risk losing track of them, during employment transitions, according to Mike Shamrell, vice president of thought leadership at Fidelity Investments, the nation’s largest provider of 401(k) plans and a member of the Portability Services Network.

UK’s FCA teams up with Nvidia to let banks experiment with AI

Donald Trump’s new travel ban is coming into effect

Sending the National Guard to LA is not about stopping rioting

New 2023 K-1 instructions stir the CAMT pot for partnerships and corporations

The Essential Practice of Bank and Credit Card Statement Reconciliation

Are American progressives making themselves sad?
Trending
-
Blog Post1 week ago
Common Bookkeeping Challenges and Solutions for Small Businesses
-
Economics1 week ago
Why the president must not be lexicographer-in-chief
-
Finance1 week ago
This is why Jamie Dimon is so gloomy on the economy
-
Personal Finance1 week ago
U.S. birth rate drop outpaces policy response, raising future concerns
-
Economics1 week ago
German inflation May 2025
-
Accounting1 week ago
Steinhoff fraud trial moved to South Africa’s high court
-
Personal Finance7 days ago
What the national debt, deficit mean for your money
-
Personal Finance1 week ago
How to save on summer travel in 2025