Accounting

IRS and Social Security rules for IRA bridge strategy

Published

3 hours ago

November 7, 2024

For some clients, taking distributions from their traditional individual retirement accounts before retirement may be a bridge too far. For others, the strategy could lead them from pre-retirement jitters to higher Social Security benefits and lower taxes a decade or more down the road.

That’s because the array of rules and figures outlined in the slideshow below add up to complex calculations that vary greatly among clients whose financial advisors and tax professionals may want to consider the so-called bridge strategy. The idea revolves around how clients can take IRA distributions in pre-retirement in order to avoid facing required minimum distributions later while gaining the cash flow necessary to delay Social Security until the payments are bigger.

The thicket of financial calculations, IRS guidelines, Medicare rules and long-term planning involved with deciding when to begin withdrawals and Social Security benefits shows the need for careful, individualized advice, according to four experts who spoke with Financial Planning.

The last two months of a year mark an especially good time to discuss the possibilities of the bridge with clients. Prior to New Year’s Day, factors such as the level of capital gains, investment dividends, business-related transactions or job situations are coming into focus, said Valerie Escobar, a senior wealth advisor with Kansas City, Missouri-based advisory practice BMG Advisors. Advisors and their clients can weigh them against the possible IRA distributions.

“As we’re approaching the end of the year, you have a better sense of what your income picture is going to look like,” Escobar said. “Having that clarity of the picture makes the year-end the best time to be looking at that.”

The fourth quarter “is the most important time to be looking at your taxes” because “it’s the last chance you have to fix things,” said Erin Wood, a senior vice president for financial planning and advanced solutions with Omaha, Nebraska-based registered investment advisory firm Carson Group. Client decisions on when to take required minimum distributions and when to begin claiming Social Security can have major consequences — including on their spouse’s survivor payments or the size of their monthly benefit checks (clients could see a bump of 8% a year if they wait until age 70).

“Those are a great example of something that you really only get one chance to make the right decision,” Wood said. “Once you make your decision, you are very much going to be stuck with that decision.”

In addition, those considerations often determine whether clients get stuck with “stealth taxes” on their benefits and whether they have to pay an income-related monthly adjustment amount on their Medicare premiums according to Sarah Brenner, the director of retirement education with retirement consulting firm Ed Slott and Company.

Once traditional IRA owners reach 59½ years old — or the age they must be to avoid getting “whacked with a 10% penalty” for a withdrawal, unless they’re for certain exceptions — they’re going to be thinking through how the distribution affects their income.

“It bumps up what you’re going to pay for Medicare,” Brenner said. “One thing they hate is IRMAA charges.”

Other than a general rule that claiming Social Security benefits while still employed is not usually a good idea, Heather Schreiber, the founder of advanced planning consulting firm HLS Retirement Consulting, said she had no one-size-fits-all standard timeline for beginning the payments.

“First of all, I’d say, ‘Don’t listen to your neighbor,'” Shreiber said. “Everyone’s decision is very unique to them. I really don’t have an, ‘Everyone should file at X date.'”

For a rundown of the key numbers involved with the IRA “bridge” strategy to claiming bigger Social Security benefits later, scroll down the cardshow. To read FP’s year-end tax planning feature, “A primer on the IRA ‘bridge’ to bigger Social Security benefits,” click here. And, for a look at changes to tax brackets and IRA rules for 2025, follow this link.

Accounting

Vanguard settles target-date fund investor case

Published

6 mins ago

November 7, 2024

Business Finance News

Vanguard agreed to pay $40 million to settle a potential class-action case over steep capital-gains taxes that hit thousands of investors in the firm’s target-date funds.

In the Nov. 6 preliminary settlement awaiting approval in Philadelphia federal court, the asset management giant did not admit any guilt or wrongdoing. However, the payout would add on to another $6.25 million in fines and restitution against Vanguard in 2022 in the settlement of a case filed by Massachusetts regulators on behalf of investors who absorbed capital gains — and the accompanying tax burden — when the firm opened the lower-cost institutional share classes of the funds to midsize retirement plans it had previously shut out from them in 2020.

Those clients rushed into the cheaper shares in a move described by The Wall Street Journal as an “elephant stampede” that caused the target-date funds to sell 15% of the products’ holdings in transactions saddling taxable-account investors with a capital-gains distribution that was 40 times any previous level, according to the March 2022 lawsuit. Less than a year after reducing the minimum-asset requirement for institutional shares to $5 million from $100 million, the firm merged them together with the retail versions of the funds. That adjustment caused no tax impact, leading experts to question why Vanguard didn’t simply do that in the first place.

“You got these huge capital gains that had to be distributed, and that was really the big problem,” said Daniel Sotiroff, a manager research senior analyst of passive strategies for Morningstar Research Services. “Vanguard actually did kind of mess this one up.”

Representatives for Vanguard didn’t respond to requests for comment on the case or the settlement.

It and the plaintiffs had indicated in September filings that they reached agreement in private mediation that month. The investors accused Vanguard and its top executives of breaching their fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting that breach, gross negligence, breaking the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment and violations of several state laws. In the course of discovery, Vanguard deposed 10 of the plaintiffs and produced 250,000 documents.

The company agreed to the settlement “solely to eliminate the burden and expense of further

litigation,” and nothing in it is “an admission or finding of any fault, liability, wrongdoing or damage whatsoever or any infirmity in the defenses that [the] defendants have asserted, or could have asserted,” according to court filings.

“Defendants have denied, and continue to deny, that they have committed any act or omission giving rise to any liability or violation of law,” the “stipulation of settlement” document stated. “Defendants have asserted, and continue to assert, that the conduct was at all times proper and in compliance with all applicable provisions of law, and they believe that the evidence developed to date supports their positions that they acted properly at all times and that the action is without merit.”

In the agreement ordering Vanguard to pay $40 million to target-date investors who paid the tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxes three years ago, the plaintiffs agreed to take roughly 15% of the “best-case scenario” payment of $259.5 million in damages, according to their filing for approval of the settlement. The settlement agreement limited attorney fees to no more than one-third of the award and capped litigation expenses at $985,000. If the settlement gets preliminary approval, the plaintiffs would then reach out to potential class members for their reaction before seeking the final green light on the agreement.

The cash settlement “provides an immediate recovery to impacted Vanguard [target-date fund] investors and avoids the considerable risks of continued litigation in this complex class action,” the filing stated. “Plaintiffs and class counsel believe that the case has merit, but they recognize the significant risk and expense that would be necessary to prosecute Plaintiffs’ claims successfully through class certification, continued fact and expert discovery, summary judgment, trial and subsequent appeals, as well as the inherent difficulties and delays complex class action litigation like this entails. As previewed in the parties’ class certification briefing, which focused almost exclusively on damages model issues, proving damages would be risky, complicated, and uncertain, involving conflicting expert testimony.”

Besides the substantial payout, the case helped remind financial advisors and their clients of the potential risks involved with holding mutual funds in taxable accounts, Sotiroff said. ETFs or separately-managed accounts could help avoid the tax surprises in non-retirement holdings, even though target-date funds may not be as readily available in that form.

“If you’re going to hold a mutual fund, you have to expect that you’re probably going to get some capital gains distributions from it,” Sotiroff said. “You’re always potentially on the hook for a capital gains distribution.”

Accounting

M&A roundup: Aldrich and GHJ expand

Published

38 mins ago

November 7, 2024

Business Finance News

Aldrich, a provider of financial, wealth, tax, and business transaction strategies based in Salem, Oregon, has acquired HMA CPA, an accounting firm based in Spokane, Washington.

The Aldrich Group of Companies includes Aldrich CPAs + Advisors LLP, a Top 75 Firm, as well as Aldrich Wealth LP, a registered investment advisory firm with over $6 billion in assets under management, and Aldrich Advisors Capital LP, which provides advisory services for business transactions.

Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed. All four HMA partners and 25 employees will be joining Aldrich, which has $86 million in revenues and 500 team members across the U.S. and India. Aldrich ranked No. 72 on Accounting Today‘s 2024 list of the Top 100 Firms.

The acquisition of HMA CPA will enable Aldrich to expand to the Spokane and Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, area, by adding HMA’s four partners and their employees. Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

“We share with HMA a commitment to serving our people, our clients, and our communities and are honored to build on HMA’s 40-year legacy,” said Aldrich CEO partner John Lauseng in a statement Tuesday. “We are excited to work together to help Spokane and Coeur d’Alene-area companies, owners and employees meet their financial goals.”

HMA was founded in Spokane in 1983 and has grown by expanding its services and through acquisition. In addition to Kevin Sell, HMA’s other owners, Kristi Bushnell, Laura Hays and Mike Whitmore, will be joining Aldrich, along with their colleagues. 

“Joining Aldrich will allow our team to deliver even more value to our clients, as well as create growth opportunities for our professionals,” said HMA CEO Kevin Sell in a statement. “Aldrich shares our entrepreneurial spirit, and we look forward to providing more services to our Spokane area clients through Aldrich CPA + Advisors, Aldrich Wealth, and Aldrich Capital Advisors.” 

After the deal, Aldrich now has eight offices in the Western U.S. across Oregon, California, Colorado, Utah and Washington.

Accounting

IFAC names Jean Bouquot its president

Published

1 hour ago

November 7, 2024

Business Finance News

The International Federation of Accountants announced Jean Bouquot as its president and Taryn Rulton as deputy president.

Bouquot will serve a two-year term through November 2026, previously having served as IFAC deputy president since November 2022.

“It is my honor to serve as IFAC president,” Mr. Bouquot said in a statement. “Together with my fellow board members, I will work on behalf of all IFAC members, convene the profession and its stakeholders to highlight the role and activities of IFAC, and always advance the profession in the public interest.”

Bouquot has over 44 years of audit experience at EY with exposure to international activities. He currently runs his own practice in Paris. He joined the IFAC board in November 2020, nominated by Compagnie Nationale des Commissaires aux Comptes and Conseil National de l’Ordre des Experts-Comptables.

He was formerly president of the CNCC, formerly president and deputy president of the Compagnie Régionale des Commissaires aux Comptes de Versailles et du Centre, and is currently a board member of IFAC Network Partner organization Fédération Internationale des Experts-comptables et commissaires aux Francophones.

Rulton, elected as IFAC deputy president, joined the board in November 2020. She has over 30 years of experience across the U.K. and Australia with a background spanning the banking industry, Big Four firms KPMG and EY, government, private companies, non-governmental organizations and universities.

She is currently chief commercial officer at La Trobe University in Melbourne, Australia, and serves on multiple corporate boards and committees in the not-for-profit and public sectors, including as chair of audit and risk committees. She has standard-setting experience and completed two terms on the Australian Accounting Standards Board.

The IFAC also announced new and re-appointed board members.

New appointments:

Josephine Su Han Phan (CPA Australia)
Michael Niehues (IDW/WPK, Germany)
Patricia Stock (SAICA, South Africa)
Mark Vaessen (Royal NBA, Netherlands)
Lei Yan (CICPA, China)
Ahmad Almeghames (SOCPA, Saudi Arabia)

Reappointments:

Greg Anton (AICPA, USA)
Tashia Batstone (CPA Canada)

The IFAC Council also approved new member and new associate organizations. The admissions were approved at the 2024 IFAC Council hybrid meeting, with a physical location held in Paris on Nov. 6-7.

New IFAC members: