Connect with us

Accounting

Senate panel approves nomination of TIGTA head

Published

on

The Senate Finance Committee voted along party lines to approve the nomination of David Samuel Johnson as the next Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, but he may need to wait until the next congressional term to be confirmed by the Senate.

Johnson is succeeding the late J. Russell George, who died in January after leading TIGTA since December 2004.

Johnson currently serves as assistant inspector general for investigations at the Department of Veterans Affairs and previously served as a federal prosecutor, including in the Fraud Section of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice. 

Senate Finance Committee chairman Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, voted to approve Johnson, along with other Democrats in a vote of 14-13. Republicans were opposed, arguing he shouldn’t be approved until a new Senate, which will be controlled by Republicans, is seated early next year.

“Independent oversight of the IRS is in the best interest of all taxpayers,” said Wyden. “It’s a challenging job. The Treasury Department has a separate Inspector General — but tax issues and the IRS require their own special focus. TIGTA, as it’s known to the tax policy crowd, is all about good government and protecting taxpayer dollars at the IRS. It helps improve tax administration and it fights waste, fraud and abuse. Those are priorities for members on both sides. This committee depends on TIGTA to provide the public with unbiased information and non-partisan oversight to help us do our jobs. Mr. Johnson is a highly qualified nominee and had an excellent hearing a few weeks ago. I strongly support his nomination, and I urge all my colleagues to do the same.”

The ranking Republican on the committee, Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, said he was voting against approving Johnson despite his qualifications. 

“Mr. Johnson has strong qualifications and oversight experience, and I appreciate his service at the Department of Veterans Affairs and his willingness to serve today,” said Crapo. “I was encouraged to hear Mr. Johnson’s commitment to: distinguishing allegations of waste, fraud and abuse from disagreements in policy; ensuring that TIGTA holds accountable any individual who unlawfully discloses taxpayer information; and providing the Senate Finance Committee with timely and thorough updates of investigations as permitted by law. I was also encouraged to hear that Mr. Johnson and I share common ground on the need for the IRS to keep taxpayer information confidential, and for personal information to not be used against taxpayers to advance political agendas. However, given that the new Congress will be sworn in only less than a month from today, and the new Administration will take office just shortly thereafter, it is my opinion that these newly-elected officials deserve the opportunity to evaluate this appointment. Therefore, I cannot support Mr. Johnson’s nomination today. That said, I look forward to working with Mr. Johnson if he is confirmed in addressing the concerns that my colleagues and I have raised throughout this process, and ensuring that TIGTA continues to provide essential oversight of the IRS and our nation’s tax system.”

Johnson indicated during his confirmation hearing in November that he would focus on inspecting the IRS.  

“Inspectors General conduct independent fact-finding and make objective recommendations so that Congress and the agency head are fully and currently informed of any deficiencies in agency programs and can take appropriate action based on accurate and unbiased information,” he said. “In my time at the VA OIG, I have focused investigative oversight resources on the most impactful issues facing VA and the veteran community. If confirmed, I will do the same for the IRS and provide candid, reliable, and pertinent information to Congress, the Treasury Secretary, and the IRS Commissioner to help improve the IRS’s operations for the benefit of all Americans.”

If he is confirmed, Johnson could be working with new leadership at the IRS. On Wednesday, President-elect Trump said he would name former Rep. Billy Long, R-Missouri, as the next IRS commissioner, even though the term of the current IRS commissioner, Danny Werfel, doesn’t end until November 2027.

Separately on Thursday, TIGTA released a report on how the tax offset program is continuing to allow millions of dollars to be erroneously refunded to taxpayers. It found that between 2020 and 2022, $40.1 billion in overpayments were offset to pay outstanding tax debts. However, over 4,500 taxpayers received more than $78 million in refunds or credits that should have been applied to their outstanding tax debts. Procedural and programming errors are continuing to prevent some overpayments from being applied to tax debts. TIGTA’s recommendations to improve the program included better training, updated internal guidance, programming changes and alerts to prevent erroneous refunds. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Business Transaction Recording For Financial Success

Published

on

Business Transaction Recording For Financial Success

In the world of financial management, accurate transaction recording is much more than a routine task—it is the foundation of fiscal integrity, operational transparency, and informed decision-making. By maintaining meticulous records, businesses ensure their financial ecosystem remains robust and reliable. This article explores the essential practices for precise transaction recording and its critical role in driving business success.

The Importance of Detailed Transaction Recording
At the heart of accurate financial management is detailed transaction recording. Each transaction must include not only the monetary amount but also its nature, the parties involved, and the exact date and time. This level of detail creates a comprehensive audit trail that supports financial analysis, regulatory compliance, and future decision-making. Proper documentation also ensures that stakeholders have a clear and trustworthy view of an organization’s financial health.

Establishing a Robust Chart of Accounts
A well-organized chart of accounts is fundamental to accurate transaction recording. This structured framework categorizes financial activities into meaningful groups, enabling businesses to track income, expenses, assets, and liabilities consistently. Regularly reviewing and updating the chart of accounts ensures it stays relevant as the business evolves, allowing for meaningful comparisons and trend analysis over time.

Leveraging Modern Accounting Software
Advanced accounting software has revolutionized how businesses handle transaction recording. These tools automate repetitive tasks like data entry, synchronize transactions in real-time with bank feeds, and perform validation checks to minimize errors. Features such as cloud integration and customizable reports make these platforms invaluable for maintaining accurate, accessible, and up-to-date financial records.

The Power of Double-Entry Bookkeeping
Double-entry bookkeeping remains a cornerstone of precise transaction management. By ensuring every transaction affects at least two accounts, this system inherently checks for errors and maintains balance within the financial records. For example, recording both a debit and a credit ensures that discrepancies are caught early, providing a reliable framework for accurate reporting.

The Role of Timely Documentation
Prompt transaction recording is another critical factor in financial accuracy. Delays in documentation can lead to missing or incorrect entries, which may skew financial reports and complicate decision-making. A culture that prioritizes timely and accurate record-keeping ensures that a company always has real-time insights into its financial position, helping it adapt to changing conditions quickly.

Regular Reconciliation for Financial Integrity
Periodic reconciliations act as a vital checkpoint in transaction recording. Whether conducted daily, weekly, or monthly, these reviews compare recorded transactions with external records, such as bank statements, to identify discrepancies. Early detection of errors ensures that records remain accurate and that the company’s financial statements are trustworthy.

Conclusion
Mastering the art of accurate transaction recording is far more than a compliance requirement—it is a strategic necessity. By implementing detailed recording practices, leveraging advanced technology, and adhering to time-tested principles like double-entry bookkeeping, businesses can ensure financial transparency and operational efficiency. For finance professionals and business leaders, precise transaction recording is the bedrock of informed decision-making, stakeholder confidence, and long-term success.

With these strategies, businesses can build a reliable financial foundation that supports growth, resilience, and the ability to navigate an ever-changing economic landscape.

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRS to test faster dispute resolution

Published

on

Easing restrictions, sharpening personal attention and clarifying denials are among the aims of three pilot programs at the Internal Revenue Service that will test changes to existing alternative dispute resolution programs. 

The programs focus on “fast track settlement,” which allows IRS Appeals to mediate disputes between a taxpayer and the IRS while the case is still within the jurisdiction of the examination function, and post-appeals mediation, in which a mediator is introduced to help foster a settlement between Appeals and the taxpayer.

The IRS has been revitalizing existing ADR programs as part of transformation efforts of the agency’s new strategic plan, said Elizabeth Askey, chief of the IRS Independent Office of Appeals.

IRS headquarters in Washington, D.C.

“By increasing awareness, changing and revitalizing existing programs and piloting new approaches, we hope to make our ADR programs, such as fast-track settlement and post-appeals mediation, more attractive and accessible for all eligible parties,” said Michael Baillif, director of Appeals’ ADR Program Management Office. 

Among other improvements, the pilots: 

  • Align the Large Business and International, Small Business and Self-Employed and Tax Exempt and Government Entities divisions in offering FTS issue by issue. Previously, if a taxpayer had one issue ineligible for FTS, the entire case was ineligible. 
  • Provide that requests to participate in FTS and PAM will not be denied without the approval of a first-line executive. 
  • Clarify that taxpayers receive an explanation when requests for FTS or PAM are denied.

Another pilot, Last Chance FTS, is a limited scope SB/SE pilot in which Appeals will call taxpayers or their representatives after a protest is filed in response to a 30-day or equivalent letter to inform taxpayers about the potential application of FTS. This pilot will not impact eligibility for FTS but will simply test the awareness of taxpayers regarding the availability of FTS. 

A final pilot removes the limitation that participation in FTS would preclude eligibility for PAM. 

The traditional appeals process remains available for all taxpayers. 

Inquiries can be addressed to the ADR Program Management Office at [email protected].

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRS revises guidance on residential clean energy credits

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service has updated and added new guidance for taxpayers claiming the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit and the Residential Clean Energy Property Credit.

The updated Fact Sheet 2025-01 includes a set of frequently asked questions and answers, superseding the fact sheet from last April. The IRS noted that the updates include substantial changes.

New sections have been added on how long a taxpayer has to claim the tax credits, guidance for condominium and co-op owners, whether taxpayers who did not previously claim the credit can file an amended return to claim it, and a series of questions on qualified manufacturers and product identification numbers. Other material has been added on how to claim the credits, what kind of records a taxpayer has to keep for claiming the credit, and for how long, and whether taxpayers can include financing costs such as interest payments in determining the amount of the credit.

The IRS states that “financing costs such as interest, as well as other miscellaneous costs such as origination fees and the cost of an extended warranty, are not eligible expenditures for purposes of the credit.” 

Continue Reading

Trending