Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Rampant self-dealing

Published

on

Makin’ a list; caught again; back to school; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Washington, D.C.: Recent IRS Office of Professional Responsibility disciplinary sanctions include censure, suspension or disbarment from practice before the IRS. Individuals disciplined include (all dates this year):

  • California (all CPAs): Vincente Alvarez, Chatsworth, and Michael D. Robinson, San Francisco, indefinite from April 29; Grigor Demirchyan, Granada Hills, and Todd W. Beutel, Thousand Oaks, indefinite from May 8; and Tiffany C. Detinne, Carmichael, and Bernard Turk, West Hills, indefinite from May 28.
  • Florida: CPA Paul S. Mills, Key West, indefinite from May 8.
  • Massachusetts: Attorney Paul S. Hughes, Wellesley, indefinite from April 29.
  • Michigan: Attorney Brian P. McMahon, Ionia, indefinite from April 3.
  • Missouri: CPA Justin L. Strauser, Sullivan, indefinite from May 28.
  • New Jersey: Attorney James R. Lisa, Jersey City, indefinite from May 8. 
  • Pennsylvania: CPA Daniel J. Carney, Shawnee on Delaware, indefinite from April 2.
  • Tennessee: CPA Richard T. Brown Jr., Brownsville, indefinite from May 8.
  • Texas: CPA David D. Renken, New Braunfels, indefinite from April 2; Attorney Pejman Maadani, Houston, indefinite from May 8.
  • Virginia: CPA Carol A. Jones, Ruckersville, indefinite from May 15.

Reinstated to practice before the IRS effective in April were CPA Robert S. Damiano, of Bridgewater, New Jersey, and attorney Charles E. Hammond III, of Katy, Texas.

San Francisco: Resident Dwayne Lorenzo Richardson has been found guilty of tax evasion.

Richardson evaded his personal income taxes for 2017 to 2019 by claiming to owe only some $28,496 in tax when he’d made more than $1.2 million as a software engineering manager. He declared more than $1.1 million in medical expenses, overstating those expenses by more than $945,000.

Richardson received tax refunds totaling over $165,000 for the three charged tax years, then lied to an IRS agent in two audit interviews, stating that the $1.1 million of medical expenses were related to an appendectomy. Richardson paid no more than a few hundred dollars for treatment related to the appendectomy, which took place in 2010.

As he explained to one of his representatives in the tax audit, Richardson deducted nonexistent medical expenses from his taxes for multiple years because he had not been “caught” the first time he did it.

Brick, New Jersey: Business owner Gerard Artz has pleaded guilty to failing to collect and pay over employee taxes.

Artz owned and operated a construction company in Brick and New York City. Beginning around 2016, his company withheld employment taxes from employees’ paychecks and did not remit those employment taxes to the IRS. From 2016 to 2020, Artz and his company failed to collect and pay over $937,943 in employment taxes.

He faces up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine; Artz has agreed to pay $937,943 in restitution. Sentencing is Feb. 5.

Encino, California: Tax preparer Bijan Kohanzad, 63, of Calabasas, California, has been sentenced to three months in jail and ordered to pay a $40,000 fine for helping a client file a return that underreported income, according to published reports.

From mid-2015 and to May 2017, Kohanzad, who pleaded guilty earlier this year, reportedly helped and counseled a client to reduce taxable income by falsely increasing business expenses.

The two years’ federal tax loss that Kohanzad caused reportedly totaled some $401,436.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

New York: Martin Handler, of Brooklyn, has been sentenced to 58 months in prison for defrauding the federal Head Start program, for stealing more than $1 million from his federally funded childcare company, and for tax evasion.

Between 2017 and August 2021, Handler secretly “owned” and exercised control over the nonprofit Project Social Care Head Start Inc. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which administers the Head Start program, annually granted Project Social Care millions of dollars to be used exclusively on the program and from which earning a profit is prohibited. Handler conspired to submit multiple fictitious documents to HHS that fraudulently asserted Project Social Care had an independent board and had in place controls to guard against fraud, waste and abuse. In fact, it had neither an independent board nor sufficient controls in place, and Handler steered Head Start funding to his own for-profit companies through what authorities called rampant undisclosed self-dealing.

Between April 2019 and January 2023, as majority owner of New York City Early Learning Co., a for-profit that also received Head Start grants, Handler misapplied and misappropriated corporate treasury funds to, among other things, repay personal loans and finance the leasing of luxury vehicles for the benefit of two members of Early Learning’s Head Start board.

In 2021 and 2022, Handler falsely reported to the IRS $2 million in charitable contributions, evading taxes of at least $740,000.

Handler was also sentenced to three years of supervised release, ordered to pay a $200,000 fine and to forfeit $1,156,068.10, and to pay $1,156,068.10 in restitution to HHS and $740,000 in restitution to the IRS.

Miami: A U.S. district court has issued a permanent injunction against tax preparers and brothers George and Luis Brito and their businesses.

The injunction bars George Brito from preparing federal income tax returns, working for or having any ownership stake in any prep business, assisting others in preparing returns or setting up business as a preparer and transferring or assigning customer lists to any other person or entity. The court similarly enjoined Luis Brito from preparing income tax returns for individuals. The Britos consented to the injunction.

The complaint alleged that George and Luis Brito owned or controlled Brito and Brito Accounting USA Inc. and prepared returns for clients that claimed various false or fabricated deductions and credits, including fabricated residential energy credits, false and exaggerated itemized deductions, and fictitious and inflated business expenses.

The order requires Luis Brito to inform his clients that he has been permanently enjoined from preparing returns except for certain types of business forms, including those reporting payroll, unemployment and corporate income taxes. The IRS can make unscheduled and random visits to Luis Brito’s business; he must also complete at least 24 hours of tax prep education by Dec. 31.

Union, New Jersey: Tax preparer Emmanuel Amenyo, 59, admitted assisting in the preparation of fraudulent returns, resulting in improperly large refunds.

From 2018 through 2021, Amenyo ran a tax prep business in which he prepared and submitted individual federal returns for clients. He filed numerous false returns and subscribed to false returns with respect to his own taxes.

These returns falsely claimed charitable contributions, itemized deductions, child and dependent care expenses, and other qualified expenses to which Amenyo and his clients were not entitled, causing a tax loss of $250,466.

Amenyo faces up to three years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Sentencing is April 1.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Interim guidance from the IRS simplifies corporate AMT

Published

on

irs-nametags.jpg

Jordan Vonderhaar/Photographer: Jordan Vonderhaar/

The Internal Revenue Service has released Notice 2025-27, which provides interim guidance on an optional simplified method for determining an applicable corporation for the corporate alternative minimum tax.

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 amended Sec. 55 to impose the CAMT based on the “adjusted financial statement income” of an “applicable corporation” for taxable years beginning in 2023. 

Among other details, proposed regs provide that “applicable corporation” means any corporation (other than an S corp, a regulated investment company or a REIT) that meets either of two average annual AFSI tests depending on financial statement net operating losses for three taxable years and whether the corporation is a member of a foreign-parented multinational group.

Prior to the publication of any final regulations relating to the CAMT, the Treasury and the IRS will issue a notice of proposed rulemaking. Notice 2025-27 will be in IRB: 2025-26, dated June 23.

Continue Reading

Accounting

In the blogs: Whiplash | Accounting Today

Published

on

Conquering tariffs; bracing for notices; FBAR penalty timing; and other highlights from our favorite tax bloggers.

Whiplash

Number-crunching

  • Canopy (https://www.getcanopy.com/blog): “7-Figure Firm, 4-Hour Workweek: 5 Questions to Ask Yourself.”
  • The National Association of Tax Professionals (https://blog.natptax.com/): This week’s “You Make the Call” looks at Sarah, a U.S. citizen who moved to London for work in 2024. On May 15, 2025, it hit her that she forgot to file her 2024 U.S. return. Was she required to file her 2024 taxes by April 15?
  • Taxable Talk (http://www.taxabletalk.com/): Anteing up with Uncle Sam: The World Series of Poker is back, and one major change this year involves players from Russia and Hungary. After suspension of tax treaties with those nations, players will have 30% of winnings withheld. 
  • Parametric (https://www.parametricportfolio.com/blog): Direct indexing seems to come with a common misunderstanding: On the performance statement, conflating the value of harvested losses with returns. 

Problems brewing

  • Taxing Subjects (https://www.drakesoftware.com/blog): No chill is chillier than the client’s at the mailbox when an IRS notice appears out of the blue. How you can educate — and warn — them about the various notices everybody’s that favorite agency might send.
  • Dean Dorton (https://deandorton.com/insights/): Perhaps because they can be founded on trust, your nonprofit clients are especially vulnerable to fraud.
  • Global Taxes (https://www.globaltaxes.com/blog.php): When it’s your time, it’s your time: The clock starts on FBAR penalties when the tax forms are due and not when penalties are assessed — and even the death of the taxpayer doesn’t extend the deadline.
  • TaxConnex (https://www.taxconnex.com/blog-): Your e-commerce clients can muck up sales tax obligations in many ways. How some of the seeds of trouble might hide in their own billing system.
  • Sovos (https://sovos.com/blog/): What’s up with the five states that don’t have a sales tax?
  • Taxjar (https://www.taxjar.com/resources/blog): Humans are still needed to handle sales tax complexity, with real-world examples.
  • Wiss (https://wiss.com/insights/read/): A business — and business-advising — success story from a California chicken eatery.

Almost half done

Continue Reading

Accounting

What the House gave the Senate: Inside the Big Beautiful tax bill

Published

on

The reconciliation bill passed by the House on May 22 is currently being considered by the Senate, and will likely undergo changes before approval by the upper chamber. To what extent the changes will create stumbling blocks before a final bill is produced and voted on is uncertain, with the increased SALT deduction, Medicaid reforms, and repeal of certain Inflation Reduction Act credits on the line. 

While much can change between now and the final version of the bill, the following is a quick overview of some of the provisions:

  • Bonus depreciation. First-year bonus depreciation, currently being phased down 20% per year since 2023, is 40% for 2025, and will drop to 0% in 2027. Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (or OBBBA) it will be reset at 100% for eligible property acquired and placed in service after Jan. 19, 2025, and before Jan. 1, 2030.
  • Section 199A Qualified Business Income deduction. The QBI deduction, created by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, is available through 2025 to owners of pass-through entities, sole proprietors and the self-employed. The OBBBA would make the deduction permanent, and the deduction would increase to 23% for tax years beginning after 2025.
  • Domestic research and experimental expenditures. The OBBBA would reinstate the deduction available to businesses that conduct research and experimentation. Expenses incurred after 2024 and before 2030 would be eligible. 
  • Section 179 expensing. The bill increases the limit to $2.5 million and increases the phaseout threshold to $4 million for property placed in service after 2024. The limit and threshold would be adjusted annually for inflation.
  • Excess business loss limitation. The bill makes permanent the excess business loss limitation for pass-through entities.
  • Pease limitation. The bill would make permanent the repeal of the Pease limitation on itemized deduction, but would introduce a new limitation for taxpayers in the 37% bracket for years after 2025. It would also temporarily increase the standard deduction for tax years 2025 through 2028.
  • The Child Tax Credit. The bill makes the CTC permanent and raises it to $2,5000 per child for tax years 2025 through 2028, after which it would return to its present $2,000 with an annual inflation adjustment. 
  • Federal gift and estate tax exemption. The bill increases the federal gift and estate tax exemption to $15 million, and adjusts it annually for inflation. It is currently set at $13.99 million.

One sector the bill is very positive for is real estate, according to Tyler Davis, president of Saunders Real Estate: “It makes a lot of the TCJA provisions permanent. The estate tax exemption is made permanent and raised to $15 million, and the bonus is back to 100% for the next four years. This allows purchasers to depreciate their investments a lot faster, so it makes deals more attractive for investors and developers. A special provision for industrial manufacturing property under the bill, it is eligible for 100% expensing.”

Rural land for sale

Photographer: Nikita Sobolkov/nikkytok – stock.adobe.com

This would allow 100% of a project’s cost to be deducted in the first year, making it “hugely attractive,” he said. “The administration wants to bring investment back to the U.S. This will incentivize that process.”

Under the bill, the Section 163(j) business interest deduction would expand and allow more interest to be deducted on qualifying real estate, he said. “And they’re redoing some of the Opportunity Zone rules and boundaries, and are lowering reinvestment thresholds for investments. This should drive more investment into rural communities. And, lastly, there are no Section 1031 changes in the bill. That’s a really positive thing from a transactions and reinvestment perspective.”

Continue Reading

Trending