Connect with us

Accounting

The ESOP alternative for CPA and accounting firms

Published

on

Private equity’s run through the ranks of the accounting professions showed no signs of slowing in 2024. But recently, employee stock ownership plans have emerged as an alternative succession strategy for middle-market firms. Long-viewed as a tax-advantaged transition tool for accountants’ business clients, CPAs are now embracing ESOPs for their own firms.

Why? Because leveraged ESOPs circumvent deferred compensation dilemmas. At most firms, new partners must pull in revenue and generate profits to gradually pay departing partners. Paradoxically, departing partners are generally among a firm’s biggest producers. As a result, a single ownership transfer period can last as long as 10 years and is often completed below fair market value.

ESOPs enable new accountants to earn equity without having to fund a deferred compensation arrangement and without having to pay out of pocket to buy-in. Instead, an employee ownership transaction can provide for a seamless, rolling transition of ownership. Partial ESOP transactions are common, enabling firms to sell targeted blocks of retiring partner stock to an employee trust. But CPA firms can only unlock the utility of an ESOP when they fully tap into the relative flexibility of these strategies.

Creating supplemental incentive opportunities

Anyone who has advised an employee-owned client knows that ESOPs are ERISA-based, non-discriminatory benefit plans. All eligible employees receive stock based on the same egalitarian formula. That makes sense for a typical business, where tangible assets are created and monetized at an organizational level. But an accounting firm’s value creation rests largely on the shoulders of its tenured partners. A standard employee ownership structure may not offer enough upside to entice or retain high-performing talent. 

Instead, CPA ESOPs are generally formed in tandem with nonqualified plans for firm leadership and top producers. These complementary structures are commonly used to create meaningful, discretionary phantom and synthetic equity opportunities.

Add-on benefits still need to be ERISA-compliant and negotiated as part of an ESOP formation. Nonetheless, supplemental plans are common fixtures at employee-owned professional service firms. These two-tiered strategies deliver short-term incentives to a firm’s established value creators, and long-term equity opportunities for all employees and future hires.

Normalizing EBITDA

Many broadly held accounting firms zero-out their net income in any given year. Meanwhile, ESOP valuations are often rooted in adjusted EBITDA multiples. To bridge this gap, firms often perform compensation scrapes, a common staple of private equity deal transactions. The resulting retained earnings will drive pre- and post-sale enterprise values.

Scrape calculations generally factor in a partner’s overall performance, productivity and tenure. A thoughtfully constructed scrape offers valuable trade-offs for impacted team members. Senior partners may take outsized reductions in their income to generate that excess retained earnings, with the expectation that they are near-term ESOP buyout targets. Junior partners can expect additional warrant or phantom stock grants that offer greater mid-to-long-term economic upside.

In addition to formalizing a firm’s valuation, EBITDA normalization and the resulting earnings retention creates a durable funding source for firm modernization and expansion. These investments are critical to continued competitiveness in an ever-consolidating industry. 

In a properly structured ESOP, these earnings are also tax-advantaged. Employee-owned firms can receive corporate income tax deductions equivalent to the value of stock sold to an employee trust. In other words, a $50 million ESOP sale should yield a firm $50 million in deductions. Furthermore, a 100% employee-owned accounting practice can effectively operate income tax-free in perpetuity.

Understanding the big picture

So, let’s study these lessons in a practical context. Consider a 300-member, $50 million revenue accounting firm with a broadly held ownership group. Thirty percent of the partner base are senior members of the firm, eyeing retirement within five years. An ESOP strategy is developed to acquire equity from these senior partners at a fair market valuation.

First, a firm-wide compensation scrape (weighted toward senior partners) is performed and yields $10 million in EBITDA. Based on prevailing industry multiples and adjustments, the firm’s assumed valuation is set at $100 million. So, there’s an expectation of a negotiated $30 million ESOP sale price for 30% of the firm.

Next, commercial financing is secured so that senior partners receive up-front cash for the equity they’ve sold. These partners will have the opportunity to defer capital gains on their sale proceeds, thanks to an ESOP-exclusive tax benefit — the 1042 rollover. Over time, the firm will pay down the bank loan on the employee trust’s behalf, using pre-tax dollars.

Steps are also taken to make younger partners whole post-scrape. A stock appreciation rights plan is developed to deliver formal equity-sharing opportunities to established team members with longer time horizons. They’ll also have opportunities to sell their retained equity to the firm’s employee trust in the future, potentially with rights to exchange some of their shares for warrants. New partners will receive standard ESOP allocations and consideration to take part in the firm’s supplemental incentive program (at leadership’s discretion).

Either through retained equity or ESOP shares, the firm’s next generation of leaders will have concrete opportunities to monetize their stake in a more efficient, employee-owned firm — one that is retaining earnings for internal investment or potential acquisitions and realizing enhanced cash flow, fueled by the ESOP’s tax incentives.

From initial conception to final negotiations with an independent trustee, the transaction takes roughly six months to finalize. An experienced ESOP investment banking advisor and knowledgeable ERISA counsel help keep everything on track. In the end, retiring partners gain liquidity while remaining team members earn broad-based equity upside and additional incentives in a firm that’s primed for greater competitiveness — one in which all staff are rowing in the same direction to grow the practice over time.

What makes a good CPA ESOP candidate?

ESOP strategies are generally geared for top 500 accounting firms that aspire to sustainable, long-term growth. There must be an appetite for broad-based ownership and a willingness to build internal capacity. To build an employee stock ownership plan is to bet on yourself.

It’s not the right shareholder liquidity solution for every firm. But for forward-looking firms with leadership teams that seek market leadership for the foreseeable future, employee ownership represents a powerful tool. ESOPs take the industry’s greatest challenge — attracting, retaining and rewarding talent — head on, while aligning all staff behind a common goal at independent, CPA-led firms.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Business Transaction Recording For Financial Success

Published

on

Business Transaction Recording For Financial Success

In the world of financial management, accurate transaction recording is much more than a routine task—it is the foundation of fiscal integrity, operational transparency, and informed decision-making. By maintaining meticulous records, businesses ensure their financial ecosystem remains robust and reliable. This article explores the essential practices for precise transaction recording and its critical role in driving business success.

The Importance of Detailed Transaction Recording
At the heart of accurate financial management is detailed transaction recording. Each transaction must include not only the monetary amount but also its nature, the parties involved, and the exact date and time. This level of detail creates a comprehensive audit trail that supports financial analysis, regulatory compliance, and future decision-making. Proper documentation also ensures that stakeholders have a clear and trustworthy view of an organization’s financial health.

Establishing a Robust Chart of Accounts
A well-organized chart of accounts is fundamental to accurate transaction recording. This structured framework categorizes financial activities into meaningful groups, enabling businesses to track income, expenses, assets, and liabilities consistently. Regularly reviewing and updating the chart of accounts ensures it stays relevant as the business evolves, allowing for meaningful comparisons and trend analysis over time.

Leveraging Modern Accounting Software
Advanced accounting software has revolutionized how businesses handle transaction recording. These tools automate repetitive tasks like data entry, synchronize transactions in real-time with bank feeds, and perform validation checks to minimize errors. Features such as cloud integration and customizable reports make these platforms invaluable for maintaining accurate, accessible, and up-to-date financial records.

The Power of Double-Entry Bookkeeping
Double-entry bookkeeping remains a cornerstone of precise transaction management. By ensuring every transaction affects at least two accounts, this system inherently checks for errors and maintains balance within the financial records. For example, recording both a debit and a credit ensures that discrepancies are caught early, providing a reliable framework for accurate reporting.

The Role of Timely Documentation
Prompt transaction recording is another critical factor in financial accuracy. Delays in documentation can lead to missing or incorrect entries, which may skew financial reports and complicate decision-making. A culture that prioritizes timely and accurate record-keeping ensures that a company always has real-time insights into its financial position, helping it adapt to changing conditions quickly.

Regular Reconciliation for Financial Integrity
Periodic reconciliations act as a vital checkpoint in transaction recording. Whether conducted daily, weekly, or monthly, these reviews compare recorded transactions with external records, such as bank statements, to identify discrepancies. Early detection of errors ensures that records remain accurate and that the company’s financial statements are trustworthy.

Conclusion
Mastering the art of accurate transaction recording is far more than a compliance requirement—it is a strategic necessity. By implementing detailed recording practices, leveraging advanced technology, and adhering to time-tested principles like double-entry bookkeeping, businesses can ensure financial transparency and operational efficiency. For finance professionals and business leaders, precise transaction recording is the bedrock of informed decision-making, stakeholder confidence, and long-term success.

With these strategies, businesses can build a reliable financial foundation that supports growth, resilience, and the ability to navigate an ever-changing economic landscape.

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRS to test faster dispute resolution

Published

on

Easing restrictions, sharpening personal attention and clarifying denials are among the aims of three pilot programs at the Internal Revenue Service that will test changes to existing alternative dispute resolution programs. 

The programs focus on “fast track settlement,” which allows IRS Appeals to mediate disputes between a taxpayer and the IRS while the case is still within the jurisdiction of the examination function, and post-appeals mediation, in which a mediator is introduced to help foster a settlement between Appeals and the taxpayer.

The IRS has been revitalizing existing ADR programs as part of transformation efforts of the agency’s new strategic plan, said Elizabeth Askey, chief of the IRS Independent Office of Appeals.

IRS headquarters in Washington, D.C.

“By increasing awareness, changing and revitalizing existing programs and piloting new approaches, we hope to make our ADR programs, such as fast-track settlement and post-appeals mediation, more attractive and accessible for all eligible parties,” said Michael Baillif, director of Appeals’ ADR Program Management Office. 

Among other improvements, the pilots: 

  • Align the Large Business and International, Small Business and Self-Employed and Tax Exempt and Government Entities divisions in offering FTS issue by issue. Previously, if a taxpayer had one issue ineligible for FTS, the entire case was ineligible. 
  • Provide that requests to participate in FTS and PAM will not be denied without the approval of a first-line executive. 
  • Clarify that taxpayers receive an explanation when requests for FTS or PAM are denied.

Another pilot, Last Chance FTS, is a limited scope SB/SE pilot in which Appeals will call taxpayers or their representatives after a protest is filed in response to a 30-day or equivalent letter to inform taxpayers about the potential application of FTS. This pilot will not impact eligibility for FTS but will simply test the awareness of taxpayers regarding the availability of FTS. 

A final pilot removes the limitation that participation in FTS would preclude eligibility for PAM. 

The traditional appeals process remains available for all taxpayers. 

Inquiries can be addressed to the ADR Program Management Office at [email protected].

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRS revises guidance on residential clean energy credits

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service has updated and added new guidance for taxpayers claiming the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit and the Residential Clean Energy Property Credit.

The updated Fact Sheet 2025-01 includes a set of frequently asked questions and answers, superseding the fact sheet from last April. The IRS noted that the updates include substantial changes.

New sections have been added on how long a taxpayer has to claim the tax credits, guidance for condominium and co-op owners, whether taxpayers who did not previously claim the credit can file an amended return to claim it, and a series of questions on qualified manufacturers and product identification numbers. Other material has been added on how to claim the credits, what kind of records a taxpayer has to keep for claiming the credit, and for how long, and whether taxpayers can include financing costs such as interest payments in determining the amount of the credit.

The IRS states that “financing costs such as interest, as well as other miscellaneous costs such as origination fees and the cost of an extended warranty, are not eligible expenditures for purposes of the credit.” 

Continue Reading

Trending