Accounting
The tax pros and cons of charitable remainder trusts
For clients with highly appreciated assets aiming to transfer part of their holdings to an heir in a tax-efficient way while giving to a nonprofit, charitable remainder trusts could be a fit.
Charitable remainder trusts (CRTs), charitable remainder annuity trusts (CRATs), charitable remainder unitrusts (CRUTs) or net income charitable remainder unitrusts (NICRUTs) are simply potential pieces of a multifaceted estate plan — but financial advisors, tax professionals and, especially, their clients could be forgiven for getting a bit of a headache when seeing their accompanying acronyms. At the basic level, wealthy families use charitable remainder trusts to get a tax deduction for the donation, avoid capital gains duties and provide income to a beneficiary.
While they are “something that is not going to be applicable to everyone,” charitable remainder trusts may act as “a spoke in the wheel” in an estate plan, according to Eric Swensen, a wealth advisor and the chief planning officer with Walnut Creek, California-based
READ MORE:
Use cases
The end of the
“You should be looking at your Social Security, IRAs and 401(k) distributions as your main source of income,” he said. “CRTs can be good for a portion of the assets to help support that primary income in retirement. … If you have enough assets for yourself, and you want to be able to help aging parents or other beneficiaries with income, this can be a good option as well.”
To illustrate what charitable remainder annuity trust can do, a
“Overall, Benny has been proactive in planning his wealth management by using charitable giving,” the study’s author, Trey Jackson, wrote. “He has set up a CRAT and three irrevocable trusts for his sons. The CRAT was funded with hot stock, evidencing Benny’s commitment to philanthropy while achieving some level of income for their lifetimes. However, the currently existing trusts were not set up in a manner designed to maximize the advantages of annual exclusions, nor were they really designed with ultimate tax efficiency.”
READ MORE:
Complicating factors
The paper details the many complexities involved with how each type of asset interacts with the others inside the estate’s holdings, and lays out possible methods for addressing them. The difference between a charitable remainder annuity trust and a charitable remainder unitrust comes from the greater flexibility in the latter vehicle, which enables adjustments to the payments to beneficiaries based on shifts in value each year, Swensen noted. The annuity vehicle pays the beneficiary the same set percentage or dollar amount each year. Alternatively, the net income version could give clients and their heirs more wriggle room if they’re currently living in a high-tax state yet plan to migrate to one with lower duties some day.
“You can set it up now, you can get the deduction now, but you can defer the income until later,” Swensen said. “It’s a great highly leveraged gift, especially if you have a big spread in your cost basis there.”
Charitable remainder trusts pose some risks, though, from the ramifications to their payouts based on downturns in stock values or other problems with the underlying assets. The failure of a business tied to a charitable remainder trust for one Swensen’s clients unfortunately led to the vehicle never passing any assets to the philanthropic recipient, he said.
“I inherited a client who had put an investment in a vineyard into a CRT, and that vineyard went under. Lucky for them, they were able to get the deduction up front,” Swensen said. “These things aren’t bulletproof, and don’t always work out in all the ways.”
READ MORE:
Tap a lawyer or a CPA
Those caveats explain why only a few out of more than 900 clients working with his firm are using charitable remainder trusts. Regardless
“Once you build that team, it also helps with confidence for talking with clients about them, too,” he said. “So, when it does come up, I can tell that client, ‘Hey not only do I think this is a great solution for you, but I’ve got a team in place that can make this really easy for you.'”
Jody Padar, an author and speaker known as “The Radical CPA,” and Katie Tolin, a growth strategist for CPAs, together launched a training and technology platform called XcelLabs.
XcelLabs provides solutions to help accountants use artificial technology fluently and strategically. The Pennsylvania Institute of CPAs and CPA Crossings joined with Padar and Tolin as strategic partners and investors.
“To reinvent the profession, we must start by training the professional who can then transform their firms,” Padar said in a statement. “By equipping people with data and insights that help them see things differently, they can provide better advice to their clients and firm.”
The platform includes XcelLabs Academy, a series of educational online courses on the basics of AI, being a better advisor, leadership and practice management; Navi, a proprietary tool that uses AI to help accountants turn unstructured data like emails, phone calls and meetings into insights; and training and consulting services. These offerings are currently in beta testing.
“Accountants know they need to be more advisory, but not everyone can figure out how to do it,” Tolin said in a statement. “Couple that with the fact that AI will be doing a lot of the lower-level work accountants do today, and we need to create that next level advisor now. By showing accountants how to unlock patterns in their actions and turn client conversations into emotionally intelligent advice, we can create the accounting professional of the future.”
“AI is transforming how CPAs work, and XcelLabs is focused on helping the profession evolve with it,” PICPA CEO Jennifer Cryder said in a statement. “At PICPA, we’re proud to support a mission that aligns so closely with ours: empowering firms to use AI not just for efficiency, but to drive growth, value and long-term relevance.”
The accountant the world urgently needs has evolved far beyond the traditional role we recognized just a few years ago.
The transformation of the accounting profession is not merely an anticipated change; it is a pressing reality that is currently shaping business decisions, academic programs and the expected contributions of professionals. Yet, in many areas, accounting education stubbornly clings to outdated, overly technical models that fail to connect with the actual demands of the market. We must confront a critical question: If we continue to train accountants solely to file tax reports, are we truly equipping them for the challenges of today’s world?
This shift in mindset extends beyond individual countries or educational systems; it is a global movement. The recent announcement of the
The CIMA/CGMA proposal for 2026 is not just a curriculum update; it is a powerful manifesto. This new program positions analytical thinking, strategic business partnering and technology application at the core of accounting education. It unequivocally highlights sustainability, aligning with IFRS S1 and S2, and expands the accountant’s responsibilities beyond mere numbers to encompass conscious leadership, environmental impact and corporate governance.
The current changes in the accounting profession underscore an urgent shift in expectations from both educators and employers. Today, companies of all sizes and industries demand accountants who can do far more than interpret balance sheets. They expect professionals who grasp the deeper context behind the numbers, identify inconsistencies, anticipate potential issues before they escalate into losses, and act decisively as a bridge between data and decision making.
To meet these expectations, a radical mindset shift is essential. There are firms still operating on autopilot, mindlessly repeating tasks with minimal critical analysis. Likewise, many academic programs continue to treat accounting as purely a technical discipline, disregarding the vital elements of reflection, strategy and behavioral insight. This outdated approach creates a significant mismatch. While the world forges ahead, parts of the accounting profession remain stuck in the past.
The consequences of this shift are already becoming evident. The demand for compliance, transparency and sustainability now applies not only to large corporations but also to small and mid-sized businesses. Many of these organizations rely on professionals ill-equipped to drive the necessary changes, putting both business performance and the reputation of the profession at risk.
The positive news is that accountants who are ready to thrive in this new era do not necessarily need additional degrees. What they truly need is a commitment to awareness, a dedication to continuous learning, and the courage to step beyond their comfort zones. The future of accounting is here, and it is firmly rooted in analytical, strategic and human-oriented perspectives. The 2026 curriculum is a clear indication of the changes underway. Those who fail to think critically and holistically will be left behind.
In contrast, accountants who see the big picture, understand the ripple effects of their decisions, and actively contribute to the financial and ethical health of organizations will undeniably remain indispensable, anywhere in the world.
Congressional Republicans are siding with Donald Trump in the messy divorce between the president and Elon Musk, an optimistic sign for eventual passage of a tax cut bill at the root of the two billionaires’ public feud.
Lawmakers are largely taking their cues from Trump and sticking by the $3 trillion bill at the center of the White House’s economic agenda. Musk, the biggest political donor of the 2024 cycle, has threatened to help primary anyone who votes for the legislation, but lawmakers are betting that staying in the president’s good graces is the safer path to political survival.
“The tax bill is not in jeopardy. We are going to deliver on that,” House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Friday.
“I’ll tell you what — do not doubt, don’t second guess and do not challenge the President of the United States Donald Trump,” he added. “He is the leader of the party. He’s the most consequential political figure of our time.”
A fight between Trump and Musk exploded into public view this week. The sparring started with the tech titan calling the president’s tax bill a “disgusting abomination,” but quickly escalated to more personal attacks and Trump threatening to cancel all federal contracts and subsidies to Musk’s companies, such as Tesla Inc. and SpaceX which have benefitted from government ties.
Republicans on Capitol Hill, who had — until recently — publicly embraced Musk, said they weren’t swayed by the billionaire’s criticism that the bill cost too much. Lawmakers have refuted official estimates of the package, saying that the tax cuts for households, small businesses and politically important groups — including hospitality and hourly workers — will generate enough economic growth to offset the price tag.
“I don’t tell my friend Elon, I don’t argue with him about how to build rockets, and I wish he wouldn’t argue with me about how to craft legislation and pass it,” Johnson told CNBC earlier Friday.
House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington told reporters that House lawmakers are focused on working with the Senate as it revises the bill to make sure the legislation has the political support in both chambers to make it to Trump’s desk for his signature.
“We move past the drama and we get the substance of what is needed to make the modest improvements that can be made,” he said.
House fiscal hawks said that they hadn’t changed their prior positions on the legislation based on Musk’s statements. They also said they agree with GOP leaders that there will be other chances to make further spending cuts outside the tax bill.
Representative Tom McClintock, a fiscal conservative, said “the bill will pass because it has to pass,” adding that both Musk and Trump needed to calm down. “They both need to take a nap,” he said.
Even some of the House bill’s most vociferous critics appeared resigned to its passage. Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie, who voted against the House version, predicted that despite Musk’s objections, the Senate will make only small changes.
“The speaker is right about one thing. This barely passed the House. If they muck with it too much in the Senate, it may not pass the House again,” he said.
Trump is pressuring lawmakers to move at breakneck speed to pass the tax-cut bill, demanding they vote on the bill before the July 4 holiday. The president has been quick to blast critics of the bill — including calling Senator Rand Paul
As the legislation worked its way through the House last month, Trump took to social media to criticize holdouts and invited undecided members to the White House to compel them to support the package. It passed by one vote.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune — who is planning to unveil his chamber’s version of the bill as soon as next week — said his timeline is unmoved by Musk.
“We are already pretty far down the trail,” he said.
Donald Trump’s new travel ban is coming into effect
Sending the National Guard to LA is not about stopping rioting
China’s EV race to the bottom leaves a few possible winners
New 2023 K-1 instructions stir the CAMT pot for partnerships and corporations
The Essential Practice of Bank and Credit Card Statement Reconciliation
Are American progressives making themselves sad?
-
Blog Post1 week agoCommon Bookkeeping Challenges and Solutions for Small Businesses
-
Economics1 week agoWhy the president must not be lexicographer-in-chief
-
Finance1 week agoThis is why Jamie Dimon is so gloomy on the economy
-
Personal Finance1 week agoU.S. birth rate drop outpaces policy response, raising future concerns
-
Accounting1 week agoSteinhoff fraud trial moved to South Africa’s high court
-
Economics1 week agoGerman inflation May 2025
-
Personal Finance6 days agoWhat the national debt, deficit mean for your money
-
Personal Finance1 week agoHow to save on summer travel in 2025