Connect with us

Accounting

TIGTA helped save $6B, agency says

Published

on

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration says it completed 1,032 investigations that contributed to savings of more than $6.1 billion from April through September of this year.

According to TIGTA’s Semiannual Report to Congress, the agency’s offices also issued some 60 reports during the six months touching on varied IRS activities and making recommendations for improvement, some of which the tax service agreed with and some of which it didn’t.

Among TIGTA reports from the period:

1. Staying above $400K. The IRS has made limited progress on the methodology to comply with a Treasury directive to not increase audits for taxpayers with incomes below $400,000. In the directive, which was issued in the wake of $24 billion of Inflation Reduction Act funds allocated to IRS enforcement activities, the Treasury Secretary stated that “enforcement resources will focus on high-end noncompliance.” 

Although the IRS and Treasury chose Tax Year 2018 for the base year, this report reads, as of May 2024, the IRS had yet to calculate the audit coverage for TY 2018 because it had not finalized its methodology for the audit coverage calculation. The IRS and Treasury have been exploring a range of options to develop a different methodology.

2. Hiring delays at the IRS. IRA funds allowed the IRS to expand its hiring; the agency was also granted multiple direct hire authorities to expedite hiring and fill job vacancies. From Oct. 1, 2021, to Sept. 30, 2023, the IRS processed nearly 53,000 new hires. Although the agency used multiple DHAs to expedite its hiring process to fill vacant positions, almost 19,000 of new hires in fiscal years 2022 and 2023 exceeded the Office of Personnel Management’s target of 80 calendar days to hire. 

Delays in hiring, according to the report, resulted from workload constraints and miscommunication, security checks exceeding their targeted completion time and limitations in the IRS’s hiring management system. TIGTA recommended corrective measures that the IRS agreed with.

3. Direct File issues. The Direct File Pilot deployed successfully but security and testing improvements are needed. The IRS launched the Direct File Pilot program on Feb. 1, implementing it to a limited scope of taxpayers. TIGTA found that during systems development, the Direct File Pilot team did not appropriately complete two of its required artifacts and that a later report was issued without the security assessment for the cloud platform where the Pilot resides, among other issues.

4. Serving the underserved. Opportunities remain for better taxpayer service to underserved communities. The IRS uses various models to identify the underserved, underrepresented and rural population, but has no clear definition for these populations, TIGTA found. Actions also need to be taken to ensure the success of the Lifting Communities Up initiative in expanding services and assistance to taxpayers in underserved populations, according to a separate report.

IRS headquarters in Washington, D.C.

5. Too big a footprint. The IRS still has unneeded office space. For FY24, the IRS indicated it would spend some $600 million on real estate costs, including 516 office buildings totaling some 22.3 million square feet, TIGTA found. In FY23, more than half of IRS buildings had a workstation occupancy rate of 50% or less. In addition, the service has not implemented workstation sharing/hoteling for some 61% of its employees. 

6. ERC issues. A little more than a year ago, the IRS placed a moratorium on processing new Employee Retention Credit claims due to a surge in  suspicious claims, updated its identity theft filters, and reported that it had identified more than 155,000 returns making potentially erroneous ERC claims, preventing $487 million in undeserved refunds. TIGTA noted that the IRS does not apply updated filters to tax returns that were previously screened using old criteria, identifying 997 returns reporting $19.6 million in potentially erroneous ERC that the IRS did not identify.

The IRS has implemented initiatives that assessed or prevented erroneous ERC amounts, preventing $1.6 billion in claims and allowed the agency to assess $573 million as of last April. TIGTA nonetheless identified an additional 923 entities that claimed credits worth $105 million that should have received a disallowance letter but were not initially identified by the IRS.

7. Other issues. Additional reports noted that:

  • Millions of taxpayers took early retirement distributions, but some did not pay the additional tax, claim an exception or report the income; 
  • The IRS has been unable to use some of its enforcement tools to match reported virtual currency-related income to taxpayers’ returns; and, 
  • Improvements are needed to ensure that local Taxpayer Advocate Service telephone lines are properly monitored.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Business Transaction Recording For Financial Success

Published

on

Business Transaction Recording For Financial Success

In the world of financial management, accurate transaction recording is much more than a routine task—it is the foundation of fiscal integrity, operational transparency, and informed decision-making. By maintaining meticulous records, businesses ensure their financial ecosystem remains robust and reliable. This article explores the essential practices for precise transaction recording and its critical role in driving business success.

The Importance of Detailed Transaction Recording
At the heart of accurate financial management is detailed transaction recording. Each transaction must include not only the monetary amount but also its nature, the parties involved, and the exact date and time. This level of detail creates a comprehensive audit trail that supports financial analysis, regulatory compliance, and future decision-making. Proper documentation also ensures that stakeholders have a clear and trustworthy view of an organization’s financial health.

Establishing a Robust Chart of Accounts
A well-organized chart of accounts is fundamental to accurate transaction recording. This structured framework categorizes financial activities into meaningful groups, enabling businesses to track income, expenses, assets, and liabilities consistently. Regularly reviewing and updating the chart of accounts ensures it stays relevant as the business evolves, allowing for meaningful comparisons and trend analysis over time.

Leveraging Modern Accounting Software
Advanced accounting software has revolutionized how businesses handle transaction recording. These tools automate repetitive tasks like data entry, synchronize transactions in real-time with bank feeds, and perform validation checks to minimize errors. Features such as cloud integration and customizable reports make these platforms invaluable for maintaining accurate, accessible, and up-to-date financial records.

The Power of Double-Entry Bookkeeping
Double-entry bookkeeping remains a cornerstone of precise transaction management. By ensuring every transaction affects at least two accounts, this system inherently checks for errors and maintains balance within the financial records. For example, recording both a debit and a credit ensures that discrepancies are caught early, providing a reliable framework for accurate reporting.

The Role of Timely Documentation
Prompt transaction recording is another critical factor in financial accuracy. Delays in documentation can lead to missing or incorrect entries, which may skew financial reports and complicate decision-making. A culture that prioritizes timely and accurate record-keeping ensures that a company always has real-time insights into its financial position, helping it adapt to changing conditions quickly.

Regular Reconciliation for Financial Integrity
Periodic reconciliations act as a vital checkpoint in transaction recording. Whether conducted daily, weekly, or monthly, these reviews compare recorded transactions with external records, such as bank statements, to identify discrepancies. Early detection of errors ensures that records remain accurate and that the company’s financial statements are trustworthy.

Conclusion
Mastering the art of accurate transaction recording is far more than a compliance requirement—it is a strategic necessity. By implementing detailed recording practices, leveraging advanced technology, and adhering to time-tested principles like double-entry bookkeeping, businesses can ensure financial transparency and operational efficiency. For finance professionals and business leaders, precise transaction recording is the bedrock of informed decision-making, stakeholder confidence, and long-term success.

With these strategies, businesses can build a reliable financial foundation that supports growth, resilience, and the ability to navigate an ever-changing economic landscape.

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRS to test faster dispute resolution

Published

on

Easing restrictions, sharpening personal attention and clarifying denials are among the aims of three pilot programs at the Internal Revenue Service that will test changes to existing alternative dispute resolution programs. 

The programs focus on “fast track settlement,” which allows IRS Appeals to mediate disputes between a taxpayer and the IRS while the case is still within the jurisdiction of the examination function, and post-appeals mediation, in which a mediator is introduced to help foster a settlement between Appeals and the taxpayer.

The IRS has been revitalizing existing ADR programs as part of transformation efforts of the agency’s new strategic plan, said Elizabeth Askey, chief of the IRS Independent Office of Appeals.

IRS headquarters in Washington, D.C.

“By increasing awareness, changing and revitalizing existing programs and piloting new approaches, we hope to make our ADR programs, such as fast-track settlement and post-appeals mediation, more attractive and accessible for all eligible parties,” said Michael Baillif, director of Appeals’ ADR Program Management Office. 

Among other improvements, the pilots: 

  • Align the Large Business and International, Small Business and Self-Employed and Tax Exempt and Government Entities divisions in offering FTS issue by issue. Previously, if a taxpayer had one issue ineligible for FTS, the entire case was ineligible. 
  • Provide that requests to participate in FTS and PAM will not be denied without the approval of a first-line executive. 
  • Clarify that taxpayers receive an explanation when requests for FTS or PAM are denied.

Another pilot, Last Chance FTS, is a limited scope SB/SE pilot in which Appeals will call taxpayers or their representatives after a protest is filed in response to a 30-day or equivalent letter to inform taxpayers about the potential application of FTS. This pilot will not impact eligibility for FTS but will simply test the awareness of taxpayers regarding the availability of FTS. 

A final pilot removes the limitation that participation in FTS would preclude eligibility for PAM. 

The traditional appeals process remains available for all taxpayers. 

Inquiries can be addressed to the ADR Program Management Office at [email protected].

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRS revises guidance on residential clean energy credits

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service has updated and added new guidance for taxpayers claiming the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit and the Residential Clean Energy Property Credit.

The updated Fact Sheet 2025-01 includes a set of frequently asked questions and answers, superseding the fact sheet from last April. The IRS noted that the updates include substantial changes.

New sections have been added on how long a taxpayer has to claim the tax credits, guidance for condominium and co-op owners, whether taxpayers who did not previously claim the credit can file an amended return to claim it, and a series of questions on qualified manufacturers and product identification numbers. Other material has been added on how to claim the credits, what kind of records a taxpayer has to keep for claiming the credit, and for how long, and whether taxpayers can include financing costs such as interest payments in determining the amount of the credit.

The IRS states that “financing costs such as interest, as well as other miscellaneous costs such as origination fees and the cost of an extended warranty, are not eligible expenditures for purposes of the credit.” 

Continue Reading

Trending