Two renters pose in front of their new home that they’re renting from Roots, a program that helps renters invest in real estate.
Courtesy: Katie Curran
When Will Hunnicutt was searching for an apartment in Atlanta earlier this year, pricey leases and application rejections left him feeling defeated.
“The three-and-a-half times income-to-rent ratio is kind of hard to fulfill when they’re wanting $3,000 in a lot of places,” the 30-year-old social worker said.
Then Hunnicutt found a $1,050-per-month two-bedroom apartment tied to Roots, a real estate investment trust based in the Atlanta area that works to help rentersof the properties in its portfolio build wealth toward homeownership.His $1,000 security deposit is invested in the REIT, and he has earned another $200 in quarterly rebates so far for taking care of his unit and paying rent on time.
“The end goal is to buy a house, so having investment funds, that passive income, would be very helpful,” Hunnicutt said.
Will Hunnicutt with his dog Bailey in his Atlanta home that he rented through Roots, a company that helps renters build wealth by investing in real estate.
Courtesy: Will Hunnicut
Roots is currently only available in Atlanta, but has plans to expand this fall. It’s just one approach to a broader aim: helping consumers get financially ready to buy a home.
As buyers continue to struggle with home affordability, experts say programs that help with down payments may be worth another look.
The dream of owning a home is moving further out of reach for many as homes get more expensive. Aspiring homebuyers need to make $113,520 a year to buy a typical U.S. home, according to national brokerage site Redfin — 35% more than what a typical household earns annually.
One barrier toward homeownership is having enough savings for a down payment. Nearly 40% of Americans who don’t own a home point to a lack of savings for a down payment, according to a 2023 CNBC Your Money Survey conducted by SurveyMonkey. More than 4,300 adults in the U.S. were surveyed in late August for the report.
‘Thousands of down payment-assistance programs’
Down payment-assistance programs come in different forms, and from different sources — including state agencies, cities, nonprofits, financial institutions and mortgage lenders. So you’ll have to hunt around to see what’s available in your area.
Usually, assistance programs focus on first-time homebuyers and buyers who meet certain income qualifications. There are also programs focused on “first-generation homebuyers.”
In many down payment-assistance programs, participants have to take a homebuyer education course. Depending on the program, they may also have to meet other conditions, like getting their mortgage through a specific lender or saving a set amount to contribute toward their home purchase.
The aid can be significant. For example, Alternatives Federal Credit Union in Ithaca, New York, has programs offering $9,000 up to $20,000. The Chicago Housing Authority can assist with up to $20,000.
These kinds of programs are one way to work toward equality in homebuying, as systemic barriers still block the path to homeownership for many Americans, housing experts say.
This is especially true for Black Americans, who have largely made up the receiving end of decades of redlining, exclusionary zoning and predatory lending, according to Nikitra Bailey, executive vice president of the National Fair Housing Alliance.
Programs targeted toward first-generation homebuyers are crucial, she said. While it’s common for family to help with a down payment, would-be buyers whose parents rent are less likely to be able to offer that help.
“We know there are thousands of down payment-assistance programs that cities have adopted,” but their reach in “underserved consumers of color” is limited, Bailey said. “And that’s why ‘first generation’ is very important, because it’s a race-neutral way to target resources to the consumers that the future health of the housing system depends on.”
How much you need for a down payment
Part of the reason coming up with a down payment is so daunting is that buyers often think they have to put down 20% of the home purchase price. They’re mistaken, experts say.
Keep in mind, putting less than 20% down typically means you would have to pay private mortgage insurance, or PMI. PMI can cost anywhere from 0.5% to 1.5% of the loan amount per year, depending on different factors, according to The Mortgage Reports. Typically, you can request for mortgage insurance to be removed after you reach 20% equity.
‘Those dollars should not be invested in the market’
First-time homebuyers may qualify to make penalty-free withdrawals up to $10,000 from a 401(k) plan or traditional or Roth individual retirement accounts. But financial advisors recommend preserving those funds for retirement when possible.
While Roots may help its renters invest to build wealth, experts typically emphasize saving rather than investing for short-term goals.
Low-risk options including high-yield savings accounts, certificate of deposits or Treasury bills may be ideal for people whose timeline to buy is up to five years.
“Anything that you need dollars for in the next three to five years, those dollars should not be invested in the market,” said Janet Stanzak, a certified financial planner and founder of Minnesota-based Financial Empowerment. “Markets typically cycle in three to five year cycles, and the worst case would be, you find a home you want to move on and your money’s in the market and the market takes a downturn.”
Some states have stopped disbursing funds to consumers via Biden-era rebate programs tied to home energy efficiency, due to a Trump administration freeze on federal funding enacted in January.
The Inflation Reduction Act, passed in 2022, had earmarked $8.8 billion of federal funds for consumers through two home energy rebate programs, to be administered by states, territories and the District of Columbia.
Arizona, Colorado, Georgia and Rhode Island — which are in various phases of rollout — have paused or delayed their fledgling programs, citing Trump administration policy.
The White House on Jan. 27 put a freeze on the disbursement of federal funds that conflict with President Trump’s agenda — including initiatives related to green energy and climate change — as a reason for halting the disbursement of rebate funds to consumers.
That fate of that freeze is still up in the air. A federal judge issued an order Tuesday that continued to block the policy, for example. However, it appears agencies had been withholding funding in some cases in defiance of earlier court rulings, according to ProPublica reporting.
In any event, the freeze — or the threat of it — appears to be impacting state rebate programs.
“Coloradans who would receive the Home Energy Rebate savings are still locked out by the Trump administration in the dead of winter,” Ari Rosenblum, a spokesperson for the Colorado Energy Office, said in an e-mailed statement.
The U.S. Department of Energy and the White House didn’t return a request for comment from CNBC on the funding freeze.
In some states, rebates are ‘currently unavailable’
Consumers are eligible for up to $8,000 of Home Efficiency Rebates and up to $14,000 of Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates, per federal law.
The rebates defray the cost of retrofitting homes and upgrading appliances to be more energy efficient. Such tweaks aim to cut consumers’ utility bills while also reducing planet-warming carbon emissions.
California, the District of Columbia, Maine, Michigan, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina and Wisconsin had also launched phases of their rebate programs in recent months, according to data on an archived federal website.
All states and territories (except for South Dakota) had applied for the federal rebate funding and the U.S. Department of Energy had approved funding for each of them.
The Arizona Governor’s Office of Resiliency said its Home Energy Rebates programs would be paused until federal funds are freed up.
“Due to the current federal Executive Orders, memorandums from the White House Office of Management and Budget, and communications from the U.S. Department of Energy, funding for all Efficiency Arizona programs is currently unavailable,” it said in an announcement Friday.
Rhode Island paused new applications as of Jan. 27 due to “current uncertainty” with Inflation Reduction Act funding and executive orders, according to its Office of Energy Resources.
The Georgia Environmental Finance Authority launched a pilot program for the rebates in fall 2024. That program is ongoing, a spokesperson confirmed Monday.
However, the timeline for a full program launch initially planned for 2025 “is delayed until we receive more information from the U.S. Department of Energy,” the Georgia spokesperson explained in an e-mail.
However, not all states have pressed the pause button: It appears Maine is still moving forward, for example.
“The program remains open to those who are eligible,” Afton Vigue, a spokesperson for the Maine Governor’s Energy Office, said in an e-mail.
The status of rebates in the eight other states and districts to have launched their programs is unclear. Their respective energy departments or governor’s offices didn’t return requests for comment.
‘Signs of an interest’
While the Trump administration on Jan. 29 rescinded its memo ordering a freeze on federal grants and loans — two days after its initial release — the White House said the freeze nonetheless remained in full force.
Democratic attorneys general in 22 states and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, claiming the freeze is unlawful. The White House has claimed it is necessary to ensure spending aligns with Trump’s presidential agenda.
David Terry, president of the National Association of State Energy Officials, said he is optimistic the rebate funding will be released to states soon.
“For these two particular programs, I do not think [the freeze] will stymie the programs,” Terry said. “I see signs of an interest in moving them forward and working with the states to implement them.”
In a new update released on Tuesday, the SSA said it will begin issuing retroactive payments in February. Most people will receive the one-time payment by the end of March, according to the agency.
The SSA plans to process the increase to monthly benefits starting in April.
The new timeline “supports President Trump’s priority to implement the Social Security Fairness Act as quickly as possible,” Social Security acting commissioner Lee Dudek said in a statement.
“The agency’s original estimate of taking a year or more now will only apply to complex cases that cannot be processed by automation,” Dudek said. “The American people deserve to get their due benefits as quickly as possible.”
Among those affected include some teachers, firefighters and police officers in certain states; federal employees who are covered by the Civil Service Retirement System and people who worked under foreign social security systems, according to the Social Security Administration.
What affected beneficiaries should know
Retroactive payments, which most people should receive by the end of March, will be deposited directly into bank accounts on file with the Social Security Administration.
All affected beneficiaries should receive a notice by mail from the Social Security Administration with details about their retroactive payment and new benefit amount. Those notices should come two to three weeks after the retroactive payments, according to the agency.
If your direct deposit information or current mailing address are up to date with the agency, no action is needed, according to the agency. If you want to double check the information the agency has on file, you may sign into your personal online account or call the agency.
If you want to ask about the status of your retroactive payment, the Social Security Administration urges you to hold off until April.
Beneficiaries should also wait until after they have received their April monthly check before contacting the agency to ask about their new benefit amount.
The average tax refund is 10.4% lower than last year according to the latest Internal Revenue Service data, and inflation is taking more of those dollars.
Bill Oxford | E+ | Getty Images
The average tax refund this year is down 32.4% compared to last year, according to early filing data from the IRS.
Tax season opened on Jan. 27, and the average refund amount was $2,169 as of Feb. 14, down from $3,207 about one year prior, the IRS reported on Friday. That figure reflects current-year refunds only.
However, the Feb. 14 filing data doesn’t include refunds receiving the earned income tax credit or additional child tax credit, which aren’t issued before mid-February, the IRS noted. The previous year’s filing data included tax returns claiming these credits. The value of these tax breaks can be substantial, even resulting in five-figure refunds, in some cases.
Typically, you can expect a refund when you overpay taxes throughout the year via paycheck withholdings or quarterly estimated payments. By comparison, there’s generally a tax bill when you haven’t paid enough.
Filing season numbers will ‘even out’
Although the average refund is currently smaller, “historically, filing season numbers even out as more tax returns come in,” according to the agency.
As of Feb. 14, the IRS received roughly 33 million individual tax returns of the more than 140 million it expects before the April 15 deadline.
As of Dec. 27, 2024, the average tax refund for the 2024 season was $3,138, compared to $3,167 in late December 2023.
It’s unclear exactly how the staffing reduction could impact future taxpayer service. But experts recommend double-checking returns for accuracy to avoid extra touch points with the agency.
“Don’t call the IRS looking for your refund,” said Tom O’Saben, an enrolled agent and director of tax content and government relations at the National Association of Tax Professionals.
Typically, the agency issues refunds within 21 days of a return’s receipt. But some returns require “additional review,” which can extend the timeline, according to the IRS.