The saga of the Corporate Transparency Act and its beneficial ownership information reporting requirement goes on.
When the District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ruled that the CTA was unconstitutional on March 1, 2024, it specified that the ruling only applied to the 65,000 members of the plaintiff organization, the National Small Business Association.
But on Dec. 3, another court, the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, granted a nationwide preliminary injunction prohibiting the federal government from enforcing the CTA and its reporting rule entirely. The injunction, ruled the court, applies against enforcement of the CTA and its Jan. 1, 2025 filing deadline. The Department of Justice appealed the injunction two days later, on Dec. 5, 2024.
Beginning Jan. 1, 2024, the CTA imposed a requirement to file beneficial ownership information with the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN. Existing companies were required to file within the year 2024, while a new company started during 2024 would have 30 days (temporarily extended to 90 days for 2024 only) to file. An estimated 32.6 million filings were expected during 2024, with five to six million expected each following year. The penalty for failure to comply is $500, with a cap of $10,000.
A beneficial owner is one who directly or indirectly exercises substantial control over the reporting entity, or who directly or indirectly owns or controls 25% or more of the ownership interests of the reporting entity.
“We always thought that a delay was necessary in the filing requirement,” said Roger Harris, president of Padgett Business Services. “That’s because of issues with the 30-day rule and lack of guidance on substantial ownership.”
“We’re telling our people to continue to gather the information necessary to file the report, but to inform clients of where we are regarding the court injunction,” he continued. “We will wait until we get further information from FinCEN and DOJ before we file a report unless the client tells us to go ahead and file. What I hope we hear is that FinCEN believes it will take too long to resolve all the court cases and the outstanding issues about how the current program is being implemented, and will extend the deadline for one year to Jan. 12, 2026.”
“The problem with the order is that it doesn’t talk about any remedies about what will happen once the injunction is lifted or an appellate court says it was wrongly decided,” said attorney Michael Chua. “It doesn’t say that the deadline is automatically extended for one year if the injunction disappears. Technically speaking, those deadlines are still effective. That’s the biggest concern at this point, since it doesn’t provide any remedies — it’s kind of a head-scratcher.”
As of right now, there is no obligation or duty to file, observed Earl Melamed, a partner and head of the CTA Working Group at law firm Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg.
But the penalties are onerous and are likely to catch people unaware, he said, so companies may not want to ignore the requirement entirely.
“We suggest that our clients can pause from any filing that they otherwise might make, but that they should continue to assemble the information so that they are ready to file,” said Melamed. “The requirement can be reimposed at any date — the Texas district court did not decide that the CTA was unconstitutional, they merely said that it was ‘likely’ to be found to be unconstitutional. The appellate court could lift the injunction but say that the deadlines are extended for a year; they could provide more time to file but they don’t have to.”
Melamed believes the DOJ will fight very hard to have the injunction lifted. But given the fact there are a number of cases before different courts around the country seeking to overturn the CTA on constitutional grounds, the question may eventually go before the Supreme Court.
“If there are two conflicting rulings, that’s the ticket to the Supreme Court,” he said.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today voted to approve the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s 2025 budget and the related accounting support fee.
The budget totals $399.7 million, which funds 945 positions. The accounting support fee totals $374.9 million, comprising $346.1 million for public company issuers and $28.8 million for registered broker dealers.
The 2025 budget is a 3.8% increase from this year’s budget of $384.7 million in 2024, and the ASF is a 4.5% increase from this year’s $358.8 million.
“Well-functioning financial markets are built on trust,” SEC Chair Gary Gensler said in a statement. “Critical to such trust are disclosures – including financial statement disclosures made by issuers and broker-dealers to the investing public. I have seen since the passage of Sarbanes-Oxley 22 years ago the importance of that law in promoting trust in public company figures. This trust, though, can easily be taken for granted. The PCAOB — an important reform of the George W. Bush Administration — writes the standards for auditors and audits the auditors. That’s the core of what it does, and it’s every bit as important now and into the future.”
“While the 2025 budget assumes a necessary increase in the ASF overall, we anticipate the smallest billable issuers will see no increase, while the median difference per bill for issuers will likely be only $100, “PCAOB chair Erica Williams said in a statement.
Williams added, “This budget enables us to both provide our staff with competitive compensation that acknowledges their extraordinary work on behalf of investors and retain them, as well as attract new, expert talent to help us meet our investor-protection mission.”
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 provides the SEC with oversight responsibility over the PCAOB, including reviewing and approving the PCAOB’s annual budget and accounting support fee.
Manufacturing Digital highlighted some of the most innovative cloud ERP companies in 2024. Examples include Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central for its comprehensive features and integration with Microsoft applications, while Odoo offers extensive customization options, allowing businesses to tailor the ERP system to their specific needs. SYSPRO specializes in manufacturing ERP, providing robust solutions for manufacturers and distributors. NetSuite is the ideal system for global operations, offering scalability and extensive features for large enterprises. To see the entire list, visit the link. (Source: Manufacturing Digital)
Why this is important for your firm and clients: If your clients are small businesses using small-business accounting software, and they grow, then they’ll find themselves in need of a more enterprise, scalable platform. If they’re manufacturers, their needs will be that much more unique. This is a great list of current platforms specifically focused on midsized manufacturers that need to address standard and job costing, bills of materials, process manufacturing, ordering, inventory management and other challenges for this industry.
Accounting Today has issued a call for submissions for its 2025 Top New Products report.
The report will recognize the best new and significantly improved products aimed at tax and accounting professionals, as judged by the editors of Accounting Today.
Products for consideration must be designed for the tax and accounting profession; must have been released no earlier than January 2024; and must be currently available (i.e., not in beta testing) in the U.S. market.
Submissions must include:
Release date;
Pricing;
A website URL and/or phone number for customer contact;
200 words or less describing the product’s functionality and its relevance to the tax and accounting profession; and
A digital image or logo for the product, if available (images can be in JPG, EPS or TIFF format, at 300 dpi or higher).
We will accept up to three submissions per vendor, or three per major division of a vendor.
Submissions may be sent by email to our technology editor, Chris Gaetano, at [email protected], and must be received NO LATER THAN Friday, JAN.10, 2025.
For additional questions about eligibility, submissions, etc., email [email protected].