The Financial Accounting Standards Board released an accounting standards update Monday to improve financial reporting by requiring public companies to disclose, in their interim and annual reporting periods, more information about certain expenses in the notes to financial statements.
The standard comes in response to demand from investors for more detailed, disaggregated information about expenses.
“This has been an effort that we’ve been working on for quite some time, certainly prior to my tenure, but it’s been a high priority by investors for a long period of time,” FASB board member Fred Cannon told Accounting Today. “It was something we heard both in 2016 and 2021 in our agenda outreach, that it was their highest priority during this time period, and we had to work with all stakeholders to come up with what I believe is a practical solution that provides critical information to investors. From my standpoint, it’s exciting to get this moving forward and find something that is both workable but provides critical information.”
During the agenda consultation and other outreach, investors told FASB that expense information is critically important in understanding a company’s performance, assessing its prospects for future cash flows, and comparing its performance over time and with that of other companies. They indicated that more granular expense information would help them better understand an entity’s cost structure and forecasting future cash flows.
FASB offices
Patrick Dorsman/Financial Accounting Foundation
“This project was one of the highest priority projects cited by investors in our extensive outreach with them as part of our 2021 agenda consultation initiative,” said FASB chair Richard Jones in a statement. “We heard time and again from investors that additional expense detail is fundamental to understanding the performance of an entity and we believe that this standard is a practical way of providing that detail.”
The ASU addresses this feedback by requiring public companies to disclose, in the notes to financial statements, specified information about certain costs and expenses at each interim and annual reporting period. Specifically, they will be required to:
1. Disclose the amounts of (a) purchases of inventory; (b) employee compensation; (c) depreciation; (d) intangible asset amortization; and (e) depreciation, depletion, and amortization recognized as part of oil- and gas-producing activities (or other amounts of depletion expense) included in each relevant expense caption. 2. Include certain amounts that are already required to be disclosed under current GAAP in the same disclosure as the other disaggregation requirements. 3. Disclose a qualitative description of the amounts remaining in relevant expense captions that are not separately disaggregated quantitatively. 4. Disclose the total amount of selling expenses and, in annual reporting periods, an entity’s definition of selling expenses.
“Essentially, what the standard will do is it will require firms to break out in a footnote certain components of the income statement line items including compensation, purchase of inventory, depreciation, depletion and amortization, to the extent that those are included in that line item on the income statement,” said Cannon. “We expect things like cost of sales, cost of goods sold, SG&A [selling, general and administrative expenses], research and development to be broken out in tabular format on a quarterly basis with these key key components. The reason this is so important to investors is to be able to put this into their urban models, and have better sense and better ability to forecast future cash flows with the trends they see in these disparate items that are currently aggregated. We have heard consistently from investors how critical this information is.”
The extra reporting may be hard work for financial statement preparers as well. “We’ve also heard, to be honest, from preparers, that it can be difficult to prepare, and so we really spent a long period of time making sure that this is operational to preparers, as well as providing critical information to users,” said Cannon.
The degree of difficulty will probably differ, depending on the company, but it may be hardest for manufacturing companies that do business around the world.
“We heard throughout this process that this first it will vary significantly across different preparers,” said Cannon. “Some preparers told us this is relatively straightforward. Others, on the other hand, especially manufacturers of global operations that perhaps have been acquiring companies throughout the globe, this could be very difficult and costly. The board went into this with our eyes wide open that this wasn’t going to be a cost-free exercise for preparers. But the decision we came up with was that this information is so critical to users that we would move ahead with the standard. At the same time, since the exposure draft, we underwent a number of changes in order to address the cost concerns from preparers.”
One of the biggest changes involved the cost of goods sold. “Perhaps the most significant was on the inventory issue,: said Cannon. “Cost of goods sold would have had a two-step disaggregation in the exposure draft, and we simplified that to one step that would just break out purchases of inventory as well as compensation, depreciation and amortization. We heard from preparers that that would be much more straightforward than our initial proposal, especially manufacturers. And we heard from users that in some ways, it would be more intuitive information that they would be getting.”
FASB also decided to give more time for implementing the new standard and didn’t require a retrospective approach to look back for information.
The amendments in the ASU are effective for annual reporting periods starting after Dec. 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2027, although early adoption is permitted. It will be effective for the 2027 annual 10-K for calendar year reporters and then it will be required for each interim period following going forward.
For users of financial statements such as investors and financial analysts, the adjustment shouldn’t be difficult for forecasting future cash flow. “I think the way we structured this for users, it’s going to be fairly straightforward,” said Cannon, who was formerly a sell-side analyst and research director. Many analysts already have a model in Excel for items like cost of goods sold. “They’re going to have to insert three or four more lines into their Excel spreadsheet, and these breakouts will aggregate to that number,” said Cannon. “It’s something that investors have been saying for a significant amount of time that would be useful”
Eventually their forecasting abilities may improve as a result of the standard. “Their accuracy in terms of improving their forecasts of, say, cost of sales will take time to improve, because they won’t initially see the trends in compensation and in these other line items,” said Cannon. “But over time, as those trends develop, they’ll improve their ability to better forecast those line items on the income statement.”
In addition to the ASU, FASB is issuing a FASB in Focus summary of the new standard and two videos, one short and the other more in depth that walks through some of the illustrative examples in the ASU about how the new standard works in practice. The ASU and other educational materials are available at www.fasb.org. Cannon does not believe it will require a great deal of training to implement the new standard, but accounting technology systems will need to be updated.
While FASB is no longer trying to converge its U.S. GAAP standards with the International Accounting Standards Board’s International Financial Reporting Standards, the two boards are following some similar aspects in terms of disaggregation and the update to IAS 18 (which has been superseded by IFRS 15) is scheduled for implementation in the same timeframe that FASB’s new standard is implemented.
“Theirs is a little bit different,” said Cannon. “It does not include purchase of inventory, so that doesn’t have to be broken out. In addition, they have a different kind of format for the information to be disclosed, but it does include breakouts in compensation, amortization and depreciation, so there are some similarities and the timeframe is similar.”
The IASB standard also goes a bit further by changing the income statement presentation, while FASB’s is a disclosure-only project.
The new standard may help investors analyze the impact of inflation and other factors, such as increased tariffs, by disaggregating items like purchases of inventory.
“Inflation is tricky to forecast, but it certainly will give investors a better ability to deal with inflationary aspects of the income statement and how they impact the overall earnings of the company,” said Cannon.
(Left to right) EY partner Mark Kronforst, SEC acting chief accountant Ryan Wolfe and FASB chair Richard Jones at the Financial Executives International and USC Leventhal conference.
The Securities and Exchange Commission is already making plans in the event that the massive tax bill now moving through Congress ends up shifting the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s duties to the SEC.
In late May, the House passed far-reaching tax and spending legislation that included a provision transferring the PCAOB’s responsibilities to the SEC. The so-called One Big Beautiful Bill is now in the hands of the Senate, where much of it is likely to pass. However, it’s unclear whether there will be changes in the PCAOB provision, which has not been attracting as much attention as the tax and Medicaid provisions. Nevertheless, the SEC is preparing in case it inherits the PCAOB’s work.
“I guess as an initial matter, certainly, we are aware of the proposed legislation that is both in the House and the Senate as part of the budget reconciliation bill,” said SEC acting chief accountant Ryan Wolfe during Financial Executives International’s SEC and Financial Reporting Conference at the University of Southern California’s Leventhal School of Accounting. “I think from the staff perspective, where we’re assisting the Commission, it’s important that we are thinking about these issues, are monitoring and are prepared as the potential for these bills to move forward would result in the Commission having new statutory responsibilities. Specifically with respect to standard-setting and inspections, the enforcement authorities would also transfer, but we already have shared jurisdiction with respect to those activities.”
He noted that the SEC has been hearing a great deal of feedback about it across the spectrum.
“I would observe that one thing that I hear, I don’t want to say universally, but quite consistently, is the importance or the overall ecosystem of the three major programs that the PCAOB engages in, being standard-setting for auditors, inspections of auditors to evaluate the compliance with those standards, and similarly, the enforcement function,” said Wolfe. “And so I think that these are incredibly important objectives that will continue regardless, which is just to say, without providing any significant details, that we’re aware of it and we are working on those issues.”
On the other hand, the SEC’s Office of Chief Accountant is prepared in case the provision gets dropped from the final bill.
“But in the event that that would not go forward, the OCA’s assistance with the Commission and the oversight of the PCAOB will continue regardless,” said Wolfe.
He also pointed to the importance of continuing standards such as the PCAOB’s recent quality control standard, QC 1000, which takes effect at the end of the year. “QC 1000 is a big project,” he said. “I know that firms are working really hard. The PCAOB is committed to engaging with those firms to work through implementation issues. I would ask any auditors watching to continue that effort and raise those issues. We as OCA staff are also willing to engage on those issues and hear what’s working and what maybe can be addressed throughout the process.”
Panel moderator Mark Kronforst, a partner at Ernst & Young, pointed out that SEC chair Paul Atkins said during a recent congressional hearing that despite a recent 15% reduction in staff at the SEC, there would still be room in the budget for the PCAOB under the legislation.
Another SEC official also acknowledged the recent reduction in the staff during a later panel discussion.
“Certainly, there has been a reduction in the federal workforce and the Commission, the SEC, has been no exception to that,” said Gaurav Hiranandani, acting deputy chief accountants at the SEC. “Many of the talented staff at the Commission have decided to retire or have sought opportunities outside of the commission. Within OCA, we have also seen some talent depart, some longstanding staff.” He noted that some of the speakers at last year’s conference are among those who left.
Financial Accounting Standards Board chair Richard Jones also spoke at the conference and discussed the progress that FASB has been making on its standard-setting.
“A couple years ago, we comprehensively reset our agenda,” he said. “We did robust stakeholder output to really ask an open-ended question of what should be the FASB’s priority, and what you’ve seen over the last couple of years is us executing on that revised agenda. If you pull up our technical agenda today, you’ll see there are 12 projects on our technical agenda. Of those 12 projects, five of those have been voted out by our board to proceed to final standards. Five of those are in redeliberations, meaning that we’ve already issued an exposure draft, we’ve gotten great input from our stakeholders, and our board will be redeliberating to decide what direction to go forward on those standards. We voted to move forward with an exposure draft on another standard, so that’s 11 of the 12. If you follow those through, and you follow a plan of execution on those standards, it’s very reasonable that we could complete substantially all the projects on our agenda at or about the end of this year.”
U.S. accountants who advise small and midsized businesses are feeling less confident this year, according to a new survey.
The 2025 Avalara Accountants Confidence Report, produced by Avalara in conjunction with CPA Trendlines, polled 623 accounting professionals and found a shift from cautious optimism to greater pessimism, thanks to various economic pressures and policy uncertainty.
Between January and April, the net sentiment among accountants swung from a positive 19% to a negative 39%. Initially, nearly half (47%) of advisors foresaw improving conditions. But by April, only 25% held this view, with nearly two-thirds (64%) expecting worsening economic environments. The shift signifies growing apprehension across Main Street accounting firms serving as advisors on tax, payroll and compliance decisions amid a backdrop of historic tariff actions, continued inflation and unpredictable tax and trade policies.
Accounting advisors pointed to the top issues impacting their clients, with 61% citing inflation, costs and pricing; 60% naming tariffs and trade impacts and uncertainty; 59% pinpointing unease around new tax legislation; 42% identifying ongoing labor supply and wage issues; and 37% citing technology and AI adoption as a priority.
“Accountants are sounding an urgent alarm,” said CPA Trendlines founder Rick Telberg in a statement Wednesday. “They’re advising SMBs to conserve cash, curb discretionary expenses, and resist taking on unnecessary debt. Amid volatility in tariffs, inflation, and complex tax legislation, SMBs face serious barriers to strategic growth and operational stability.”
According to the accountants polled, the biggest challenges facing SMBs are hiring and retaining talent (60%), keeping pace with technology (55%), and managing rising costs (52%). The added strain of tariffs has handicapped SMBs’ adaptability and agility, which is typically their key advantage over larger competitors.
Other challenges include adapting to disruption (35%), meeting evolving customer expectations (32%), and managing product costs (29%).
Accountants feel the most confidence in their professional services sector — including doctors, lawyers and other professionals — with 60% believing this sector will thrive during a downturn. Not far behind that is the technology sector, where 57% of accountants expressed confidence driven by strong demand for digital solutions and AI that boost operational efficiency and resilience. And the oil, energy and mining sectors show 39% of respondents optimistic due to recent spikes in supply and demand for these resources.
On the other hand, farming (6%), franchising (3%), and arts and entertainment (2%) are seen as the most vulnerable sectors. These sectors depend heavily on broader economic performance, and the recent tariffs have further strained their growth and output.
Firms are encouraging clients to monitor their burn rates, cut overhead and avoid unnecessary borrowing. AI and automation are also important as survival tools amid labor shortages and pricing pressure.
“This year’s survey underscores a critical moment for the SMB business sector,” said Sona Akmakjian, head of global strategic accountant partnerships at Avalara, in a statement. “Accountants are urging businesses to fortify themselves against ongoing economic turbulence by sharpening their operational focus, adopting intelligent technology, and carefully managing resources. Clients are, more than ever, relying on the accretive business acumen and advisory skills of their trusted advisor for guidance through historic headwinds and uncertainty.”
The 2025 Accountants Confidence Report can be accessed here by using the code “avlr”.
Republican senators are considering placing a $30,000 cap on the state and local tax deduction as a compromise between current law and the more generous limit in the House’s version of President Donald Trump’s tax bill, a key GOP negotiator said.
Senator Thom Tillis, a moderate Republican involved in the talks, said Republican senators are trying to reduce the House-passed $40,000 SALT limit to at least $30,000.
Republican senators are meeting behind closed doors Wednesday afternoon to discuss the details of the bill, which the Senate is aiming to pass later this month.
SALT was a core issue in the House, where Republicans from high-tax states like New York, New Jersey and California threatened to block the bill without a substantial increase to the current $10,000 SALT cap.
House Speaker Mike Johnson has warned senators to make as few changes as possible to the House’s SALT deal. But SALT isn’t a concern in the Senate, where there are no Republicans representing states where the deduction is a political priority.
“It’s hard because we don’t have any senators from SALT states,” said Republican Senator Markwayne Mullin. “We are searching for a compromise.”
Mullin said he has already spoken on the issue with New York Republican Mike Lawler, a key proponent of the increased SALT cap.